Post: #1

Huffington Post Canada published an "open letter" by feminist Lauren Messervey about me. I'm not saying every girl wants to bone me, but it does seem like a poor effort to deal with her primal attraction for me.

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lauren-mess...04250.html

Quote:I'd like to start a dialogue with you, if I may. I find you to be very interesting.

Allow me to introduce myself: I am a Canadian writer and blogger, the majority of my content veering on what may be called "feminist." From my name and photo, you may be able to glean that I am a woman.

I have done extensive research about you and your work, and I have to say, I've never seen anything like you. Most PUAs sort of beat around the bush (no pun intended), but you really cut to the chase, don't you? I mean, at least the others pretend to like women. You actively show your hatred and disdain for the fairer sex in ways that would make any self-respecting person cringe. That, good sir, is a feat.

Quote:There are laws now, Roosh. They are made by powerful, important men and women who are appalled at the way women are treated by men like you. Although you can't put a ban on words, you may find that a lot of powerful people have such an aversion to that word that they are flagging individuals who use such terms in their literature. I'm sure you wouldn't want to be flagged and monitored by any government for hate mongering, would you, Roosh?

She was hammered all day yesterday for the article:

https://twitter.com/search?f=realtime&q=...y&src=typd

   

   

A woman criticizes her, saying she wouldn't mind my rape legalization idea:

Quote:I, for one, don’t mind this attitude even a little bit. It will save me from having to raise pregnant teenage daughters or some random, ill-selected offspring. I also think that drugs should be decriminalized and stop signs are unnecessary.Anyone out there that thinks human beings will suddenly run rampant without regulations to stop rape, murder and mayhem is ill-informed at best. I live in the rootin’-tootin’ (recently declared) concealed-carry state of Kansas and the blood in the streets is only ankle-deep after a hard rain.

https://motivationalhierarchy.wordpress....judgement/

And of course this post is not complete without pictures of Lauren...

At her beauty peak:



Now it's impossible to find pictures of her from the chest down:







WYB?

Post: #2

I always get a kick when people describe you as a "PUA who hates women". Even your last interview here https://vimeo.com/116015349 -she had the clarity to retract her statement of calling you a pick-up artist.


She has a point. The word 'slut' has become archaic, because 'sluts' of the past would be considered 'normal' today.

Post: #3

She might as well have written, "... And we are NOT having sex tonight!!!"

Post: #4

She has an air of femininity about her, you can see it in her eyes. Those submissive eyes.

Post: #5

After careful examination of the photos, I have made a decision. I'll let her suck my dick.



This wasn't an easy decision to make, but I hope you all trust my judgement. Thank you.

Post: #6

Would give a pearl necklace:

Post: #7

Given that her cheek and collarbones are prominent in the last photo Roosh posted, I'm pretty sure she isn't a SIF.

WB.

Post: #8

Just another example of how women dread and loath a man who has his shit together. They are attracted and repulsed at the same time and cant figure out what to do.

Post: #9

Quote:I am a Canadian writer and blogger, the majority of my content veering on what may be called "feminist."

I'd bet the majority of her content screams feminist

Post: #10

You should invite her over to EE, show her what your life is all about, bang, and then post on twitter a story about it.

Post: #11

(04-22-2015 07:43 AM)Libertas Wrote:  Given that her cheek and collarbones are prominent in the last photo Roosh posted, I'm pretty sure she isn't a SIF.

WB.

I don't know man.

(04-22-2015 07:02 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

Fat face.

Quote:

Fat face.

Quote:

Downward angle.

Post: #12

Pretty face, nice skin. A pair of fake tits and some cardio and she wouldn't have to write for a living after what seems to be a failed/half hearted modelling attempt.

Which makes sense as to why she is a huffpo/femenist writer...Couldn't break into a beauty based industry, turns resentment into an alternative career.

Post: #13

While she may be of questionable attractiveness, she is not stupid.

She is a 3rd rate journalist/blogger, and is trolling for clicks and pageviews.

So far, I'm guessing her plan is working. She has probably gotten more attention for this than anything else she has written in the past year. It is a great way for her to move up a wrung on the Feminism Inc ladder. If she keeps it up, in a year or two she will be a regular columnist and possibly publish some shitty book.

Also, I guarantee you she is chubby and unbangable. The picture angles are a classic internet fatty trick.

Post: #14

WB

Post: #15

(04-22-2015 07:02 AM)Roosh Wrote:  I am a Canadian writer and blogger, the majority of my content veering on what may be called "feminist."

Quote:veer 1 (vîr)
v. veered, veer·ing, veers
v.intr.
1.
a. To turn aside from a course or established direction; swerve: veered to the left to avoid a pothole.
b. To deviate from a purpose, behavior, or previous pattern: "a sequence of adventures that veered between tragedy and bleak farce" (Anthony Haden-Guest). See Synonyms at swerve.
2. To shift clockwise in direction, as from north to northeast. Used of the wind.
3. Nautical To change the course of a ship by turning the stern to the wind while advancing to windward; wear ship.
v.tr.
1. To alter the direction of; turn: veered the car sharply to the left.
2. Nautical To change the course of (a ship) by turning the stern windward.
n.
A change in direction; a swerve.

