Post: #1

The Womens Center at Vanderbilt University will sponsor a week-long series of events dedicated to telling men how to be masculine. "Healthy Masculinity Week" will feature a series of lectures and forums dedicated to showing men the error of their ways and, judging from some fo the topics, replacing traditional masculine values with male characteristics more amenable to feminists and other men-haters.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015...z3kuGXkDpE
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

I wonder why they didn't invite Roosh to hold a seminar there

Post: #2

My initial thought upon reading the thread title was, 'this could be really great, or... nah, it won't be'

Post: #3

This is funny. The world is on the brink and Vanderbilt's doing this...

All this outrageous cultural suicide stuff right when times are about to get really tough and by definition tough times demand reality based (red pill) thinking, is good for us.

Our enemies will be pathetically weak.

Post: #4

"How to be a man"
-by women

Well now I've fucking seen everything.

Post: #5

(09-05-2015 06:03 PM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  "How to be a man"
-by women

Well now I've fucking seen everything.

"How to be a lion".
-by mice.

Post: #6

I'm gonna' just drop this bit of commentary someone provided in here:

http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/09/04...ini/205390

Post: #7

(09-05-2015 06:22 PM)Kingsley Davis Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 06:03 PM)Aquiles_Baesta_Parada Wrote:  "How to be a man"
-by women

Well now I've fucking seen everything.

"How to be a lion".
-by mice.

" How to be an oppressed ultra minority female in gender studies class fighting the evil Patriarchy "
-by White Cis-Gendered Male Identity Figure

Post: #8

Women telling men how to be masculine.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOL​OLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

The next panel at Vanderbilt will be me telling astronauts about space exploration.

Post: #9

This is so stunningly narcissistic and misguided it's almost comic.

First, the very idea that men are somehow damaged goods that need to be "fixed" is beyond belief. Who came up with this? Who are they to say masculinity is bad or good? Bad towards whom? Women? If so, guess that means men are here to serve their needs. So much for equality.

Second, why isn't this also being directed at women? Who says their "femininity" is healthy?

Has anyone ever stopped to think it's women's behavior that shapes masculinity, so maybe they're the problem? You don't want any more macho assholes around? Fine. Tell women to stop breeding with thugs. That's where you need to direct your seminars. Go to the source.

Masculinity will change when no thugs have sons and every nerd in silicon valley has ten kids. Only one gender can change that: the female one. Therefore, this entire series should be directed at getting them to change their instincts.

Finally, their push toward "gender equality" is not based on science -- which I thought liberals "fucking loved." The average IQ of men and women are about the same, but the reason men pull out ahead in almost all fields is because men have more "outliers" when it comes to high IQ. The reason the prisons and mental institutions are filled with men is because we also have more low outliers.

On top of that, women will always be the ones bearing children or wanting to bear children, which leads them down a different path in life. Give them all the education you want, but when they hear that baby cry, they're going to want to be with it. WHY anyone would want to alter mother's instincts in favor of making them worker bees is beyond me. Catholics attempted to alter people's instincts too with things like celibacy for priests. It didn't turn out well.

You'll never change the above, so you'll never get "gender equality." Liberals and feminists really hate science, especially as it relates to biology.

Post: #10

There's a similar seminar at my local university. Something about how men can benefit from more feminism. I bet it was a very healthily masculine turnout...

(09-05-2015 07:33 PM)eatthishomie Wrote:  The next panel at Vanderbilt will be me telling astronauts about space exploration.

My money is on "How to obtain consent before landing a rocket on a comet".

Post: #11

(09-06-2015 03:19 AM)StrikeBack Wrote:  There's a similar seminar at my local university. Something about how men can benefit from more feminism. I bet it was a very healthily masculine turnout...

(09-05-2015 07:33 PM)eatthishomie Wrote:  The next panel at Vanderbilt will be me telling astronauts about space exploration.

My money is on "How to obtain consent before landing a rocket on a comet".

That seminar will be preceded by "The appropriate shirt to wear before landing your groundbreaking historical probe on an asteroid."

Post: #12

Lol, no doubt there will be a stall with a testicle guillotine.

Should set up a Healthy Feminity week, and copy all their colour scheme and layout and everything. I'm sure they'll be tolerant of your diverse opinions.

