Dude, are you trolling? I really can't tell if you're serious about that girl being a "generous" 4. Her nose is a little big but she's not downright ugly by any means. Also, you just implied that a 5 was good looking in your last post, yet a 4 is a chick who got hit with a hammer?

If you like pale white skin, then don't go to a country where the average person is tanned and complain about it. It's that simple. If someone doesn't like black women, don't go to a country where the average person has African ancestry.

These discussions get so skewed because people don't even attempt to account for personal preferences and look at the situation objectively.

For the record, there are plenty of women with that skin tone in the Phils. Perhaps you were looking in the wrong areas.

Never implied that. A 5 is a girl barely fuckable while sober in the daytime. Would not hold hands with her. A 4 is someone not fuckable while sober. Aka the drunk 5. A 4 is not downright ugly come on.

Unless everyone wants to be generous and declare any barely fuckable girl while drunk a 5. Five = Average. 4 is BELOW average.

Yes, her face is awful. Lets be real here. Compared to the average girl in Asia, lol wouldn't even get a 2nd look from me. Straight ignore at the clubs. If you think her face is not bad well Philippines is indeed a pussy paradise.

Never been to Africa. Went to Philippines as a side trip, saw the girls. Don't get the hype. Posting a counterpoint.

Make a trip all around asia, then we can have an objective comparison. I've been to pretty much every big city in the developed Asia minus Shanghai / Hong Kong. For god sakes even Luxy has more hot girls then Prive when I went. And that is a "top club" in Manila. Comparing any asian country to the US / Europe is like apples and oranges.

Walk on the street in Tokyo / Seoul vs Manila. Its really no contest.

Objectively: If one is a young good looking male, move to Taipei (not much money) or Tokyo (making good money). Skip the Philippines. If you wanted a real challenge, try and go for hiso girls in Bangkok.

(04-11-2014 02:31 AM)Enigma Wrote:  Dude, are you trolling? I really can't tell if you're serious about that girl being a "generous" 4. Her nose is a little big but she's not downright ugly by any means. Also, you just implied that a 5 was good looking in your last post, yet a 4 is a chick who got hit with a hammer?

If you like pale white skin, then don't go to a country where the average person is tanned and complain about it. It's that simple. If someone doesn't like black women, don't go to a country where the average person has African ancestry.

These discussions get so skewed because people don't even attempt to account for personal preferences and look at the situation objectively.

For the record, there are plenty of women with that skin tone in the Phils. Perhaps you were looking in the wrong areas.

(04-11-2014 02:44 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Never implied that.

Actually, you did, bud. I even quoted it in my last post.

"Philippines has a solid amount of 5 (more then Taiwan for sure), followed by surprisingly a lot of not so good looking girls in the daytime."

By differentiating between a "5" and "not so good looking girls" directly implies that a 5 is thus good looking. That may not have been your intention but that is what is communicated through your word choice. Perhaps you were trying to say "not AS good looking"?

Quote:A 5 is a girl barely fuckable while sober in the daytime. Would not hold hands with her. A 4 is someone not fuckable while sober. Aka the drunk 5. A 4 is not downright ugly come on.

Unless everyone wants to be generous and declare any barely fuckable girl while drunk a 5. Five = Average. 4 is BELOW average.

Yes, her face is awful. Lets be real here. Compared to the average girl in Asia, lol wouldn't even get a 2nd look from me. Straight ignore at the clubs. If you think her face is not bad well Philippines is indeed a pussy paradise.

So, if a young, thin girl with long hair and flat stomach but a big-ish nose is a 4, what is a 300-pound white woman with a huge, hairy mole on the tip of her nose? What is a 40 year old meth addict with no teeth? What is someone who is physically deformed and grotesque in apperance?

(04-11-2014 03:11 AM)Enigma Wrote:  

(04-11-2014 02:44 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Never implied that.

Actually, you did, bud. I even quoted it in my last post.

