(06-09-2012 04:29 PM)ImWaitingForTheMan Wrote: That science is shoddy as all hell.
I'm going to write a data sheet tomorrow explaining how to interpret scientific articles/studies. I know that some people on the forum understand the subtleties behind them, but too many people are posting links that when I read the science behind them I want to vomit.
There's a fine line between a well thought out scientific study that carefully parses it's results as to not invite overly broad interpretations, and the one-sided studies/articles that go for sensational headlines.
Actually, I'll bust that data sheet out tonight. My beach adventure didn't work out too well as I got there 1 hour before closing and the sun was going down.
Personally, if I'm wanking it a lot, I have
more drive to go out and get the real deal. Not to shoot my upcoming data sheet in the foot, it is my opinion (only an opinion!) that the times I've been getting off 3-4 times a day with my good old hand have been some of my more successful periods of chasing tail
To me it is a sign of being hungry and having a good flow of your bodies "drive/motivation neurochemicals (those terms being used in the loosest possible sense.)
This all will be broken down extensively in the data sheet. I expect it to take at least two hours, I have my own base of knowledge built up over the last 6-7 years, and plan to cite concrete studies and respected scientific meta-analyses. It will be a bit long, naturally, but I think the forum needs this in order to be able to properly judge the merits of all these links to "scientific" articles that we have been getting lately. This does not solely refer to this thread alone.