Post: #26

The movie looks like the female love child of Thor and Captain America. That is a good thing.
Great casting, that girl is a definite WCIWC (would cum inside without condom).

Post: #27

(07-31-2016 08:15 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I was trying to think of a heroine played by someone that nailed the epitome of being a warrior-woman without being a complete try-hard.



You can't really explain it. Hell if I know how you'd coach someone to replicate it. But there it is.

Sympathy for Lady Vengeance.

Koreans can do it because their movies are so damn bleak to begin with.

There's no try hard western political correctness in Korean thrillers.

Post: #28

I really hope that this movie is not a horrible, illogical clusterfuck like Batman V Superman was.

Post: #29

(07-31-2016 03:25 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  They should've done this movie before the Batman v Superman movie.
I watched BvS, and wonderwoman comes in and is invincible or something, her shield and sword do wonders against doomsday, and she seems fine with the situation. The first time I watched it, it was too much of a shock to see all this without any explanation.
Why is she invincible? Is she an alien too? Why is her shield so powerful? Why is her sword cutting off a kryptonian's arm? What the fuck is going on? For the first 2/3rds of the movie she just kind of wanders in and out, some rich chick messing with bruce wayne, oh ok she is wonder woman, oh wait how is she fucking up doomsday?
So really, this movie should have come out before BvS, to explain why she is what she is, what her actual powers are, why her roman era equipment is so extreme, etc.

edit, like what marvel did with their movies, give back story and put the characters into context.

Absolutely, the problem was people wanted:

a) A sequel to Man of Steel
b) Another Batman movie
c) Batman v Superman

And to top it off DC wanted to kick start their Aveng-I mean Justice League franchise ASAP before Tony Stark and friends had their eighth movie.

BvM:DoS was simply pandering to the fans and money grabbing, origin movies be damned.

If you don't mind watching Animated movies I seriously recommend the DC animated movie Wonder Woman to get a good idea of her backstory without waiting for the live action movie:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonder_Woman_(2009_film)

It's completely on point.

O

Post: #30

In my opinion, something is very wrong with soecity today if a majority of movies in 2014-2016 are all just one type of movies: fantasy superheroes movies.

Post: #31

(08-01-2016 05:33 AM)AntiMediocrity Wrote:  

(07-31-2016 03:25 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  So really, this movie should have come out before BvS, to explain why she is what she is, what her actual powers are, why her roman era equipment is so extreme, etc.

edit, like what marvel did with their movies, give back story and put the characters into context.

If you don't mind watching Animated movies I seriously recommend the DC animated movie Wonder Woman to get a good idea of her backstory without waiting for the live action movie:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonder_Woman_(2009_film)

It's completely on point.

They've rewritten her backstory since then.

(08-01-2016 05:57 AM)seniol Wrote:  In my opinion, something is very wrong with soecity today if a majority of movies in 2014-2016 are all just one type of movies: fantasy superheroes movies.

I think it's just that the technology has finally allowed these movies to be made the way kids envisioned them when reading the comics. Same for the LOTR franchise. They've been wanting to make LOTR since the 70s but it just looked silly. Some of the sets from Excalibur were originally used for test shoots for a failed LOTR movie.

My biggest problem is that the character motivations, plots points and resulting message have been changed. The only movie hero that is faithful to the comic is Captain America - and they couldn't have that so they've been destroying his character in the comics.

Post: #32

(01-02-1970 11:50 AM)senioly9025' Wrote:  In my opinion, something is very wrong with soecity today if a majority of movies in 2014-2016 are all just one type of movies: fantasy superheroes movies.

I second what the captain posted. That, and Hollywood is running out of fresh material for the big screen. Although movies based on comic books are a double edged sword.

On one hand, there's a built in audience. Boys/men grew up with Batman, Iron Man, Justice League, X-Men, etc. Most of us have our favorites and will plunk down the money to see the live action movie. There's a nostalgic feeling of anticipation when the trailers give a glimpse of the character come to life. And if you're lucky enough to catch the movie on opening day, you're glowing in the camaraderie you share with all those strangers when the Mark I armor or the Batmobile shows up for the first time, and the audience erupts in cheers and applause.

