Post: #1

Gay men can't stop raw dogging each other via casual encounters, causing an "exploding epidemic" of HIV. Now the WHO recommends that gay men take anti-HIV drugs as a way to prevent infection.

Quote:The World Health Organization has suggested for the first time that all men who have sex with men should take antiretroviral medicine, warning that HIV infection rates among gay men are exploding around the world.

In guidelines published Friday, it said that it “strongly recommends men who have sex with men consider taking antiretroviral medicines as an additional method of preventing HIV infection.” Similar guidelines were issued by the U.S. in May.

http://time.com/2975573/who-hiv-aids-gay...emic-rise/

http://www.afp.com/en/news/who-warns-hiv...tive-drugs

Post: #2

This is why arse bandits aren't allowed to donate blood, not because blood banks have an anti-gay, discriminatory agenda as some on the left believe.

Post: #3

As the article mentions, this generation of gay men has largely never had to deal with the grim specter of AIDS, and as a result, they're much more cavalier with their contraception. That generation has largely died off, and this generation of gay men will deal with the same problems. I know one gay male who absolutely refuses to not use a condom. One, and I know quite a few (liberal arts colleges attract them).

Although the left wants you to believe that gays are special little snowflakes who are completely like us in every way, the truth is much different. They're at significantly higher risk for HIV and other STDs, and they generally live much shorter lifespans. Ever notice that you don't see too many gay men over the age of about 35?

Post: #4

Read an article today on this press release, apparently homosexuals are 19 tines as likely to catch HIV as the average heterosexual Joe/Jane.

I blame Grindr.

Post: #5

Antything goes for the global goal of Depopulation - the WHO absolutely loves mankind and gays especially. Next will be the prostitutes, porn stars and then all college students. Anti-HIV-drugs are partly based on a light version of chemotherapy - good luck surviving that crap while being otherwise healthy. The first batch of Anti-HIV drugs in the 80s to 90s were former chemotherapy drugs which were banned, because they killed 100% of patients within 5 years. Good job doing that on Nureiew and Freddy Mercury.

Post: #6

(07-13-2014 09:07 AM)Truth Teller Wrote:  As the article mentions, this generation of gay men has largely never had to deal with the grim specter of AIDS, and as a result, they're much more cavalier with their contraception.

Contraception!?

Gays can't conceive a child. Hence, the word "contraception" cannot be used in this case.

Post: #7

An excerpt from physics professor Jonathan I. Katz's In Defense of Homophobia:

Quote: In America attitudes towards homosexuality changed in the 1970's. It went from a private, furtively practiced, vice to an open and accepted subculture. In many circles, ``sodomite'' ceased to be an insult. This acceptance led to the toleration, and wide practice, of gross homosexual promiscuity. HIV, falling onto that fertile soil, made the AIDS epidemic. Even before AIDS was recognized, practicing homosexuals were notorious for a high rate of venereal diseases.

The religious believer may see the hand of God, but both he and the rationalist must see a fact of Nature. The human body was not designed to share hypodermic needles, it was not designed to be promiscuous, and it was not designed to engage in homosexual acts. Engaging in such behavior is like riding a motorcycle on an icy road without a helmet. It may be possible to get away with it for a while, and a few misguided souls may get a thrill out of doing so, but sooner or later (probably sooner) the consequences will be catastrophic. Lethal diseases spread rapidly among people who do such things.

Unfortunately, the victims are not only those whose reckless behavior brought death on themselves. There are many completely innocent victims, too: hemophiliacs (a substantial fraction died as a result of contaminated clotting factor), recipients of contaminated transfusions, and their spouses and children, for AIDS can be transmitted heterosexually (in America, only infrequently) and congenitally. The icy road was lined with unsuspecting innocents, who never chose to ride a motorcycle. Guilt for their deaths is on the hands of the homosexuals and intravenous drug abusers who poisoned the blood supply. These people died so the sodomites could feel good about themselves.

This article got Prof. Katz in trouble with the DOE in 2010. The DOE sought his assistance during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill crisis, but then some DOE employee found the article above, and he got the Larry Summers treatment and was eventually fired. So much for progressives being tolerant and open-minded...

