Post: #1

Where in the US can I save the most money but have the best opportunity to meet fly girls.

Obviously NYC is number one when it comes to hot women but the cost of living is very high. It seems DC's talent is low with a high cost of living. ATL has some fly girls with the southern benefit of low cost. I hear LA has talent but cost of living and logistics is a pain.

So where can I get the lowest cost of living but not lose out on a large population of good looking girls?

Post: #2

(11-21-2014 10:20 PM)Mentavious Wrote:  Where in the US can I save the most money but have the best opportunity to meet fly girls.

Obviously NYC is number one when it comes to hot women but the cost of living is very high. It seems DC's talent is low with a high cost of living. ATL has some fly girls with the southern benefit of low cost. I hear LA has talent but cost of living and logistics is a pain.

So where can I get the lowest cost of living but not lose out on a large population of good looking girls?

Scottsdale

Post: #3

Nashville. If I were able to find a steady job in my field, I would still be there. The best kept secret in the country, IMOHO.

Post: #4

detriot

Post: #5

(11-21-2014 10:29 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  detriot

Low cost of living but the talent is very much lacking.

Post: #6

This thread is worthless. There is no such thing as a US city with low cost and hot women (if you want that get your ass across the ocean ASAP). For now all I can say is

Post: #7

(11-21-2014 10:46 PM)TripleG Wrote:  This thread is worthless. There is no such thing as a US city with low cost and hot women (if you want that get your ass across the ocean ASAP). For now all I can say is

Whats up with the negativity bro? There are some gems out there.

I'll say Houston, hot bitches and the city is cheap. Dallas has better quality but there's less interracial stuff going on, at least with the white girls.

Also, zanesville.

Post: #8

(11-21-2014 11:15 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

(11-21-2014 10:46 PM)TripleG Wrote:  This thread is worthless. There is no such thing as a US city with low cost and hot women (if you want that get your ass across the ocean ASAP). For now all I can say is

Whats up with the negativity bro? There are some gems out there.

I'll say Houston, hot bitches and the city is cheap. Dallas has better quality but there's less interracial stuff going on, at least with the white girls.

Also, zanesville.

Houston has some hotter international looking type chicks. As for Dallas, white chicks feel me better out there than in Houston. Too many Chinese dudes in H-Town = less exotic look out there, haha.

Post: #9

Obviously Zanesville, OH.

Any cost savings you'd have in Houston are offset by the gas you'll burn sitting in traffic.

Post: #10

(11-21-2014 11:22 PM)Brosemite Wrote:  

(11-21-2014 11:15 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

(11-21-2014 10:46 PM)TripleG Wrote:  This thread is worthless. There is no such thing as a US city with low cost and hot women (if you want that get your ass across the ocean ASAP). For now all I can say is

Whats up with the negativity bro? There are some gems out there.

I'll say Houston, hot bitches and the city is cheap. Dallas has better quality but there's less interracial stuff going on, at least with the white girls.

Also, zanesville.

Houston has some hotter international looking type chicks. As for Dallas, white chicks feel me better out there than in Houston. Too many Chinese dudes in H-Town = less exotic look out there, haha.

Which city has a lower cost of living?

Post: #11

Vegas (real estate and rent is cheap right? so are taxes I think)
Dallas
Minneapolis
Chicago
Columbus, OH
Tampa Bay

Is New Orleans cheap?

Post: #12

Minneapolis

Charlotte

Scottsdale

Houston

Post: #13

Chicago, Minneapolis, Miami and Houston.

Post: #14

Minny has always been a place I've been hearing about.

Positives:
Slightly more expensive then where I live. Apartment cost is about 25% more but because I pay a high water and sewage bill (gotta makeup pay for everyone not paying in Detroit) it actually evens out.
Airport isn't major like NYC, ATL, ORD, etc But it's in the second tier of good airports like Dallas, Charlotte, etc
RVF seems to be good with the girls there

Negatives: the winter sucks


Can anyone speak on some more southwest or west coast cities?

Post: #15

If you want a U.S. city with a low cost of living, you're generally going to be trying to bang Wal-mart employees who already have some drug dealer's kid.

Post: #16

Low COL + Hot women = Las Vegas
Anyone who has lived here will confirm

Post: #17

New Orleans is much, much better than either Houston or Dallas for decently attractive girls. I'm pretty sure there is a good chance NO will be cheaper as well given the recent price increases in TX.

