Post: #26

I like him - I listened to his interview with Joe Rogan in full:





I agree with him on many points. Some of the points:

+ he doesn't hate being gay, actually loves it, was never abused, but admits that it's a pain in the ass
+ he doesn't like gay marriage, because it's a stupid idea for 2 people who cannot procreate
+ also he does not support the gay lobby and the government supporting gay parades and LGBT projects with tax money
+ he is highly intelligent and well connected having worked for interesting NGOs - for example falsifying climate change data for one to fit the global warming scam - that's why he does not believe in it - also there is plenty of actual researching debunking the whole crap
+ he is not an MRA, but he acknowledges the need for legal change
+ he can say and talk for men like a 'sphere guy on TV just because he is gay - if he were straight, then he would be attacked like Roosh
+ he acknowledges the fact that gays are coddled by the stupid media and can get away with murder - if he said everything and more that Roosh did, then no feminist whatsoever would attack him like during the incidences in Canada
+ also he discloses the hypocrisy of the media also blowing up Joe Rogan in that respect - for example Milo correctly stated that if you are attracted to a 15 or 16 year old girl, then that does not make you a pedophile (at which Rogan claimed that this is preposterous and 16 year old girls are children - yeah right). Because when you were 16 you were attracted to a sexually mature post-puberty girl and that is absolutely alright. However being attracted to a pre-puberty not sexually mature girl is where the crap begins and pedophilia starts.
The reason I mention that particular point is because you will see in the next years a push towards pedophilia - at first they will just lower the age of consent to 17, 16 or 15. It is something that many people will be on board with - it is similar to making homosexuality legal and not some kind of punishable offense (like in the times of Oscar Wilde throwing a literary genius to prison and ruining him). But you see the problem with the global social programmers is that they won't stop there. When they made homosexuality legal and let everyone be whatever they wanted they turned on the heat and pushed further PROMOTING IT, making it appear superior and something that everyone should try - even worse, if you just expressed disgust, then this would be homophobia and punishable by firing you instantly through a SJW mob and public outcry.
In terms of the age of consent, they will at first lower it to levels which are normal for the human race - when you are sexually mature, then it should be legal to fuck people older than you. Female teachers will always find some 16 year old manly boys who they find attractive and it will be the same for male teachers.

BUT - HERE IS THE TRICK they apply - when they are done doing the legitimate parts, then they are going to push further into the craziness - pre-puberty sex and sex with children as a sexual choice - pedophiles are just born that way. I have also heard of the UN's "right of the child" - one of the rights is the right for sex. So a 6 year old can have sex with the nice man just because little Suzy feels that it's nice. The very same Suzy also decides in our crazy system that God did an error and she should have been a Tom - so a gender operation is initiated.

Milo also talks about pedophilia and the coming push in that respect - next is pedophilia, incest, necrophilia, bestiality etc. Society has to become completely degenerate. And even then I think that they will push on forward - snuff, cannibalism, killing during sex etc. - why hold back? Serial killers have just been born that way - they should be free to express their urge finding people who want to commit suicide - that way both parties' desires can be met.

Post: #27

(10-05-2015 08:45 AM)Stay Wrote:  I like him. Hating gay marriage is one thing having a genuine hatred for gay people is another and there's probably a reason it's producing such a powerful reaction within you e.g. abused by a male as a child, suppressed desires and so on.

Most obsessive homophobe I knew growing up turned out to have a massive shemale fetish.

"If you hate gay people you're secretly gay yourself" was a silencing tactic created by the Radical Lesbian Feminists within the GBLT lobby in the 70's designed to shut down discourse and both delegitimise the speaker and stigmatise them as having some kind of psychological condition.

Related would be the internalisation argument: If you criticised gay culture or affected femininity in any way, you'd have internalised homophobia.

As such, the gay community was now immune from criticism from both within and without, and its eventual triumph was assured.