Post: #8

(07-13-2014 09:24 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Antything goes for the global goal of Depopulation - the WHO absolutely loves mankind and gays especially. Next will be the prostitutes, porn stars and then all college students. Anti-HIV-drugs are partly based on a light version of chemotherapy - good luck surviving that crap while being otherwise healthy. The first batch of Anti-HIV drugs in the 80s to 90s were former chemotherapy drugs which were banned, because they killed 100% of patients within 5 years. Good job doing that on Nureiew and Freddy Mercury.

Hm, interesting do you have any links/resources re: anti-Hiv drugs?

*I don't think you bs'ing but I want to learn more.

Post: #9

A buddy of mine sells HIV diagnostic supplies to hospitals and knows all the stats. A gay man in San Francisco has an average of over 100 sexual partners a year. A year. He says it's common for the top 50% of gay men to cross the 300+ mark.

Post: #10

(07-13-2014 09:17 AM)Vicious Wrote:  Read an article today on this press release, apparently homosexuals are 19 tines as likely to catch HIV as the average heterosexual Joe/Jane.

I blame Grindr.

HIV also spreads much more easily via anal sex vs vaginal. Virtually all people with HIV in Western countries are gay or intravenous drug users.

(07-13-2014 10:18 AM)maxmueller Wrote:  A buddy of mine sells HIV diagnostic supplies to hospitals and knows all the stats. A gay man in San Francisco has an average of over 100 sexual partners a year. A year. He says it's common for the top 50% of gay men to cross the 300+ mark.

That just seems too high to be believable. No doubt some are, but no way a population of that size is running through 100+ a year on average.

The most I've heard from people I know personally is the "gay bestfriend" of one of my regular's who went from a virgin to having sex with (incl. oral) 20 dudes in 6 months right after coming out of the closet.

Post: #11

Maybe they legalized gay marriage so that this would happen

Post: #12

(07-13-2014 10:50 AM)Deluge Wrote:  That just seems too high to be believable. No doubt some are, but no way a population of that size is running through 100+ a year on average.

The most I've heard from people I know personally is the "gay bestfriend" of one of my regular's who went from a virgin to having sex with (incl. oral) 20 dudes in 6 months right after coming out of the closet.

Bro, gays don't have to deal with LMR and all that shyt. Imagine a group of uninhibited peeps who are both in the same frame of mind, getting that nutt.

I totally believe those numbers.

Post: #13

(07-13-2014 09:25 AM)Icarus Wrote:  Contraception!?

Gays can't conceive a child. Hence, the word "contraception" cannot be used in this case.

No but faggots and bull-dyke lesbians can adopt. Heck, in this fucked-up bizzarro world we live in, they're probably at the front of the line!

Am I the only one who finds that perverse? A kid needs a mom and a dad...a NORMAL mom and dad!

Post: #14

I remember attending a microbiology conference, where a student was modeling the costs of anti-retroviral drugs to prevent HIV infection. Even if you target only high risk individuals (50 sexual partners a year), the government (our taxpayer money) needs to spend about $50 000 dollars per HIV infection prevented. It's stupid expensive. The estimated costs of drugs is $10 000 a year just for preventative measures.

Post: #15

"Read an article today on this press release, apparently homosexuals are 19 tines as likely to catch HIV as the average heterosexual Joe/Jane.

I blame Grindr."

It didn't start with Grindr - there were bathhouses in the 70s where you could lie face down and get assrammed without ever seeing who was inside you.

And the ratio of AIDS prevalence among homosexuals vs others depends on which groups you're talking about. Gay men have it 800 times more than straight white men do.

http://www.returnofkings.com/3882/the-truth-about-aids

If you want the real story on AIDS, talk to a pathologist who runs a blood bank. I did recently, she confirmed everything we're saying here, more or less.

Post: #16

I have a buddy who is a gay soldier in the IDF and at age 21 he stopped counting at 200. His 37 year old boyfriend stopped counting at 500.

Post: #17

I'm actually pleasantly surprised by the subhead: "Warns of 'exploding epidemics' of HIV among gay men."

For decades, the media preached to us "AIDS is an equal opportunity disease" and warned it would explode into the heterosexual community. It never did. In trying to placate gay activists, they ruined sex for an entire generation (Gen X).