"Philippines has a solid amount of 5 (more then Taiwan for sure), followed by surprisingly a lot of not so good looking girls in the daytime."

By differentiating between a "5" and "not so good looking girls" directly implies that a 5 is thus good looking. That may not have been your intention but that is what is communicated through your word choice.

Quote:A 5 is a girl barely fuckable while sober in the daytime. Would not hold hands with her. A 4 is someone not fuckable while sober. Aka the drunk 5. A 4 is not downright ugly come on.

Unless everyone wants to be generous and declare any barely fuckable girl while drunk a 5. Five = Average. 4 is BELOW average.

Yes, her face is awful. Lets be real here. Compared to the average girl in Asia, lol wouldn't even get a 2nd look from me. Straight ignore at the clubs. If you think her face is not bad well Philippines is indeed a pussy paradise.

So, if a young, thin girl with long hair and flat stomach but a big-ish nose is a 4, what is a 300-pound white woman with a huge, hairy mole on the tip of her nose? What is a 40 year old meth addict with no teeth? What is someone who is physically deformed and grotesque in apperance?

Thanks for catching that. Writing is not my forte. I just write in a steady stream so stuff gets overlooked.

To answer your question:

300 pound - a 1 (bottom 1% of population)

40 year meth addict with no teeth (depending on the rest of her body / look can have dentures)- 2

Physically deformed - 1

It is a bell curve really. With 4-6 being the most common in any country. Rounding a girl down also does well when gaming psychologically. At least for me.

(04-11-2014 03:17 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Thanks for catching that. Writing is not my forte. I just write in a steady stream so stuff gets overlooked.

To answer your question:

300 pound - a 1 (bottom 1% of population)

40 year meth addict with no teeth (depending on the rest of her body / look can have dentures)- 2

Physically deformed - 1

It is a bell curve really. With 4-6 being the most common in any country. Rounding a girl down also does well when gaming psychologically. At least for me.

So this woman is less attractive than the average woman on Earth and only two points higher than an old drug addict with no teeth. Got ya.

(04-11-2014 02:11 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Typical filipina on the street (Being generous at 4, her face looks like its been hit with a fucking hammer)

/attachment.php?aid=11736

(04-11-2014 02:31 AM)Enigma Wrote:  Dude, are you trolling? I really can't tell if you're serious about that girl being a "generous" 4.

Seconded. If that girl is a "generous 4" in your eyes, then there really isn't any point in having a discussion involving ratings, it would be completely meaningless.

If I may....here's a scale I propose:

10 - absolute smokeshow. extremely rare creature. level of hotness only sustainable for several years.
9 - stunner
8 - hot. cut off point for the 'high-end' in quality
7 - cute. universally bangable. a cut off point for being considered good looking
6 - bangable but absolutely nothing to brag about. most girls can achieve this level or above by being slim.
5 - barely bangable on rare occasions. would usually involve alcohol and repeated strike-outs. would send you into a downward spiral of questioning your choices and contemplating your life.
4 - ugly. worse than the before photos in neutrogena ads
3 - very ugly
2 - face transplant success story
1 - do not look directly at or risk boner malfunction for the next couple hours

(04-11-2014 03:27 AM)Enigma Wrote:  

(04-11-2014 03:17 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Thanks for catching that. Writing is not my forte. I just write in a steady stream so stuff gets overlooked.

To answer your question:

300 pound - a 1 (bottom 1% of population)

40 year meth addict with no teeth (depending on the rest of her body / look can have dentures)- 2

Physically deformed - 1

It is a bell curve really. With 4-6 being the most common in any country. Rounding a girl down also does well when gaming psychologically. At least for me.

So this woman is less attractive than the average woman on Earth and only two points higher than an old drug addict with no teeth. Got ya.

(04-11-2014 02:11 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Typical filipina on the street (Being generous at 4, her face looks like its been hit with a fucking hammer)

/attachment.php?aid=11736

Yes that's how a bell curve system works. If you really believe 5 is average. Is that not how a system of 1-10 works? Never said the earth. 5 is average in country. Obviously an American 5 be much worse then a Philippines 5.



