Post: #1

I just stumbled upon this article by Infowars' Paul Joseph Watson on a recent Buzzfeed video in which a lesbian couple who identify as "gender non-conforming" (aka, mentally ill) talk about forcing their son into "queer" relationships.

Quote:“Everyone needs to be reconsidering the way that they’re presenting gender to their kids. It’s not even whether or not Atticus is personally going to be a genderqueer or genderfluid person. Atticus can grow up to be a completely traditional cisgendered male and he needs to understand the variety of genders that are out there so that he can be a respectful human being in the world,” Michelle concluded. Source

I'm not trying to be overdramatic but after watching that ^^^ I literally felt sick. As in, I had to shut it off and run to the bathroom where I was about ready to lose my lunch.

This is child abuse, plain and simple. In fact, I'd even go as far as classifying this as pedophilia. The kid just learned to walk and they're already trying to push complete and utter degeneracy on him. There is no way that this little boy "Atticus" is going to grow up living even a remotely normal life. He'll either end up a tranny postitute by his mid 20s or a Starbucks drinking, thick black-rim glasses wearing, perpetually offended social justice warrior psychopath.

Gentlemen, our culture is on a downward spiral to Hell and it all started when we allowed deranged filth to 1). Marry and 2). Adopt children.

Post: #2

I will take your word for it. I don't want to watch that.

Post: #3

Even the truly mentally ill are disturbed by this. The kid can barely walk and they're already fucking with his head with all this ''genderfluid'' crap.

Post: #4

It's getting completely panned in the comments, so maybe there's some hope.

That part about mentioning him as "he can grow up a completely traditional cisgendered male" sounded like so much of an afterthought, that it bordered on a disappointing outcome.

What you can really see bleeding through is that this kid isn't seen as his own person. He's seen as a projection of them. He's not a project in and of himself, not, as Kant would say, an end in himself, he's but hobby, an interesting item for the prodding of these two freaks. It's not about him. It's all about them. It's all about mmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!

Post: #5

I've seen worse among women in "mixed orientation" marriages (heterosexual man, closet lesbian woman); they use their offspring as experiments to "prove" that gender is a "construct", so that mommy doesn't feel bad about her own gendering. They'll intentionally trans-gender them, seemingly more the boys than the girls though I have seen it both ways.

Give them transgendered names (boys named "Blyss"; girls named "Steve"), they shop in the opposite-gendered section of the store for each of their kids (boys in hot-pink skirts, girls in navy-blue trowsers and shirts), give them trans-gendered toys (dolls for boys, model bulldozers and back-hoes for girls), and so on.

Note the sparkley cyan unicorn toy in the boy's bedroom in the video.

It's pretty common where I live; I would estimate it's around 1-2% of the kids here. I would guess maybe 10% of marriages here involve a closet lesbian woman. This is much more common than most people realize, and I'm pretty sure it's ubiquitous, and not just a local phenomenon. They think they can over-ride theiir sexual impulses, but as they get older, their testosterone levels keep rising and rising, and it gets ever-more-obvious that they're living a lie.

Some of them do it to hide behind a window-dressing marriage, and because they want a family. For those who aren't aware: lesbians tend not to couple up as readily as groupings involving a man. As Sonia Johnson once said after her two attempts at lesbian relationships blew out in quick succession, "coupling up is a man's idea". They like their freedom. They tend to maintain relatively casual relationships, often with more than one woman, and they tend to maintain separate households, like Susan Sontag and Annie Leibowitz.

The women in the video keep referring to "queer". That has come to mean "gender-queer" = other than male-female gender dichotomy. It took a while for what was going on to quite "click" with me but I'd noticed a lot of people with unusual genderings.

That's pretty common too--I suspect more common than is generally realized. Seems to be more common among anatomical females than anatomical males--I would guess by a ratio of at least 2-1. One common pattern I have seen is to mix masculine and feminine sexual characteristics. People who look like Conchita Wurst. Sometimes it's hard to tell what sex they were born, because they have seemingly impossible combinations of characteristics--mostly artificially produced I think, like facial hair, chest hair, boobs, and hips. In more conservative parts of the world, they may have a private look and a public look, so you might not notice them.

Another common pattern is when they start developing strong aversions to ALL sexual characteristics and start erasing them.

This isn't really a new thing; in the old days they simply conformed as much as they could. Sometimes they couldn't, so even in the old days there were stories that nice people weren't supposed to talk about. All that has happened is that what used to be hidden away in dark corners is now out in the open.

The problem is when people who don't fit into male-female dichotomies start demanding that the rest of the world be demolished and reconstructed around their own needs.

Post: #6

This is about controlling parents first and foremost. Their use of control has to do with gender. But there are parents like this who control by other means.

I think it bothers us the most when it comes to gender because it strikes deep into the heart of who we all are. But...the upside of this is that you can't make a boy a girl or vice-versa. The kid will likely grow up to laugh at them and know exactly who he is.

