philosophical_recovery
International Playboy
     
Posts: 3,554
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 66
|
|
| 05-12-2016 11:08 PM |
|
The following 5 users Like philosophical_recovery's post:5 users Like philosophical_recovery's post
NASA Test Pilot, Tactician, debeguiled, Scesci, Gideon Griffin
|
Alsos
Chubby Chaser
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation: 8
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
Basic stuff?
I, Pencil is useful.
As is "Political Economy for Beginners" by Millicent Garrett Fawcett - written as a primer for high schoolers in the 1860s. On the one hand it's a little dated, on the other hand, it's solid on the fundamentals and isn't polluted by Marxism or subsequent junk economics. If you had the usual macro/micro in high school and/or college, her approach will seem totally different, like learning a language via immersion instead of memorizing phrases without learning the grammar or vocabulary.
"Economics in One Lesson" gets a lot of respectable recommendations, but it didn't stick in my mind at all. I'd just read Bastiat's "The Law", which covers much of the same ground, so that could be why. Bastiat's feisty. More fun to read. You'd benefit from either, really.
I'm drawn to the philosophy of economics more than the mechanics. "The Road to Serfdom" is a worthwhile read, and there are a number of economic histories like "Forgotten Man" and "Empire of Wealth" that are instructive.
(This post was last modified: 05-12-2016 11:48 PM by Alsos.)
|
|
| 05-12-2016 11:43 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Alsos's post:1 user Likes Alsos's post
Scesci
|
The Beast1
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 6,414
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 74
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
I like Martin's blog and his analysis on cycles. However, his attempts to predict what will happen later on because of said cycles tend to be way off.
You only only really predict the cause of a cycle as it gets closer to the eventual day they're supposed to hit. The best analogy I have is an earth quake. The actual quake is the event, but the forces of pressure building up unseen are the cycle. Swap these out for economics, trust, capital flows, etc and the outcome changes to the real world. Fun fact: this is what astrology is.
Cycles are like road signs saying "NYC Ahead 5 miles". You know a city is there but not exactly what is in it. A turning point will tell you something will happen that day, but not exactly what nor the outcomes of it later on.
Between that, acting like an "I told you so Oracle" , and then write blog posts with 2nd grade grammar mistakes his blog gets a little hard to handle. Not to mention the constant, "My info is free to use! Oh read my 2016 Metals Report for 250$"
He sometimes reminds me of those penny stock guys who make people sign up to get their "stock alerts". Except he charges way more with the added, "I was jailed because my ideas are too dangerous" spiel.
Take it with a grain of salt.
|
|
| 05-13-2016 01:12 AM |
|
The following 1 user Likes The Beast1's post:1 user Likes The Beast1's post
Scesci
|
Easy_C
True Player
    
Posts: 2,064
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 16
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
(05-13-2016 01:12 AM)The Beast1 Wrote: I like Martin's blog and his analysis on cycles. However, his attempts to predict what will happen later on because of said cycles tend to be way off.
You only only really predict the cause of a cycle as it gets closer to the eventual day they're supposed to hit. The best analogy I have is an earth quake. The actual quake is the event, but the forces of pressure building up unseen are the cycle. Swap these out for economics, trust, capital flows, etc and the outcome changes to the real world. Fun fact: this is what astrology is.
Cycles are like road signs saying "NYC Ahead 5 miles". You know a city is there but not exactly what is in it. A turning point will tell you something will happen that day, but not exactly what nor the outcomes of it later on.
Between that, acting like an "I told you so Oracle" , and then write blog posts with 2nd grade grammar mistakes his blog gets a little hard to handle. Not to mention the constant, "My info is free to use! Oh read my 2016 Metals Report for 250$"
He sometimes reminds me of those penny stock guys who make people sign up to get their "stock alerts". Except he charges way more with the added, "I was jailed because my ideas are too dangerous" spiel.
Take it with a grain of salt.
Except the guy's not entirely kidding, he does have a lot of high level connections. To me he's more interesting for that as he is for his forecasting. Interestingly enough his political forecasts tend to be off, but his market forecasts are not. He correctly called the drop in gold, and in January was calling for the stock market to rebound strongly around the mid April timeframe.
He wasn't jailed because his ideas were too dangerous. It's not entirely clear why, but it stemmed from some shadiness regarding HSBC, Goldman Sachs, and Edmond Saffra.
If you want good trading ideas he's a goldmine...and it's worth noting that Socrates is far more useful than his blog is.