1- Bottom 0.1%
2- Bottom 2.1%
3 - Bottom 13.6%
4 - Bottom 34%
5 - AVERAGE GIRL IN COUNTRY OF CHOICE OF HER AGE GROUP
6 - Upper 34%
7 - Upper 13.6%
8 - Upper 2%
9+ - Top 0.1%

Always downgrade girls. Makes you work for good talent, not mediocre. I like the challenge. Its a case of mental masturbation, but I actually think whenever puts out a datasheet and shows what they think is a 6/7/8 would help make the data much more useful. Will do this when I throw down the Taipei Datasheet.

If I went with Espresso's ratings I'm banging 7-8s. In my mind I don't think so. I want the top of the top. Banging mediocre girls might as well stay in the USA.

(04-11-2014 03:50 AM)Espresso Wrote:  If I may....here's a scale I propose:

10 - absolute smokeshow. extremely rare creature. level of hotness only sustainable for several years.
9 - stunner
8 - hot. cut off point for the 'high-end' in quality
7 - cute. universally bangable. a cut off point for being considered good looking
6 - bangable but absolutely nothing to brag about. most girls can achieve this level or above by being slim.
5 - barely bangable on rare occasions. would usually involve alcohol and repeated strike-outs. would send you into a downward spiral of questioning your choices and contemplating your life.
4 - ugly. worse than the before photos in neutrogena ads
3 - very ugly
2 - face transplant success story
1 - do not look directly at or risk boner malfunction for the next couple hours

On that scale, that Filipino chick would be a 7.
I've been to the Philippines, most girls are definitely not on that level. But obviously Seoul/Tokyo chicks wipe their ass with girls like her, no one's contesting that
.

BlondeChaser, I would love to see you pull up an entire array of 1 to 10 women, at 0.5 intervals (20 girls) and for you to rank them.

One is a 5 and the other a 4 you said, right? That means that a full 50% of women are better looking than the 5 (body and face combined). Sure, she's not the hottest girl in the world, but I don't think you can find any population where a full 50% (of let's say 18-29 year old girls) are better looking than her. There's no way. Not even in Japan! You transplant this girl in Japan and she'll easy be a guy's top 20% in the bar. And for the 4, you are saying that, based on a standard bell curve, approx 65% of women are better looking that her. That's delusional. Again, EVEN IN JAPAN, she'd be considered cute and would easily place above 50 or 60% of other girls. I guarantee it.

(04-11-2014 03:58 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Yes that's how a bell curve system works. If you really believe 5 is average. Is that not how a system of 1-10 works? Never said the earth. 5 is average in country. Obviously an American 5 be much worse then a Philippines 5.



1- Bottom 0.1%
2- Bottom 2.1%
3 - Bottom 13.6%
4 - Bottom 34%
5 - AVERAGE GIRL IN COUNTRY OF CHOICE
6 - Upper 34%
7 - Upper 13.6%
8 - Upper 2%
9+ - Top 0.1%

Meanwhile at BlondeChaser's house:



It's not meant to be some math scale with standard deviations and percentiles. It's what most guys would refer to as a 6,7,8 etc in conversation. I'm pretty sure most guys here would think your scale with the two girls being a 4 and a 5 is skewed. But hey if it helps you bang hotter girls somehow, not hating, have at it. Just be aware that when you drop these ratings, people you talk to are generally going to raise an eyebrow.

I get what you are saying. All my friends do say I am quite harsh when it comes to ratings. I highly suggest anyone to try it though, it really pushes you. Aim for the top. Push yourself to talk to all the stunners in a club. You'd be surprise how friendly they are compared to the states. Don't settle for a girl who chooses you. You are the chooser. Be a man and initiate.

