Post: #1

I'm curious. I'm at the terminus of my studies at this fine institute of academia. I have accomplished every goal that I have set for myself. I made in-roads on my career. I have established a large network that will be able to serve me well post-college. I have fucked the bitches that I wanted to fuck. I have carved myself into a better man and human being. I was fortunate to discover the red pill my sophomore year, then I turned it all around. Pre red-pill, I probably got lucky once or twice but I never had any conscious luck on my own.

So far, I have been able to net the girls I find attractive and I am pleased about it. I haven't really had any complaints, but some girls are just terrible in bed.

So what about you all? Especially the newly graduated guys? Did you find that quantity or quality was better in college compared to your post-college life? Or is the quality better post-college?

Which one did you have? Did you have both? Or none?

Post: #2

redacted

Post: #3

You're in for a treat Sir Alan. IMO quality only gets better once you leave college.

Post: #4

College was a funny thing for me because I found out about game half way through. Before I found out about game, all I did was get drunk and see if I was going to "luck" out, obviously that is really inconsistant but when you get chicks on alcohol, even with shitty/no game your chances of getting laid goes up a lot. I am not male model good looking but I chicks have told me in the past that I have "good looks", so before game it was a mixture of luck+looks+alcohol that got me laid. I got 4 lays this way in a span of about 4 months.

After game, I stopped drinking when talking to girls because I find it makes me a complete retard, at first I wasn't use to it but then I realized that having even an ounce of game in college puts you in the top 1% and I definitely had more results, I had a fuck buddy and also had sex with other girls so definitely a plus. So all in all, I would say my sex life after game was better because relying of luck and looks is definitely not the way to go.

Post: #5

My first post on the RVF ~ thanks to Roosh and you guys for the wealth of information that can be found here!

Having gone to college from '72 - '76, the mindset of both the guys and the lizards was definitely from another era. The early '70s were basically a hold-over period from the sexual revolution spawned in the '60s with the advent of The Pill coupled with the free love ethos espoused by counterculture. As for me, I had zero game - I'd gone to a boarding school outside of LA - it was a cross between a love-in and "Animal House", and I'd lost my virginity there (at 13) to an older chick who decided that she was going to be the one to pop my cherry. Back in Pasadena for high school (was kicked out of the boarding school for fucking off), I recall being fairly aggressive - but was stymied by the fact that I was just over 5' (grew a foot in the summer prior to 12th grade...thank gawd!) and only got laid 2-3 times at most during that time. I bought the Beatles' "All You Need Is Love" lock, stock & barrel...and was convinced that the only way I was going to get laid was by falling in love - which, of course led to rejection, humiliation and/or plain indifference! "I love you, now please bang me" game was only nominally effective then, and is considered downright creepy in this day & age.

Then I went off to college...which was a completely different ball game. My game was still non-existent, but I was no longer "Prince-sized" and my musical abilities (was a music comp major and also began to play professionally in Top 40 bands) certainly gave me a leg up in my pursuit of puss, but I was still caught up in "girls will only bone you if they're in love with you" mindset. DESPITE that, I did surprisingly well - even hooking up with a few chicks that I'd admired from a distance and was convinced were out of my league. But it was all basically handed to me on a silver platter because I was terrified of rejection - and 90% of the action I got was from chicks who did essentially ALL the work in facilitating the bang! If only I'd understood game back then (and had the balls to implement it) I'm sure I would've done a lot better! It was definitely "a different world" back then - Roosh recently posted that blog (or thread) featuring photos of chicks from the '60s/70s ~ it was very much like how you guys describe the women of Poland....much more laid-back, feminine and for lack of a better word, demure.

By way of introduction: just out of an 18 year (last July) marriage (to a complete harpy!), pushing 58 but blessed with good genes, did the pay-for-play thing at the tail-end of my matrimony (or was it just acrimony?), and now I'm single. Jumped into the "match.com pool" prior to studying any game, and made all the classic Internet dating beta errors culminating in finding myself in another suffocating relationship (just broke it off) - I'm ready to wipe the slate clean and start applying the principles...and start getting some flags!