Post: #1

Here's a post on Quora, regarding militant feminism...

https://www.quora.com/Feminism/If-femini...t-for-them

Quote:The "militant" form of feminism (largely invented in the 1960s) was completely unnecessary, and I think one day, historians will look back at it as one of the worst mistakes every made. Militant feminism is quickly creating a "hate culture" between men and women that is going to explode into something very bad indeed.

It's important to understand that feminism has been based on a very dangerous lie. Lies of this sort almost always lead to disaster on a social scale.

Feminists like to paint their "struggle" as a thousand-year fight against oppression, but that's utter historical nonsense. It's sad, stupid, and lame to read the idiocy that poses as "feminist history.". It has zero relation to any reality.

In fact women before the year 1900 could give a hoot about "feminism" or the vote or any of that. Before 1900 women were just desperately trying to not starve and not see their children starve.

Before 1900, people starved every day, every minute. LIfe wasn't just hard, it was horrible. Famine and waves of sickness were commonplace. Any woman, rich or poor, could expect to see 50% of her children die from disease. Famine and collapse every 30-60 years.

Women like to blame men for all this. What baloney. Life was hard because life was hard. Nature was ruthless and cruel to all. There was no medicine as we know it. There was no government or charity as we know it. There was little or no machinery, no labor-saving, no electricity, no nothing. Just hunting and crops, and never enough for everybody.

Before 1900 or so, only 100 years ago, life was primitive, brutal, and vicious in every was possible.

The only way to survive, for women, was to find a man and get him to marry and support the family. To find a husband was literally, like finding a gold mine. It was not easy because men were dying of starvation, often, themselves. To find a husband who could provide security and food was the pinnacle of life, because it was literally a matter of survival.

Men in that role were expected (and did) suffer horribly themselves, working till their "backs were broken" in the field, hunting in freezing cold, being torn and mutilated by animals or the elements, fighting to protect from all manner of threats, human and natural. To be a man was to suffer, to fight and claw, every minute, to feed your children, or suffer the hell of seeing your family die in front of your eyes.

Feminists like to complain that "society" expected women to get married. That's such a load of bull. It's such a horrible lie and such a breathtaking betrayal.

Women married because they didn't want to starve. There was nobody else to feed you. You either found a man to work on the farm with you, to hunt for you, to protect you, or you and your children would starve. If you stayed single, your aging parents would starve because you as a single woman could not provide enough for them to eat.

So the whole "Women have been slaves for thousands of years to men" thing is just a load of horrible, history-twisting hateful garbage.

Women in the 1960s, the most spoiled, narcissistic, rich, fat generation in history, rich from the spoils of World War II, and the first generation to luxuriate in technology, invented militant feminism out of an utter lack of understanding of what their grandmothers, great--grandmothers, etc, had lived like. They completely ignored hundreds of thousands of years of sacrifice, toil, and misery endured by men, men fighting and scratching every day, being torn by the woods and the beasts to find food for their children. Militant feminists created a version of history that abused and disrespected the sacrifice of their grandfathers (and the wisdom of their grandmothers).

The net result of militant in-your-face feminism is an entire generation of modern women who have zero understanding or awareness of the real history of men and women in the world. We live in a society that is deeply brainwashed young women to think that "men are the enemy" when for 100 thousand years, men have been partners and heroes in a fight for human survival. The result of that brainwashing is going to be sad beyond description.

Not long ago, girls were taught to view men as heroes. Now they are taught that men are monsters. The worst thing is, men often become what women expect them to be.

Feminists, congratulations. You have twisted history to paint men as monsters. Soon men will become the monsters you imagined them to be.

The age of heroes has ended, killed by militant feminist neuroses and deceit.

Good luck, daughters of feminism. Bad times are coming for you.

Post: #2

Of course, in order to find this comment I had to scroll to the bottom at the downvote section. RVF Unite! Log in and upvote it so feminists will be forced to squirm in front of the truth.

Post: #3

(04-18-2014 10:09 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Of course, in order to find this comment I had to scroll to the bottom at the downvote section. RVF Unite! Log in and upvote it so feminists will be forced to squirm in front of the truth.

I'm happy to report the post has already got 2 classic Fem-moron responses....the Personal attack response ("You are a nobody") and the Strawman "We'll just ignore the point completely" response.