Post: #13

This friendly reminder will be placed in the toilets.



There will also be a lecture by this male feminist preaching the reasons he teaches his son to pee sitting down.

Post: #14

(09-06-2015 06:28 AM)Horus Wrote:  This friendly reminder will be placed in the toilets.



There will also be a lecture by this male feminist preaching the reasons he teaches his son to pee sitting down.

Why does it show the one sitting down to pee with a dick and balls?

Post: #15

(09-05-2015 09:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  This is so stunningly narcissistic and misguided it's almost comic.

First, the very idea that men are somehow damaged goods that need to be "fixed" is beyond belief. Who came up with this? Who are they to say masculinity is bad or good? Bad towards whom? Women? If so, guess that means men are here to serve their needs. So much for equality.

Second, why isn't this also being directed at women? Who says their "femininity" is healthy?

Has anyone ever stopped to think it's women's behavior that shapes masculinity, so maybe they're the problem? You don't want any more macho assholes around? Fine. Tell women to stop breeding with thugs. That's where you need to direct your seminars. Go to the source.

Masculinity will change when no thugs have sons and every nerd in silicon valley has ten kids. Only one gender can change that: the female one. Therefore, this entire series should be directed at getting them to change their instincts.

Finally, their push toward "gender equality" is not based on science -- which I thought liberals "fucking loved." The average IQ of men and women are about the same, but the reason men pull out ahead in almost all fields is because men have more "outliers" when it comes to high IQ. The reason the prisons and mental institutions are filled with men is because we also have more low outliers.

On top of that, women will always be the ones bearing children or wanting to bear children, which leads them down a different path in life. Give them all the education you want, but when they hear that baby cry, they're going to want to be with it. WHY anyone would want to alter mother's instincts in favor of making them worker bees is beyond me. Catholics attempted to alter people's instincts too with things like celibacy for priests. It didn't turn out well.

You'll never change the above, so you'll never get "gender equality." Liberals and feminists really hate science, especially as it relates to biology.

Gold, as always.

Just a few weeks ago it must've been anti-bullying week, and two women that I went to HS with (mediocrely attractive) posted rants against bullying, how their kids are now bullied. When we we were in HS, they were both constantly fucked by a couple of guys who constantly bullied smaller kids. Funny thing is, it was a friend who messaged me and pointed this out.

And I absolutely despise the "I fucking love science" meme, or whatever it is. This link explains it well:

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/219979/f...e-science/

Post: #16

(09-06-2015 10:27 AM)realologist Wrote:  

(09-06-2015 06:28 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Why does it show the one sitting down to pee with a dick and balls?

Why did sitting on the toilet warrant changing how he was wearing his hat?

Post: #17

(09-06-2015 09:59 PM)CRR Wrote:  Just a few weeks ago it must've been anti-bullying week, and two women that I went to HS with (mediocrely attractive) posted rants against bullying, how their kids are now bullied. When we we were in HS, they were both constantly fucked by a couple of guys who constantly bullied smaller kids. Funny thing is, it was a friend who messaged me and pointed this out.

Do fathers no longer teach their sons the basics in self-defense?
I can remember being 9 or 10 and my dad showing me some basic boxing/blocking moves and basic wrestling holds (he wrestled in college). Every rambunctious boy loves to learn that shit at that age.
I got taunted probably an average amount in school, which I just did my best to stoically ignore, but the minute it got physical, I *always* ended it then and there, to be thenceforth left alone.
"You have a right to self-defense," my dad used to say. (r.i.p.)
Can't argue with Natural Law.

When I hear mothers nowadays complain about "bullies" I just have to shake my head and wonder if there's a father in the picture.

An ineffectual father who is present is actually sadder than an absentee father.

---

Mothers raise boys.
Fathers raise men.

Post: #18

(09-06-2015 10:16 PM)Sombro Wrote:  

(09-06-2015 09:59 PM)CRR Wrote:  Just a few weeks ago it must've been anti-bullying week, and two women that I went to HS with (mediocrely attractive) posted rants against bullying, how their kids are now bullied. When we we were in HS, they were both constantly fucked by a couple of guys who constantly bullied smaller kids. Funny thing is, it was a friend who messaged me and pointed this out.