Post: #18

The West Coast and Southwest are in general bad places to look for what you want except for 2 places repeatedly mentioned already:

Vegas
Scottsdale/Tempe (I question how cheap it is to live here)

The West Coast overall is expensive. SoCal is the only place with solid chicks. The chicks are worse looking as you go north for the most part and the expense is on par and sometimes greater (Bay Area, Seattle).

Cross the West Coast off your list entirely.

From south to north:

San Diego - expensive in the desirable parts, hot chicks, sausagefest factor

Orange County - expensive in the desirable parts, hot chicks but not many in the sweet spot of 18-25, cliquish, logistical nightmare

L.A. - can be of okay expense (certainly not cheap), logistical nightmares again

Santa Barbara - can be of okay expense value (not cheap), hot chicks, not very big though (150k people in the surrounding area), hard thing is making money here

Santa Cruz - heard it's expensive, tiny population (75k), chicks are decent, not SoCal good though

Bay Area - too expensive, too many guys with money and no game

Portland - not too expensive, heard it's hard to get a decent job most PhDs unemployed anywhere, girls medicore

Seattle - expensive, girls mediocre, also a tech sausagefest to a certain degree

Post: #19

(11-22-2014 03:04 PM)speeddemon Wrote:  New Orleans is much, much better than either Houston or Dallas for decently attractive girls. I'm pretty sure there is a good chance NO will be cheaper as well given the recent price increases in TX.

Never heard a comparison of these 3 cities.

Could you break it down a bit more? What are the main differences? What makes NO chicks better? Thinner, better dressed, more feminine?

Post: #20

(11-21-2014 11:15 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

(11-21-2014 10:46 PM)TripleG Wrote:  This thread is worthless. There is no such thing as a US city with low cost and hot women (if you want that get your ass across the ocean ASAP). For now all I can say is

Whats up with the negativity bro? There are some gems out there.

I'll say Houston, hot bitches and the city is cheap. Dallas has better quality but there's less interracial stuff going on, at least with the white girls.

Also, zanesville.

@CastleRuster, please mention those gems. Houston it ain't.
My sister went to medical school in Houston and lived a stone's throw away from downtown (which is a joke by the way). Houston has the shittiest logistics of any large American city i've ever been to. Their "metro" only go's north to south for about 12 stops. Bus system is slow and too spread out, and forget about walking. Many nice neighborhoods don't even have side-walks, are gated and are meant for cars only. Too many women are fat or undesirable looking. If you like white chicks forget about going to east Houston. Also, the only good looking girls are college aged however if one is in their 30's or 40's the picking are very slim as most of the women tend to settle down, pop kids, and gain weight right after college.

Also, Houston ain't that cheap. I spent a bit of time by Rice University and was paying over 1k/month for a small 1 bedroom. Not a good value.
Again, I stand correct in that most US cities are expensive and don't have good-looking women (except perhaps for some small pockets in FL or Cali).

Post: #21

I'm thinking ATL is a good choice

Apt rentals are reasonable
One of the best airports in the US for international destinations
Plenty of single and fine women
Good weather
5+ universities nearby which means young college girls

Post: #22

Come on down to Atlanta. Its cheap living and we got fine women.

I stay right outside the perimeter and I'm roughly 15 miles from the middle of the city. ATL is most definitely a driving city. We do have public transport but you'll almost ALWAYS opt to drive once you've ridden the bus a few times. Especially when bouncing a chick to your crib.

Can elaborate more on areas to live in and around the city,as well as offer suggestions to the types of women we have and the places you'd have to go to find them.

Post: #23

I'm on board team Houston. You got a variety of chicks from all shapes and sizes. All of Texas really is great because its generally cheap compared to other parts of the country and the women there are fine.

Minneapolis is a good gem in the midwest also.

Maybe Detroit? I heard good things about it.

I really liked Baltimore when I went. I thought the girls were good looking.

Post: #24

How about Milwaukee or Salt Lake City?

Post: #25

(11-23-2014 01:00 AM)Marvin Wrote:  How about Milwaukee or Salt Lake City?

Much of the Big 10 talent including UW moves to Chicago. Milwaukee gets the left overs.

If you are thinking about going there it is a no brainer to go to Chicago or Minneapolis instead.

I have been to SLC, not to party, but just there for half a day. Seems dead quiet and tiny. Not enough to game really. Maybe a great place to find a wife. I imagine it is like what Albequerque, NM is like, just.... underwhelming in many ways.

You would ask your self everyday... is this it?