Post: #1

Some weird ass shit in that article.

It sounds creepy as hell, like the former author was a participant in a child porn forum.

Let's get to the basic of the story: This bitch claimed that she was drunk at a house party & she entered the homeowners’ bedroom to find a baby boy who “consented” to her attempting to strip naked for her to “breastfeed”.

She wanted to “breastfeed” him by stripping her vetements off so that the infant boy can suck her non-lactating breast while she was partially naked. This wasn't her child, but the son of a now-"Conservative" MP running for Presidency in Canada.

She hamsters her actions by comparing the Slavery colonial period when thick Black mothers were forced to breastfeed the same-sex infants of their white, or (((white))) Colonial masters during Slavery.

That’s more fucking infuriating because this white harpie doesn’t know about the suffering of black women in slavery. Those black women weren’t excited to “breastfeed” the daughters of (((white))) slave owner.

This Toronto harpie became popular all the way down to Cape Coral, FL. I’m not kidding. Lots of people think this woman is a potential baby molester or pedophile, but it can only be alleged, because that could end up like Alex Jones and that James Alfanatis shit.

It can be probable that this woman is one of the masterminds in the Toronto-Canada mainstream media behind the Roosh pro-rape libel in 2015, but read the wording of the remnants of Leah’s article (Globe & Mail claimed that they 404’d the original article for “Legal Reasons” of course)…

It sounds like she is writing child erotica like she wanted to fuck that baby or something like that.

Creepy, stuff. It’s like similar stuff that what convicted pedophile, Ben Levin wrote online which caused him to go in jail after confiding his fantasies with an undercover female cop, except that Leah uses “breastfeeding” as a toned down way to conceal sexual innuendo with minors, without further pushing the envelope by avoiding sexual assault charged themes like found in Ben Levin.

Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2017/03/27...30742.html

Quote:Leah McLaren Column About Trying To Breastfeed A Stranger's Baby Without Permission Breaks Twitter
The Huffington Post Canada | By Andree Lau

Posted: 03/27/2017 12:48 am EDT Updated: 03/27/2017 12:05 pm EDT

Share
Tweet
Comment

Print
AdChoices

Globe and Mail columnist and author Leah McLaren has made a career out of sharing her life as part of her work. But her latest column has pretty much broken Twitter.

In "The joy (and politics) of breastfeeding someone else’s baby," McLaren reminisces about that time she tried to breastfeed now-Conservative leadership candidate Michael Chong's infant more than a decade ago.


She writes that she was at a Toronto house party when she was about 25, and walked into a bedroom where there was a baby in a car seat. Already feeling "broody" and "glum," McLaren says she picked up the infant to "give him a cuddle."

The columnist was then seized by the urge to try breastfeeding him — even though she was not lactating or pregnant.

"But would it be so bad, I wondered, if I just tried it out — just for a minute — just to see what it felt like?" McLaren wrote.

A Globe columnist said she began removing her blouse, planned to breastfeed Michael Chong's baby... without consent. https://t.co/MBZU40tv2C

— Sean Craig (@sdbcraig) March 26, 2017

She says she unbuttoned her blouse and was just about to reach into her bra, when a man she identified as Chong walked in and retrieved his son. Chong is an Ontario MP and currently running for the Tory party leadership.

The column, which was published this week, has been removed from the Globe website. But a cached version is still available online.

Uhh, did anyone grab a copy of this column before it was 404'd? pic.twitter.com/gRx6rAb0F7

— ishmael n. daro (@iD4RO) March 26, 2017

On Sunday night, Twitter users didn't know what to react to first. First, there was the mystery.

So @goldsbie has done the math and when @leahmclaren was 25 @MichaelChongMP had no babies so WHOSE BABY DID SHE TRY TO FORCE HER BOOB ON?

