Post: #1

Yup, another week, another opportunity to be lectured to about what we're supposed to be attracted to.

http://www.boredpanda.com/body-positivit...rey-fruth/

“By stepping into a fantasy dream girl world and by letting go of that fear, they free themselves up to direct that energy they once wasted on telling themselves that they weren’t good enough to elsewhere in their life”

On the plus side (heh heh), only half of the 14 examples provided are land whales (accompanied with a few WB's).

Post: #2

Not a bad game, guess if the next one is gonna make you puke or not.

Scroll slowly...

Post: #3

Caution, gentlemen: the first trigger warning kicks in with the second example.

Post: #4

If they are so brave, why all of the Photoshop?

Post: #5

It's not a "standard" (but it should be) - but a 'preference'.

Post: #6

Reaffirming traditional beauty standards, one weird, misguided photo shoot at a time.

Post: #7

Why the hell did they throw all those fatties in with the cute chicks?

This has got to be some catty girl shit "I'm going to do a photoshoot with my fugly BFF so I look better in comparison... Wait! I mean disrupting beauty standards, that's it!"

Post: #8

Maaaaaaybe... and that's a big "let-me-see-you-without-make-up-and-photoshop" maybe.

Post: #9

Pay no attention to the boner behind the curtain.

Post: #10

What man ever said, "Now that I've seen a photoshopped, nude hippopotamus, they're actually hot?"

Post: #11

Post: #12

(07-23-2015 03:43 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

Not into the whole "more cushin for the pushin" I see...

Post: #13

^^^^ Not so much

I am trying to figure out if she is one of those cursed fat girls with big lower body and no tits.

Post: #14

How the hell did this challenge anything? Some of these women are down right hideous. What is up with granny and her slutty tattoo?

Post: #15

(07-23-2015 03:56 PM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  

(07-23-2015 03:43 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

Not into the whole "more cushin for the pushin" I see...

I'd hit it.

Post: #16

Pic 1: No tits and a stupid tattoo but a beautiful face and nice legs, she is the second best one. 7.5/10 WB.
Pic 2: Absofucklutely not, she looks big enough to be an All-Pro DT. 2/10 WNB.
Pic 3: Old, fat, multiple stupid tattoos, post-op tranny face. 2/10 WNB.
Pic 4: Nice body, toned arms, appears to be some tittayz, WB but I can't give a chick with a buzzcut any higher than 6/10 WB.
Pic 5: Just by a hair better than Pics 1 and 8, the best one. Perfect W:H Ratio, milky skin, slim body and a beautiful face. 8.5/10 WB.
Pic 6: Needs to drop 30, maybe WB if I was hurting and could do it secretly. 5/10 M(aybe)WB.
Pic 7: I thought she was a caterpillar...another fat chick who doesn't have big tits. <1/10 WNB.
Pic 8: The third best one. A little more plain in features and less toned than Pic 5, facially inferior to Pic 1. 7/10 WB.
Pic 9: A cute, slightly thick Asian chick - I'll bite. 6.5/10 WB.
Pic 10: Body is nice but a little too 'straight' (no curves) and her stupid tattoos drop her score. 7/10 WB.
Pic 11: Another fat girl with small tits. 2/10 WNB.
Pic 12: Why are they back-loading the fatties here!? 2/10 WNB.
Pic 13: And yet another fattie! 2/10 WNB.
Pic 14: And finishing strong with a busty black chick with a nice face. Gym time would bump her to a 7. 6/10 WB.

So it goes...5, 1, 8, 10, 9, 4>=<14, 6, fat, fat, fat, fat, old & fat and REALLY fuckin' fat...

Not as bad as I originally planned - but if it wasn't already as clear as day (to us I know it is)...Just being thin and deformity free = automatic 5/10.

Post: #17

I hate to keep making the same comment over and over on these threads. But maybe if I repeat it enough it will disseminate into the mainstream. Then we won't have to put up with pretentious photo "essays" like this from women and their White Knight Beta supporters.

Anyway, my standard comment is:

Women are the only ones who get to challenge beauty standards. Men are supposed to accept today's women any which way they come, or else we're body-shaming bigots and haters.

And yet women indulge in body-shaming, bigotry, and judgement so offhandedly that no one even seems to notice, including them.

If you look on Match.com, the height minimum for men is locked-in at 6,' the minimum salary requirement is usually around $50K, and they expect an undergraduate degree...and many are now requiring men to have tattoos as well.

Then there's that race thing. On Facebook women come off like they're bleeding heart liberals out of the Obama Administration. They love EVERYONE! All lives matter! But when it comes to dating, suddenly, they're the Daughters of the KKK. If you're a male with darker skin, you've probably seen it on a dating site. It goes "Not prejudiced, just a preference."

So to summarize: In America, 2015, women get to have standards -- and high ones at that -- while men are expected to accept anything dumped on their doorstep OR ELSE!

Got that?

Post: #18

My eyes are bleeding.

(07-23-2015 04:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  So to summarize: In America, 2015, women get to have standards -- and high ones at that -- while men are expected to accept anything dumped on their doorstep OR ELSE!

"The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality." -Heartiste

Post: #19

I took the challenge!!

And still think most of these women are obese and sexually unattractive.



DEAL WITH IT LADIES! Stop getting fat and better your mind, body, health and soul by losing weight and feeling great!!!

#positivefatshamingisgoodforyou

Post: #20

[quote='Aquiles_Baesta_Parada' pid='1071495' dateline='1437682520']
Maaaaaaybe... and that's a big "let-me-see-you-without-make-up-and-photoshop" maybe.

WB all of these plus #9

Post: #21

(07-23-2015 04:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Then there's that race thing. On Facebook women come off like they're bleeding heart liberals out of the Obama Administration. They love EVERYONE! All lives matter! But when it comes to dating, suddenly, they're the Daughters of the KKK. If you're a male with darker skin, you've probably seen it on a dating site. It goes "Not prejudiced, just a preference."

Man, look...this was one of the things pre-redpill discovery that made me really start questioning what was behind the curtain. How the hell could these supposedly "liberal" women, who at face value checked off all the "correct" PC boxes and would no doubt say "I have black friends" if questioned turn around and go "sorry, no darkies" when it came to who they actually wanted to fuck? Made no sense to me then.

Post: #22

Post: #23

(07-23-2015 06:47 PM)Aphex Wrote:  

She looks like Chris Farley when he skipped leg day.

G

Post: #24

So brave. So brave.

Post: #25

The very first one (the redhead) I instantly found the most attractive of the "hotter" ones -- amazing the effect a friendly smile (a rarity these days) plays in creating attraction, whereas all the other "fitter" ones choose their patented "I'm doing this for me, not for you, asshole" scowl faces.