The flip side is that comic book fans are fickle. While there are some areas that the studio can be creative, a big part of the movie's success or failure is based on how 'true' the movie is to the comics, while still drawing in new viewers. I remember when the 1989 Batman came out, and the discontent of comic book fans over a couple of inconsistencies.

Early in the movie, Bruce Wayne (Michael Keaton) beds Vicky Vale (Kim Basinger) on the first date. This wasn't Batman's style in the comics, he wasn't a player, so fans were outraged. On the same note, how do you convey in a two hour movie, to the audience, that this guy can get laid with ease, but would rather hop around town beating the shit out of criminals ?

The bigger outrage was that, in this movie, the Joker is responsible for Batman's creation (Joker shot Bruce's parents). Forget outrage, fans were downright pissed off !!!!

This was explained by director Tim Burton that they had to be able to show, in a two hour movie, that Batman was Batman because he chose to protect the people of Gotham, and not because he was looking for his parents killer. So the solution was that Joker shot Bruce's parents, Joker dies later in the movie, Batman still keeps being Batman.

Comic book movies have the benefit of having the familiarity of the character, which is good money for studios because there will always be people that will go see the film. The downside is if the studio changes too much of the character, they risk alienating an entire class of people that will not only not see the movie but boycott it via social media.

Post: #33

(07-31-2016 10:40 AM)Avon Barksdale Wrote:  Gal Gadot is dope, However Gina Carano still should of been Wonder Woman



mmmmmmmm

The chick on the right with the great ass is not Gina. Its Jaime Koeppe a Canadian fitness model.

Post: #34

(08-01-2016 08:26 AM)Sam Malone Wrote:  

(01-02-1970 11:50 AM)senioly9025' Wrote:  In my opinion, something is very wrong with soecity today if a majority of movies in 2014-2016 are all just one type of movies: fantasy superheroes movies.

I second what the captain posted. That, and Hollywood is running out of fresh material for the big screen. Although movies based on comic books are a double edged sword.

This is why all the truly original material has moved on to TV. It's easier to get the budgets needed for series. Creators and writers like it more because the format allows exploration of ideas. TV audiences are a bit less fickle and the revenue model works differently on the small screen.

The only profitable movies being tentpole comic films is going to hurt the industry eventually. When Marvel reaches the very end of its planned phases they'll either have to reboot again or release more obscure superhero titles.

People are going to get sick of constant rebooting too if it's not much better than the prior series.

Hollywood kind of blows anyways. They constantly rehash the same archetypes with the same writers and set of actors behind these movies. You really have to look outside Hollywood to see original movies these days.

Post: #35

(08-01-2016 08:51 AM)vinman Wrote:  

(07-31-2016 10:40 AM)Avon Barksdale Wrote:  Gal Gadot is dope, However Gina Carano still should of been Wonder Woman



mmmmmmmm

The chick on the right with the great ass is not Gina. Its Jaime Koeppe a Canadian fitness model.

Vinman, How could you spot out that ass out perfectly and identify who the as belongs too?

Hmmmm

Post: #36

(08-01-2016 04:58 PM)realologist Wrote:  

(08-01-2016 08:51 AM)vinman Wrote:  

(07-31-2016 10:40 AM)Avon Barksdale Wrote:  Gal Gadot is dope, However Gina Carano still should of been Wonder Woman



mmmmmmmm

The chick on the right with the great ass is not Gina. Its Jaime Koeppe a Canadian fitness model.

Vinman, How could you spot out that ass out perfectly and identify who the as belongs too?

Hmmmm

He has the EYE

Post: #37

(07-31-2016 07:01 AM)seniol Wrote:  Are these fake NSFW photos of her, or real?

http://leakedcelebritynude.com/gal-gadot-celeb-nude/

Each of those photos is a shitty photoshop(it's obviously even the same body in each shot) job but who cares?