Of course, although there's never been any non-biased research to support this, though, as expected, this belief was seeded through PC entertainment media to be accepted as fact - see a film like American Beauty.

Since this tactic was so successful, it's always used to silence dissent in other Leftist causes. Female Gamergaters were shut down by Feminists with accusations of 'internalised misogyny'. The 'Uncle Tom' argument - bizarrely used by white hipsters against African Americans - is basically a form of 'internalised racism', where they hate their own race.

Every time, the idea is to label the critic against abnormal behaviour as stigmatised. They're the one with the psychological issue, which then strengthens the accuser's position of being psychologically sound.

I can't believe it ever worked to the degree it does, but, well it does. It's a tactic that needs to be weaponised by those on the right - 'cuckservative' is a good start - but it's made more difficult because Radical Leftists are incapable of being personally-shamed. Note the recent Twitter hashtag pushes to 'de-shame' Slutdom, Abortions and Anti-Depressant Medication Dependence and you'll see the weak points they're trying to shield.

Post: #28

I don't think I'd heard of him until I read his Forward to Vox Day's "SJWs Always Lie". He impressed me with it.

Post: #29

(10-05-2015 03:32 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Milo also talks about pedophilia and the coming push in that respect - next is pedophilia, incest, necrophilia, bestiality etc. Society has to become completely degenerate. And even then I think that they will push on forward - snuff, cannibalism, killing during sex etc. - why hold back? Serial killers have just been born that way - they should be free to express their urge finding people who want to commit suicide - that way both parties' desires can be met.

Come on, it's getting ridiculous here. This is a great example of a slippery slope fallacy.

The step from gay marriage to pedophilia, necrophilia and bestiality is much greater than some here think it is. In terms of morality, it's a totally different dimension. I know many hardcore SJWs personally and even they would never support that shit.

Post: #30

(10-05-2015 07:05 PM)Flint Wrote:  

(10-05-2015 03:32 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Milo also talks about pedophilia and the coming push in that respect - next is pedophilia, incest, necrophilia, bestiality etc. Society has to become completely degenerate. And even then I think that they will push on forward - snuff, cannibalism, killing during sex etc. - why hold back? Serial killers have just been born that way - they should be free to express their urge finding people who want to commit suicide - that way both parties' desires can be met.

Come on, it's getting ridiculous here. This is a great example of a slippery slope fallacy.

The step from gay marriage to pedophilia, necrophilia and bestiality is much greater than some here think it is. In terms of morality, it's a totally different dimension. I know many hardcore SJWs personally and even they would never support that shit.

Post: #31

(10-05-2015 07:05 PM)Flint Wrote:  

(10-05-2015 03:32 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Milo also talks about pedophilia and the coming push in that respect - next is pedophilia, incest, necrophilia, bestiality etc. Society has to become completely degenerate. And even then I think that they will push on forward - snuff, cannibalism, killing during sex etc. - why hold back? Serial killers have just been born that way - they should be free to express their urge finding people who want to commit suicide - that way both parties' desires can be met.

Come on, it's getting ridiculous here. This is a great example of a slippery slope fallacy.

The step from gay marriage to pedophilia, necrophilia and bestiality is much greater than some here think it is. In terms of morality, it's a totally different dimension. I know many hardcore SJWs personally and even they would never support that shit.

Of course not - SJWs are brainless sheep who get updated with the current dogma or at best run a bit forward with it - trans-deer, trans-black etc.

But I have read enough books and excerpts by the real social planners of our world to know what they plan and how they intend to go. They definitely want to go to pedophilia, bestiality and necrophilia - whether snuff stuff will be added remains to be seen. I am sure that some of the very elite is into that sort of thing - ultimate power, not having any taboos that's all part of their life - fucking beautiful women is not really a challenge when you are born into infinite wealth. We will see how far that thing goes.