— Jesse Brown (@JesseBrown) March 27, 2017

UPDATE: Michael Chong released a statement on Monday and told The Huffington Post Canada in an email: "This incident happened over 10 years ago. It was odd, no doubt, but not of any real consequence. I entered this race to discuss important challenges facing Canada. I am happy to discuss those. But I won't be making any further comment on this."

There was outrage.

@sdbcraig @leahmclaren 'weird' doesn't begin to describe this. Not only is this behaviour inappropriate; it verges on some sort of assault

— Sebastian DeGrandis (@SebMarkinTO) March 27, 2017

if this happened to my baby and i seen it, I would call the police on the drunk pedophile|https://t.co/31QBkIlpnz#cdnpoli #leahmclaren

— ISHBAHFF (@AntiTiSA) March 27, 2017

There was plain WTF.

Me: Why do I keep seeing Leah Mclaren in my timeline?

*finds and reads article*

Me: pic.twitter.com/pNxB5zbtGC

— Jill (@jedichica) March 27, 2017

@JesseBrown @leahmclaren @sdbcraig I don't... I mean... Why did they publish this? And why did she write this? Also put ur boob away lady!!

— Bad Critic (@Eliisabadcritic) March 27, 2017

And there was regular funny stuff.

Went to washroom at bar last night. Asked #LeahMcLaren to watch my vodka, came back to a White Russian. Not cool. https://t.co/9N32t4WAl7

— Mark Critch (@markcritch) March 27, 2017

Find yourself someone who looks at you the way Leah McLaren looks at a hungry baby.

— ? or barbarism (@grahamvsworld) March 27, 2017

McLaren's column concludes with her touting the benefits of co-feeding — which she said she experienced after having her own babies — and wondering why wet nurses aren't more popular.

@JesseBrown @leahmclaren it is the weirdest argument for ending stigma around co-feeding I've read. And will have the opposite effect. ?

— ???? ????? (@happystash) March 27, 2017

@ArielTroster @JulieSLalonde Judging from that column, I think Leah McLaren has zero clue what wet nurses do, much less the racist history

— Voltron of Failure (@mattrose) March 27, 2017

McLaren, who is Maclean's magazine's London correspondent, is no stranger to controversy.

In 2012, the Globe's Public Editor Sylvia Stead found it was a conflict of interest for McLaren to promote (and then sell) her own home in the newspaper's Home of the Week feature.

All the way down to Cape Coral, FL this article became viral.

What infuriated me was that it was the Canadian establishment media who first started to defame Roosh back in 2015 for writing a satire piece which could have been published by an editor found in your local college dorm during Abercrombie days in the early 2000.

This Leah Clarence looked like she wanted to write child erotica under the disguise of “breastfeeding”. What sickening stuff.

It’s one thing for Toronto media to falsely accuse Roosh of sexual assault for writing a satire college humor piece, but it’s another thing for the Globe & Mail to assent and post written child erotica under the disguise of breastfeeding an infant without their or their parent consent.

Post: #2

Female Conservative commented from Rebel Media sums it all up:

Quote:“liza Rosie commented 2017-03-27 16:17:38 -0400
I don’t care how old she was, Leah McLaren is a sick bitch and had it been my child I would have brought her up on charges, after I had punched her in the face. She is the worst kind of pervert. No better than any other pedophile. It is a violation, and before anyone mentions milk banks or wet nurses this is an entirely different thing.
Jeezus! What slime. My name for her is pedophile, and she not only should be fired she should be charged.

A strange thing for her to bring up now, who did she think it would reflect badly on? All she has done is identified herself to be a pedophile.”

It is weird for a drunk woman to try and force an infant that is not hers to “breastfeed” while she is in the process of unclothing herself like a whore preparing to start full service for her client.

Is it the Toronto establishment media trying to legalize women to be naked around helpless little infants in private property?????

Post: #3

Safe to say this story hasn't (so far) been mentioned on this side of the pond.

