Post: #1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...t-sex.html

Quote:Now UK scientists have found the secret of making men temporarily infertile – by ‘switching off’ sperm’s ability to swim.

They have made tiny ‘designer compounds’ which smuggle themselves into sperm, and stop their tails from wiggling. If a sperm can’t swim, it has no chance of naturally fertilizing a woman’s egg.

The effeciveness of the pill

Quote:Lead researcher Professor John Howl, of Wolverhampton University, last night described how effective their sperm-stopping agent had been in lab tests.

He said: ‘The results are startling – and almost instant. When you take healthy sperm and add our compound, within a few minutes the sperm basically cannot move.’

Male infertility is often the result of poorly moving sperm, called ‘low motility’. Using this, the Wolverhampton team, together with Portuguese researchers, made a compound called a cell-penetrating peptide, which gets inside sperm and brings them to a standstill. Prof Howl said: ‘This is a totally unique approach – nobody else has ever done this before.’

Peptides are short chains of amino acids that can influence how human cells work. They occur naturally but biochemists can make synthetic versions. Prof Howl and colleague Dr Sarah Jones first demonstrated that certain ‘cell-penetrating peptides’ could smuggle themselves inside sperm cells, like a Trojan horse.

I wonder if this will mysteriously get shut down too. Or if there is suddenly tons of side effects and it can't be sold. I prefer to take a pill than having some compound injected in my balls (I think that is how RISUG works) or vasectomy.

Post: #2

Long term effects is what im worried about

Post: #3

With the rate of sperm production I wonder how many times a day you would need to ingest the pill for it to be effective. Plenty of new swimmers ready to overtake the disabled every hour.

Edit. Looked it up, this solution seems promising since sperm is stored for 2-3 months to mature is produced by the million a day

https://www.shadygrovefertility.com/blog...eneration/

Post: #4

I'm fond of the "pull out and don't bust inside her" or the "her ass and mouth can't get pregnant" methods, myself.

Post: #5

Yeah, I'll try this in about 20 years when the long term effects are known. Frankly I never had an issue with condoms - slap it on and get to business. I'm glad more options are becoming available though as condoms can be pierced obviously and some of those cunts are known to go fishing for them. Watch your six - literally.

Post: #6

Feminist groups are going to go completely apeshit over this. It means that women no longer get to decide whether or not to have a baby.

Post: #7

(10-23-2016 05:34 PM)chicane Wrote:  Feminist groups are going to go completely apeshit over this. It means that women no longer get to decide whether or not to have a baby.

Uh oh! No more happy accidents!

Post: #8

(10-23-2016 05:25 PM)Germanicus Wrote:  I'm fond of the "pull out and don't bust inside her" or the "her ass and mouth can't get pregnant" methods, myself.

A man after my own heart.

100% natural and 100% effective*, with no long term effects.

I don't need no stinking pill. But I do like the idea of the affect this would have on the dating market, writ large.

G

*Assuming you actually pull out/bust in the right spot

Post: #9

(10-23-2016 08:22 PM)Suits Wrote:  Uh oh! No more happy accidents!

Something tells me that women will employ shaming tactics to the point where most men will shy away from using a male birth control method.

A similar correlative can be seen with the pocket pussy. No different, theoretically, from the vibrator in that it's a false "member" of the opposite sex. Yet the the pocket pussy is frowned upon whereas the vibrator is socially acceptable.

Post: #10

(10-23-2016 05:25 PM)Germanicus Wrote:  I'm fond of the "pull out and don't bust inside her" or the "her ass and mouth can't get pregnant" methods, myself.

If you use the latter a ton, then don't worry, but if you use the former a lot, you should get your sperm count checked.

Usually what you call guys dependent on the pull out method is "dad."

Post: #11

(10-25-2016 02:58 AM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 05:25 PM)Germanicus Wrote:  I'm fond of the "pull out and don't bust inside her" or the "her ass and mouth can't get pregnant" methods, myself.

If you use the latter a ton, then don't worry, but if you use the former a lot, you should get your sperm count checked.

Usually what you call guys dependent on the pull out method is "dad."

Nope. I've been raw dogging for 15+ years now and I've never had a pregnancy scare from properly pulling out before I bust and blasting on her in a safe area instead. While it is still possible to knock a girl up, the odds are very low.

From the babykillers at Planned Parenthood:

Quote:
How Effective Is Withdrawal?

Effectiveness is an important and common concern when choosing a birth control method. Like all birth control methods, the pull out method is much more effective when you do it correctly.

Of every 100 women whose partners use withdrawal, 4 will become pregnant each year if they always do it correctly.
Of every 100 women whose partners use withdrawal, 27 will become pregnant each year if they don't always do it correctly.

Couples who have great self-control, experience, and trust may use the pull out method more effectively. Men who use the pull out method must be able to know when they are reaching the point in sexual excitement when ejaculation can no longer be stopped or postponed. If you cannot predict this moment accurately, withdrawal will not be as effective.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/...out-method

So 4 times per 100 couples having sex, over the course of a year. And that's in the aggregate. I also think most of those in the 4% still aren't pulling out in time since Cowper's Fluid (pre-cum) has little to none sperm content. And/or maybe during the jackpot sex session the dude pulled out only to stupidly blast right on the chick's pussy.

Now, if your technique sucks or you don't have any control over yourself when you're about to nut, by all means, don't kid yourself into believing you'll be ok. Wrap it up. For those of us who are able, we'll be just fine.

Post: #12

When I began to read the thread, an instant alarm was triggered in my head.


Think about several facts:
-sperm and testosterone are directly correlated
-testosterone levels have decreased over the last 20 years (several papers on the matter, just Google it or since we ban globalist here, Duck Duck Go)
-the pill for girls has negative side effect that we know now
-Some of our food is already contaminated with chemicals that slow down testosterone (again, look on the forum)

Where do I wanna go with that? Easy. With all the globalist agenda of emasculating males (well documented), it would be a perfect weapon. Imagine if a lot of (mainly whites, rapefugee or street hood gangsta don't care about contraception) males were to take this pill and we discover that it causes "by accident" infertility/decrease even more testosterone... Keep in mind that the elites plan is to decrease the population (less to control, easier to control) and transform men into submissive pussy.

So to sum up, I would take this pill over my dead body . In the meantime, lets go to the gym, eat red meat and fuck bitches to show them men are still strong!! Let the girl use the pill or use a condom.

Post: #13

(10-24-2016 10:21 PM)MajorStyles Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 08:22 PM)Suits Wrote:  Uh oh! No more happy accidents!

Something tells me that women will employ shaming tactics to the point where most men will shy away from using a male birth control method.

A similar correlative can be seen with the pocket pussy. No different, theoretically, from the vibrator in that it's a false "member" of the opposite sex. Yet the the pocket pussy is frowned upon whereas the vibrator is socially acceptable.

Shame away, bitches.
The nice thing about this type of birth control is that no one will know that you are using it if you don't tell them.

You lie and say that trust her to take the pill. She lies and says that she is faithfully taking the pill. Conclusion: you aren't on the hook for child support payments for 18 years.