Post: #1

For those who did not hear about this poll yet, it made quite a lot of stir on Twitter.

A lot of hamsters died, and many feelings were hurt on that fateful day.

It was made by Milo and, if I remember correctly, was one of the reasons why he lost his verified status on Twitter.

That poll states that is better for you child to get cancer, rather than feminism. Which makes sense, since it is curable in early stages, and, hopefully, will be in later stages as well, thanks to the advances in medicine. On the other hand, feminism is much harder to cure. Being regularly fucked by a well built guy with a big dick, unfortunately, is not a guaranteed cure, due to MSM, schools etc. And bad parents.

My personal opinion is that cancer is better, based on the facts I have stated in the previous paragraph.

Some food for thought:





What is your opinion, gentlemen? Feminism...or cancer?

Post: #2

I'm happy life has more than two options.

Post: #3

Irenicus,
You clearly have no idea what cancer is nor it seems that you (fortunately for you!) have not experienced its devastating and deadly effect on a loved one. Which I wouldn't even wish on my worst enemy!

You should read more before posting a useless thread next time.

Post: #4

Offering feminism as an alternative to death is sort of similar to offering someone in Guantanamo the alternatives of giving a name or getting waterboarded.

As cascadecombo points out, it's a false dichotomy -- an intellectually dishonest debating tactic. And when it comes to false dichotomies:

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #5

It's possible to open the eyes of someone, but not bring him back from the dead.

Post: #6

Indeed, life has, in general, more options than two, in which I agree.

Vacancier, I know several people who died of cancer in my family, and agree with you - it is a slow, and indeed painful death. I did not mean to belittle your experiences, or the experiences of anyone else, for that matter.

And Paracelsus, although I indeed learned a lot from you (thanks, by the way), and I agree on principle with many posts you have made I have to respectfully disagree with you now.

Look around you.

How many people suffered, suffer, and eventually will suffer because of the scourge that is feminism? We may never know, but we can bet it's millions, even billions.

How many people died, due to abortions, which this scourge promotes? Millions. Of all races, nationalities, social standing(s)... .

And much more. Respectfully, I cannot agree it is a intellectually dishonest tactic - both cause(d) millions of deaths and sufferings. It cannot be argued it is a useless topic, as we saw it on Twitter and MSM, and I look forward to discuss it.



Of course, if the moderators believe that this topic in way over the top, all can I offer is a apology.

Post: #7

I joke and make light about a lot of horrible things but cancer is not one of them. Until you have experienced it firsthand or have had a friend touched by it (I have; my friends mom died at 50 from the disease far too young to die); it should not be placed in this context (I dont mean you in particular OP because I know this poll is from another source, but in general).

I'm sure there have been some former manginas on this board who have eventually seen the light like myself but that is far preferable than getting cancer. Although I respect in a way the ladies who actually had a hard time choosing between the two in the video. Any woman who has to even think for a few seconds between feminism and a deadly disease seems like a keeper to me. They would not have been so indecisive on the campus of Berkeley.

Post: #8

Everyone dies; some with their integrity intact, some with it in tatters. Living a lie is no life at all.

Post: #9

You can survive cancer, feminism is a death sentence

Post: #10

(03-11-2016 08:39 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  Offering feminism as an alternative to death is sort of similar to offering someone in Guantanamo the alternatives of giving a name or getting waterboarded.

As cascadecombo points out, it's a false dichotomy -- an intellectually dishonest debating tactic. And when it comes to false dichotomies:

I didn't know batman was in favor of gun control...

Post: #11

Batman's a cultural libertarian. He personally chooses not to use guns and insists the people working for him don't use guns. It's his choice.

He has thus far refrained from conquering North America and ensuring NO ONE can have any guns. But obviously he could if he wanted. He's Batman.

Post: #12

Cancer- can be cured, doesn't always attack the brain. Lethal for the individual but not everybody else. Not contagious.

Cancer is the clear winner here.

Post: #13

Feminism causes cancer... cervical cancer.

Post: #14

I have cancer. It's ocular melanoma. I lost an eye already and when this cancer spreads to my liver, it will kill me. Story here.

OK, now that the morose bit is over, let the hilarity commence. (Yes, it's a false dichotomy, I know)

When I saw this poll on Twitter, I laughed out loud and quickly responded that it's better to have cancer than be a feminist. Why? As others have pointed, cancer is curable. Feminism is curable also but everyone with cancer wants it cured. Those with feminism usually want that intellectually deadly affliction to continue.

Post: #15

Wow, as someone who has had loved ones deal with cancer, I can't believe such a comparison is being made.

One is a very serious affliction, coming on strong in the latter half of the 20th century to affect the lives of millions of people. It can result in women being unable to have children and losing their hair.

The other is cancer.

Post: #16

(03-11-2016 03:22 PM)Kabal Wrote:  Wow, as someone who has had loved ones deal with cancer, I can't believe such a comparison is being made.

One is a very serious affliction, coming on strong in the latter half of the 20th century to affect the lives of millions of people. It can result in women being unable to have children and losing their hair.

The other is cancer.

Post: #17

I'm going to assume this is rabid and militant feminism.

Cancer is horrible, but in all seriousness and with much deliberation I would rather that my child have cancer than feminism.

Serious feminism often results in being a genetic dead end, whilst also being insufferable to normal people. Further, those afflicted often don't recognize feminism as a problem, and thus take no steps to solve it.

Cancer is horrible, but it is also curable and, in a way, provides a clear and objective goal in life; getting rid of cancer.
Surviving cancer tends to produce a very appreciative outlook on life; someone that has come so close to death won't want to clown around or waste their precious time any more. Of course, many people don't survive cancer, but this risk is exactly what makes the few who survive it appreciate life so much.

If my child had serious feminism, I would be mortified because it would be very hard to love them due to the huge entitlement complexes and views that are antithetical to reality. In some ways, they would already be dead to me.

If my child had cancer, I would be mortified, but I would do my best to show them love and help them get whatever treatments they needed. They would be very much alive to me and I would always have some hope that they could recover.

Post: #18

Well Trebek, I'll take AIDS for 300 please.

Post: #19

Despite the moral objections, it's clear a majority of the forum would rather their children potentially die than become militant feminists.

To use a better example, it's kind of like if you had colon cancer, and your options were to either have your colon removed, resulting in your anus being sewn shut and having to have a colostomy bag for the rest of your life, or letting the cancer progress and dying. Which is worse? Certainly, one allows you to live, but honestly, if you value being with attractive women, this is going to put a major obstacle in the way of that. You can suit up, be alpha, etc, but at the end of the day, when your shit collects in a bag, you have a pretty big hurtle to overcome in the "attraction" field.

Note that I'm not belittling cancer, nor any other disease. Several people close to me have died of it. That said, I'm a FIRM believer in free speech, and I think NOTHING is above humor. There IS a difference in good-taste and bad taste, but if OP's post offends you, you really should get a thicker skin. If we can make fun of someones religion, which (to the belief of many) has eternal consequences, we can certainly allow people to make light of a sometimes terminal illness.

If you're offended by someones humor, take the advice we often give to SJW's: Shut off your computer, and step outside. Problem solved.

Post: #20

Cancer for a thousand years.