I'm glad they're at least now able to report honestly. Years ago, what reporters would do was cover reports like this with euphemisms or get quotes from sex ed counselors with no scientific basis, just to make it look like "everyone" was in danger.

I once worked at a newspaper that ran a cover story called "FRAIDS," about people who were so scared of getting AIDS, they wouldn't drink from public water fountains, shake hands, or share drinks, etc. So this article is a big step away from that kind of fear mongering.

Post: #18

HIV drug manfacturers must've been like "how do we make it as consumable as asprin?" ...Thats right, take it every day whether you need it or not.

Post: #19

"But...but...but.. The Gays are just like us!"

"Were all the same"

These rates make the worst of syphilis epidemics in the old Dutch and Belgium ports look tame. At least they had ignorance and squalor conditions to blame. The modern gay in their downtown condo can't be any more modern and clean yet they still dumpster dive in the parks with each other.

Nature always wins.

Post: #20

(07-13-2014 11:00 AM)Moma Wrote:  

(07-13-2014 10:50 AM)Deluge Wrote:  That just seems too high to be believable. No doubt some are, but no way a population of that size is running through 100+ a year on average.

The most I've heard from people I know personally is the "gay bestfriend" of one of my regular's who went from a virgin to having sex with (incl. oral) 20 dudes in 6 months right after coming out of the closet.

Bro, gays don't have to deal with LMR and all that shyt. Imagine a group of uninhibited peeps who are both in the same frame of mind, getting that nutt.

I totally believe those numbers.

There must be tens of thousands of gay dudes in San Francisco. If the average gay guy is fucking 100 dudes, the top 10% would have to be fucking more than one person a day on average and sustain that for a whole year, it's just not conceivable for a population of that size. Like I said, I have no doubt some of them are, but the "average" guy? No way.

The "stats" maxmueller's friend told him also completely contradict each other. On the one hand, he says the average gay guy in San Francisco is fucking 100+ dudes a year, on the other hand he also says half of them have 300+ lifetime notch counts. Those two figures are impossible to reconcile. If the former was true then half the gay dudes in SF would have 1000+ lifetime bangs, not 300+.

Any statistic on how many dudes gay guys fuck in their lifetime is dubious, a sizeable portion of them would have notch counts too high to bother counting. I'm willing to bet the average figure is much higher than the median figure though to an even greater degree then it is for for straight people, based off gay guys I know.

Post: #21

I too find an average of 100 partners a year to be dubious. I. could believe the most promiscuous 10% do, but the average? The math doesn't work out.

Post: #22

(07-13-2014 09:25 AM)Icarus Wrote:  

(07-13-2014 09:07 AM)Truth Teller Wrote:  As the article mentions, this generation of gay men has largely never had to deal with the grim specter of AIDS, and as a result, they're much more cavalier with their contraception.

Contraception!?

Gays can't conceive a child. Hence, the word "contraception" cannot be used in this case.

Okay, condom would've been more accurate a term.

I also find the 100 partners a year to be dubious. Maybe this is selection bias, but the gay guys I know have had 0 and 5 partners respectively.

Post: #23

(07-13-2014 01:48 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  I too find an average of 100 partners a year to be dubious. I. could believe the most promiscuous 10% do, but the average? The math doesn't work out.

Well imagine this. How many times in a week do you expect the average male or even female to masturbate or how many nights a week you go out even if you got laid the previous night? Now imagine if instead you could go on Grindr and be uninhibited as to what you can fuck in an instant instead of having to masturbate or go out. I'd imagine 100 partners to be atleast the amount they are going through. Gays hookup much easier than straight people.

Post: #24

I don't find the 100 notch count for gays unrealistic. Its just hard for us strait gays to fathom because we have to work for each bang. Think of the ease of sex a female has access too and couple it with the male urge for sex, that's basically how they get such high notch counts.

Even just a slight connect of eye contact and two homos will go at it, sometimes not even that.

Post: #25

What about orgies to get that gay-notch count up. The way to get to 100 new partners per year is through orgies where a homosexual may have sex (not necessarily to completion) with 5 or more partners. If there is just one orgy like this every other week, that person already hit the mark of 100/year. Heck, even if there was one once a month you would already be at 60 partners assuming 5 new other people per event.

Ok, that's enough math.