Post: #1

You meet her. You bang her within 2 weeks. Was she just a yes girl slvt all along or did we game them.

Always wondered if a girl I banged easily is just that way with any guy or if I gamed her so well she wouldn't normally but she banged.

Post: #2

You met each other, you liked each other, and she decided to bang. I don't think it's necessarily "she's a slut" vs "you gamed her." You obviously did enough to impress her/make her like you to fuck, so there's that. But people meet, thye get along, and they fuck. Happens all the time.

Post: #3

A girl that bangs "within 2 weeks" is not easy at all, friend.

Post: #4

What do you mean not easy at all?

Post: #5

Not enough information, and women are notoriously adept at masking their true natures from men (and also other women!).

It's possible she's a ho, but it's also possible she was just really into you.

Why does it matter?

As an aside, just about all the girls I've ever banged, I banged quickly after meeting, typically within a week or two. The ones that didn't put out by the 3rd date, fizzled and faded away.

Post: #6

(05-09-2017 04:20 PM)wonderer1 Wrote:  You meet her. You bang her within 2 weeks. Was she just a yes girl slvt all along or did we game them.

Always wondered if a girl I banged easily is just that way with any guy or if I gamed her so well she wouldn't normally but she banged.

2 weeks is a long time in a player's world to bang a girl.

Now if you met a girl within a few hours of matching her online, you meet at a bar, and then are balls deep in her outside the bar in your car. (Which happened recently)

.....odds are that girl is a slut.


She banged you because she liked you, but didn't give it up to you until 2 weeks in.

But here's a question, how many dates (times you hung out) before you fucked her ?

Post: #7

Met 5 times. She told me I should've been quicker. Didn't let me do anything the night before the bang . She's 16 and has had 2 bfs already, also best sex I've ever had, wouldn't get off me for 3 hours straight

Post: #8

16? Ruh roh

Post: #9

The fact she told you, that you should've been quicker, sounds like a slut tell.

Or you were bringing weak game and she basically said, "about fucking time"

5 times isn't a fast bang at all - matter of fact that's a record for me taking that long to fuck a girl.


Also to note, we don't talk about underage girls on here.

Post: #10

They are all sluts for the right man.

Post: #11

(05-09-2017 05:46 PM)ChrisGaines Wrote:  16? Ruh roh

Post: #12

Assuming OP is underage then this is all legal.

Also a lot of countries have varying ages of consent.

I'll be real though, she's definitely a ho. Girls that age shouldn't be giving it up that easy

Post: #13

(05-09-2017 06:34 PM)Sonoma Wrote:  Assuming OP is underage then this is all legal.

Also a lot of countries have varying ages of consent.

I'll be real though, she's definitely a ho. Girls that age shouldn't be giving it up that easy

Roosh talks about this on Rule 7, not talking about Jail Bait girls - I believe that age is 18 - regardless of law or location.

Post: #14

Age of Concent to have sex in U.K. Is 16. Sorry should of clarified.

Deffo think she's a slut now as she wanted me to be quicker and voiced this, she wanted me to bang her, also questioned if I wanted friendship after 2nd date when I hadn't tried to kiss her yet. She was waiting for it all and I wasn't quick enough.

But if the longest you had to have sex was 5 meetings doesn't that make them all sluts?

Post: #15

The rule on the forum is that only girls 18+ can be discussed, regardless of the legal age of consent in the poster's jurisdiction.

Post: #16

Could we discuss it if we all pretend that she's 18?

Good. Anyway I think she's a slut. At that age (whatever that may be) she shouldn't be able to give anyone the best sex they're ever had.

Post: #17

(05-09-2017 04:20 PM)wonderer1 Wrote:  You meet her. You bang her within 2 weeks. Was she just a yes girl slvt all along or did we game them.

Always wondered if a girl I banged easily is just that way with any guy or if I gamed her so well she wouldn't normally but she banged.

(05-09-2017 05:41 PM)wonderer1 Wrote:  Met 5 times. She told me I should've been quicker. Didn't let me do anything the night before the bang . She's 16 and has had 2 bfs already, also best sex I've ever had, wouldn't get off me for 3 hours straight

(05-10-2017 01:10 AM)wonderer1 Wrote:  Age of Concent to have sex in U.K. Is 16. Sorry should of clarified.

