Post: #1

His public persona was a "male feminist," but behind closed doors he fooled girls into thinking he ran a "porn recruitment" agency. He would target girls who wanted to get into porn with promises that he had connections to the big porn studios. He used that story to sleep with at least six girls. Unfortunately for him, that broke a lot of laws. He is now in jail facing four rape charges while owing over $300,000 in fines.

Quote:Things are not looking good for Matt Hickey. The former tech journalist, who is currently being held in King County jail on four separate charges of second-degree rape, failed to respond to the Attorney General Office's lawsuit against his fake porn scam. As a result, on Tuesday a King County judge granted the Attorney General's motion for a default judgment against Hickey.

Not only did King County Superior Court Judge Ken Schubert issue a ruling finding that Hickey did, indeed, scam at least six women by pretending to be a fake female porn recruiter online since 2006; Schubert also ruled that Hickey owes the state $300,000 in penalties that represent 150 violations of state consumer protection laws in connection with this scam. Additionally, Hickey must pay $32,201 in court fees, the judge ruled.

http://www.thestranger.com/slog/2017/03/...udge-rules

Quote:Bishop says she drank so much that she nearly blacked out. And that's when she claims that Matt said they had to have sex. "He was like, 'Well, we have to have sex, because if we don't then how am I going to know you're for real and you'll actually be able to do this in the industry? So you have to prove to me you're not going to bail out.'"

Bishop says that she never would have had sex with Matt if she didn't think it was for the audition. She wasn't attracted to him. Bishop left Matt's apartment upset but didn't quite understand why. All she knew was that she felt violated.

http://www.thestranger.com/feature/2016/...e-audition

Quote:Hickey recently made an article on Forbes back on March 18th, 2016 decrying and lambasting Microsoft for having scantily clad dancers at an after-party during the Game Developers Conference.

The journalist was also one of many within the tech sector who condemned #GamerGate.

While condemning the hashtag used to expose scandals and ethical violations by journalists, it turns out that Hickey himself has become involved in an alleged sex scandal involving a pornographic recruitment agency.

http://www.oneangrygamer.net/2016/06/ant...ndal/4525/

Most SJWs harbor deep secrets and other demons. This guy was no exception.

Post: #2

Hiding in plain sight, it seems the smart move

Would those laws count if you lied about your income/job/age/wealth I wonder as I do this all the time to defuse IEDs between myself and the target, coming clean down the road after a few lays seems to jive ok if she likes it

Post: #3

This simply isn't rape.

Post: #4

(04-10-2017 02:48 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Bishop says that she never would have had sex with Matt if she didn't think it was for the audition. She wasn't attracted to him. Bishop left Matt's apartment upset but didn't quite understand why. All she knew was that she felt violated.

The dudes a douche for sure... but rapist?

So she fucks him (even though shes not attracted to him) thinking she's going "benefit" (get to do porn and more fucking for pay) with other dudes (and possibly girls) not all of which (if any) she will be attracted to (but pretend to be) thereby scamming the audience...

Post: #5

Isn't there a thread on this sort of thing on this form?

I'm pretty sure a member mentioned a buddy of his doing this sort thing out of some swanky apartment. Rents professional film equipment too.

Makes them sign a form to say no guarantees that they'll actually get an audition etc etc. I dunno if some kind of upfront pay is involved I don't know the exact specifics.

I swear I've read this exact thing on this forum ages ago...

Post: #6

(04-10-2017 02:48 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Bishop says that she never would have had sex with Matt if she didn't think it was for the audition. She wasn't attracted to him. Bishop left Matt's apartment upset but didn't quite understand why. All she knew was that she felt violated.

Post: #7

Post: #8

Hey - that is one of my getting laid plans past 50!

But frankly there is no reason to scam anyone there.

You can start a real porn company and cast talent. The company does not have to be very successful and the movies don't have to be distributed much or hardly at all.

Essentially you could publish 5 solo masturbation movies while banging 20 girls and it would all be legal. Of course you have to tell them more or less the truth. How much of the footage is being distributed is up to you anyway.

The idiot likely assumed that all those Casting Porn Sites did it exactly as can be seen on camera where the "casting director" tells them about the wonderful opportunities of the porn world and fucks them for free. Of course that is bullshit - all girls there sign contracts before the shoot, then they do the fake casting. Otherwise those guys would be all in jail.

However there is a loophole for anyone who wants to fuck wannabe porn starlets without putting your dick out on the net - you can simply fuck the girls and never publish the footage. Some porn companies never publish some shoots because they are not up to their standards, but the girl gets paid anyway and has to sign a legal binding contract nonetheless.

But what can you expect - he is a "male feminist" who obviously could not get laid with his feminism, so he resorted to what he saw online. The good news is that he will get plenty of action behind bars now.

Post: #9

(04-10-2017 04:56 PM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  

The man who produces those vids is a Red Pill guy who reads the 'sphere. He used to post stuff on Twitter - little bit on the Asperger Scale (said so himself), but made almost 10 mio. $ off of it. I think he got his son now to take over for him - family biz.

Post: #10

Quote:Bishop says she drank so much that she nearly blacked out. And that's when she claims that Matt said they had to have sex. "He was like, 'Well, we have to have sex, because if we don't then how am I going to know you're for real and you'll actually be able to do this in the industry? So you have to prove to me you're not going to bail out.'"

Bishop says that she never would have had sex with Matt if she didn't think it was for the audition. She wasn't attracted to him. Bishop left Matt's apartment upset but didn't quite understand why. All she knew was that she felt violated.

