Post: #1

Unvarnished hatred.

Male privilege my ass. Washington Post would never allow an article with this kind of hatred for any other group ( except perhaps for white people).

This is a broken dyke.

Quote:Why can’t we hate men?

Suzanna Danuta Walters, a professor of sociology and director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at Northeastern University, is the editor of the gender studies journal Signs.

It’s not that Eric Schneiderman (the now-former New York attorney general accused of abuse by multiple women) pushed me over the edge. My edge has been crossed for a long time, before President Trump, before Harvey Weinstein, before “mansplaining” and “incels.” Before live-streaming sexual assaults and red pill men’s groups and rape camps as a tool of war and the deadening banality of male prerogative.

Seen in this indisputably true context, it seems logical to hate men. I can’t lie, I’ve always had a soft spot for the radical feminist smackdown, for naming the problem in no uncertain terms. I’ve rankled at the “but we don’t hate men” protestations of generations of would-be feminists and found the “men are not the problem, this system is” obfuscation too precious by half.

But, of course, the criticisms of this blanket condemnation of men — from transnational feminists who decry such glib universalism to U.S. women of color who demand an intersectional perspective — are mostly on the mark. These critics rightly insist on an analysis of male power as institutional, not narrowly personal or individual or biologically based in male bodies. Growing movements to challenge a masculinity built on domination and violence and to engage boys and men in feminism are both gratifying and necessary.

But this recognition of the complexity of male domination (how different it can be in different parts of the world, how racism shapes it) should not — must not — mean we forget some universal facts.

Pretty much everywhere in the world, this is true: Women experience sexual violence, and the threat of that violence permeates our choices big and small. In addition, male violence is not restricted to intimate-partner attacks or sexual assault but plagues us in the form of terrorism and mass gun violence. Women are underrepresented in higher-wage jobs, local and federal government, business, educational leadership, etc.; wage inequality continues to permeate every economy and almost every industry; women continue to provide far higher rates of unpaid labor in the home (e.g., child care, elder care, care for disabled individuals, housework and food provision); women have less access to education, particularly at the higher levels; women have lower rates of property ownership.

The list goes on. It varies by country, but these global realities — of women’s economic, political, social and sexual vulnerabilities — are, well, real. Indeed, the nations in which these inequities have been radically minimized (e.g., Iceland) are those in which deliberate effort has been made to both own up to gender disparities and to address them directly and concretely.

So, in this moment, here in the land of legislatively legitimated toxic masculinity, is it really so illogical to hate men? For all the power of #MeToo and #TimesUp and the women’s marches, only a relatively few men have been called to task, and I’ve yet to see a mass wave of prosecutions or even serious recognition of wrongdoing. On the contrary, cries of “witch hunt” and the plotted resurrection of celebrity offenders came quick on the heels of the outcry over endemic sexual harassment and violence. But we’re not supposed to hate them because . . . #NotAllMen. I love Michelle Obama as much as the next woman, but when they have gone low for all of human history, maybe it’s time for us to go all Thelma and Louise and Foxy Brown on their collective butts.

The world has little place for feminist anger. Women are supposed to support, not condemn, offer succor not dismissal. We’re supposed to feel more empathy for your fear of being called a harasser than we are for the women harassed. We are told he’s with us and #NotHim. But, truly, if he were with us, wouldn’t this all have ended a long time ago? If he really were with us, wouldn’t he reckon that one good way to change structural violence and inequity would be to refuse the power that comes with it?

So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced and benefited from, start with this: Lean out so we can actually just stand up without being beaten down. Pledge to vote for feminist women only. Don’t run for office. Don’t be in charge of anything. Step away from the power. We got this. And please know that your crocodile tears won’t be wiped away by us anymore. We have every right to hate you. You have done us wrong. #BecausePatriarchy. It is long past time to play hard for Team Feminism. And win.

She hates men and wants them to grovel to women.

Here is her pic.



No wonder why she is so angry.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/...8540b7e4ba

Post: #2

She's a witch.

/thread-67797...pid1760608

Post: #3

She has no eyebrows. Maybe Trudeau can loan her one of his.

Post: #4

If men are so bad, maybe this country should stop the wholesale importation of third-world men. Because we have enough evil men here already.

Post: #5

women are going completely insane.

Curse of Eve.

Post: #6

I physically gagged when I saw her photo. Do we not do trigger-warnings anymore?

Post: #7

Another one who felt for (((their))) psyop... All that hate would make her a good shag.

Post: #8

https://mobile.twitter.com/SuzannaDWalte...0730611712

She’s getting torn up.

Post: #9

Let's see:

-Ugly
-Jewish
-Her grandparents and parents were socialists/communists
-She's a sociology and women's studies/gender/sex professor
-Hillary fan

Here's another article of hers:

Why This Socialist Feminist Is For Hillary
By Suzanna Danuta Walters

"Born to leftists themselves born to leftists, I am what is known in some circles as a “red-diaper baby.”

My immigrant Jewish grandparents met in New York City, at a meeting of the Young People’s Socialist League on the Lower East Side, and I grew up more familiar with the words to labor anthems than to those of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” My mother was an activist in the civil-rights movement who later engaged with feminism, antiwar activism, and the vast panoply of progressive issues that ebbed and flowed through our national politics over the past half-century.