About pedophilia I am 100% certain - whether we will see snuff in 60 years - who knows, but I would not be surprised. And whether the elite actually manages to implement the next steps and make pedophilia to age zero as acceptable as the gender crap - we will see as well. SJWs are not the guideline here - it's the elite and their mental patterns.

Post: #32

(10-05-2015 07:05 PM)Flint Wrote:  Come on, it's getting ridiculous here. This is a great example of a slippery slope fallacy.

The step from gay marriage to pedophilia, necrophilia and bestiality is much greater than some here think it is. In terms of morality, it's a totally different dimension. I know many hardcore SJWs personally and even they would never support that shit.

Nope. The slippery slope is real. When planning subversion, you discount attempts to subvert ideology - they tend to be ineffective - and go for the two pillars that are easily subverted: institutions and morals.

When a generation has been taught there are no objective moral truths, anything becomes permissible. Over the last year, I've seen multiple articles about beastiality, incest, pedophilia and necrophilia on multiple progressive media sides presented as rational 'we need to have this discussion' articles.

The comment sections chill me to the bone. The Millennial generation - particularly the middle class tech and media sectors - can't seem to understand there are objective moral truths. The discussion over Salon's recent Pedophilia normalisation pieces - one of many, many that have been floated in mainstream media over the last 18 months, was rational and without emotion - abuse survivors were deliberately blocked from speaking. It's happening now, whether you chose to believe it or not.

It's so obviously-different to traditional moral thinking - it seems like someone is deliberately-programming them to be morally broken - I wondered if anyone else had noticed.

Why Our Children Don't Think There Are Moral Facts

Quote:In summary, our public schools teach students that all claims are either facts or opinions and that all value and moral claims fall into the latter camp. The punchline: there are no moral facts. And if there are no moral facts, then there are no moral truths.

If It Feels Right....

Quote: When asked about wrong or evil, they could generally agree that rape and murder are wrong. But, aside from these extreme cases, moral thinking didn’t enter the picture, even when considering things like drunken driving, cheating in school or cheating on a partner. “I don’t really deal with right and wrong that often,” is how one interviewee put it.

The default position, which most of them came back to again and again, is that moral choices are just a matter of individual taste. “It’s personal,” the respondents typically said. “It’s up to the individual. Who am I to say?”

Rejecting blind deference to authority, many of the young people have gone off to the other extreme: “I would do what I thought made me happy or how I felt. I have no other way of knowing what to do but how I internally feel.”

Many were quick to talk about their moral feelings but hesitant to link these feelings to any broader thinking about a shared moral framework or obligation. As one put it, “I mean, I guess what makes something right is how I feel about it. But different people feel different ways, so I couldn’t speak on behalf of anyone else as to what’s right and wrong.”

Slate knows how threatening this type of thinking is to the Narrative, so went in full out attack mode, offering evidence of fuddy-duddy minds that just aren't progressive, like this:

Quote:The psychologists Geoffrey Goodwin and John Darley have found that more objectivist moral thinkers tend to be more closed-minded. When confronted with a disagreement, they’re not inclined to understand the other person’s point of view.

From experience, I find subjective moral relativists - like SJW's - are always open-minded, ready-to-discuss and politely-debate alternative points of view.

This is a huge problem in modern theology: the church is struggling to recruit millennials and again and again I see them saying the moment any statement strike a young person as 'churchy' - ie. preachy, moral absolutist - they shut down.

I'm starting to root for the Muslims.

Post: #33

Bump. I used to think Milo was annoying but since Joe Rogan I've become a big fan.

Side note: this compilation below is a great watch for guys who don't have cool hair. Milo's hair looks GREAT while on Joe Rogan, but look at some of the older clips in the OP where he has the black teenage angst look going on. Terrible. I had to go through a similar trial-and-error and now I have glorious hair.

Quote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yt5erv9861E

Best Milo Yiannopoulos Quotes Ever - Milo Yiannopoulos Quote Compliation

This video below was interesting because despite all the typical hamsterization one of the men brought up how the leading cause of death for men under 45 in the UK is suicide. That blows my mind.

