Post: #1

Well she may have her sisterhood card revoked after this one, but it's the expected consequences of allowing women to define sex and rape.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worl...de11f1808e

Quote:At the Hay literary festival this week, Greer again stirred the pot in an address about sexual violence.

“I want to turn the discourse about rape upside down,” she said, according to the Guardian. “We are not getting anywhere approaching it down the tunnel of history.”

In the speech, she argued that a lot of heterosexual sex is nonconsensual. Most of what we describe as rape is much more mundane, she said, more like “bad sex ... where there is no communication, no tenderness, no mention of love.”

“Every time a man rolls over on his exhausted wife and insists on enjoying his conjugal rights, he is raping her,” she said. “It will never end up in a court of law.”

Rape, she said, should be understood not as a “spectacularly violent crime” but rather as something that is simply “lazy, careless and insensitive"

Greer also said that the depictions of rape on television and in the movies do not accurately reflect the reality for many women.

“Most rapes don’t involve any injury whatsoever,” Greer said, according to the Guardian. “We are told that it is a sexually violent crime, an expert like Quentin Tarantino will tell us that when you use the word rape you’re talking about violence, a throwing them down ... it is one of the most violent crimes in the world. Bulls--t Tarantino.”

Greer said the culture's ideas about rape make the experience more traumatic for women than it needs to be. Society wants women to believe that rape will destroy them, she said. “We haven’t been destroyed, we’ve been bloody annoyed is what we’ve been,” she told the newspaper.

She cited a study that found that 70 percent of rape victims suffer post-traumatic stress disorder compared with 20 percent of conflict veterans. “What the hell are you saying? Something that leaves no sign, no injury, no nothing is more damaging to a woman than seeing your best friend blown up by an IED is to a veteran?” she asked.

Greer said that some rapes are violent. In those cases, she said, the perpetrators should be punished.

But in most cases, she said, it's hard for lawyers to prove that the perpetrators truly did not have consent. Instead of humiliating trials that devolve into long debates about what happened behind closed doors, Greer said, we should punish rape less harshly but make it easier for women to push claims through.

Rather than prison, Greer recommended that rapists be punished with 200 hours of community service and perhaps an “r” tattoo on the hand, arm or cheek."

All the false equivalences of regret sex or a hubby nudging his wife because he's gone without for two weeks, ergo the 1 in 4 rape victims, aren't really experiencing muslim style sexual enrichment..... but its still rape.

I think its been a long time since Germaine has been fucked properly to know what sex is.

Good thing they're up on arms though, otherwise every man would become a criminal with an R on his hand....

Post: #2

Would the 'R' tattoo become the new 'wedding ring' for pickup...?
If felons (even incel school shooters), gain love letters in prison. The 'R' tattoo may become the new 'bad-boy' status symbol.

Perhaps R. Kelly was simply so ahead of the trend one could think he's a time traveller?

Post: #3

Germaine Greer isn't far from going full alt-right. She's rightly called trannies and marital rape what they are.

Post: #4

Ah, the old tattoo. Despots through out history have used them to brand, and dehumanise. Once that has been done, it is really a much smaller step than one might imagine to ostracise or even kill that whole subclass - after all, they aren't really people, not like you and me. This really is an extraordinary thing to advocate. Branded and railroaded into unpaid labour - sounds pretty much like slavery to me, and I think that is something this nasty woman would like. And for what? For being a lousy shag, or for not showing womanhood due reverence. Monster.

Post: #5

F Roger Devlin Wrote:Looking about them for some legal and moral basis for enforcing this novel claim, they hit upon the age-old prohibition against rape. Feminists understand rape, however, not as a violation of a woman’s chastity or marital fidelity, but of her merely personal wishes. They are making use of the ancient law against rape to enforce not respect for feminine modesty but obedience to female whims. Their ideal is not the man whose self-control permits a woman to exercise her own, but the man who is subservient to a woman’s good pleasure—the man who behaves, not like a gentleman, but like a dildo.

From Sexual Utopia in Power
https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v6n2/...OQV6N2.pdf

Post: #6

She helped usher in feminism not realizing that feminism was a radical ideology that would not stop in the 1970s - it would march on until it destroyed society. And it is still not done.