Do fathers no longer teach their sons the basics in self-defense?
I can remember being 9 or 10 and my dad showing me some basic boxing/blocking moves and basic wrestling holds (he wrestled in college). Every rambunctious boy loves to learn that shit at that age.
I got taunted probably an average amount in school, which I just did my best to stoically ignore, but the minute it got physical, I *always* ended it then and there, to be thenceforth left alone.
"You have a right to self-defense," my dad used to say. (r.i.p.)
Can't argue with Natural Law.

When I hear mothers nowadays complain about "bullies" I just have to shake my head and wonder if there's a father in the picture.

An ineffectual father who is present is actually sadder than an absentee father.

---

Mothers raise boys.
Fathers raise men.

I agree with what you are saying, and I was always able to defend myself, and was never picked on. I was always of average size, moderate athletic ability, and since I played sports was friends with bigger kids.

However I think there are a lot of boys who are smaller (or hit puberty later) and are much more inclined to get picked on. All the self defense in the world won't help them against an aggressive bigger kid who knows how to fight.

One of my proudest moments in HS was punching a few kids who were picking on a smaller kid. The smaller kid had done nothing wrong except for being a smaller human, and being a quiet introvert.

Point being is that not every man is capable of being "Alpha", which would negate the term anyway (just like how every woman is supposedly beautiful negates the term itself). Some men are going to be smaller, some are going to be more reserved. Sure, it is important to learn self defense, but it is also important to focus on working with the cards one has been dealt with, focusing on one's strengths, and improving weaknesses with realistic expectations depending on the individual.

In fact, I'd say it's "Alpha" to protect those kids who are physically weaker, invite them to the gym, and in return see if they'll help you with your computer science project.

Post: #19

(09-06-2015 10:16 PM)Sombro Wrote:  

(09-06-2015 09:59 PM)CRR Wrote:  Just a few weeks ago it must've been anti-bullying week, and two women that I went to HS with (mediocrely attractive) posted rants against bullying, how their kids are now bullied. When we we were in HS, they were both constantly fucked by a couple of guys who constantly bullied smaller kids. Funny thing is, it was a friend who messaged me and pointed this out.

Do fathers no longer teach their sons the basics in self-defense?
I can remember being 9 or 10 and my dad showing me some basic boxing/blocking moves and basic wrestling holds (he wrestled in college). Every rambunctious boy loves to learn that shit at that age.
I got taunted probably an average amount in school, which I just did my best to stoically ignore, but the minute it got physical, I *always* ended it then and there, to be thenceforth left alone.
"You have a right to self-defense," my dad used to say. (r.i.p.)
Can't argue with Natural Law.

When I hear mothers nowadays complain about "bullies" I just have to shake my head and wonder if there's a father in the picture.

An ineffectual father who is present is actually sadder than an absentee father.

---

Mothers raise boys.
Fathers raise men.

From what I understand, whenever a fight breaks out in school, all parties (regardless of retaliation, victory, whatever) get arrested.

Post: #20

Taking a page right out of 1984.

Somehow, men are in need of "re-education".

Room 101 comes to mind.

Post: #21

Quote:In fact, I'd say it's "Alpha" to protect those kids who are physically weaker, invite them to the gym, and in return see if they'll help you with your computer science project.

Hang out with a guy who has had his head flushed down a toilet a few times, treat him with respect, and you'll find a faithful friend forever.
--Henry Rollins, The Iron and the Soul.

Post: #22

(09-06-2015 10:32 PM)CRR Wrote:  However I think there are a lot of boys who are smaller (or hit puberty later) and are much more inclined to get picked on. All the self defense in the world won't help them against an aggressive bigger kid who knows how to fight.

All the more reason for sons to be taught some form of self-defense.
You'd be surprised how often the bigger kid doesn't actually know how to fight, and just backs off when the smaller kid raises too much of a stink in defense. I've seen it.
It's an old cliché, but has some truth to it: "It's not the size of the dog in the fight; it's the size of the fight in the dog."

Post: #23

(09-06-2015 10:27 AM)realologist Wrote:  

(09-06-2015 06:28 AM)Horus Wrote:  This friendly reminder will be placed in the toilets.



There will also be a lecture by this male feminist preaching the reasons he teaches his son to pee sitting down.

Why does it show the one sitting down to pee with a dick and balls?

Post-op trans.