michelin
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,014
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 5
|
MEASURING AMERICA’S DECLINE, IN THREE CHARTS (New Yorker)
"Fart, and if you must, fart often. But always fart without apology. Fart for freedom, fart for liberty, and fart proudly" (Ben Franklin)
|
|
| 10-24-2013 04:16 PM |
|
|
magellan
Recovering Beta

Posts: 234
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 2
|
RE: MEASURING AMERICA’S DECLINE, IN THREE CHARTS (New Yorker)
Quote:Is it surprising that, in comparing a country set up to allow intelligent people to become brilliant against countries that are set up to raise average welfare, the more collective cultures have higher averages? If we wanted to raise the average, there are very concrete steps that we could take (see: Finland), but our country is driven and funded by the inventiveness and brilliance of the top end of the distribution...so I would be wary of changes that threaten this special niche. The more countries that seek the average, the more lucrative it is for a country to differentiate by cultivating the top. I don't know which is better, but you can't change the educational system without having a major impact on the economic and social system.
I found this comment very interesting. We really do live in a winner-take-all nation and I wonder if this also takes root in our education system. I have been on the top end of the distribution my whole life, been coddled through gifted, honors, AP classes, etc., graduated in the top percentile of my class with minimal effort and great contempt for being forced to "learn" a bunch of nonsense I had little interest in, but I can't say my the system really did me any wrong. They gave me my As and sent me on my way and I maintained my intellectual curiosity outside the classroom, like many of us who came upon this community.
With that said, I was almost immediately separated from the mass of the student body upon entering public school, so I didn't get a lot of firsthand experience with them and their education. However, from what little I did see, it was pretty terrible...
My experience in Europe showed me a whole new world: better lifestyle for everyone and a semblance of satisfactory baseline standards for general education. And as a broad generalization, they seemed to value intellectual pursuits more than us.
|
|
| 10-24-2013 04:36 PM |
|
|
Samseau
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 14,226
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 284
|
RE: MEASURING AMERICA’S DECLINE, IN THREE CHARTS (New Yorker)
Shitty graphs, shitty article, and a magazine that becomes shittier every day. I remember when the New Yorker was interesting.
I love how the preceding article is called "Why Obamacare Will Work (On It's Own Terms)" and the following article "Playing The Obamacare Blame Game." Just a bunch of SWPL's who are obsessed with making the status quo work. These guys are cocksuckers.
As for the article, the charts mean nothing because America has a huge population of minorities that are part of the underclass. If you just took the college educated population of the USA, I'm sure we'd top the charts.
Second, the article assumes the countries who are chart toppers do not face any serious problems of their own. What sort of nonsensical unspoken assumption is that? Look at the second graph; Japan tops the charts in literacy and yet that country is going extinct. Who cares about speaking Japanese anyways? Why don't we brag about which countries know the most Latin while we are at it.
A country's decline or incline has very little to do with literacy, numeracy, or "problem-solving," it has everything to do with it's cultural fabric; the willingness of it's countrymen to stick together and support one another, it's ability to crush its competitors (America is still #1), and the quality of the government guiding these factors. When measured in these terms, America is going downhill fast, but that makes a lot more sense than the regular SWPL preaching about "education," which is just university dogma.
Contributor at Return of Kings. You can follow me on Twitter.
Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.
(This post was last modified: 10-24-2013 04:43 PM by Samseau.)
|
|
| 10-24-2013 04:41 PM |
|
The following 8 users Like Samseau's post:8 users Like Samseau's post
PoosyWrecker, Emancipator, EisenBarde, CactusCat589, vinman, durangotang, Handsome Creepy Eel, michelin
|
speakeasy
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 9,099
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 102
|
RE: MEASURING AMERICA’S DECLINE, IN THREE CHARTS (New Yorker)
(10-24-2013 04:41 PM)Samseau Wrote: As for the article, the charts mean nothing because America has a huge population of minorities that are part of the underclass. If you just took the college educated population of the USA, I'm sure we'd top the charts.
