Post: #26

No piercings. No visible tattoos.

I have 2 tattoos: shoulder blade and rib cage. Greatly enjoy both.

I would never get a tattoo that is not easily hidden in a business setting though.

Post: #27

None, don't agree with either. I don't consider either of them real ornaments. A battle/accident scar, on the other hand, is a legitimate ornament.

If a girl is less attracted to me because I don't have tats or piercings, or she had any tats or any piercings outside her earlobe, those are good screening factors for me.

Post: #28

None.

Post: #29

None.

Post: #30

So far none.

Will never do piercings.

But since I got myself a small Fight club like chemical burn on my hand I am considering a tattoo covering part of my hand and reaching my elbow.



I do believe that tattoos can help you get laid just like a well-trained physique and muscles. But of course it's not really necessary and this concerns only men - never women.

Post: #31

Normal ear piercings (2 on each ear) done in my late teens. Nonetheless I haven't worn earrings in about 15 years.

Post: #32

(12-15-2014 03:00 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  I do believe that tattoos can help you get laid just like a well-trained physique and muscles. But of course it's not really necessary and this concerns only men - never women.

Yeah I have no interest in tattoos but the majority of hot girls do seem to dig them. I just don't want to commit to ink for the next 50-years.

To answer the op's question I've had pierced ears for brief periods of time in the past. I kinda liked the look and might try it out again in the future.

Moderate piercings like Colin Farrell's can be a cool juxtaposition if you're otherwise well-dressed.

Post: #33

Yeah dude. I've got major burn scars hidden under my clothing and a small one on my hand, so I decided against any more modification.

Post: #34

Me, but i plan to get a tattoo once an efficient removal method is invented >_>
I would want to have a tattoo for probably 10 years and that's about it.
.

Post: #35

None of either. I've considered it at times, but working out is the best form of body modification.

Post: #36

None.

Post: #37

Neither, save a few minor scars and a birthmark.

I'd always considered getting a tattoo, but it had to fit 3 criteria:
-Something that had major importance and significance to me
-Something that people would recognize if seen
-Something timeless

By those standards I'd never be able to get one.
I was tempted by a classic Robocop tattoo a few years back, but then the remake came out.
Dodged a bullet there.

Post: #38

None; piercings are a no-no amongst my family if you are a male and too many idiots have tattoos now that I don't want to associate with them.

Post: #39

I have neither, won't get any either.

Whatever melts your butter; I prefer a blank canvas.

Post: #40

No tats, had snakebites (dual lip piercings) back in my punk days.

I'm one of the only ones in my social circle who doesn't have any tattoos.

Post: #41

I have a full stomach, chest, approximately half of my arms and full back covered

Post: #42

Back of my head and neck too

Post: #43

None.
Never understood the appeal of tattoos. They might look cool in the moment or when you're young, but it certainly won't when you're older.

What amazes me is seeing more and more guys with neck and face tattoos! Wtf?!!

Post: #44

I am clean but i might get a sleeve in the future and that's it

Post: #45

The while original appeal of tattoos was exactly that, there is no appeal because there ugly and look nasty. It was a middle finger to every one

Post: #46

None.

Tattoo game is legit though. Hate on them all you want, but girls love em. Girls are dumb that way.

Post: #47

None.

When I was younger I thought I would get some tattoos. But tattoos that I could live with for the rest of my life. With important meanings. That I could use to remind myself of something I would never want to forget etc. Basically, tattoos for me and me only. Of course I'd want them to look unique and beautiful etc, but that was more for me than showing off to anyone else.

But after tattoos became trendy.......I got really turned off to them. Everyone who had tattoos would constantly talk about their "tats" and obnoxiously show them off, or talk endlessly about which tattoos they were getting next. To me this was so boring and narcissistic. And worst of all, how do you tell someone, "your tattoo sucks. I hate it"? I love to tell the truth, but you can't go and be honest with people about these opinions.

Maybe it's something I don't understand because I don't belong to the club. And I don't want to condemn tattoos or people that love them. But, what was sort of a sacred, private, and very meaningful thing, became very artificial feeling for me. And I now have no interest.

Post: #48

(12-15-2014 03:44 PM)Brian Shima Wrote:  The while original appeal of tattoos was exactly that, there is no appeal because there ugly and look nasty. It was a middle finger to every one

Agreed. A lot of that got co-opted and diminished when women started getting three pages of Dr. Suess quotes scrawled on their shoulder blades.

Post: #49

none here

Post: #50

I see tattoos and piercings as a way to fuck up your earning potential for the rest of your life. That is, unless you're a criminal or rapper or athlete. But the majority of tattooed people are not one of these and are broke.