Post: #1

I hate to have to be the one to post this, but here it is. It's not the Onion.

In Pikesville, Maryland a boy is being hit with a CRIMINAL charge (not a school charge, mind you) for giving a girl an unwanted kiss. He apparently did this on a dare from his friends.

If there was any doubt that the encroaching influence of radical feminists is criminalizing male sexuality, this story should put that doubt to rest. This type of thing was always handled within the schools. Now the cops are bring brought in.

Not only is this being covered locally (see here), but places like Reason.com have picked up on it. They're too oblivious -- or chickenshit -- to call this what it is, but what it is is your society on feminism. This is also a hot trending topic on Facebook.

From the news story: "School officials took a report regarding a 13-year-old boy who kissed a 14-year-old girl during school hours. The unwanted kiss was allegedly the result of a dare made by students.

Police confirm that the boy is now facing a second-degree assault charge as a juvenile. No one was injured during the incident, police say, and disciplinary actions related to suspension or expulsion will be handled by the school system."

"The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality" -- Heartiste

Post: #2

I think there should be more of this. The more they overreact on trivial ass shit, the better.

What judge in his right mind would be willing to see this case?
What prosecutor is willing to press charges?

Soon enough there will be checks in place to get rid of these useless idiots, seeing as how all the money they waste and lives they ruin will start piling up, society can't afford to let this bullshit go on for much longer.

edit;
Also, shouldn't his friends who made the dare all be arrested as well for organized crime, and since they did it as a group (gang), why not fire up the RICO act and get the FBI in this as well.
I'm serious, if you're going to pull this shit, go balls to the wall with it.
I remember back in the day this stupid shit wouldn't even rate a visit to the principal's office, it would just be high fives and giggles.

Post: #3

If one kindergartner pinches the other, how many years in prison should he get?

Post: #4

REASON has hit feminism pretty hard over the years. Cathy Young writes some excellent criticism of it.

Post: #5

Meanwhile Lena Dunham admits she sexually abused her sister to a deafening silence...

Post: #6

If this case isn't thrown out of court we know America needs some serious house cleaning. And if it does go to court and the jury does not vote innocent within 3 days of trial, then Maryland deserves to be taken over by Islam.

Post: #7

(09-11-2015 10:35 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  "The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality" -- Heartiste

Not quite, Heartiste. It's to "remove all constraints on female action while maximally restricting male action". It's a standard factional master-slave maneuver, sex will just be an inevitable part of it given that it's between two sexes.

Post: #8

(09-12-2015 01:17 AM)spokepoker Wrote:  I think there should be more of this. The more they overreact on trivial ass shit, the better.

I used to think this as well, but now I strongly disagree. The counter-reaction will never come. Humans are social animals and the more things like this happen, the more they accept it as normal. All that happens is the hegemony of SJW ideas becomes stronger.

What we need is to see reactionaries winning more battles, then people who are tired of this shit but feel it's hopeless to do anything will start to think it's a fight worth fighting. Which also means that we need to be fighting far smarter, and picking battles we can not just win, but win very publicly.

Post: #9

Just imagine that kid having to walk around his neighborhood letting his neighbors know they are living next to registered sex offender.

Post: #10

Very Orwellian, do the police and news stations reporting this know how stupid this sounds?

Goes back to the noticeable double standard, girl said she was assaulted by getting an unwanted kiss, police come to school and charge the 14 year old boy. Do we really think the police would show up if a boy was shoved into a locker because of a dare and was not injured (like the girl in the article)? At most would be sent to the principal's office.

Government schools- the gift that keeps giving

Post: #11

Now if the 13 year old boy was dared to kiss another boy, we would have a viral story plastered all over the news about how much progress we've made.

Post: #12

I hope the kid's family sues the school and the police for filing false charges, abuse of authority, and endangering the welfare of a minor.

The people perpetrating these evil Year Zero outrages deserve to be punished with extreme prejudice.

Post: #13

(09-12-2015 05:59 AM)bacon Wrote:  Just imagine that kid having to walk around his neighborhood letting his neighbors know they are living next to registered sex offender.

Just like the watering down of 'rape' this stupid shit will water down 'sex offender'. If a 13 year old came to my house to notify me of his sex offender status, which I would then google and it came up that he kissed a girl I'd go out of my way to talk to him and make sure my neighbors knew why he was a 'sex offender' as well.

