MajorStyles
Wingman
  
Posts: 711
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 7
|
RE: To eat or not to eat: breakfast
Years ago, I was teaching English to a group of Chinese students. When I asked them what they had for breakfast, they all said the same thing: milk and bread. And, as you might imagine, they all were skinny.
Recently, I adopted this Chinese model and I've been very happy with it. A glass of almond milk with a piece of bread, and then I bounce out the door. It's just enough to satiate my appetite and give me energy for the morning. And moreover, it really does not move the digits on the scale.
So I vote for a small breakfast...almost a snack, essentially. This is, in my opinion, superior to eating nothing, as well as eating too much (pancakes, eggs, etc.).
"Action still preserves for us a hope that we may stand erect." - Thucydides (from History of the Peloponnesian War)
|
|
| 12-17-2017 11:26 AM |
|
|
BadgerHut
Wingman
  
Posts: 804
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 14
|
RE: To eat or not to eat: breakfast
(12-17-2017 11:26 AM)MajorStyles Wrote: Years ago, I was teaching English to a group of Chinese students. When I asked them what they had for breakfast, they all said the same thing: milk and bread. And, as you might imagine, they all were skinny.
Recently, I adopted this Chinese model and I've been very happy with it. A glass of almond milk with a piece of bread, and then I bounce out the door. It's just enough to satiate my appetite and give me energy for the morning. And moreover, it really does not move the digits on the scale.
So I vote for a small breakfast...almost a snack, essentially. This is, in my opinion, superior to eating nothing, as well as eating too much (pancakes, eggs, etc.).
Sounds like their cultural view of breakfast is "a thing you eat to get your body started for the day." I'd put the continental breakfast in that category.
Other cultures seem to view breakfast as a dining experience in its own right, or a social event (think of the English breakfast which is like a steak dinner, or American brunch culture, or the "working breakfast" or reading a full-length newspaper while munching away).
I would bet that people who value their time are in the former category and view breakfast as nutritional delivery for a purpose, combined with maybe a ritual to get the discipline booted up. Then again, juicing takes a good 20-30 minutes.
|
|
| 12-17-2017 11:41 AM |
|
The following 1 user Likes BadgerHut's post:1 user Likes BadgerHut's post
MajorStyles
|
Ruslan
Beta Orbiter

Posts: 122
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation: 2
|
RE: To eat or not to eat: breakfast
^^ Recently I have read a book that states importance of timing of meals. The gap between supper and breakfast should not be longer then 15 hours as body "goes" into saving mode. Also it advices to delay breakfast for 2-3 hours after waking up. Once digestive system is activated by first meal it will demand another one. All this attests the idea of intermittent fasting; 12 hours feeding window is good enough. It also denies the need of eating every 2-3 hours but encourages long breaks between meals as it will prevent one to become more insuline resitant. There is also psychological argument for that. One would never feel satiated having 2.5k calories broken in 5 meals, therefore making the whole process more strugglesome. The book is only in polish as far as I know. Here is the link: http://2xme.pl The photos of man and woman popping out are of the authors.
When I used to wake up at 4:30AM to get ready for 6AM physical labour I did eat breakfast right away after cold shower. It worked really well that time, as I was very active throughout the day; finishing work at 2PM then gym at 3, either tennis for 2h or bball for 2h at 6PM (30mins walk to court). Second meal used to be at 10AM containg 2 brown toast and of 6, up to 12 fried eggs, depending how hungry I was. Third meal: chicken breasts, rice, salad with extra virgin olive oil. Last meal: 150-200g curd cheese with cinamon, black pepper and honey. Nowadays, I do not work and eat breakfast late sticking to 3 meals a day. Most of mornings I spend on reading. Waist and weight stays the same. All it comes down to how you feel; energy, mood, boners etc. One way to check what works for you and what does not is to follow Steelex in his cutting thread .
Quote:I don't snack I eat the same thing every day. Remove the variables.
(This post was last modified: 12-18-2017 06:36 AM by Ruslan.)
|
|
| 12-18-2017 06:32 AM |
|
|
Truth Tiger
Chubby Chaser
 
