Post: #1

I'm surprised there isn't a thread on this. BLM shut down an event Milo was speaking at and threatened him on stage. Even more shocking is that Breitbart paid $1,000 for extra Chicago police security that weren't present when the event started, and refused to do anything once they showed up.

What I don't understand is that after it was clear that the police were refusing to do their jobs, why didn't Milo supporters storm the stage and start throwing fists? It would have either forced the police to act or the crowd would have taken care of the problem themselves. I don't know how anyone could sit though 5 minutes of that shit. Especially once they knew that police weren't going to do anything.

At least the whole thing is on video. Also the name of the ringleader is publicly available. So if the university refuses to do the right thing and expel these students hopefully someone can catch up with the main two protestors and dish out some street justice.

Post: #2

What's BLM?

Milo, despite his love of sucking dicks, is doing yeoman's work. He's so gay and so red pill and so libertarian-conservative-traditional and so anti-feminist and anti-SJW.

Post: #3

Dupe...

/thread-50871-page-14.html

Post: #4

(05-26-2016 09:59 AM)mpr Wrote:  What I don't understand is that after it was clear that the police were refusing to do their jobs, why didn't Milo supporters storm the stage and start throwing fists? It would have either forced the police to act or the crowd would have taken care of the problem themselves.

No. No. No. This is definitely not the approach you take in public and it would be a disaster for Milo and conservative supporters. You don't take it on the chin like a cuck but you force their hand first to make them look like the thug trash that they are.

What Milo did was correct. He sat there, mocked them, and commented on their every action and made it a matter of public record. If you do take action go the legal or financial route and tool them up hard that way.

Then let the public decide on who's right or wrong and if you look at DePaul's facebook page which is getting hammered right now with thousands of 1 star reviews and horrible media publicity it's obvious who won this skirmish.

Post: #5

(05-26-2016 11:18 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  What Milo did was correct. He sat there, mocked them, and commented on their every action and made it a matter of public record. If you do take action go the legal or financial route and tool them up hard that way.

Milo telling the leader of BLM, "If you weren't such an obnoxious cunt, I'd hit on you." was master trolling.

Not only does it imply that the leader of BLM is gay - (something very offensive to the Black community) - but it also implies that he's less-than-gay, - i.e. - gay, but not good enough to please Milo. No wonder he got triggered.

-----------

Also, Matt Forney did a good job of provoking an assault by telling a Black woman, "You need to lose some weight, honey."

Simple statements like that provoke so much rage, and make BLM members look like tools and thugs.

Post: #6

(05-26-2016 11:30 AM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 11:18 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  What Milo did was correct. He sat there, mocked them, and commented on their every action and made it a matter of public record. If you do take action go the legal or financial route and tool them up hard that way.

Milo telling the leader of BLM, "If you weren't such an obnoxious cunt, I'd hit on you." was master trolling.

Not only does it imply that the leader of BLM is gay - (something very offensive to the Black community) - but it also implies that he's less-than-gay, - i.e. - gay, but not good enough to please Milo. No wonder he got triggered.

-----------

Also, Matt Forney did a good job of provoking an assault by telling a Black woman, "You need to lose some weight, honey."

Simple statements like that provoke so much rage, and make BLM members look like tools and thugs.

What all these SJWs and BLM fanatics have in common aside from looking like ugly dorks or ghetto thugs is really poor frame control. They think that yelling, disrupting, or basic intimidation is power. When in reality it's just doing the same thing that toddlers do when they throw a tantrum on the floor. It's a weak form of attention seeking.

It's easy to manipulate their actions and make them lose their shit with simple calm words. Condescension, mockery, and casual disregard enrages them because you aren't taking them seriously. What you are telling them is that they are stupid and insignificant.

They are emotionally weak people who react to everything.

When someone has such a poor handle over their emotions it's very easy to set them up for a very hard fall.