Post: #14

(09-12-2015 09:34 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(09-12-2015 05:59 AM)bacon Wrote:  Just imagine that kid having to walk around his neighborhood letting his neighbors know they are living next to registered sex offender.

Just like the watering down of 'rape' this stupid shit will water down 'sex offender'. If a 13 year old came to my house to notify me of his sex offender status, which I would then google and it came up that he kissed a girl I'd go out of my way to talk to him and make sure my neighbors knew why he was a 'sex offender' as well.

Even if he is "convicted" of this evilly absurd "charge" he will not need to register as a sex offender. It's a second degree assault charge in juvenile court.

Regardless, in cases involving actual registered sex offenders most people have no way of knowing what the offender was convicted of. They will usually imagine that the dude whose mug they see plastered on street signs raped a 6 year old child, rather than (as the case may be) had the misfortune at 20 to consensually fuck a 17 year girl who looked 25.

Post: #15

(09-12-2015 09:46 AM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

(09-12-2015 09:34 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(09-12-2015 05:59 AM)bacon Wrote:  Just imagine that kid having to walk around his neighborhood letting his neighbors know they are living next to registered sex offender.

Just like the watering down of 'rape' this stupid shit will water down 'sex offender'. If a 13 year old came to my house to notify me of his sex offender status, which I would then google and it came up that he kissed a girl I'd go out of my way to talk to him and make sure my neighbors knew why he was a 'sex offender' as well.

Even if he is "convicted" of this evilly absurd "charge" he will not need to register as a sex offender. It's a second degree assault charge in juvenile court.

Regardless, in cases involving actual registered sex offenders most people have no way of knowing what the offender was convicted of. They will usually imagine that the dude whose mug they see plastered on street signs raped a 6 year old child, rather than (as the case may be) had the misfortune at 20 to consensually fuck a 17 year girl who looked 25.

I disagree, the state listings usually list the crime they were convicted of...pedos vs. sexual assault and then google has been helpful with the offenders living in my area. I always check that stuff out before I move...

Post: #16

But the crime they were convicted of is usually some very broad category, like "sexual assault". Without knowing the details of the crime, you really don't know very much. Statutory rape, for example, is also a subcategory of "sexual assault" so in my example above that's what the guy's crime would be listed as. You're right that it's possible to differentiate to some extent between convictions of different severity (although most people would never bother and just assume the worst that comes into their minds) but the categories are still so broad that they can encompass a wide variety of offenses.

Post: #17

This kind of reminds me of that popular story of Emmett Till, a black boy who whistled at a white woman (60 years ago as of a couple weeks ago) and was murdered for it.

Obviously race has nothing to do with this story, and this kid won't be killed as punishment, but it's like in certain ways we're going backwards in social progression. We're back to everyone wanting to lose their minds over the smallest of things.

Post: #18

This actually reminds me of my childhood, now that I think about it.

In kindergarten a girl took a liking to me and I was kissing her during recess in one of the play houses. One of the female assistants there brought me into a room with the female principal of the school. She then proceeded to scold me for what felt like twenty minutes about what I did was wrong, etc. etc. with all sorts of female doublespeak, and then had me apologize to the girl for kissing her and to tell her we couldn't kiss anymore.

That shit really fucked me up at a 5-years old, I was basically afraid to touch or kiss girls until I was in high school and even then my shyness and betaness was crippling.

I actually met this female principle who caused me so many problems at my grandfather's funeral last year. She had gained a lot of weight, but still had the huge tits and was wearing them on full display. She saw me and proceeded to give me a big sexual hug, then spoke with me and leaned over a chair with her tits hanging over it. Obviously I had no interest, I just kept polite and waited for her to leave. My brother watching me told me, "She was into you."

And then I thought about it, and as a five-year old this woman must have been shit-testing me for being a schoolyard alpha. Breaking me down back then was just the natural female reaction to shit-test any man, no matter their age, of their alphaness. She obviously had no idea how crushing it was on a child's ego.

Events like these lead me to conclude that no female should ever manage boys in school. Schools should be completely sex-segregated, and females should never hold any authority over males.