I do think there is something to what Samseau is saying. They are comparing the USA which has a large minority population(black and Latino) and comparing them to largely homogenous countries in Europe and East Asia. Since there's large disparities in performance between white Americans and blacks and Latinos, you are going to see an average that looks lower for the U.S.
So if you don't break this down ethnically, the results don't say much. White Americans if separated out are probably on par with their European counterparts. Obviously Latinos in America do better than Latinos in Latin America and blacks in America do better than blacks in Africa, but you have to consider the gap in education attainment between the groups and the implications that has on the nationwide average.
America's economy doesn't function equally for everyone and prosperity comes rather selectively. Even if the country is sliding downhill on average, it will always be good for certain types of people when you have a two-tier economy. Think Brazil if you want to see where we're headed.
(This post was last modified: 10-24-2013 05:58 PM by speakeasy.)
|
|
| 10-24-2013 05:56 PM |
|
The following 5 users Like speakeasy's post:5 users Like speakeasy's post
Emancipator, , EisenBarde, michelin, Suits
|
Samseau
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 14,226
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 284
|
RE: MEASURING AMERICA’S DECLINE, IN THREE CHARTS (New Yorker)
(10-24-2013 05:56 PM)speakeasy Wrote: (10-24-2013 04:41 PM)Samseau Wrote: As for the article, the charts mean nothing because America has a huge population of minorities that are part of the underclass. If you just took the college educated population of the USA, I'm sure we'd top the charts.
I do think there is something to what Samseau is saying. They are comparing the USA which has a large minority population(black and Latino) and comparing them to largely homogenous countries in Europe and East Asia. Since there's large disparities in performance between white Americans and blacks and Latinos, you are going to see an average that looks lower for the U.S.
So if you don't break this down ethnically, the results don't say much. White Americans if separated out are probably on par with their European counterparts. Obviously Latinos in America do better than Latinos in Latin America and blacks in America do better than blacks in Africa, but you have to consider the gap in education attainment between the groups and the implications that has on the nationwide average.
America's economy doesn't function equally for everyone and prosperity comes rather selectively. Even if the country is sliding downhill on average, it will always be good for certain types of people when you have a two-tier economy. Think Brazil if you want to see where we're headed.
For me, this isn't even a racial issue. It's a class issue. Notice, I said, "college educated." So college educated blacks and latinos could be included in this polling and America would still be comparable to the homogeneous European countries.
Likewise, if you took whites who never finished college, then you'd probably get dismal results on all of these questions.
Also, I'm not saying college is the answer to the world's problems. However, a college grad should be able to dominate the types of questions the New Yorker was polling for.
Contributor at Return of Kings. You can follow me on Twitter.
Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.
|
|
| 10-24-2013 08:16 PM |
|
|
Kabal
True Player
    
Posts: 1,704
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 44
|
RE: MEASURING AMERICA’S DECLINE, IN THREE CHARTS (New Yorker)
#NoSingleMoms
#NoHymenNoDiamond
#DontWantDaughters
|
|
| 10-24-2013 10:09 PM |
|
|
michelin
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,014
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 5
|
RE: MEASURING AMERICA’S DECLINE, IN THREE CHARTS (New Yorker)
(10-24-2013 04:41 PM)Samseau Wrote: Shitty graphs, shitty article, and a magazine that becomes shittier every day. I remember when the New Yorker was interesting.
maybe the grapohs are crap, but the O.E.C.D. has a pretty strong record when it comes to stats. I have a hard time though to believe Americans are not problemsolving-minded, I believe quite the opposite is true when it gets to getting problems solved.
"Fart, and if you must, fart often. But always fart without apology. Fart for freedom, fart for liberty, and fart proudly" (Ben Franklin)
|
|
| 10-26-2013 09:12 AM |
|
|