Posts: 521
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 28
|
RE: To eat or not to eat: breakfast
I agree with Thomas and IF in general. Has worked for me (blood type O hunter gatherer). I usually aim for at least 12 hours and more like 14 hrs between dinner and 'brunch.' It can vary on if I'm recovering from an intense workout / sport activity or just in maintenance.
Drink a glass or two of water on waking. Add lemon to help detox your liver and alkalize your blood.
I avoid gluten / bread / wheat as much as possible as modern wheat is NOT healthy, whether labeled 'organic' or not. It was hybridized in the 1970s with wild strains that now caused or exacerbated gut dysbiosis, multiple sclerosis (as Terry Wahls has healed herself from), and pretty much every auto immune disease you can name.
I'm also anti-bean as they're also hard on the gut but some types can tolerate them okay.
A few medium boiled eggs, some natural uncured pastrami, and a little ghee / clarified butter are my staple starter meal.
Any liquids should be 30 min before eating or 60 min eating to allow full digestion and absorption.
Kombucha is a great way to get beneficial bacteria. The 'Bu' brand at whole foods is low sugar and really pleasant. I also like GT Dave.
I think juiced vegetables (with little fruit) are best had in afternoon or early evening, not first thing but see what your body responds to well. You shouldn't need they much fuel first thing in the morning if you ate well at supper and got enough sleep. Lack of sleep triggers hormones that increase hunger cravings.
I am a fan of salmon sashimi and every other day will have 'sake' sushi (salmon sashimi over sushi rice). The husk from brown rice can irritate the stomach and gut lining. White rice is pure glucose, good fuel for your muscles in recovery. Sometimes I will also have sashimi for brunch.
Smachnego!
'100% MAGA' Bill Mitchell interviews military veteran, Patriot, & Q Anon decoder Praying Medic
NeonRevolt.com - incredible research/analysis
Q drops here // Q proofs here
I fixed a leaky gut & got rid of eczema with GAPS diet, bone broth, etc., while avoiding the 12 bad foods
|
|
| 12-18-2017 12:37 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Truth Tiger's post:1 user Likes Truth Tiger's post
Built to Fade
|
gracy
Banned
Posts: 10
Joined: Dec 2017
|
RE: To eat or not to eat: breakfast
(12-17-2017 04:04 AM)BadgerHut Wrote: Has anybody found a good reason to either eat or not eat breakfast daily?
I usually don't get up early enough to get breakfast in before work, so I often skip it, and do a brunch-type thing for weekends. I don't think I've noticed any ill effect, but curious what others' experiences are. (I don't do coffee either so I'm usually not putting anything but water in my body until lunchtime.)
I'll note two points of pop-science:
On one hand, I'm told (from a Jordan Peterson video) that eating a big, fat/protein-heavy breakfast is a hedge against anxiety. I tried going hard on the bakey-eggs, and maybe it helped me focus a bit at work but maybe that was just the effect of the discipline itself.
On the other, I saw Rhonda Patrick on Joe Rogan's podcast talking about time-restricted eating and saying that 11 hours is a good window, which for me would cover lunch, dinner and a late snack but NOT an earlier breakfast.
Sir don't skip breakfast, As far for my knowledge you should your day with heavy breakfast, if you want you can skip after meals.
|
|
| 12-21-2017 02:10 AM |
|
|
IvanDrago
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,082
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 19
|
RE: To eat or not to eat: breakfast
I feel most people's views on breakfast come from Kellogg and Post cereal commercials that ran on Saturday morning cartoons when they were kids.
A cartoon character commercial cuts to a picture of a table with toast, eggs, bacon, fruit, glass of milk and a box of Fruity Pebbles... the announcer then says "Fruity Pebbles is part of this complete breakfast". That always got me thinking WTF does that even mean? "Part" of this complete breakfast. If I put a box of Fruity Pebbles in a bag with some jumper cables, a socket set, wrenches and a tow rope would I be able to say "Fruity Pebbles is a part of this emergency roadside tool kit."? The phrase is burned in to the lexicon of everyone but it makes no damn sense.
Another thing I hear from breakfast advocates are words like "boost", "kick start", "rev up", "jump start" when referring to metabolism. These words are meaningless to me as well and whenever I ask anyone what do you mean by "boost" or "rev up", they can't give me a response. I ask why can't I do my "boosting" at 11am instead of 8am and I can't get an answer.
I am not knocking eating breakfast by any means, and I am intrigued by OP's mention of fatty/protein rich breakfast in being a hedge against anxiety. I generally don't eat until around noon because I am not hungry until noon and I generally feel more alert when I am in a fasted state (although I admit I do feel anxious at times as well).
I have been in to IF off and on for about 4 years now by skipping breakfast with great results as far as my body fat percentage is concerned. I have noticed I am more anxious from time to time though, I was attributing it to a job change and high caffeine. I might try having some eggs and meat right when I wake up for a bit and see if anything changes.
|
|
| 12-22-2017 10:06 PM |
|
|