Post: #1

https://nkilsdonkgervais.wordpress.com/2...-of-women/

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again—men will always earn more than women. They take more risks, and spend a lot more time finding ways to earn money. Despite close to 100 years of legislation to hinder men relative to women, men always find novel ways to generate wealth.

By the time the government completely invaded universities and set up its gynocentric curriculum, men dropped out of school and became Bitcoin millionaires.

Despite trillions in legislation to promote equality, a new patriarchy just emerged. A Bitcoin was worth just a few cents in 2009, and is now worth around 17,000$. The Bitcoin empire, and its market capitalization of $350 billion, is now worth more than Israel, Ireland, or Denmark. And like any system that isn’t regulated by the government—it’s entirely controlled by men.

I was taught that the patriarchy existed because men were physically stronger and coerced women into a subordinate role. So what’s their excuse this time? It’s not like you need physical strength for mining Bitcoins.

The Bitcoin train: only for men

Coinbase, a website where cryptofanatics can exchange their currencies, conducted a survey recently. At least 95% of it’s users were male. That’s a whopping majority. The 5% of women were probably there to sell the Bitcoins that men gave them anyway.

Bitcoin, which was originally the project of a pseudo-Japanese anonymous weeaboo in his unemployed years, turned out massive and profitable. It’s at this moment that it became a feminist issue. Put this one on your calendar—March 8th is Bitcoin Women’s Day. If you want to contribute, join the Facebook page of BitcoinWomen, they already have 39 members and a profile picture.

womencrypto
Give me a break, “Bloomberg”.

#WomenDoItBetter

To demonstrate that women can do it too, a feminist named Galia Benartzi tried to create her own cryptocurrency. “We have an opportunity to rebuild the financial system,” she said. “Are we going to do it with all guys again?” Her cryptocurrency, Bancor token, had one of the worst performances of all cryptocurrencies, according to Bloomberg.

The gubmint failed

Here’s what’s funny about the fact that women don’t own Bitcoin. For close to 100 years, the government has forced the involvement of women in all spheres of life. After trillions in programs to transform them into men, women weren’t able to properly identify this unprecendented opportunity. Despite a century of efforts on the (male) taxpayer’s dime, a new patriarchy the size of a country emerged in just a few years. And now girls sell their nudes in exchanges for 1/1000th of a Bitcoin.

In 2010, thousands of women were employed full-time to promote feminist theory and legislation. Their goal: to smash the patriarchy. They gave us female superheroes, they voted for Hillary, they were in total control of published media, they replaced university professors, they put quotas for female executives, they took half your income to fund all of these programs… but the Bitcoin train went right past them.

Told ya

Bitcoin is a perfect example why there will always be some sort of patriarchy. Men will always find ways to be wealthy, because they have motivation to do so. By the time a system is successful and the government makes it “female-friendly”, men have already moved on. Our weaponized autism cannot be unloaded.

Post: #2

What a great post, totally agree.

Post: #3

There’s already a thread on this

When crypto is decentralised do we need decentralised feminists to tell us about the gender pay gap in coins

Post: #4

Here’s a crypto with a lot of potential in the female post-wall market. I wonder if an RVF member created it?

https://www.cryptokitties.co/marketplace

Post: #5

I guess this is the level of intelligence of the average crypto investor.

You should look up cognitive biases.

Post: #6

(12-16-2017 06:15 AM)pitt Wrote:  What a great post, totally agree.

Fuckin' rights.

Post: #7

(12-16-2017 12:10 PM)Zauber Wrote:  I guess this is the level of intelligence of the average crypto investor.

You should look up cognitive biases.

Yeah, I guess we're a slow bunch. Why don't you explain to us what biases burner has in his post?

Is anything he said wrong? Is it not true that it's predominantly men in crypto because men on average take far more risks than women do?

Post: #8

He might be a undercover feminist. Either that or im just paranoid.

Post: #9

(12-16-2017 02:14 PM)Genghis Khan Wrote:  

(12-16-2017 12:10 PM)Zauber Wrote:  I guess this is the level of intelligence of the average crypto investor.