Post: #38

Feminists are frankly dishonest and stupid as all hell.

I am the most hardcore misogynist on this forum, by my reckoning, and I tell short haired women to fuck themselves and grow their hair out all the time. Get rid of piercings and tattoos too, unless they actually mean something.

Just today a woman I seriously insulted last week bought me some pizza and a beer at the local pub. She and her husband are going on a second honeymoon to the Bahamas and she wished to inform me of her nice plans, six years post marriage. I gave her a little peck on the check and wished them well in their new life.

Post: #39

(07-31-2016 12:54 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(07-31-2016 10:40 AM)Avon Barksdale Wrote:  Gal Gadot is dope, However Gina Carano still should of been Wonder Woman



mmmmmmmm

She looks the part, but unfortunately she can't act. Watch the movie Haywire to see how much of a stiff she is:



The creator of Wonder Woman William Moulton Marston invented the Lie Detector, and was in a polygamous relationship with two women.

Quote:Marston intended his character to be "tender, submissive, peaceloving as good women are", combining "all the strength of a Superman plus all the allure of a good and beautiful woman". His character was a native of an all-female utopia who became a crime-fighting U.S. government agent, using her superhuman strength and agility, and her ability to force villains to submit and tell the truth by binding them with her magic lasso.

He was also into BDSM:

Quote:Marston's "Wonder Woman" is an early example of bondage themes that were entering popular culture in the 1930s. Physical submission appears again and again throughout Marston's comics work, with Wonder Woman and her criminal opponents frequently being tied up or otherwise restrained, and her Amazonian friends engaging in frequent wrestling and bondage play. These elements were softened by later writers of the series, who dropped such characters as the Nazi-like blond female slaver Eviless completely, despite her having formed the original Villainy Inc. of WW's enemies (in Wonder Woman #28, the last by Marston).

Though Marston had described female nature as submissive, in his other writings and interviews[citation needed] he referred to submission as a noble practice and did not shy away from the sexual implications, saying:

The only hope for peace is to teach people who are full of pep and unbound force to enjoy being bound... Only when the control of self by others is more pleasant than the unbound assertion of self in human relationships can we hope for a stable, peaceful human society... Giving to others, being controlled by them, submitting to other people cannot possibly be enjoyable without a strong erotic element.

One of the purposes of these bondage depictions was to induce eroticism in readers as a part of what he called "sex love training". Through his Wonder Woman comics, he aimed to condition readers to becoming more readily accepting of loving submission to loving authorities rather than being so assertive with their own destructive egos.

About male readers, he later wrote: "Give them an alluring woman stronger than themselves to submit to, and they'll be proud to become her willing slaves!"

For research purposes, here's photos of the original TV Show Wonder Woman (Lynda Carter):

Nice background information on the creator of Wonder Woman. That last quote by Marston is interesting. I find it fishy that the fantasy of a strong woman who dominates men was created by a man.

Post: #40

(08-01-2016 07:23 PM)Hades Wrote:  Feminists are frankly dishonest and stupid as all hell.

I am the most hardcore misogynist on this forum, by my reckoning, and I tell short haired women to fuck themselves and grow their hair out all the time. Get rid of piercings and tattoos too, unless they actually mean something.

When piercings and tattoos mean anything else than hardcore attention whoring "Look-at-meeee!!!" begging?

Post: #41

(08-01-2016 10:52 PM)SmartAlec Wrote:  

(07-31-2016 12:54 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(07-31-2016 10:40 AM)Avon Barksdale Wrote:  Gal Gadot is dope, However Gina Carano still should of been Wonder Woman



mmmmmmmm

She looks the part, but unfortunately she can't act. Watch the movie Haywire to see how much of a stiff she is:



The creator of Wonder Woman William Moulton Marston invented the Lie Detector, and was in a polygamous relationship with two women.