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2016 04:25 PM by Easy_C.)
|
|
| 05-13-2016 04:23 PM |
|
The following 2 users Like Easy_C's post:2 users Like Easy_C's post
Scesci, thoughtgypsy
|
The Beast1
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 6,414
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 74
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
(05-13-2016 04:23 PM)Easy_C Wrote: (05-13-2016 01:12 AM)The Beast1 Wrote: I like Martin's blog and his analysis on cycles. However, his attempts to predict what will happen later on because of said cycles tend to be way off.
You only only really predict the cause of a cycle as it gets closer to the eventual day they're supposed to hit. The best analogy I have is an earth quake. The actual quake is the event, but the forces of pressure building up unseen are the cycle. Swap these out for economics, trust, capital flows, etc and the outcome changes to the real world. Fun fact: this is what astrology is.
Cycles are like road signs saying "NYC Ahead 5 miles". You know a city is there but not exactly what is in it. A turning point will tell you something will happen that day, but not exactly what nor the outcomes of it later on.
Between that, acting like an "I told you so Oracle" , and then write blog posts with 2nd grade grammar mistakes his blog gets a little hard to handle. Not to mention the constant, "My info is free to use! Oh read my 2016 Metals Report for 250$"
He sometimes reminds me of those penny stock guys who make people sign up to get their "stock alerts". Except he charges way more with the added, "I was jailed because my ideas are too dangerous" spiel.
Take it with a grain of salt.
Except the guy's not entirely kidding, he does have a lot of high level connections. To me he's more interesting for that as he is for his forecasting. Interestingly enough his political forecasts tend to be off, but his market forecasts are not. He correctly called the drop in gold, and in January was calling for the stock market to rebound strongly around the mid April timeframe.
He wasn't jailed because his ideas were too dangerous. It's not entirely clear why, but it stemmed from some shadiness regarding HSBC, Goldman Sachs, and Edmond Saffra.
If you want good trading ideas he's a goldmine...and it's worth noting that Socrates is far more useful than his blog is.
I know and i can definitely see that. The annoying part though is all of the good info is locked up behind a paywall and the half baked political stuff is out for all to see. A man's allowed to make money, but it just comes off poorly when he says, "this stuff is free for all to use and seek out!" Not quite.
I'm still waiting for the trader level service which was supposed to be out in Q1. We're well into Q2 now with him peddling his 2k$ conference tickets.
Easy, have you attended his conferences? What were they like if you did? Care to share some of what Socarates trader level can really do?
(This post was last modified: 05-14-2016 05:18 AM by The Beast1.)
|
|
| 05-14-2016 04:49 AM |
|
The following 1 user Likes The Beast1's post:1 user Likes The Beast1's post
Scesci
|
NASA Test Pilot
Banned
Posts: 310
Joined: Dec 2015
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
|
|
| 05-15-2016 01:51 AM |
|
The following 4 users Like NASA Test Pilot's post:4 users Like NASA Test Pilot's post
amity, Seth_Rose, Gideon Griffin, TooFineAPoint
|
Peregrine
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,422
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 33
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
|
|
| 05-16-2016 10:02 PM |
|
The following 2 users Like Peregrine's post:2 users Like Peregrine's post
LeBeau, debeguiled
|
ovloV
Banned
Posts: 50
Joined: Mar 2016
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
(05-18-2016 01:38 PM)mpr Wrote: (05-18-2016 09:53 AM)Easy_C Wrote: Well, be careful with that. I've taken Macro Economics as a mandatory course. It's helpful because it helps you understand the terminology and ideas people refer to but I challenge you to find any of the theories or models they teach that actually work the way they expect it to in the real world.
That seems like a pretty bold statement. You don't think that the basic macroeconomic: supply/demand/price/output model works in real life? I've found macroeconomic models very useful to supplement my training in finance, and they helped me predict movements in prices that I probably otherwise would have missed. As well as understand the environment that companies were operating in. Of course no model can work perfectly in all real world circumstances. You have to understand the model you're using, the limits of it's predictive power, and in what circumstances you should use it.
A lot of this depends on the institution you go to. Some schools go very light on the math with their econ students, and as such, you get some worthless theories.
This leads to me to an important point to make: economics is very math intensive. Be wary of anything that tries to teach economics without the use of lots of math. Things that are boiled down to seemingly accurate statements without empirical methods to back them up should be scrutinized heavily. It's why Austrian Economics is not mainstream in academia. Everything they say sounds nice, but unless you can prove it mathematically, be skeptical.
|
|
| 05-18-2016 03:30 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes ovloV's post:1 user Likes ovloV's post
mpr
|
Gideon Griffin
Male Feminist
Posts: 8
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 1
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
I second the recommendation for the Austrian school, expressed above with a recommendation for Mises.org, the works of Murray Rothbard, and others.
However, for the layman, this may be a bit overwhelming. It leaves one with a "holy cow, where do I start?" sort of feeling.