Speaking of The Rebel, here's Faith Goldy's take on the story, for no other reason than because I enjoy looking at Faith Goldy.

Post: #4

Just shows how insane of a society we have gotten.

Post: #5

"There was something about the sleeping baby girl that just made me want to clutch her closely. Her baby sounds, the smell of milk and purity; I just wanted to be close. I picked her up out of her seat and snuggled her into my chest. I began to unbutton my shirt, guiding her to my hairy pectorals and nipple. It was at this moment that her mother walked in to the room....."

Bob - Columnist for Globe & Mail

Post: #6

@ Laner:

If someone wrote: "There was something about this 13-year-old Latina chick that made me want to hold her closely and hug her thick, juicy ass" or " That 13-year-old Latina with the huge rack gave me that look to give it to her"

...There would be a riot in Canada. But this Leah Mc Laren chick confessed her pedophile tendency to force a stranger's baby in his bedroom to sexually stimulate her nipple whjen she is undressing in front of him as an infant.

Speaking of feminazi riots, I think Cheri DiNovo is a hypocrite herself because she doesn't appear to have a problem with women in Toronto sexually molesting children in their bedrooms.

One of Roosh's favorite supporters discovered that when Cher DiNovo was insisting that toplessness is a right, he asked if women were allowed to be naked in childrens' bedrooms at 0:37, then she smiled at 0:41.



So much for virtue signalling. Cheri Di Novo was the same politician who was at Toronto Queens Park in 2015 slandering Roosh, telling everyone from a megaphone that Roosh committed sexual crimes against women, which is false.

Cheri DoiNovo thinks it's funny that women are breaking into people's homes to strip naked in children's' bedrooms (while expressing outrage at Roosh satire article which illustrated no form of sexual deviance like Leah Mc Laren's child erotica, pedophilia justified as "breastfeeding" a stranger's baby in a room), but that Leah McLaren bitch only confirmed the insanity of these Feministe establishment Canadians who dictate powers from downtown Toronto to the rest of Canada.

Post: #7

@ Preator Lupus:

Thanks for sharing the Rebel Media video. It's a breath of fresh air to find anti-feminist women who can explain that pedophilia tendencies from an empowered woman to force herself on an infant boy is not "breastfeeding".

I'm sure if 15-year-old Johnny and his friends wanted to sneak into 13-year-old Julia's bedroom for some sex, the Canadian sheeple would call for their blood, but these same Canadian sheeple appear to defend that woman to force herself on an infant boy under the justification of "breastfeeding".

Leah McLaren is perfectly described in the comments' section. She appears to be a pedophile and potential baby fucker. She's probably the typical empowered harpies in Toronto in any case. They claim RAPE, RAPE, RAPE, RAPE, RAPE (sing it in Rihanna Work melody for comedic effect) if a man catcalls them on the street while they are walking naked for a slut-walk, but these women will enter an infant's boy bedroom disrobed to sexually assault him without consent.

Post: #8

They need to keep going. I want them to push this. They are so out of touch with Canadians, they will keep pushing because of their arrogance. They have now lived in the Canadian 'Big Three' cities for so long that they really think that people across the nation will read this story and relate.

Here is a real story though. I was breastfed by one or two other women when I was a baby. So were my cousins. I remember my aunt and her friend from the Yukon making fun of me and another kid my age that when they took turns taking care of us they would feed us.

But the G&M story has all the liberal arrogance written into it. She did it for her pleasure, it had nothing to do with the baby. Some liberal women will defend it, but likely most mothers will be disgusted by it. They will say "it was just a drunken urge to fulfill her biological needs!" Perhaps, but what if Chong did not happen to walk in?

Post: #9

@ Laner: True dat, but I think that this Leah McLaren isn't even an "authorized surrogate breastfeeding mother".

