Post: #1

Before:



Today:



She's the same age as me (33), but looks much older.

Also I found this picture:



Maybe she had cancer?

Post: #2

Jesus, her forehead is huge!

Post: #3

The first "after" photo is of a man. That is all.

Post: #4

Yup.

Post: #5

I mean, she has been in what, 4 movies with the word "American" in the title. What do you expect from such an "American" broad?

Post: #6

even in american beauty i wasnt too impressed. but that recent photo is scary. prepare for the inevitable downward spiral as face lifts and such will follow to help salvage her looks ahem career.

Post: #7

God damn she was good looking. That's a real shame.

Post: #8

Is she one of the actresses from Avatar? She looks Avatar-ish...

Post: #9

Looks like ellen degeneres and a fierce feminist activist as well. She gets no sympathy from me.

Post: #10

Yeah I was always really turned off by her for some reasons. American Beauty was not as good of a movie for me simply because they cast her. And now she's most certainly a 2/10.

Post: #11

Oh god. How old was she in the first picture?

Seems quite apt that she was cast in a movie called American Beauty

Post: #12

That shaved head one is 5 years old. From earlier this year:



Looks ok to me. The hair chopping, rather than age, takes off 2-3 points.

Post: #13

(10-29-2012 03:07 PM)Soma Wrote:  That shaved head one is 5 years old. From earlier this year:

The first documented Wall Rescue on the forum!

   

Post: #14

Let's all wish for many more to come

Post: #15

This could be a good official icon:

   

Post: #16

Interview earlier this year:

Post: #17

I want a Tiger pie.

Post: #18

She looks good in the green dress, but looks nothing like the picture I posted, which is more recent:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/art...dress.html

Post: #19

One woman who held up for quite a while and was actually nice looking in person was Lauren Graham (the Mom from Gilmore Girls). I used to see her at a coffee place in Los Feliz in the late 90's (when she was still hot) and then again in 2008-2009 when she had passed 40, but was still pretty sweet, especially for her age. I went to visit some friends in the summer, saw her and it's sadly coming to an end. But she's 45 or something, now. Well past expiration date.

Post: #20

(10-29-2012 07:39 PM)Roosh Wrote:  She looks good in the green dress, but looks nothing like the picture I posted, which is more recent:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/art...dress.html

I think there's a few things going on in that pic: 1) poorly done glamour makeup actually makes her look worse compared to her normal makeup, 2) her hair is pulled up exposing her giant alien forehead that is covered up when her hair is down, 3) the harsh lighting and camera flashes on the red carpet are doing her no favours compared to the natural lighting in the green dress pic.

Also, upper arms are looking a little thick, probably hiding some weight in the midsection.

Based on green dress pic, would definitely bang. Based on shaved head pic, 2/10 WNB, not attracted to young boys.

Post: #21

(10-29-2012 04:10 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Interview earlier this year:

May have called it premature. Let's revisit this topic in 5 years.

Post: #22

It's the same woman in both pictures. It's a good example of what fashion can do for a woman's looks. You guys wonder why women spend so much time with makeup and clothes? Look at how different our perception of the same woman is because of it.


I would say the black is a shitty color for her; she should stick to bright, soft, and warm colors and not heavy dark colors that drain her complexion causing her skin to look flabby and lifeless. Her ridiculous accessories and black nail polish only completes her look as a witch.


However, she was still way hotter at 18, for damn sure...