Predicitons for Democrat candidate in 2020?

Nancy Pelosi will never give up her California power broker job, she has tons of money and much more DC power than a POTUS does. She is a heavy left coast political player. Plus, if she runs all her skeletons from ill-gotten gains from office will be known. She became rich from becoming a politician.

She won't ever run.

Quote

Shit if Hillary can run and not go to prison I don't see how Nancy can't do the same.

Quote

Pelosi is 78 right now. Would be 80 when she took office in 2021, I don’t think she’d try it at this point.

Hillary could run again but I somehow doubt it

Quote

(12-26-2018 09:12 AM)eradicator Wrote:  Pelosi is 78 right now. Would be 80 when she took office in 2021, I don’t think she’d try it at this point.

Hillary could run again but I somehow doubt it

The mistake we're making is thinking that being senile is a bug.

It's a FEATURE. Having a senile, lazy, or stupid president in office means that the Deep State gets to do whatever the hell they want with no challenge.

Quote

Easy_C but then what about Obama. Dude was relatively young and seemingly energetic, and yet was a total lapdog for the DS.

Quote

Obama was a globalist from the very beginning. His father was a socialist from Kenya. Obama's very first public speech was about divestment in apartheid South Africa.

Which has fuck all to do with America.

Quote

I think Kamala Harris will be the nominee.

Quote

(12-28-2018 04:46 PM)MaceTyrell Wrote:  I think Kamala Harris will be the nominee.

She's the frontrunner. But it will get ugly quickly.

Chapo Trap House soycialist types see her as another Hillary, which will open the door for lefty lunatic wing (Berniecrats). These two camps will first feud amongst themselves to see who's the "moderate" candidate (moderate in quotes, because the agenda is still open borders, but more favorable to globalist corporations) and who's the lefty (who, while also favoring open borders, will at least talk tough about Goldman Sachs).

Once each camp has anointed their preferred candidate, expect a replay of 2016 to occur with the establishment candidate winning because of the favorable demographics in the South, but this time the lefty candidate will not refrain from personal attacks out of some misplaced sense of ethics.

Quote

Quote

Warren declared way too early. That campaign will have run out of gas well before the Iowa Caucus, let alone Super Tuesday.

Quote

(12-26-2018 10:42 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Easy_C but then what about Obama. Dude was relatively young and seemingly energetic, and yet was a total lapdog for the DS.

Notice I said "senile or stupid". Other personality traits that enable them to be easily controlled are also considered ideal.


That's why Cortez is a possibility. I'm fairly certain that they've decided on Beto right now but that might change if Cortez turns out to be easy to control. The odds of that are decent given that she's a raging moron, including by some word of mouth I've heard.

She actually is that dumb. I've got an acquaintance who had a family member go to school with her. Word is that she's a raging idiot.

Quote

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/...2c62ecc78c

An uninspiring field full of toxic ideas and identity politics. Here's a quick breakdown:
Warren = crappier version of HRC
Booker = crappier version of Obama
Biden = same old creepy grandpa
Bernie = senile socialist
Beto = unemployed bum loser Robert O'Rourke
Castro = reconquista por favor
Schultz/Styer/Bloomberg/Cuban/Oprah = out of touch billionaires
NY/CA candidates = virtue signaling "resistance" coastal elites happy to raise taxes to fund illegals and destroy middle class (de Blasio and Newsom's recent speeches in reaction to Trump were atrocious and moves moderates to the right)
Everyone else is unknown and low on energy/charisma/funds

Barring an outsider or something crazy happening, Trump wins re-election easily

Quote

Warren is a cut above Clinton. She's a bit goofy but not nearly as toxic or witch-like as HRC, or as dirty as Biden.

Looking at her cringy beer campaign video, she's positioning herself as a champion of the middle class, which is the winning formula, and something that Clinton or Biden would have a hard time pulling off. As well she was the only major Democrat who has come out and approved Trump's announced Syrian and Afghanistan pullouts.





Note that Bernie hasn't, because deep down Bernie is pretty much another Israel firster neocon, as well as a masonic trotskist. So Warren has got some outsider cred, and comes across as a Carter Democrat.

