Post: #1

This brilliant man had it all figured out - back in 1970!

http://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard4.html

Quote:

"If our New Feminists wish to abandon male-female "integrationism" for liberation, then this logically implies Female Power, in short, Female Nationalism. Shall we then turn over some Virgin land, maybe the Black Hills, maybe Arizona, to these termagants? Yes, let them set up their karate-chopping Amazonian Women’s Democratic People’s Republic, and ban access to them. The infection of their sick attitudes and ideology would then be isolated and removed from the greater social body, and the rest of us, dedicated to good old fashioned heterosexuality, could then go about our business undisturbed."

It appears that the central arguments for women's lib have hardly changed since then, and its simple and logical refutations also remain the same. What has changed is its mainstream acceptance. Share this and help turn the tide!

Post: #2

Rothbard is a god among men! We was absolutely brilliant and saw things for what they were. Like feminism, Keynesianism, history ,and american foreign policy to name a few.

If you don't mind me asking do you consider yourself a rothbardian libertarian?

Post: #3

   
   

Post: #4

I've considered myself an anarcho-capitalist in the rothbardian tradition for a few years, however more recently (after reading Jack Donovan's The Way of Men - discussed in another thread) I've looked into the idea that the concept of individual liberty as understood in this tradition requires a large state to enforce its laws - and that clan based local authorities are required to prevent the growth of to globalist-liberal-feminist state.

Is there any hope that sound ideas, institutional channels (like voting) and logic can overcome the leftist agenda? Or is some kind of radical revolution involving decentralized communities the answer?

Post: #5

if England were closer, if they were reading every email, listening to every call, and controlled all of the news sources before the people could assemble a resistance, would the American revolution have been successful?