The point of traveling is to bang top quality girls you cant get in your home country. IMO moving out just to bang mediocre "fuckable" girls you can bang with some effort in the states is just not worth it.

An easier way to think about it. How many ok looking girls you see on the street. Now think about how many cute ones. You see a decent amount. That is your average. Now the hotties, you can see LOCAL guys checking them out hard. That is your 7. You don't see many of them on the street, and if you do its all in the high end shopping areas. Then find the rare girl of the day that you want to marry on the spot, the girls check her out and guys. That is your 8+.

Same in reverse. Meh girls with butter faces. Atrocious girls that make you go like wow. And nasty ass lizard that makes you want to puke.

Its a real clear distinction of hierarchy. Bell Curve actually fits quite well in general. Obviously some countries like Ukraine, lots of stunners make this a bit more skewed.

(04-11-2014 04:19 AM)Espresso Wrote:  

(04-11-2014 03:58 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Yes that's how a bell curve system works. If you really believe 5 is average. Is that not how a system of 1-10 works? Never said the earth. 5 is average in country. Obviously an American 5 be much worse then a Philippines 5.



1- Bottom 0.1%
2- Bottom 2.1%
3 - Bottom 13.6%
4 - Bottom 34%
5 - AVERAGE GIRL IN COUNTRY OF CHOICE
6 - Upper 34%
7 - Upper 13.6%
8 - Upper 2%
9+ - Top 0.1%

Meanwhile at BlondeChaser's house:



It's not meant to be some math scale with standard deviations and percentiles. It's what most guys would refer to as a 6,7,8 etc in conversation. I'm pretty sure most guys here would think your scale with the two girls being a 4 and a 5 is skewed. But hey if it helps you bang hotter girls somehow, not hating, have at it. Just be aware that when you drop these ratings, people you talk to are generally going to raise an eyebrow.

(04-11-2014 04:28 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  I get what you are saying. All my friends do say I am quite harsh when it comes to ratings. I highly suggest anyone to try it though, it really pushes you. Aim for the top. Push yourself to talk to all the stunners in a club. You'd be surprise how friendly they are compared to the states. Don't settle for a girl who chooses you. You are the chooser. Be a man and initiate.

You can do this without your weird scale though. Just decide only to bang 9s and 10s. Or 8s and up or whatever.

And if you're cool with banging 7s and ups, as you said is what you're usually hitting here...

Quote:If I went with Espresso's ratings I'm banging 7-8s.

...well, congratulations, you're attracted to the same level of women as just about every other man on the planet. Considering that, might as well use the scale everyone else is using.

Quote:The point of traveling is to bang top quality girls you cant get in your home country. IMO moving out just to bang mediocre "fuckable" girls you can bang with some effort in the states is just not worth it.

This may not make me popular, but for the record, that's not the reason that all of us travel.

It can be a nice side perk, and one of the main reasons for a lot of guys, but I don't know that it's the entire point of travel.

Your thinking is all over the place.

What you call a 5 on your scale, she's not even ON your scale. She's that ONE girl in a population of 100 million that is the epitome of average. Besides that ONE girl, every single girl on your chart is either a 4 or less or a 6 or better. How does that make sense? These ratings in real life are ranges, not absolutes.

Also, after all the effort you put in to being academic and accurate in placing girls on a 'standard' bell curve is admirable (I agree with the concept, actually. An 8 is not better than 80/100 girls, she's better than 95%) but then you go and say that you like to downgrade them a couple of points. Do that in your own head, but if accuracy is something you're striving for, then this doesn't make any sense either. (This is aside from the fact that, for most people, especially those who haven't studied stats, they will look at a girl and put her on a scale by percentile, not by standard deviation.)

And then you said that you are judging my COUNTRY??? Shit, I thought you were comparing these girls globally, including countries like Japan, Korea and Taiwan. If you judge by country, these girls get another point in the Philippines. That 5 you talked about is easily a 7.5 globally, an 8.5 in the U.S. and a 6.5 or better even in Japan.