Parents before these have tried to mess with gender. The stories are pretty funny: They give girls trucks, but the girls make "truck families" as if the trucks were dolls. They ban boys from toy guns and give boys dolls, and the boys use the dolls as pretend guns.

What I think is more insidious are the parents who attempt to smash square pegs into round holes in other areas where it's less easy to call them out. I knew quite a few kids like that character in "Dead's Poet Society" who was a talented actor but gets banned by his folks from being in the school play and winds up killing himself.

How many of us had talents we were not allowed to realize because our parents frowned on what we were good at? Often these parents ban kids from doing something "just because." There is no reason other than the parents say so. At least these parents -- foolish as they are -- have some midguided rationale.

So, while these parents are justifiably scorned, I'd like to see that same ire directed at the type of parents whose boy is a great guitarist, but entirely banned from playing music in the house (ahem!) or the girl who is a great ballet dancer but it not allowed to dance at all.

Controlling parents who keep kids from realizing their talents need to be called out, whether the control has to do with gender or not. They're kids, not programmable robots. Let them be.

Post: #7

(06-18-2016 02:44 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  How many of us had talents we were not allowed to realize because our parents frowned on what we were good at? Often these parents ban kids from doing something "just because." There is no reason other than the parents say so. At least these parents -- foolish as they are -- have some midguided rationale.

So, while these parents are justifiably scorned, I'd like to see that same ire directed at the type of parents whose boy is a great guitarist, but entirely banned from playing music in the house (ahem!) or the girl who is a great ballet dancer but it not allowed to dance at all.

Controlling parents who keep kids from realizing their talents need to be called out, whether the control has to do with gender or not. They're kids, not programmable robots. Let them be.

There is a balance to be observed, though. Not everything for which you have a talent is something a rational person should be making a career from, and parents need to at least make that clear to their kids. I pity the parent whose kid thinks they are destined to be an artist of any kind. Either the kid is in for serious disillusionment as he grows up, or he's destined for a life of close-to-poverty-line dependence on the welfare machine to indulge his obsession. Ditto the parent whose kid appears gifted athletically, because not only are sports of all kinds brutally competitive, but it's realistically a profession you can only do until your body wears out -- and your body does wear out goddamned fast. You have to parent kids bearing in mind their whole lives, not just until they hit 35 and cease being of interest to the MSM.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #8

At least the comments give me hope that society isn't completely f**cked.

Post: #9

I made it 15 seconds and knew this video was gonna be shit.

I have no words. Whatever happened to normal people trying to raise normal kids? Why are these degenerates pushing this genderfluid bullshit on their own kid? It's sickening.

Post: #10

She was trying to get him to wear a tutus

Post: #11

Eh, fuck these dykes. I don't think this will become a normal thing.

I seriously think there's going to be a strong backlash, soon, against this kind of degeneracy.

Driving home from today, I saw a business with huge banners for "HAPPY FATHER'S DAY!" on both sides of the building visible from the streets. i saw this banner as a huge "FUCK YOU" to the degeneracy that has been pushed this year: Fathers are important. Transgenderism promotion is evil bullshit. All with some big banners. A big middle finger extended at this nonsense.

Just a simple "HAPPY FATHER'S DAY!" sign.

Take a walk around the city and enjoy the masculine fathers that you see. Even in the wonderland of SJWs that I live in, I'm seeing them. Men standing with erect spines, chins proud, not lisping in their speech or bowing towards their wives. Men still raising younger men.

Fuck these cunts. They're a distraction. Unplug.

Post: #12

To paraphrase what I read this week, "Feminism/ SJWism is like The Netherlands: it owes it existence to dykes holding back the forces of nature."

Post: #13

I copped some sympathy shaming on the Orlando shooting thread but I'm doubling down.

These people may live in the same country as you but they are not your people. Never forget that. You cannot fix them and you cannot force them to stop being freaks or stop them forcing freakery on whoever the government allows them to.

We all hope that Trump will make America great again, but the stark reality is that in most western nations there is an irreversible split between the left and the right that will inevitably come down to an outright demand for submission by the left where-after the right will either fight or disappear, possibly for centuries.

With that in mind I will repeat my second paragraph.

These people may live in the same country as you but they are not your people. Never forget that. You cannot fix them and you cannot force them to stop being freaks or stop them forcing freakery on whoever the government allows them to.

Do not waste hatred or pity on them or their victims. You could be bombarded daily with pictures of starving African children to feel bad about. Your mental defence would be to distance yourself from them because the are not your people.

So I will repeat. The freaks residing predominantly in the coastal megacities are not your people. Make your own tribe ready to stand up to them. There will be no reunification.

Post: #14

Atticus

Post: #15

Lesbian couples have by far the highest rates of domestic violence

Post: #16

(06-21-2016 03:52 PM)seniol Wrote:  Lesbian couples have by far the highest rates of domestic violence

imagine if there were little to no social stigma attached to hitting your wife...