I predict that nobody (except maybe somebody from RVF) will actually talk about the main point (ie, why have feminists re-written history so radically and obviously incorrect, and why has society allowed it?)

Post: #4

That site wants to know *everything* about you before it allows you to read anything

Post: #5

(04-18-2014 11:33 AM)Muk Wrote:  That site wants to know *everything* about you before it allows you to read anything

Yeah. No problem though. Just create an account using an anonymous email. You can also mark your answers on the site as anonymous which is what you have to do with anti-feminist arguments, since you don't want them coming after you and getting you fired (which is the favorite tactic now to suppress dissent)

Post: #6

Honest and legit. One of my foremost arguments to counter feminists.

Most "feminist" men and women would not know what to do in an environment where there was no society. It would suck hard core, but I get the impression guys like us would suffer through a collapse bringing about some new form of civilization. However hard and broken that may be.

Post: #7

(04-18-2014 11:33 AM)Muk Wrote:  That site wants to know *everything* about you before it allows you to read anything

Just add ?share=1 to the end of the url. This allows you to read it without logging in.

Post: #8

(04-17-2014 09:57 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  Here's a post on Quora, regarding militant feminism...

https://www.quora.com/Feminism/If-femini...t-for-them

Reminds me of this fantastic post of yours, which I used to troll some feminists: Modern feminism is the worst act of betrayal and ingratitude in history

Post: #9

(04-18-2014 02:51 PM)player Wrote:  

(04-17-2014 09:57 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  Here's a post on Quora, regarding militant feminism...

https://www.quora.com/Feminism/If-femini...t-for-them

Reminds me of this fantastic post of yours, which I used to troll some feminists: Modern feminism is the worst act of betrayal and ingratitude in history

Thank you, glad it was useful!

Post: #10

Upvoted - did my part. Might want to post this in some other places. Quora is full of blue pill feminists. For example, the poster from India, I upvoted.... Because yeah, no woman deserves to be gang raped in public on a bus. That is an actual, REAL, problem.

Post: #11

Upvoted it, let it become visible, then cancelled my upvote because I don't want a future employer to see this and blacklist me (I'm in the states and am not self-employed yet).

That answer is hands -down the best description of feminism to date. Women today have been brought up by corporations and the media to see men as uniformly evil. This has been done in order to fragment society and restrict any form of revolution. If you look at it, people from broken, dysfunctional families have little ability to fight the Government and the 1%. Marxism will never prevail again, simply because corporations & the media have made people too greedy to unite and have a revolution. Similarly, you won't see a reaction because that requires strong communities.

Look at the Arab Spring, Eroumaidan and other recent revolutions. They are all in countries with a traditional family structure. My prediction is that the US and other Western nations will clamp down on civil rights and destroy any remaining freedom in order to benefit the richest of the rich. Feminism and consumerism are the best ways to get that done. If people fight among themselves and behave like pigs, they won't fight the real enemy.

Me? I'm just going to try my very best to join the 0.1%. I'd rather be a billionaire in an unfair world than another pawn in a rigged game of chess. I'd suggest other forum members do the same. We can argue all we want about feminism, but in the end it will prevail because the powerful want it to prevail. Society will eventually collapse, but not until we are all 6 feet under. So lets go out and get some power before our right to gain any form of power is taken away.

Post: #12

(04-18-2014 06:19 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  Me? I'm just going to try my very best to join the 0.1%. I'd rather be a billionaire in an unfair world than another pawn in a rigged game of chess. I'd suggest other forum members do the same. We can argue all we want about feminism, but in the end it will prevail because the powerful want it to prevail. Society will eventually collapse, but not until we are all 6 feet under. So lets go out and get some power before our right to gain any form of power is taken away.

The race already started before you were born. If you aren't in the .01% today, you almost certainly never will be. The tickets to that show ran out back in the 1980's.

Post: #13

(04-18-2014 06:31 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(04-18-2014 06:19 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  Me? I'm just going to try my very best to join the 0.1%. I'd rather be a billionaire in an unfair world than another pawn in a rigged game of chess. I'd suggest other forum members do the same. We can argue all we want about feminism, but in the end it will prevail because the powerful want it to prevail. Society will eventually collapse, but not until we are all 6 feet under. So lets go out and get some power before our right to gain any form of power is taken away.