Here's my rating scale (it's on a 1 - 4 spectrum).

1 - would not bang.
2 - would bang drunk (or deep undercover).
3 - would bang sober.
4 - would date.

Boom. Problem solved.

(04-11-2014 03:50 AM)Espresso Wrote:  

(04-11-2014 02:31 AM)Enigma Wrote:  Dude, are you trolling? I really can't tell if you're serious about that girl being a "generous" 4.

Seconded. If that girl is a "generous 4" in your eyes, then there really isn't any point in having a discussion involving ratings, it would be completely meaningless.

If I may....here's a scale I propose:

10 - absolute smokeshow. extremely rare creature. level of hotness only sustainable for several years.
9 - stunner
8 - hot. cut off point for the 'high-end' in quality
7 - cute. universally bangable. a cut off point for being considered good looking
6 - bangable but absolutely nothing to brag about. most girls can achieve this level or above by being slim.
5 - barely bangable on rare occasions. would usually involve alcohol and repeated strike-outs. would send you into a downward spiral of questioning your choices and contemplating your life.
4 - ugly. worse than the before photos in neutrogena ads
3 - very ugly
2 - face transplant success story
1 - do not look directly at or risk boner malfunction for the next couple hours

I don't agree with this scale because you're trying to impose your subjectivity onto an objective scale. A 5 is "perfectly average" in most people's minds. (I know, that would make more sense on a 0-10 scale than a 1-10 scale but that doesn't change the fact that we use 5 to mean average.)

But a 5, being perfectly average, should not elicit such a negative emotional response that you see her as "barely bangable". Of course, in a place like the States where 70% of women are fat or obese, perfectly average is something I'm not willing to do. So subjectively, if I put girls on a scale according to how I feel, then an average girl in the US is a 3. But in the observable population where I rank all 160 million women, she will be smack dab in the middle.

The problem lies in that your descriptions are fairly accurate but only for a place like the US. In Japan, a 5 is much, much more bangable, so you have to rewrite the descriptions.

At the end of the day, we use a rating scale with our buddies all the time, but they really don't mean very much to anybody but ourselves. LOL

(04-11-2014 04:35 AM)Bix Wrote:  Your thinking is all over the place.

What you call a 5 on your scale, she's not even ON your scale. She's that ONE girl in a population of 100 million that is the epitome of average. Besides that ONE girl, every single girl on your chart is either a 4 or less or a 6 or better. How does that make sense? These ratings in real life are ranges, not absolutes.

Also, after all the effort you put in to being academic and accurate in placing girls on a 'standard' bell curve is admirable (I agree with the concept, actually. An 8 is not better than 80/100 girls, she's better than 95%) but then you go and say that you like to downgrade them a couple of points. Do that in your own head, but if accuracy is something you're striving for, then this doesn't make any sense either. (This is aside from the fact that, for most people, especially those who haven't studied stats, they will look at a girl and put her on a scale by percentile, not by standard deviation.)

And then you said that you are judging my COUNTRY??? Shit, I thought you were comparing these girls globally, including countries like Japan, Korea and Taiwan. If you judge by country, these girls get another point in the Philippines. That 5 you talked about is easily a 7.5 globally, an 8.5 in the U.S. and a 6.5 or better even in Japan.

Well of course there's .5's and the bell curve is not to be taken literally. Its a range. Is she basically flat out average? Yes. But if you have to choose a number I still stick with 5.

Really in the Philippines that girl is a straight 5. She looks like a man. Makes it up with a good body. But lol I thought she was a ladyboy. Is it the fact I am half asian and have had asian tail chase me in the US thats making me real biased here? With europeans I find myself much more generous.

@Direct Danger - The cultural aspect is also nice, but would you move to a country with a great culture, but crap girls. I find the culture of Peru, especially in Cuzco to be amazing, but would never live there. Living abroad is nice without the feminist crap that is being shoved down in the states.