Post: #34

I don't like having anything to do with gay dudes, but I feel like a a lot of posters are true anti gay hardliners. Do you guys believe that there is a genetic component to homosexuality?

edit:
Love Milo and like the way he conducts arguments with fem nazi fanatics. Drops knowledge and hits 'em with the machine gun rapid fire verbal assault that is more commonly possessed by profoundly ignorant people. Sometimes he needs to pump the breaks though. He was pretty annoying on the Rogan interview, he should chill out a bit when he's talking to someone who can actually have an engaging conversation. I respect the dude though, he's sharp.

Post: #35

I almost had to stop listening to the Joe Rogan podcast because he was getting so deep into the cliche 'Religion is stupid' + 'Jewish Zombie' etc. nonsense. As he was saying this, Milo made a fantastic rebuttal. Joe seems to be deep into the camp in a lot of these issues, but he still has a good program overall.

Milo is a talented writer, and quite bright too. I could stand to hear a little less of the outrageous gay sex stories on audio, but overall he is a welcome and refreshing personality.

Post: #36

(10-05-2015 06:46 AM)Speculation Wrote:  To be honest I don't get the hate against all gays when some of them are such great allies. I understand the subversion of children and the agenda to destroy the nuclear family are issues, but I don't think all gays pose a threat.

I think most people here are willing to tolerate people having gay relationships even if they personally find it distasteful. What people find objectionable isn't so much the gay act itself but the political and cultural movement that demands that you not only tolerate the act but that you must condone it against your own conscience and if refused results in you being metaphorically locked to the stocks and pelted with abuse until you submit to the mob.

As for Milo, I'm a pretty big fan. He's been with Gamergate since the beginning and has done a lot of work to combat the SJW hordes which is already a fine deed but he's mixed in a lot of amusing trolling so that's just icing on the cake.

Post: #37

(10-05-2015 04:39 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  "If you hate gay people you're secretly gay yourself" was a silencing tactic created by the Radical Lesbian Feminists within the GBLT lobby in the 70's designed to shut down discourse and both delegitimise the speaker and stigmatise them as having some kind of psychological condition.

That's a big issue with the media these days - the relatively few anti-gay politicians that the liberal media have gleefully latched on to once their secret gay affairs became public pretty well solidified that silencing tactic into reality. Were these self-loathing closet homos outliers? Absolutely. But they became the norm since an accusation of being homosexual, however unfounded, remains an accusation. It's power is not to bring facts to light, but to cast aspersions.

Post: #38

Saw that an article trending on Facebook about Milo being banned from an university debate...on censorship

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...ensorship/

Post: #39

(10-08-2015 01:49 AM)Wutang Wrote:  Saw that an article trending on Facebook about Milo being banned from an university debate...on censorship

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...ensorship/

So spread that irony around....

Not just to RVF. We're all on the same page...

Post: #40

@Nero
I have written a huge essay about the coming war between feminists and gays. Coming shortly.

@Nero
After starting a war with gamers—and losing—feminists are now coming after gays. I don’t think they realise what’s about to happen.

@Nero
Oh, feminists… if you thought the gamers were bad, wait until you get a load of the GAYS

Silly, silly girls

Post: #41

Dear Fag Hags: I Want a Divorce

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...a-divorce/

by Milo Yiannopoulos 14 Oct 2015

' Feminism’s growing distaste for gay men has been apparent for some time. In 2010, Rose McGowan went on a long rant against one of
Britain’s most prominent gay celebrities, Stephen Fry. Accusing male homosexuals of failing to “extend a hand to women,” the
actress said: “Gay men are as misogynistic as straight men, if not more so.” British feminist Laurie Penny similarly accused Fry of failing
to show “solidarity in the face of a heteronormative patriarchy that oppresses us all.”