The way she wrote her initial article sounded like written explicit, child erotica one will find on a pedophile forum which facilitates the molestation of under-10 children, as in real pedophilia, not the "pedophilia" of autistic 18-year-old Mort getting lucky with a 13-year-old Latina chick with a rack and ass of a 20-year-old Playboy model.

That';s also the double standards of Liberal Canada. Invade the Pot shops, but defend that woman to force herself on an infant boy which appeared to be a sexual assault in progress.

I do agree, along with thousands of other commenters on other platforms, what would have happened if Chong did not walk into that room? Would that baby boy later learn how to fuck Leah McLaren in her pussy?

Ironic thing is that Toronto men will complain to me that these Toronto specimens will walk with their cleavage showing on the street, but when they approach the man from the opposite end of the sidewalk, she will automatically "cover her cleavage" like a Tradcon conservative clutching her luxury handbag when seeing a black man on the street of Harlem.

What irate me is that the same Canadian mainstream media which vilified Roosh initially endorsed that written child erotica from Leah Mc Laren. Canadian establishment tries to define their Draconian way of "Consent", but when Leah McLaren forces herself on a baby boy, the "consent" rules appear not to apply.

Post: #10

American people and British people backlash on Twitter most likely caused negative publicity, causing that female feminazi-pedophile Leah McLaren to become suspended for her perverted written child erotica article: Link below, emphasis personal:
https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2017/03...versy.html

Quote:On Monday, Chong tweeted that the “incident happened over 10 years ago. It was odd, no doubt, but not of any real consequence.” McLaren has not commented publicly on the circumstances surrounding the column and its publication, but has retweeted Chong’s comment.

Related: MP Michael Chong calls writer’s attempt to nurse his baby ‘odd’ but inconsequential

In the column, McLaren recounted an incident at a Toronto house party when she was “about 25” and happened upon a baby. She wrote that she was feeling down, and so picked the child up to give it a cuddle.

“Somehow, my pinky finger ended up in his mouth and I was astonished at the strength of his sucking reflex. ‘C’mon lady,’ said his eyes,” she wrote. “And I suddenly knew what he wanted. And I of course wanted to give him what he wanted. The only problem was, I had no milk. But would it be so bad, I wondered, if I just tried it out — just for a minute — just to see what it felt like?”

McLaren wrote that before anything happened, Chong walked into the room and picked up the child and said a “swift and polite goodbye.”

Roosh, I already posted enough evidence that Leah McLaren is a fucking potential baby fucking pedophile who should stay away from little boys, but you were darn right at your World Tour speech, that the Feminist Establishment wants to legalize baby fucking on private property.

If Leah Mc Laren & her shyster lawyer white knight manginas from Toronto send a "legal notice" to take down this post, tell them to fuck off and eat shit, because under the SPEECH Act, you are not responsible for any alleged "Libel & Slander" found on the website. Plus, American courts aren't obligated to surrender under the boot-stamping bureaucratic petty tyranny from a foreign country, including Canada.

Plus, Leah McLaren admitted in her article in a written child erotic way that she wanted to force herself on a little baby boy, hamstering it as motherly affection towards a baby, incident confirmed by the "Conservative" MP father who is trying to downplay the incident.

Post: #11

I was almost expecting her to say: "somehow my pinky ended up in the butthole of the baby".

Don't know if what she describes is pedophilia - strong mother instinct coupled with depression/psychotropics would do the trick as well.

Post: #12

Look at the face of a feminist from Toronto who is also a self-confessed potential child molester fucking pedophile who wanted to force her nudity and breasts on a little infant boy on private property:


Look at the screencap of the original article which was taken down...Look at the face of a feminazi Toronto female pedophile who wants to force herself on little baby infants on private property:

Post: #13

(03-28-2017 12:45 AM)RBerkley Wrote:  She wanted to “breastfeed” him by stripping her vetements off so that the infant boy can suck her non-lactating breast while she was partially naked. This wasn't her child, but the son of a now-"Conservative" MP running for Presidency in Canada.