Quote:Marston intended his character to be "tender, submissive, peaceloving as good women are", combining "all the strength of a Superman plus all the allure of a good and beautiful woman". His character was a native of an all-female utopia who became a crime-fighting U.S. government agent, using her superhuman strength and agility, and her ability to force villains to submit and tell the truth by binding them with her magic lasso.

He was also into BDSM:

Quote:Marston's "Wonder Woman" is an early example of bondage themes that were entering popular culture in the 1930s. Physical submission appears again and again throughout Marston's comics work, with Wonder Woman and her criminal opponents frequently being tied up or otherwise restrained, and her Amazonian friends engaging in frequent wrestling and bondage play. These elements were softened by later writers of the series, who dropped such characters as the Nazi-like blond female slaver Eviless completely, despite her having formed the original Villainy Inc. of WW's enemies (in Wonder Woman #28, the last by Marston).

Though Marston had described female nature as submissive, in his other writings and interviews[citation needed] he referred to submission as a noble practice and did not shy away from the sexual implications, saying:

The only hope for peace is to teach people who are full of pep and unbound force to enjoy being bound... Only when the control of self by others is more pleasant than the unbound assertion of self in human relationships can we hope for a stable, peaceful human society... Giving to others, being controlled by them, submitting to other people cannot possibly be enjoyable without a strong erotic element.

One of the purposes of these bondage depictions was to induce eroticism in readers as a part of what he called "sex love training". Through his Wonder Woman comics, he aimed to condition readers to becoming more readily accepting of loving submission to loving authorities rather than being so assertive with their own destructive egos.

About male readers, he later wrote: "Give them an alluring woman stronger than themselves to submit to, and they'll be proud to become her willing slaves!"

For research purposes, here's photos of the original TV Show Wonder Woman (Lynda Carter):

Nice background information on the creator of Wonder Woman. That last quote by Marston is interesting. I find it fishy that the fantasy of a strong woman who dominates men was created by a man.

Wonder Women was created by a man who was into in BDSM, I wrote about in anther thread.

NSFW pictures inside

/thread-27278...pid1150287

Here is Wonder Woman's creator wife and his mistress, they all love together in the same house.




Here he is testing the lie detector he helped to created on his mistress, you can see her face was the inspiration for the early design of Wonder Woman.



In other words, the icon of feminism was created by a guy who liked to dominated women and had his own harem.

Post: #42

I just feel we need some better pictures of Lynda Carter in this thread:

Miss Word America 1972:





A lot of teenage guys in the seventies had this poster:

Post: #43

She looked much older than her real age

Post: #44

(08-02-2016 12:34 PM)seniol Wrote:  She looked much older than her real age

Did this guy just knock Linda Carter? Roosh should ban you for such blasphemy!

Post: #45

Well, she just simply doesn't turn me on at all

She looks like a bad version of Katy Perry

Post: #46

(08-02-2016 11:28 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  

Face overloaded with makeup and mascara,
dumb expression on her face,
masculine jawline...

need to say any more?

Post: #47

(07-31-2016 07:01 AM)seniol Wrote:  Are these fake NSFW photos of her, or real?

http://leakedcelebritynude.com/gal-gadot-celeb-nude/

Saw [below] at the bottom of the webpage.

   

(08-02-2016 12:49 PM)seniol Wrote:  Face overloaded with makeup and mascara,
dumb expression on her face,
masculine jawline...

need to say any more?

You forgot to mention her pointy elbows.

G

Post: #48

(08-02-2016 01:19 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  You forgot to mention her pointy elbows.

G

Not to mention living in 1972 and failing to anticipate 2016 standards.

Post: #49

Wonder Woman Lynda Carter Wants You to Vote for Her Friend Hillary Clinton

http://www.people.com/article/lynda-cart...ident-2016



Lynda Carter: I’m not a female icon, Hillary Clinton is

http://nypost.com/2016/04/22/lynda-carte...illary-is/



I hope now it is quite clear that Lynda Carter is not pro-men at all...

Post: #50

Back in the day Lynda Carter definitely gave me a little 8 year old chubby watching Wonder Woman on tv.