Post: #19

(09-12-2015 10:28 AM)Samseau Wrote:  This actually reminds me of my childhood, now that I think about it.

In kindergarten a girl took a liking to me and I was kissing her during recess in one of the play houses. One of the female assistants there brought me into a room with the female principal of the school. She then proceeded to scold me for what felt like twenty minutes about what I did was wrong, etc. etc. with all sorts of female doublespeak, and then had me apologize to the girl for kissing her and to tell her we couldn't kiss anymore.

Funny how the kissing was entirely your fault and not at all the girl's.

(09-12-2015 10:28 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Events like these lead me to conclude that no female should ever manage boys in school. Schools should be completely sex-segregated, and females should never hold any authority over males.

I disagree. If there were no girls around growing up, I would have lost my mind. Think about it, you would have too.

Post: #20

(09-12-2015 10:43 AM)Goldhawkstar Wrote:  

(09-12-2015 10:28 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Events like these lead me to conclude that no female should ever manage boys in school. Schools should be completely sex-segregated, and females should never hold any authority over males.

I disagree. If there were no girls around growing up, I would have lost my mind. Think about it, you would have too.

Not at all, we would have learned at 10x the rate and then have more free time to chase pussy without sitting in a stuffy classroom environment.

Frankly, the idea that men need schools to get access to pussy is BETA as hell. Why do you need the nanny state to give you pussy? Please it never works out that way in the long run as the nanny state always castrates men.

A good community could easily organize dances and such to help youths meet and find spouses. But all the current system gives is the hookup culture, which produces cat-ladies, single-moms, and beta-male incels by the masses. It's obviously a failed system.

Post: #21

That's all a good point, and honestly your opinion is probably more correct than mine, but think of it this way:

Remember when you grew up all the crushes you had in school. From preschool through the end of high school. Hell I remember my first crush started in preschool. Remember all the times you'd talk to a cute girl on the playground and got all nervous and shit. Now imagine that all didn't happen. It was just a 14-year sausage fest growing up. That just sounds depressing. It also sounds like an environment that will falsely lead boys and girls into thinking they're gay because that's the only environment they know.

You say that a good community can organize school dances, but many communities in America are not good communities. I had a handful of dances growing up, but most of them were sponsored or ran by the school and school officials. I don't know if they would have happened, or at least in the large amount, had there been sex-segregated schools.

I agree with the "castration of men" environment schools bring. Hell I remember playing 'House' with some girls in Kindergarten or 1st grade and kissing my 'wife' only to be yelled at by the playground supervisor. But growing up, most of your social life revolves around school. There aren't many opportunities outside of school to meet girls when you're growing up. For example, most sports are sex-segregated.

Maybe I'm over exaggerating. I'd love to hear from someone who grew up in a sex-segregated school.

Post: #22

(09-12-2015 10:54 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(09-12-2015 10:43 AM)Goldhawkstar Wrote:  

(09-12-2015 10:28 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Events like these lead me to conclude that no female should ever manage boys in school. Schools should be completely sex-segregated, and females should never hold any authority over males.

I disagree. If there were no girls around growing up, I would have lost my mind. Think about it, you would have too.

Not at all, we would have learned at 10x the rate and then have more free time to chase pussy without sitting in a stuffy classroom environment.

Frankly, the idea that men need schools to get access to pussy is BETA as hell. Why do you need the nanny state to give you pussy? Please it never works out that way in the long run as the nanny state always castrates men.

A good community could easily organize dances and such to help youths meet and find spouses. But all the current system gives is the hookup culture, which produces cat-ladies, single-moms, and beta-male incels by the masses. It's obviously a failed system.

I believe studies have shown that same gender learning environments are way better for both genders during early schooling. It's because there's less bias with teachers favoring one gender over another in class. Most teachers are female and we've already seen evidence they tend to gravitate more towards female students with their attention because the bias is that they are "easier" to handle than boys. People have said that this is the real reason why young boys lag girls in academic performance earlier in life.

Have male teachers teach boys and vice versa for girls.

Then the difference is completely reversed later in life when it matters the most in stem type fields and most other professional fields which require actual knowledge and skills that isn't humanities crap. This is when men naturally outperform women by a wide margin.