In other words, I come by my democratic socialism organically and deeply.

Hillary may not be the radical, intersectional feminist that activists—myself included—fantasize about seeing in power. But she’s some kind of a feminist for sure, and her election would no doubt foreground the centrality of gender equity to social justice in ways we have not yet seen at a national level.

https://www.thenation.com/article/why-th...r-hillary/

Anyone want to guess where she lies on Kohlberg's model of moral development?

Post: #10

(06-12-2018 12:48 AM)blck Wrote:  Another one who felt for (((their))) psyop... All that hate would make her a good shag.

Post: #11

I would actually love to see a society comprised of nothing but wretched women (such as the one in the Oped) & soy-boys.

Give them a large island all to themselves, sit back, chuckle & watch the clusterfuck that would ensue.

Post: #12

(06-12-2018 02:37 AM)Super_Fire Wrote:  Let's see:

-Ugly
-Jewish
-Her grandparents and parents were socialists/communists
-She's a sociology and women's studies/gender/sex professor
-Hillary fan

I'm less surprised now...

Post: #13

She just wants to ruin as many young women as possible. I bet a hot girl in her class is viewed with as much hostility as a man is.

Post: #14

Quote:If men are so bad, maybe this country should stop the wholesale importation of third-world men. Because we have enough evil men here already.

Sounds like a brilliant 4chan campaign

"Let's not import toxic masculinity.

Let's not import any masculinity!"

Have photos if Ukrainian women war beaten in the Donetsk basin....

"Compassion dictates we offer refuge to these victims of war."

Profit = improved gender ratios.

Post: #15

Incredible. They call themselves 'Professors' and wonder why we have no respect for mainstream 'education' anymore.

Journalists publish this excrement and wonder why we have no respect for the mainstream media anymore.

They preach and bully into us the need for 'tolerance' and tell us that our gender (think they mean 'sex') is a 'protected characteristic' and can't be attacked or even disliked, yet then proceed to write articles on how much they hate 'all men' etc.

I love it when they do this though. It just makes them look bad and recruits fence-sitting normies. The MSM with their unimaginative, well-worn and failing propaganda are doing a great job dishing out the red pill and it isn't costing us a penny.

Post: #16

"So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced..."

Over in the Anthony Bourdain thread (and several others) I've written about how the media "invents reality." That means they present fictional ideas that get passed off as fact. People believe the ideas because they're in print.

The phrase "millennia of woe" is one such fictional idea. What the hell is she talking about?

For the past several centuries, men have come up with countless inventions that have made women's lives easier AND extended those lives. Women used to die in childbirth all the time, but now that rarely happens because of the medical inventions by men. Men have also given their lives to keep women and children safe.

This isn't "millennia of woe." This sounds more like "millennia of privilege" to me. Camille Paglia has been saying this for years.

Good post, Dusty. We need to expose this crap and I especially appreciate you putting the name of this writer, Suzanna Danuta Walters, front-and-center.

Hard to believe this woman gets paid to teach. Hopefully some of her students will find this post and realize there are alternative -- and more reality-based -- ideas out there.

Post: #17

Damn is that a woman or is that Medusa?

Post: #18

She got tenure and academic freedom. Those are actually good things that make it possible for people with non-PC views to say what they believe they should say. But they can also be abused, and this is a case of blatant abuse. The Washington Post, however, has no excuse for publishing this crap.

Post: #19

"We got this."

You've got what?

Right, men - everybody down tools, abandon your desks, close your shops. We're just oppressing them with our technology and civilisation. 'They' got this. Especially when Mohammad and his enriching pals come knocking.

Absolute retard.

Post: #20

(06-12-2018 06:44 AM)Matsufubu Wrote:  "We (/I) got this."
...

AFAIC this phrase constitutes possibly the most annoying 3 word combination in the history of the English language.

It even edges out "my mom's home".

Post: #21

(06-12-2018 05:58 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  "So men, if you really are #WithUs and would like us to not hate you for all the millennia of woe you have produced..."

Over in the Anthony Bourdain thread (and several others) I've written about how the media "invents reality." That means they present fictional ideas that get passed off as fact. People believe the ideas because they're in print.

This is a fact that verify itself more and more, with a diversity of media (trustful or not) growing larger by the day and belonging to fewer and fewer people, those realities spread on papers, radio and digital forms so we can be bombarded from everywhere.

The intelligence community got sections who their solely purpose is to read propaganda going on in other countries and even when they know that they're reading lies they can't help but to start trusting them so they have to get debriefed each day to counter this.

My worry is that nobody is debriefing us and even amongst our rank some people will call you conspirationist if you dare questioning the mainstream reality.

Post: #22

This is sort of the other end of the spectrum from Roseanne as far as hate-speech goes. The problem is that the public has embraced the victimhood mentality to such an extent that it can't see this sort of essay as the hate-speech it is. What kind of society are we supposed to have if half the population (at least the white part) is demonized to this extent?

Post: #23

(06-12-2018 01:39 AM)astro Wrote:  https://mobile.twitter.com/SuzannaDWalte...0730611712

She’s getting torn up.

Just not in the pussy!

Post: #24

Post: #25