Post: #1

After complaining about commercials and their anti-male bias, I decided to do some sampling. Now, I hate the NFL and it's SJW bent, so this was painful, but Sunday, October 16, I noted 1 hour's worth of commercials as an experiment for the Red Pill takers to get one measure of how culture is against us.

Totals - 53 commercials (in one hour!)
Red-Pill (positive male image, no feminism in sight) - 12
Neutral (neither anti-male or strong male) - 11
Mixed (opposites - anti-male/femine or red-pill/feminist)- 2
Anti-male (negative male image without feminist female image) - 9
Feminist (bitchy feminist harpy) - 12
Degenerate (self-explanatory) - 2

And there you have it - over half of the commercials are against Red-Pill thinking / worldview. Less than 1/4 presented a positive male image, while nearly that number presented a negative male image. NONE of the commercials presented a negative female image, although a few presented femininity. And just as many presented women in dominant, demeaning roles as presented men in positive roles.

The worst of the lot, IMHO, is the Toyota RAV4 commercial where the loud-mouth, smug, arrogant woman driver corrects the guy in a thoroughly demeaning fashion as she parks the vehicle.

That was during a sport that was considered the domain of men not so long ago. Someone should repeat the experiment during prime-time to see how much WORSE it is then.

Post: #2

Post: #3

So you watched TV for an hour and found the content was leftist and feminist?

What's next? You gonna tell everyone here that sex is pleasant and water is wet?

Post: #4

Quote: Someone should repeat the experiment during prime-time to see how much WORSE it is then.

For a proper scientific experiment we should use the same standards for what's red pill or not. So it seems we must entrust this new experiment to you OP! Thank you.

Post: #5

(10-19-2016 09:52 PM)Germanicus Wrote:  So you watched TV for an hour and found the content was leftist and feminist?

What's next? You gonna tell everyone here that sex is pleasant and water is wet?

Hardly to the either sarcastic question. I'm making a semi-quantitative measure of content's bias, and will repeat the experiment at intervals to see if it's changing over the next year or so. However, if you guys don't give a flying shit about some measurable assessment of the leftward drift in media over time, then I can skip subjecting myself to television, which I hate anyway.

If one identifies the worst offenders, it would be possible for 'going Galt' on those corporations and skipping doing business with them. The economy may be 85% driven by women purchasing crap, but even a 5% drop in sales of companies will get their attention. If the movement is being successful on a small scale, how will anyone know without data to show the results?

Or y'all can sit on your asses and not try to at least check if not reverse the trend. I'm old enough to not give a shit. But if anyone is going to DO something, it starts with data identifying targets, which means someone has to start actually collecting it. I started but y'all are being snarky about it. Those who want to do something can mindlessly flail about instead of identifying vulnerable targets because you think this is stupid and want to be a smartass.