Post: #1

This one came in this morning and reaffirms my theory that we have entered Generation Woke (or generation snowflake)

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/maryland-hi...ight-back/

Prior to the red pill I'd have no problem with this article. The problem is that rating people on attractiveness is biologically rooted and a fact of life. Women do it as well (fuck/marry/kill) and the dating game is now dominated by surface looks on swipers like Tinder/Bumble. The only difference is the fact that it's a little unseemly to know where you stand within your local social circle rather than anonymous swiping. I mean, I doubt that the betas could muster enough sympathy to scold girls for not dating them. Attraction is brutally amoral and can't be socialy engineered otherwise.

And the other problem is that normies won't think twice about articles like this. They've already been indoctrinated by simple idealistic platitudes. Yet it's all do as I say, not as I do.

Post: #2

(03-29-2019 08:33 AM)questor70 Wrote:  This one came in this morning and reaffirms my theory that we have entered Generation Woke (or generation snowflake)

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/maryland-hi...ight-back/

Prior to the red pill I'd have no problem with this article. The problem is that rating people on attractiveness is biologically rooted and a fact of life. Women do it as well (fuck/marry/kill) and the dating game is now dominated by surface looks on swipers like Tinder/Bumble. The only difference is the fact that it's a little unseemly to know where you stand within your local social circle rather than anonymous swiping. I mean, I doubt that the betas could muster enough sympathy to scold girls for not dating them. Attraction is brutally amoral and can't be socialy engineered otherwise.

And the other problem is that normies won't think twice about articles like this. They've already been indoctrinated by simple idealistic platitudes. Yet it's all do as I say, not as I do.

I love that the inference in that article is that women would never rate/judge by appearance!

Post: #3

Quote:Corcoran said. "In my head, you know, I tried to push away the thoughts that, you know, a number does not define me and I put out a confident front but it's really hard to think about 'Why is this girl a point better than me?'

Oh, so numbers don’t define you? So if we take away all your Instagram followers and all your ‘likes’ that should be okay, right?

Post: #4

And in related news...

https://ideas.ted.com/if-youre-unhappy-w...w-hotness/

If you just repeat it enough times, maybe men will believe it!

What are the odds these two would be banging on this drum if they didn't look like this?

Post: #5

Always with the fucking cateye glasses...

Post: #6

In my years teaching in the clusterfuck that is the American education system, I always saw the pretty cheerleaders date the mathletes and D&D crowd. Their lockers were adorned not with pictures of Harry Styles and Justin Bieber, but of Mark Zuckerberg and Justin Long. And the old anchors and authors covering this mega-story never talked about the boys who were gross and the ones who gave them weird tingles at sleepovers or post/like/ preposterous black and white memes of bearded, six-pack men with lame captions on Facebook.

These girls are not upset that they were ranked. They're upset AT their ranking. Does anyone really think the top three girls are really mad? Absolutely not. They may outwardly express sjw talking points, but everyone knows that they are inwardly very pleased.

Post: #7

Incessant whining about non-issues, and demanding the spotlight with trendy shaming buzzwords like misogyny and objectification and toxic masculinity?

Well, girls will be girls.

Post: #8

Only 21st century girls feel empowered enough to command the system to bring these boys into a humiliating reprogramming session. Gynocracy at work.

Post: #9

(03-30-2019 07:40 PM)la bodhisattva Wrote:  In my years teaching in the clusterfuck that is the American education system, I always saw the pretty cheerleaders date the mathletes and D&D crowd. Their lockers were adorned not with pictures of Harry Styles and Justin Bieber, but of Mark Zuckerberg and Justin Long. And the old anchors and authors covering this mega-story never talked about the boys who were gross and the ones who gave them weird tingles at sleepovers or post/like/ preposterous black and white memes of bearded, six-pack men with lame captions on Facebook.

These girls are not upset that they were ranked. They're upset AT their ranking. Does anyone really think the top three girls are really mad? Absolutely not. They may outwardly express sjw talking points, but everyone knows that they are inwardly very pleased.

It's no different than the 'fat acceptance' movement. It's not that fat women can't find men to accept them, it's just a matter of WHAT men accept them.

Women aren't interested in fairness, only power.