I'm getting the feeling that you don't know all that much about the Canadian political system.

Post: #14

I would not call it pedophilia - if it were a man, then yes.

But in reality it was a 32yo woman (not 25 as stated in her own article) who probably by then regretted not having had a kid. Add psychotropics and her action make sense from a female point of view.

There won't be any psychological damage to the kid and she did not hurt him.

But it still is interesting that she even dares to tell this story out in the open. The mainstream media can be as demented and degenerate as they wish to be - at least if they are women. Correction - leftists like George Takei can make positive statements about real pedophilia, but when a Milo says anything about young boys at puberty age, then all hell breaks loose.

This is a double standard. The story itself is "meh" since nothing much happened. I expect those kind of actions by women who are getting regrets about motherhood. It seems that she got a kid a couple years later, so at least it worked out.

The story in itself is unlikely to have much to with pedophilia.

Post: #15

(04-03-2017 08:26 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  I would not call it pedophilia - if it were a man, then yes.

But in reality it was a 32yo woman (not 25 as stated in her own article) who probably by then regretted not having had a kid. Add psychotropics and her action make sense from a female point of view.

There won't be any psychological damage to the kid and she did not hurt him.

But it still is interesting that she even dares to tell this story out in the open. The mainstream media can be as demented and degenerate as they wish to be - at least if they are women.

This is generally my take on it.

It's my understanding that she got started due to being the daughter of a senior employee at the Globe & Mail and is widely thought to be a talentless nepotism hire. Her musings are like somebody's attention-whoring Instagram account expanded for print.

...and that's literally how the column started. The news reminds me of that one weird time I tried to breastfeed a famous person's baby! Let me tell you about it.

We've all had regrettable thoughts and made awkward mistakes to varying degrees...though this truly pegs the meter...but what stands out is that with her father's position giving her a platform where she is usually immunized from criticism or accountability, she had no idea that she should keep her psychological problems to herself and that they were not interesting to others. Even she admitted that she's surprised nobody called the police. She knows it's whacko and doesn't realize there's anything stigmatizing about acting whacko.

Also, obligatory:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiOZcKEwPes

Post: #16

This is at a minimum honorary pedophilia. She's tried to take her own non-lactating sexual organ and shove it in an infant's mouth.

If you or I touch that same sexual organ without her consent, it's sexual assault. But if she pops it in its non-lactating state in an infant's mouth, which she fully intended to do, we're not going to call it sexual?

I'm all for recognizing the differences between men and women, but nothing about this is normal.

For all intents and purposes, this is no different from a fat man with manboobs trying to "breastfeed" an infant.

Forget the explanation. These are her hamster words. Focus on the act and what she intended to do.

Meanwhile, guys like this dude are falsely called pedophiles merely for taking selfies for their kids, all because some hag decides to squawk for 15 minutes of attention-whoring: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ology.html

Post: #17

Post: #18

(04-03-2017 09:33 AM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  This is at a minimum honorary pedophilia. She's tried to take her own non-lactating sexual organ and shove it in an infant's mouth.

Lactating mothers love to sit around all day nursing. Best not to think about it too deeply.

Post: #19

(04-03-2017 02:01 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(04-03-2017 09:33 AM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  This is at a minimum honorary pedophilia. She's tried to take her own non-lactating sexual organ and shove it in an infant's mouth.

Lactating mothers love to sit around all day nursing. Best not to think about it too deeply.

Except this wasn't a mother "breastfeeding" in a natural context. She wanted to force herself on an infant boy without his or his parents' consent.

Also, certain diseases such as HIV/AIDS are spread from breastfeeding, so that bitch was risky in that if she was under a disease, she could have transmitted it to the baby.

There us even diseases like Chicken Pox, Molluscum, Herpes which are easily spread t babies because their immune systems are weak. Even adults get those diseases easily.