The storm of accusations against Fry came after he stated a fact: that women don’t have the same appetite for sex as men. It was a typically
idiotic backlash against a man who had the audacity to state a fact about women in public. Fry and I don’t always see eye-to-eye but on
that one he was right. But beyond the transient controversy, the charge that gay men are more misogynistic than straights in sticking, at least
in batty far-Left circles.

I’ve seen this myself. I’ve lost count of the number of times a mad feminist has made the claim, often implicitly to avoid allegation is of
homophobia, that my attraction to men over women is somehow a sign of misogyny. Yeah, okay love, I think to myself. I’m such a
woman-hater I actually started sleeping with men. This is how bonkers modern feminism can be.

Thinking about it… even if you’re right and I’m gay because women are awful, you’ve sort of proved my point for me, haven’t you? '
--------------

Let the entertainment begin.

Post: #42

Whoops... :

@ivangluscic
As a straight, white male, I never thought a gay guy would be my general in the culture war. And yet, @Nero, you have my sword... wait...

Post: #43

(10-14-2015 08:03 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Whoops... :

@ivangluscic
As a straight, white male, I never thought a gay guy would be my general in the culture war. And yet, @Nero, you have my sword... wait...

I'm more curious. Would you still be a cynical contrarian if you are a part of RVF?

Post: #44

(10-14-2015 12:53 PM)hwuzhere Wrote:  I'm more curious. Would you still be a cynical contrarian if you are a part of RVF?

What can I say, brah. I march to the beat of my own drum.
Yet the cynical / contrarian reference is not supposed to be about red-pill / game theory.
More-so to do with the Idiocracy we all live in at the moment.

So with faggy Milo making a fuss about foolish feminists.
While those two bitchy factions go at it.
I get to sit on the side lines with popcorn & chuckle at the entertainment.

Post: #45

That microphone.

Post: #46

^^^that woman at the 30 second mark claims to be in a lot of magazines. Senility Awareness, AARP? She might be holding together well for 60 but she needs to learn not to open her mouth. Just sounds like she would be a trainwreck.

Post: #47

When some of you guys started to make the case that there is some secret pro necrophilia agenda out there, that's when I realized this thread went off the rails and quit reading...

Post: #48

(10-15-2015 11:02 AM)bacan Wrote:  When some of you guys started to make the case that there is some secret pro necrophilia agenda out there, that's when I realized this thread went off the rails and quit reading...

You can start reading again - the push is on:

http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/the-littl...ource=mbfb

Quote:The Little Death: Living and Loving as a Necrophiliac
October 27, 2015

Every sexual morality has to go.

Also I might add - the social planners work in cycles testing the water for blowback. If they see that too many people resist pedophilia (inter-generational sex as they call it now), then they put it on hold for a few years or even a decade, then they start again after the new generation has been brainwashed better and families are more destroyed. I guess the Muslim population brought into the West will change the dynamic too in that respect as pedophilia and bestiality are no biggies for some of them. (Of course for everyone except their daughters.)

Post: #49

(10-27-2015 11:52 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(10-15-2015 11:02 AM)bacan Wrote:  When some of you guys started to make the case that there is some secret pro necrophilia agenda out there, that's when I realized this thread went off the rails and quit reading...

Every sexual morality has to go.

Also I might add - the social planners work in cycles testing the water for blowback. If they see that too many people resist pedophilia (inter-generational sex as they call it now), then they put it on hold for a few years or even a decade, then they start again after the new generation has been brainwashed better and families are more destroyed. I guess the Muslim population brought into the West will change the dynamic too in that respect as pedophilia and bestiality are no biggies for some of them. (Of course for everyone except their daughters.)

Do you have evidence to back up these specific claims? I see a lot of claims like this and they are never verifiable.

Post: #50

(10-05-2015 03:32 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  + he doesn't hate being gay, actually loves it, was never abused, but admits that it's a pain in the ass.

Well, that sort of comes with the territory.