You should look up cognitive biases.

Yeah, I guess we're a slow bunch. Why don't you explain to us what biases burner has in his post?

Is anything he said wrong? Is it not true that it's predominantly men in crypto because men on average take far more risks than women do?

I may even go one step further. The average man has at least a passing interest in the possibilities of the technology: decentralization, political freedom, etc.

Aside from just being risk averse, women are generally repelled by the idea of cryptocurrencies for some reason.

We saw similar behavior with computers. Men have long used computers for recreation (gaming, tinkering, etc.). These activities were also repellent to women. Only when computers were made social and more user friendly through social media and smartphones, respectively, did we see an explosion in female interest. Women are closer to the end of the technology adoption lifecycle.

Post: #10

I don't think the sole reason why people invest has to do with risk taking, otherwise people who climb buildings would be the best investors. This argument is essentially saying that the prime reason why some people have BTC and some do not is because of risk.

As someone else said it's in most cultures for men to have more interest in technology than women, it's only recently became socially acceptable for women to use computers and play video games and not look like nerds (which is why now it is supposed to be "cool" when a girl says she likes mario kart on her dating profile). It will likely take another generation for women to catch up.

Correct me if I am wrong but aren't most crypto holders from Asia? If we were to follow this template, this would mean that people from East Asia take more risks than people from America, which I find hard to believe (my experience in China gives me more of an impression that many Asians are designed to be part of their system more so than Americans are). More people in Asia are probably tech savy, trendy or friendly than in the West, which is probably why Asians are bigger on this than Westerners (I could be wrong, but it's my guess). Men have been connected to technology longer than women. A large reason why people do not hold BTC is due to lack of knowledge of it and how it works - in the grand scheme of things hardly any one had bit coins before a few years ago in general. Men also have more wealth than women as a whole, and more money to invest.



As for whether men take bigger risks than women in general, I would say so - though I don't think that's why so many more men hold bitcoins than women (at least not in a direct sense, it is more layered than that). Men have been expected to take care of themselves and a family for much longer than women, and predominantly men attract women through success (or at least this is what most men think) which can only happen through risks (and a reason why most people want success is to get pussy).

Post: #11

(12-16-2017 12:10 PM)Zauber Wrote:  I guess this is the level of intelligence of the average crypto investor.

You should look up cognitive biases.

100% cranberry juice helps with stinging vagina.

Post: #12

I think we are going to see a rise in the new super rich soon - digital oil barons.

Post: #13

It's not just Bitcoin. Men have to be good at every single thing if they want to get laid consistently with high quality women. For a women just being a 7 on looks scale is enough to open many doors.

Men are better at everything, including cooking! All world renowned chefs are male!

We even do their make up, all top tier make up artists are gay males nearly.

What do ugly women do instead of trying to improve themselves? They become feminists, what do men do? They fight till the end, they don't give up. Of course there are always beta cuck exceptions.

Post: #14

No shit, generating wealth isn't important to a woman's survival. Only access to a partner who can generate wealth is relevant to their survival and such access is determined by their looks and ability of being a good partner.

This is why it's male dominated. We have the drive because subconsciously it's another avenue to increase our resources which are needed for our own survival and consequently, families that rely on the men.

Post: #15

Hey guys didn't you know women are better investors? It says so in this article here:

"The most comprehensive study on gender and the stock market shows that women who invest — whether their own money or on behalf of an organization — take a more cautious approach but tend to outperform their male peers in the long run."

Also, women make up only 3.43% of crypto investors.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/bitcoin-...-1.4458884

Post: #16

^lmao, when I see this kind of shit (cbc article above), all I can do is just nod, agree and secretly laugh.

Testosterone increases risk taking. Higher risk = higher reward. It wasn't women who drove the dot com bubble to its peak and sunsequently it wasnt women who made mad cash during that bubble. Obviously a lot of people got burned when the dot com bubble popped, but it was the testosterone, along with fear ( of missing out) and greed, that drove it.

Reminds me of my mom recently, she just cashed out her canada savings bond and it was like a measly 1% increase over a couple years lol.