That's where they often get us. It may be ridiculous to thinking men, but if she was "black-out-drunk", she gets to play the rape card. No responsibility for the harlots.

Post: #11

Every time the "sex by fraud" allegation is brought up, it reminds me of the case where a doctor diagnosed his patients with a rare disease which can only be cured by having sex with a certified donor. He, completely coincidentally, was a certified donor.

http://articles.latimes.com/1987-03-31/l...unty-woman

If you read the entire article, he previously beat the heat and inspired lawmakers to write a new law. If you'd like to read the California Court of Appeals on that original matter:

http://www.lawlink.com/research/caselevel3/61611

It contains gems regarding the fact pattern as outlined:

Quote: "Dr. Stevens" told Ms. R. that he had the results of her blood test and that she had contracted a dangerous, highly infectious and perhaps fatal disease; that she could be sued as a result; that the disease came from using public toilets; and that she would have to tell him the identity of all her friends who would then have to be contacted in the interest of controlling the spread of the disease.

"Dr. Stevens" further explained that there were only two ways to treat the disease. The first was a painful surgical procedure--graphically described--costing $9,000, and requiring her uninsured hospitalization for six weeks. A second alternative, "Dr. Stevens" explained, was to have sexual intercourse with an anonymous donor who had been injected with a serum which would cure the disease. The latter, nonsurgical procedure would only cost $4,500. When the victim replied that she lacked sufficient funds the "doctor" suggested that $1,000 would suffice as a down payment. The victim thereupon agreed to the nonsurgical alternative and consented to intercourse with the mysterious donor, believing "it was the only choice I had."

After discussing her intentions with her work supervisor, the victim proceeded to the Hyatt Hotel in Burlingame as instructed, and contacted "Dr. [163 Cal.App.3d 1227] Stevens" by telephone. The latter became furious when he learned Ms. R. had informed her employer of the plan, and threatened to terminate his treatment, finally instructing her to inform her employer she had decided not to go through with the treatment. Ms. R. did so, then went to her bank, withdrew $1,000 and, as instructed, checked into another hotel and called "Dr. Stevens" to give him her room number.

About a half hour later the defendant "donor" arrived at her room. When Ms. R. had undressed, the "donor," petitioner, after urging her to relax, had sexual intercourse with her.

At the time of penetration, it was Ms. R.'s belief that she would die unless she consented to sexual intercourse with the defendant: as she testified, "My life felt threatened, and for that reason and that reason alone did I do it."

This guy was a real piece of shit. After they changed the law, he ran his scheme again and was tried under the new law.

http://articles.latimes.com/1987-04-22/l...-testifies


Please excuse the brief interruption from our previously scheduled program. These sex by fraud allegations always remind me of this case.

Post: #12

(04-10-2017 06:29 PM)tarquin Wrote:  Every time the "sex by fraud" allegation is brought up, it reminds me of the case where a doctor diagnosed his patients with a rare disease which can only be cured by having sex with a certified donor. He, completely coincidentally, was a certified donor...

Is it even possible for a woman that stupid to consent in any situation?

Tom Cruise tried a similar gambit, but to less success:

Post: #13

Quote:I swear I've read this exact thing on this forum ages ago...

Because there already is at least one thread already with a dude doing this exact same thing. Then a link to a guy who was setting up a similar thing with models by renting out a studio or something similar.

Post: #14

(04-10-2017 07:29 PM)cascadecombo Wrote:  

Quote:I swear I've read this exact thing on this forum ages ago...

Because there already is at least one thread already with a dude doing this exact same thing.

Same guy, actually.

/thread-56360.html

Post: #15

(04-10-2017 03:19 PM)captndonk Wrote:  This simply isn't rape.

I just don't feel bad for this guy, what with him being a virtue-signaling "woke" male feminist.

Post: #16

I posted a dupe.

Post: #17

Hahaha, they are putting a price on access to their pussies.. This is literally prostitutes sueing a customer who didn't pay up as promised. All nice and dandy, but they don't have the moral high ground. The state is playing the pimp, smacking the customer to pay up.

Post: #18

Another self proclaimed male who has deviant sexual behavior and just HAPPENS to be a male feminist.

Who would have guessed.

Post: #19

Any pics of the ladies?

Post: #20

This guy only banged 6 girls from this ?



Not worth the risk of rape charges.

Post: #21

(04-10-2017 09:26 PM)Roosh Wrote:  I posted a dupe.

Fuck you Roosh.

This is like the time I realised my parents were both idiots.

I need a puppy & a colouring book STAT!

Back on point. This dude IS a rapist. Probably the most clever rapist I'd conceive of. Raping in plain sight. Props & enjoy the consequences. Hoes will be hoes. He was playing with fire.

Post: #22

< I would not call this rape - the feminists love to broaden the definition of rape.

It is similar to a man who convincingly duped a woman into believing he is worth 500 mio. $. Then he tells her, that he would pay her 200.000$ for sex, but of course never does.

She is still a hoe willing to fuck for money, but he simply conned her.

The guy here should not be tried as a rapist, but a s a mere con artist. Everything would be alright if he had paid the girls and signed an actual contract. The girls then could not scream "rape".

All those broad definitions of what constitutes rape are indeed moronic - "pulled out too late rape", "dissatisfied with sex rape" - fuck that. No one forced those women to fuck him, they were just conned.

Post: #23

Zel, coercion is coercion, philosophically speaking.

I am in no way defending these hoes.

Post: #24

(04-10-2017 09:26 PM)Roosh Wrote:  I posted a dupe.

The honest question out of all of this is:

Will you lock your own thread?