16 is brainless, one word out of her mouth and you get thrown in jail and count on the justice system to believe that she ever had some evil in her doing it, at this age women are seen as angels and fucking angels get you thrown to hell for the best treatment...

Post: #18

Sluts also need game. Read Roissys post Slut are no less selective and Roosh also wrote that Whores require game, maybe even more than 'good' girls.

Post: #19

(05-09-2017 04:38 PM)wonderer1 Wrote:  What do you mean not easy at all?

I meant that if she were a slut and 18+ she wouldn't wait that long to let you bang her (the fact that she's underaged changes things of course).

Post: #20

deep down inside, they are all sluts, you just have to use game to make them your slut. if there is attraction, etc. the amount of effort required by you may be less. But trying to place women in categories like slut or not-slut is a waste of time and frames the question incorrectly.

your question brings up some subtle points that underlies all game - is game effective on all women, and to the same extent?

my experience is that some women are more receptive to me than others. I can't figure out why, but I stopped trying to figure out why a long time ago. Its not like I can hit right handed pitching but strike out with left handed pitching, and can predict my results. So I just get up to the plate and take a shot. Looking for IOIs helps, but to a large extent what creates those IOIs is a ZFG attitude and the willingness to approach without IOIs.

In contrast, there are some folks on this board who believe that if your game is tight it should be effective on everyone. Perhaps its because I'm not the master that some guys are, but I haven't found that to be true for me. And like the slut/not-slut question, I think it causes you to have the wrong outlook.

The famous investor Jim Rogers says he waits to invest until he sees a pile of money sitting in the corner, and then he goes and picks it up. I guess I'm sort of like that, except I'm in the batters box and I swing at everything I'm interested in. To me, there is little cost to swinging and missing, and the cost of not taking a chance is higher than taking a chance and missing.

Just assume they are all sluts and that they all will swallow your game. Of course they won't all be homeruns, and they won't all be into you to the same degree, but you knew that already. Don't adopt self-limiting beliefs or negotiate against yourself.

Post: #21

Slut + Game = Bang
Slut + No game = Someone else's bang.

Post: #22

A little from column A, a little from column B.

Post: #23

7 day ban. We only discuss girls 18 and over on this forum.

Post: #24

(05-10-2017 01:37 AM)Suits Wrote:  The rule on the forum is that only girls 18+ can be discussed, regardless of the legal age of consent in the poster's jurisdiction.

The reason of course is not so much that we care whether a chick who has already had 20 dicks in her gets a 21st, but rather that we don't want to provoke an attack by the SJWs and feminists who are always looking for an excuse to try to get the site shut down.

They don't want people calling a 16-year-old a slut, because in their view, if a woman has casual sex with alpha badboys, she's just enjoying her right to be a liberated woman. Allowing young women to have casual sex helps keep them in school (where there are plenty of alpha badboys to bang); if they had to wait for marriage before having sex, their hormones might tempt them to drop out of school to get married.

At the same time, SJWs don't want the narrative challenged that beta providers (which older men tend to be) are predators. It is the entire basis of feminism summed up.

There's a sweet spot between being not controversial enough, and being too controversial, but the goal of feminists and SJWs is to keep applying pressure that will push that sweet spot far enough to the left that it's hard to say much of anything before free speech becomes unaffordable.

Feminists don't mind if we bang out chicks, as long as we wait till they're 18, i.e., till after they've had an opportunity to get banged out by plenty of other guys and lose their ability to pair bond. That way, there's not as much risk that they'll want to settle down and be faithful and loyal. That has to be avoided at all costs.

For this reason, feminists will just barely tolerate this site's remaining up, as long as we limit the discussion to certain parameters (e.g. no discussion of girls under 18). However, feminists still don't like all this talk about how women shouldn't get educated, or how women put themselves in situations that lead to rape accusations, so they do target the site by, e.g., getting PayPal to cut off services, just to send a message, "You're on a short leash, buddy. Don't forget it. You've reached a point where if you go any further, we'll turn up the heat beyond what you can stand."

As long as you're still being persecuted, though, it's a sign that you haven't become a controlled opposition quite yet. You are still enough out of their control that they're having to continually apply more pressure to try to keep you down. On the other hand, if I see that a supposedly dissident site still accepts PayPal, that's how I know that they're either too small to matter, or they're cucked. We might say that has become the canary in the mine shaft.