How can your content be "veering" on feminist? Do you swing wildly from rabid idiocy to annoying lesbianism?

I'd guess the majority of her content is verging on unreadable because of a shit education and poor proofreading skills. Whatever her job is, it's not "writer". Writers out to provoke pageclicks by composing troll pieces make sure their sentences actually, y'know, make sense first.

Post: #16

To reiterate something I once wrote on here:

Women have a natural need for drama in their lives. They are the ones that have always taken to soap operas (even back when there were radio dramas) and gossip.

The reason for this is that women were built for such drama. There is nothing more dramatic than deal with the travails of raising children. Women are "people people," while men are "things and ideas people," for the most part.

Unfortunately, white women no longer seem to have kids anymore, and they indulge their urges for drama by taking on various "causes" or trying to solve problems that aren't problems.

This is what we see here. This woman would not be fixating on Roosh if she was busy with kids and a husband.

Instead, according to her HuffPost profile:

1). She's still "figuring out" dating at 30, as if she's still 15 (my mother already had three kids at 30 and went onto become extremely successful when her kids were grown...and all her friends did nearly the same).

2). She's droning on about the "dangers" of porn as if we're still fighting the porn wars of 1986. Even liberal bastions like Slate have connected the DROP in violent crimes against women to the rise of online porn.

3). She's obsessed with every trendy cause-of-the-moment, from bullying to kids beauty pageants to pick-up artists to shaming the mentally ill to size-shaming. The media might as well be embedding a cable in her veins, as if it was an IV drip.

In short, she embodies almost everything wrong with women in our society today. And like a lot of Millennials, she has a disturbing streak of fascism within her.

Baby Boomer women used to thumb their nose at authority. Millennial women look to authority to "flag" and "monitor" people with viewpoints they don't like. This isn't progress, much less "progressive."

Post: #17

WB if the pic up above holds true.

Post: #18

The first thing that came to mind reading this was: "Who bitch this is?"

Post: #19

Who knows when these were taken. So many glamor shots, I can't imagine a chick so vapid, would let her only asset turn to trash, but then again Chipotle's is a power thing.

Post: #20

She wants to start a dialogue but threatens in the request some vague laws, which most likely don't affect Roosh.

I don't know if she is SIF due to how defined her facial bones are, so WB, but would record and use fake name.

Post: #21

Sublimating her desire to a man she can't help but be attracted to by "telling him off." Classic empowered woman.

The comment thread casts light on the turning tide:

Quote:Next, I think you should know that the term 'slut' is fairly archaic."

Sluts love to rationalize why their worth is so low.

Fact is there is scientific research that proves that promiscuous women (aka sluts - are we banning/outdating "promiscuous" now?) are not only toxic to themselves (have mental issues), they are awful for society as well.

More sexual partners for women results in more disorders:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles...figure/F1/

Quote:I don't understand the challenge. I've read that guys blog for many years, and though he is annoyed with women, he doesn't hate them. You bloggers and your poopie pants articles about pickup artists and their misogyny are tiresome. Always the exact same diatribe. So you don't like his article, what's your counter argument? How would his likely satirical article reduce or not the likelihood of rape? If you were actually a journalist you would answer this question, or at least challenge it, instead of whining that you don't like the guy. You're just proving his point.

Quote:1) If you've ever brushed your teeth before going out on a date, you've used pick-up artist techniques. If North American women didn't rate 80% of men as "below average," there would be no need for many pick-up artist techniques.

2) If there's nothing wrong with being a "slut," then why do you have a problem with girls being called "sluts"? North American women are free to sleep with 100 men if they want. What you are not "entitled" to (Elliot Rodger / catcalling video callback) is to have men be more interested in you than the chaste girl. There is no double standard since for a man to be with 100 women, he must have qualities that men and women value---e.g., wealth, charisma, fame---but for a woman to be with 100 men, she just needs to be female.

Post: #22

Links to some of her other work, powerful stuff like "Top 5 Spray Tans in Toronto" and "Top 5 Juice Delivery Services In Toronto".

Everyone, has 0 comments.

http://mycitygossip.com/author/lauren-messervey/

Post: #23

The comments say more about where Canada is at right now than anything else. If this was Huffington-Post US it would be the opposite, tons of comments trashing Roosh.


If Roosh could share his google analytics data I bet there would be a disproportionate representation from Canada-Britain.

Post: #24

Now, there is one part of her article that could be true, being in canada

Quote:I'm sure you wouldn't want to be flagged and monitored by any government for hate mongering, would you, Roosh?

Canada does have hate speech laws and I'm sure that feminists would love to have a case law victory that isn't the usual homosexual and anti-semitic basis for charges.

Also, with the new pictures, if she only got some fake tits when younger and maybe made a sex tape she could have been a cbc actress.

Post: #25

So far the comments are brutal. Its like she posted it on Return of Kings. Not one single " he's a virgin who lives in a basement ".....well done Canada.