A good compromise would be to have a sex segregated learning environment at the same school but with a mixed social environment for joint activities. Of course something like this would immediately be shouted down by the SJWs/P.C. police for various reasons which is ironic because they are the ones constantly arguing for female only "safe" spaces everywhere else.

Post: #23

(09-12-2015 11:31 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  I believe studies have shown that same gender learning environments are way better for both genders during early schooling. It's because there's less bias with teachers favoring one gender over another in class. Most teachers are female and we've already seen evidence they tend to gravitate more towards female students with their attention because the bias is that they are "easier" to handle than boys. People have said that this is the real reason why young boys lag girls in academic performance earlier in life.

Have male teachers teach boys and vice versa for girls.

Not a bad idea, but there's already a shortage of men and a surplus of women in the job market for teaching (especially Elementary Ed). It would have to even itself out by paying men more which would cause an SJW feeding frenzy, but I get the point you're trying to make.

(09-12-2015 11:31 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  A good compromise would be to have a sex segregated learning environment at the same school but with a mixed social environment for joint activities. Of course something like this would immediately be shouted down by the SJWs/P.C. police for various reasons which is ironic because they are the ones constantly arguing for female only "safe" spaces everywhere else.

Separate normal classes by sex but combine for lunch, gym class, music classes, art, stuff like that. That's a good idea.

Post: #24

(09-12-2015 11:11 AM)Goldhawkstar Wrote:  That's all a good point, and honestly your opinion is probably more correct than mine, but think of it this way:

Remember when you grew up all the crushes you had in school. From preschool through the end of high school. Hell I remember my first crush started in preschool. Remember all the times you'd talk to a cute girl on the playground and got all nervous and shit. Now imagine that all didn't happen. It was just a 14-year sausage fest growing up. That just sounds depressing. It also sounds like an environment that will falsely lead boys and girls into thinking they're gay because that's the only environment they know.

You say that a good community can organize school dances, but many communities in America are not good communities. I had a handful of dances growing up, but most of them were sponsored or ran by the school and school officials. I don't know if they would have happened, or at least in the large amount, had there been sex-segregated schools.

I agree with the "castration of men" environment schools bring. Hell I remember playing 'House' with some girls in Kindergarten or 1st grade and kissing my 'wife' only to be yelled at by the playground supervisor. But growing up, most of your social life revolves around school. There aren't many opportunities outside of school to meet girls when you're growing up. For example, most sports are sex-segregated.

Maybe I'm over exaggerating. I'd love to hear from someone who grew up in a sex-segregated school.

Think both of you bring up good points. I went to a co-ed school up until 8th grade and an all-boy school from 8-12th grade, with a sister school on campus. The cafeteria (different building) was shared with the girl school, so could interact with girls in recess and lunch, and there were some occasional classes with girls like language and arts courses.

Despite some of the things I didn't like about my high school (what place is perfect?), I actually did get a good education, which is the point of school in the first place. Had very good teachers and maybe only 10-20% of my classes were boring and useless. The rest I actually enjoyed being there and learned applicable material that could be used in the real world. It was an environment that catered to masculinity, with little feminist brainwashing and an environment that didn't create pussified manginas. We could get in fights and give each other shit as all of us knew that the principal's and teachers wouldn't do anything over arbitrary things. Sure, there were some annoyances like a few leftist teachers but we could always share our opinions and have discourse without being burned at the stake.

My transition to public, state university was a shock as most of my classes were entirely pointless and pure leftist indoctrination. I literally didn't know what feminism was until I went to college as I never had to hear that bullshit in high school and the girls I previously was around came from intact families and were not babbling about women's rights and white male privilege constantly. I at least had a strong foundation not to buy into this garbage but it was then that I knew something bigger was going on with these universities.

I definitely got more experience with women in college and was a much easier environment to develop my game, but I am thankful about my early years as I learned masculine virtues, played a lot of sports, and was in a environment where men could be men. Maybe you get access to more pussy in co-ed schools, but you won't see your friend getting arrested for kissing a girl as a prank.

Post: #25

Jesus Christ, I am so glad that I recently accepted a position in a school system adjacent to Pikesville. It's in a more traditional and conservative area, but if this lunacy travels thirty miles, my time in Maryland may extend only the length of my employment contract. This coming week could be very telling in my ability to tolerate the region's "values."