I suggest that first, you start with this short video, "Fear the Boom and Bust" a Hayek vs. Keynes Rap Anthem.
I can feel you experienced scholars cringing at the very idea. But hear me... or rather IT out. The producers did a remarkable job at highlighting the differences between Keynsian vs Austrian thought:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0nERTFo-Sk
Second, pick up a copy of "Economics for Real People: An Introduction to the Austrian School" by Gene Callahan.
It's fairly short (about 350 pages), well written, and interesting.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1479220809
Once you get through these, you'll have a better grasp of real economics than most College graduates, and can then decide which of the more challenging tomes piques your interest.
|
|
| 05-19-2016 02:25 PM |
|
|
WeekendCasanova
Chubby Chaser
Posts: 589
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 40
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
(05-19-2016 02:25 PM)Gideon Griffin Wrote: I second the recommendation for the Austrian school, expressed above with a recommendation for Mises.org, the works of Murray Rothbard, and others.
However, for the layman, this may be a bit overwhelming. It leaves one with a "holy cow, where do I start?" sort of feeling.
I suggest that first, you start with this short video, "Fear the Boom and Bust" a Hayek vs. Keynes Rap Anthem.
I can feel you experienced scholars cringing at the very idea. But hear me... or rather IT out. The producers did a remarkable job at highlighting the differences between Keynsian vs Austrian thought:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0nERTFo-Sk
Second, pick up a copy of "Economics for Real People: An Introduction to the Austrian School" by Gene Callahan.
It's fairly short (about 350 pages), well written, and interesting.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1479220809
Once you get through these, you'll have a better grasp of real economics than most College graduates, and can then decide which of the more challenging tomes piques your interest.
Reading on the Austrian school is required reading in third year for most economics student, and your claim that reading the above will leave you with a better grasp of real economics than most college graduates is delusional. It's pure conjecture.
I'd also like to add that Keynsian theory is pretty much completely discredited in Universities right now. It's taught as an example of how things can go wrong when theories don't adapt and change as fast as economies change.
I full recommend reading any book you can on economics. Research different views - never pick just one. Even the Austrian school had its flaws, which is what makes economics so interesting.
Blog - Jacques de Seingalt
Twitter
|
|
| 05-19-2016 02:32 PM |
|
|
Gideon Griffin
Male Feminist
Posts: 8
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 1
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
(05-19-2016 02:32 PM)WeekendCasanova Wrote: Reading on the Austrian school is required reading in third year for most economics student, and your claim that reading the above will leave you with a better grasp of real economics than most college graduates is delusional. It's pure conjecture.
While I don't want to get stuck on that particular claim, I would, as evidence, point to all the Bernie Sanders supporters.
Most college graduates do not have a grasp of economics, and it is better for the continued functioning of the system that they do not. How else are they to encourage their own sons and daughters to assume massive debt for worthless degrees?
And yes, it's better to read more than less. However, one should learn the truth first. Which is why I stand by my recommendation for the Austrian School, introduced by Callahan's book.
Afterward, read "The Worldly Philosphers" by Robert Heilbroner. It won't help your understanding of economics, but it will introduce you to the authors that have shaped economic thought over the last several centuries.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/068486214X
|
|
| 05-19-2016 02:51 PM |
|
|
WeekendCasanova
Chubby Chaser
Posts: 589
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 40
|
RE: Decent Resources on Economics?
(05-19-2016 02:51 PM)Gideon Griffin Wrote: (05-19-2016 02:32 PM)WeekendCasanova Wrote: Reading on the Austrian school is required reading in third year for most economics student, and your claim that reading the above will leave you with a better grasp of real economics than most college graduates is delusional. It's pure conjecture.
While I don't want to get stuck on that particular claim, I would, as evidence, point to all the Bernie Sanders supporters.
Most college graduates do not have a grasp of economics, and it is better for the continued functioning of the system that they do not. How else are they to encourage their own sons and daughters to assume massive debt for worthless degrees?
And yes, it's better to read more than less. However, one should learn the truth first. Which is why I stand by my recommendation for the Austrian School, introduced by Callahan's book.
Afterward, read "The Worldly Philosphers" by Robert Heilbroner. It won't help your understanding of economics, but it will introduce you to the authors that have shaped economic thought over the last several centuries.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/068486214X
I don't know why you would say 'college grads' then, as this is an economics thread. The average college student takes maybe one economics course in their entire life. Read a book on psychology and you'll know more than the average college grad; it's not a spectacular feat.
I assumed that by college grad you meant economics major; which you clearly didn't. My bad!
- WC
Blog - Jacques de Seingalt
Twitter
|
|
| 05-19-2016 02:54 PM |
|
|