Voters crave outsiders, Obama fooled them into thinking he was one, and Trump was one, that's why they've won. Voters can put up with a goofy woman like Warren as long as she can convince them she's more of an outsider than the other candidates. In a sense the Pocahontas stuff can actually help her with the TDS NPC Dems, having Trump rag on her so much helps her stand out from the field.

Quote

Quote

Tulsi Gabbard is officially running.

Whilte she fits all the diversity quotas of Democratic party (young, female, minority), she's hated by the establishment into not buying too much russiagate and being an anti-interventionist, notably meeting with Assad.

In a way, how Tulsi polls will tell a lot about the average democratic voter. I can already see her being labeled as "dictator stooge" "soft" "naive" by other nominees.

Interesting few months ahead

Quote

She should have waited 4 more years. I think this is a bad election for her to run in.

Quote

Ocasio-Cortez can't run, she's not yet 35.

If Gabbard gains traction, Trump is in for a hell of a fight.

Quote

(01-11-2019 09:12 PM)Truth Teller Wrote:  Ocasio-Cortez can't run, she's not yet 35.

If Gabbard gains traction, Trump is in for a hell of a fight.

Tulsi can't win under any circumstances. She has no children. Nobody is going to vote for a woman who doesn't like family.

Quote

(01-11-2019 07:00 PM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  Tulsi Gabbard is officially running.

Whilte she fits all the diversity quotas of Democratic party (young, female, minority), she's hated by the establishment into not buying too much russiagate and being an anti-interventionist, notably meeting with Assad.

In a way, how Tulsi polls will tell a lot about the average democratic voter. I can already see her being labeled as "dictator stooge" "soft" "naive" by other nominees.

Interesting few months ahead

Assad Apologist is already the way they've framed her. She actually seems surprisingly reasonable for a Democratic candidate.

Warren has also actually been saying reasonable things so far and would be getting far too many of the Dems offside with her reasonableness.

Be shocked if either of those two make it very far purely on that. If you're not a corporate shill or a complete loon then you're basically outside of the Democratic spectrum that is basically binary on those two outcomes.

Quote

You don’t think Tulsi or Pocahontas would fall in line when Goldman Sachs and George Soros offer to write checks?

Quote

(01-12-2019 02:24 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  Tulsi can't win under any circumstances. She has no children. Nobody is going to vote for a woman who doesn't like family.

Except for the hardcore feminists and SJWs

Quote

(01-08-2019 02:10 PM)TheBowery Wrote:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/...2c62ecc78c

An uninspiring field full of toxic ideas and identity politics. Here's a quick breakdown:
Warren = crappier version of HRC
Booker = crappier version of Obama
Biden = same old creepy grandpa
Bernie = senile socialist
Beto = unemployed bum loser Robert O'Rourke
Castro = reconquista por favor
Schultz/Styer/Bloomberg/Cuban/Oprah = out of touch billionaires
NY/CA candidates = virtue signaling "resistance" coastal elites happy to raise taxes to fund illegals and destroy middle class (de Blasio and Newsom's recent speeches in reaction to Trump were atrocious and moves moderates to the right)
Everyone else is unknown and low on energy/charisma/funds

Barring an outsider or something crazy happening, Trump wins re-election easily

I see Trump haters crying for another 4 years if Trump wins re-election in 2020

Quote

(01-12-2019 10:47 AM)eradicator Wrote:  You don’t think Tulsi or Pocahontas would fall in line when Goldman Sachs and George Soros offer to write checks?

Neither of these two women are their ideal candidates. From their standpoint, Warren is not as reliable as whores like Hillary, Harris, Pelosi and co. Warren could easily play working class hero and flip the board on Wall Street. She's already got the right focus, the economic welfare of the middle class.

Tulsi is on a whole different level though, right from the gate she's the designated enemy of the globohomo deep state, having taken on the MIC-ZOG with her outright support for Assad.

Quote

Kirsten Gillibrand put her hat in the ring, not really surprised by that. She could have a good chance of winning. She seemed to have won every Senate race here in NY with the help of NYC.

Quote

I don’t think she can win because she recently spoke out against Israel. You can’t successfully run for president and be against Israel, she will either change her tune or lose.

I hope she loses badly because she endorsed mattress girl and even invited her to the state of the union
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/...e-columbi/

Quote