The race already started before you were born. If you aren't in the .01% today, you almost certainly never will be. The tickets to that show ran out back in the 1980's.

Making it to the top 10% is very doable, though. No, you won't be able to change anything, but you'll be in a position to personally be exempt from most of the negative stuff.

Post: #14

Someone put into words the thoughts that have been swirling around in my head for a while now.

Bravo!

Post: #15

(04-18-2014 06:31 PM)Samseau Wrote:  The race already started before you were born. If you aren't in the .01% today, you almost certainly never will be. The tickets to that show ran out back in the 1980's.

Nothing in this world is permanent.

Post: #16

(04-18-2014 09:14 PM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

(04-18-2014 06:31 PM)Samseau Wrote:  The race already started before you were born. If you aren't in the .01% today, you almost certainly never will be. The tickets to that show ran out back in the 1980's.

Nothing in this world is permanent.

Not trying to be a big-baller troll but I agree with AoN. The race has begun, but nothing stays, even if it is grounded in Earth and worshiped by all. Look at the ruins of the Parthenon for more detail.

There is much money to be made in international trade and in the changing relations between nations. Creating wealth isn't as hard as it is made out to be, you just need to be willing to risk a lot to get a lot more.

Post: #17

Good article.

Why Are Feminists So Insecure? 6 Reflections On The Confidence Gap

Quote:1) It isn’t about confidence.
The article is really about risk-taking and how men differ in their risk calculations from women. To give just two examples from the article, and to give you an idea of its tone:

• “We watch our male colleagues take risks, while we hold back until we’re sure we are perfectly ready and perfectly qualified.”
• “If a woman walks into her boss’s office with unsolicited opinions, speaks up first at meetings, or gives business advice above her pay grade, she risks being disliked or even—let’s be blunt—being labeled a bitch.”
Leaving aside the melodramatic stereotyping and bizarre generalizations about how people love unsolicited advice from men but abhor it from women, you’ll note that risk is the main ingredient in the supposed confidence gap.

[…]

Quote:3) Is second-guessing our nature really so empowering?
[…] Nothing shouts “be confident in your natural abilities!” like “your brain is mushy and able to be reshaped by propaganda!” But maybe that’s just me. Still, all this second-guessing of female traits doesn’t feel empowering. At all. Feminists seem to be on a constant campaign of obsessive gender reflection, the net result of which is to tell women they’re bad at what they’re doing. Don’t call bossy people bossy. Don’t be considerate of others. Please keep kids out of the picture for the vast majority if not entirety of your fertility. If you do choose to stop fighting your fertility for a brief period, you shouldn’t let kids affect your career. You need to crush or at least smother your maternal instincts at all costs. In order to succeed in life, you must be like men — emulate everything they’re doing.

More here:

http://thefederalist.com/2014/04/18/why-...dence-gap/

Post: #18

(04-18-2014 06:19 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  Upvoted it, let it become visible, then cancelled my upvote because I don't want a future employer to see this and blacklist me (I'm in the states and am not self-employed yet).

That answer is hands -down the best description of feminism to date. Women today have been brought up by corporations and the media to see men as uniformly evil. This has been done in order to fragment society and restrict any form of revolution. If you look at it, people from broken, dysfunctional families have little ability to fight the Government and the 1%. Marxism will never prevail again, simply because corporations & the media have made people too greedy to unite and have a revolution. Similarly, you won't see a reaction because that requires strong communities.

Look at the Arab Spring, Eroumaidan and other recent revolutions. They are all in countries with a traditional family structure. My prediction is that the US and other Western nations will clamp down on civil rights and destroy any remaining freedom in order to benefit the richest of the rich. Feminism and consumerism are the best ways to get that done. If people fight among themselves and behave like pigs, they won't fight the real enemy.

Me? I'm just going to try my very best to join the 0.1%. I'd rather be a billionaire in an unfair world than another pawn in a rigged game of chess. I'd suggest other forum members do the same. We can argue all we want about feminism, but in the end it will prevail because the powerful want it to prevail. Society will eventually collapse, but not until we are all 6 feet under. So lets go out and get some power before our right to gain any form of power is taken away.

xpatplayer You can turn off the google indexing feature - internet searches will not turn up your quora account. IT's what I've done.

Edit: MrLemon, have you posted this request for upvotes in other red pill sites? Your post needs a LOT of upvotes.