Post: #1

The truth cannot be concealed for long, especially in the internet age. A portion of the elite has recognized this and allowed discourse to move from political correctness version 1.0 to an upgraded 2.0 version where more real-talk is allowed. This permits them to build trust with an increasing percentage of the Western population that hates the heavy-handedness of the existing program.
Political correctness 1.0 was so strict and sniffling that it promoted a reaction which is currently threatening the entire globalist establishment. Here are tenets of the 1.0 program:
1. All races are equal
2. All sexes are equal
3. Homosexuals are just like heterosexuals
4. Islam can and should co-exist in democratic societies
5. Western civilization is the main cause of evil to minorities
6. Nation borders sacrifice human rights
7. Critique of Jews is anti-Semitic, and we must encourage Israel’s existence
When I or other commentators refer to “globalism,” we’re generally describing a system of power that has built itself atop the 1.0 program since World War 2. The reaction to this program has gotten so intense that anti-globalism is now a broad-based movement that aims to bring down both the useful idiots and the puppet masters who control it.
I’m not entirely certain if existing globalists are deciding to move to a 2.0 program to retain their control, or if entirely new billionaires, such as Peter Thiel, are attempting a power grab for their own ends. Whatever the reality, and it’s probably a combination of the two, some members of the elite are now using the upgraded political correctness program to appeal to those who reject the 1.0 version. Here is what we have in version 2.0:
1. Not all races are equal, but all races deserve equality
2. The sexes aren’t equal, but both sexes deserve equality
3. Homosexuals are just like heterosexuals
4. Islam cannot co-exist in democratic societies
5. Western civilization should be praised
6. Nation borders are essential
7. Critique of Jews is anti-Semitic, and we must encourage Israel’s existence
First let’s describe what hasn’t changed from 1.0 (points 3 and 7). Gays and Jews are still a protected class because they are the highest members orchestrating 2.0 (Peter Thiel happens to be gay). Egalitarianism in terms of sex and race (1 and 2) haven’t been completely tossed aside, since “equality” is still seen as an ideal, but purple and red pill thoughts in those areas are more accepted. It’s okay for media outlets operating on version 2.0 to state that black people are more prone to criminality followed by articles mocking feminism and other social justice insanities.
Three points have been completely reversed. First is Islam. Attacking the religion, its customs, and the terrorists it breeds is fair game, and perhaps the most consistent element of the 2.0 program that is even exhibited by liberals like Bill Maher. The second reversal is the praise of “Western civilization” with a focus on civic nationalism, which essentially means that people have to follow existing immigration laws. Lacking, however, is addressing how laws can be changed or what the specific racial demographic of a nation like the USA should be. The final reversal is the praise of national borders as a feature that can improve the safety and well-being of existing citizens.
When I refer to political correctness 2.0, I’m not referring to 4chan, the alt right, or other edgelord movements that don’t place limits on their speech, but the rising power structures that include new media, pundit thots like Tomi Lahren, Twitter e-celebrities, and government politicians, especially the ones that exist in Trump’s shadow.
The best examples of political correctness 2.0 right now are represented by Breitbart, Rebel Media, and the alt lite, who produce ideas and content that have wide reach because of the large number of people who reject the 1.0 program but who are not ready to completely throw away egalitarianism, discuss the Jewish Question, or embrace tradition. The low-hanging fruits of the 1.0 program were the KKK, racists who use the n-word, and caveman misogynists. For the 2.0 program, the low-hanging fruits are low IQ Islamists, fat feminists with green hair, and the mainstream media.
The 2.0 version is a step in the right direction, and will make my ideas of patriarchy slightly more accepting, but ultimately will fail just like 1.0 did, because it is counting on deliberate concealment of truths that simply can not be concealed in the internet age. I therefore predict that 2.0 will have a much shorter run than 1.0, and not stop a reactionary push where no lie can be successfully hoisted upon the public, and where no secret stays secret for long.
Read Next: How To Save Western Civilization




Posted on Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:00:26 +0000 at http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/dcb/~3/w_...-2-point-0
Comments: http://www.rooshv.com/political-correctn...-0#respond

Post: #2

Great article Roosh. You are doing a great job of analyzing the current culture war and articulating your findings. Keep up the good work sir.

Post: #3

(03-27-2017 09:59 AM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  Great article Roosh. You are doing a great job of analyzing the current culture war and articulating your findings. Keep up the good work sir.

Agreed-very insightful.

PC 2.0 is designed to create a controlled opposition, to give non-shit-libs the illusion that some part of the power structure is on their side.

The goal is to to buy time so their opponents won't agitate for more change until it's too late to do anything about the Brave New Soros World Order being jammed down our throats.

The truth is that only a tiny percentage of people in power really do support those of us on the alt-right.

Let's hope that Trump/Bannon really are our side and are able to change the current trajectory that we're on.

While we can all hope that PC 2.0 is replaced by Real Talk, it could be also be replaced by a weaponized version (PC 3.0) that Hillary Clinton and her friends wanted to unleash on the US had the Hag won.

In that world, this forum would probably be closed down for hate speech and many commenters arrested for Bad-Think.

Post: #4

Frankly I don't see it.

Breitbart, Infowars, Rebel Media are alternative sites. They may get millions of viewers and will influence elections, but they are not accepted by the globalists.

Personally I see a WWIII with Islam in the future so of course it is logical that some kind of long-term preparation for that is happening.

But aside of that I see the PC culture even getting worse than ever - the transgender crap has been added to it. We have to look what is taught in schools, what is presented in media worldwide, what is shown on TV and cinemas worldwide. All countries are pumping out the same crap.

The few alternative outlets serve also a good tool - especially when they are controlled opposition, then the globalists will know that they won't reach any movement that is truly dangerous. And frankly I don't see Breitbart, Rebel Media or Infowars as truly dangerous movements. The Thrive organization with Foster Gamble is potentially dangerous and that is why they are hardly heard of despite having massive broad support.

Meet the old PC culture, it is the same PC culture except for some controlled opposition boys.

Post: #5

1.0 won't die out. It's agreeable to a big fraction of the population in western countries.

A lot of people find it oppressive, but an equal or slightly smaller number of people find it perfect, all 7 points of it.

Expect 1.0 to hold about half of the mainstream media networks and about half of the most popular internet sites for as long as we live.

Post: #6

I've been reading RoK for 2-3 years now, and I think the last four months or so have consistently had the highest-quality run of articles/posts that I've ever seen on the site. Your current crew of writers is really putting out some quality work.

Post: #7

I'm an anti-sensationalist, so no I'm not trying to predict time frames here, but I believe that everyone on this board deep down can sense what's going on.

Within our lifetime there will be even more rapid change than what we've already experienced. The nationalism movement has wounded the Beast if you will, but it is also (if I had to guess) what will lead to indeed a large scale war, and leading up to this point is no doubt (not sure their role in it but it is a worldwide role of sorts) Islam. That's why you have seen the posting previously regarding "ο προδρομος του αντιχριστου". Islam is the forerunner.

The lament will be that nationalism has "failed again" and created more wars "like we saw in the 20th century" and the people will hand their sovereignty to you know who, who will temporarily solve the world's "problems," but it will be obvious that this person is a deceiver when things do not go the way they "should."

When the levee breaks, you'll be shocked just how fast the tide rushes in.