This article is about a feminist from Toronto who preaches "Consent" even way back in 2001, but when it comes to her respecting the consent of others, she thinks it's her God given right to force herself on an infant boy by attempting to strip nude in baby's bedroom to "breastfeed" him.

She could have probably taught him how to fuck her in her asshole later on in life if the envelope was pushed and no one knew of that incident.

Post: #20

With the birth of my second son recently, my wife breastfed for about a month, so I'll share some tidbits with you savages.

1. If a baby has stopped latching and breastfeeding, it won't latch onto anyone's nipple. The nipples that are on bottles are too different and the baby won't go back to it.

2. Baby's know their mother's milk. They won't necessarily feed on the breast of some random woman. Mother's milk adjusts to the babies needs which it communicates to her after each feeding.

But the most important point that us science hating misogynists must make is this: ITs impossible for her to feed! No lactation = no latching.

Obviously in this case, she can't lactate as she isn't or hadn't been pregnant at the time. She can't feed from a biological "SCIENTIFIC" standpoint that her kind likes to harp on about, so what urge is she reacting to?

Sounds like some pedo feelings of hers reached the surface.

Post: #21

Death penalty or mental asylum.

Post: #22

I find the insistence that this is some kind of latent pedophilia to be a little strange. It seems to me more like a flirtation with something akin to "baby stealing", a well-documented psychological phenomenon.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1788403/

"Baby stealing seems usually to be an attempt to compensate for emotional deprivation or frustrated maternal feelings, and a real or imaginary miscarriage may be a predisposing or precipitating factor."

Crazy as hell and deadly serious, but not sexualized in the least.

Post: #23

@ Jetset" Attempted kidnapping of a baby is still considered a criminal offense, no matter what clinical justification is used an excuse. There is also a Clinical Psychology thesis on why pedophiles offend too, if you want to compare using clinical research. But that does give anyone the right to steal or attempt to molest someones infant baby? No.

There was that Uof T Professor Ben Levin who was trolling on incest forums who posted child erotica, & he served 1-year in jail for counseling a sexual assault to a female undercover pig cop, and "written child pornography" as the other offense, but this McLaren woman published child erotica where she admitted to her act of trying to experiment a baby boy to sexually arouse her nipple, yet there is an excuse (clinical) to her action of almost stripping nude in front of a stranger's baby boy in his bedroom on private property?

This smells like double standards. She should be treated almost like Ben Levin for her written child erotica that she confessed in acting upon her urged until she was stopped when she was caught almost in the act.

By the way, Roosh will tell you that women from that area aren't that fond of meeting men, because probably those women enter little boy's bedrooms to strip nude and "breastfeed" them without anyone knowing,those weird women there in Toronto.

Post: #24

I don't mind treating women with a double-standard on some issues. In fact I would argue that true equality is not possible before the law.

We should treat men and women differently on some issues, but we should also give men and women silghtly different rights and responsibilities before the law. That was the case in the Uk in the 1890s and the system worked much better than what we have now.

Let her off easily with that, but fucking fire her from all her bloody jobs, bar her from propaganda professions and let her stay at home with her kid that she finally has. She will be more happy that way. And we will also be more happy for never ever hearing from her again.

Post: #25

(04-03-2017 08:00 PM)Jetset Wrote:  I find the insistence that this is some kind of latent pedophilia to be a little strange. It seems to me more like a flirtation with something akin to "baby stealing", a well-documented psychological phenomenon.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1788403/

"Baby stealing seems usually to be an attempt to compensate for emotional deprivation or frustrated maternal feelings, and a real or imaginary miscarriage may be a predisposing or precipitating factor."

Crazy as hell and deadly serious, but not sexualized in the least.

So chuck her in an insane asylum for the rest of her life.

Sounds like a reasonable compromise.

There's a vanishingly thin level of fucks being given by cis white men of western civilisation for these complicated rationales that only seem to spring up when the person on trial is not a cis white man of western civilisation.