^ Were you talking to me or Direct Danger? I think you may have mis-attributed that.

(04-11-2014 03:58 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Yes that's how a bell curve system works. If you really believe 5 is average. Is that not how a system of 1-10 works? Never said the earth. 5 is average in country. Obviously an American 5 be much worse then a Philippines 5.



1- Bottom 0.1%
2- Bottom 2.1%
3 - Bottom 13.6%
4 - Bottom 34%
5 - AVERAGE GIRL IN COUNTRY OF CHOICE OF HER AGE GROUP
6 - Upper 34%
7 - Upper 13.6%
8 - Upper 2%
9+ - Top 0.1%

Always downgrade girls. Makes you work for good talent, not mediocre. I like the challenge. Its a case of mental masturbation, but I actually think whenever puts out a datasheet and shows what they think is a 6/7/8 would help make the data much more useful. Will do this when I throw down the Taipei Datasheet.

If I went with Espresso's ratings I'm banging 7-8s. In my mind I don't think so. I want the top of the top. Banging mediocre girls might as well stay in the USA.

Your thinking is all over the place.

1. You "never said Earth" but you're comparing Filipinos to Japanese, despite the two being extremely different both genetically and culturally. What is your logic behind that? Because they're "Asian"?

2. If you think that girl in the black dress is the average in the Philippines, you may want to look into the possibility that you were tripping acid during your trip.

3. Most guys don't rate on a bell curve.

4. Again pointing out where you're contradicting yourself, you claimed the girl in the bathing suit is a "generous 4" as if they're close in rating then later state that there is a 20% dropoff from 4 to 3.

(04-11-2014 04:34 AM)Beyond Borders Wrote:  This may not make me popular, but for the record, that's not the reason that all of us travel.

It can be a nice side perk, and one of the main reasons for a lot of guys, but I don't know that it's the entire point of travel.

I agree completely. Travel and adventure is something I've wanted since before I hit puberty. Yes, the women are great, but so is the low cost of living, beautiful beaches and world class diving, experiencing new cultures while escaping the dying one in the West, etc.

That statement also ignores the fact that many of the guys here were gaming attractive women in the States and the truly upper echelon of women in these countries tend to be no less accessible to foreigners than those in the states.

(04-11-2014 04:51 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Really in the Philippines that girl is a straight 5. She looks like a man. Makes it up with a good body. But lol I thought she was a ladyboy. Is it the fact I am half asian and have had asian tail chase me in the US thats making me real biased here? With europeans I find myself much more generous.

This is why, if you're going to throw out numbers, you have to try to be consistent with how everyone else is thinking, otherwise it loses any communicative value. Ergo, no point saying it.

If you're biased towards or against a certain set of racial features, then you have to try to put that aside for discussion purposes. Of course, that's very hard to do, if even possible.

But I'd still like to see you post up 20 girls and rate them 1 to 10. I have a feeling that the girls you rate a 9 might be a 7 for me.

I've seen the "what do you consider a 10" thread and half of the ones guys seem to like don't appeal to me at all. Not related to the "10" thread, but also, if you look at the top 100 for 2013 on the Maxim list, they've got Miley Cyrus at #1! Jennifer Lawrence at #5! Scarlett Johansson used to be #1 a couple years ago. NONE of these are even close to a 10 in my book. Miley has a good body but her face? Not so much. Would bang but certainly not my ideal by far. JLaw? Fuck no, all around. Wouldn't bang unless I had a couple beers in me. I see little appeal at all. Scarlett? A 6 at best for me. But I hear guys go on about these girls all the time like they are the shit. Go figure.

Olivia Wilde, big yes. Venessa Hudgens, hell yeah. Mila Kunis, before she got fat, yes. Emma Stone? GTFO of here. There is NOTHING about her that would give me wood. How is Heather Graham even on the list? Isn't she like 45? No woman that age ever belongs on a top 100 list of anything, unless it's the Top 100 list of 45-yr-olds. And this list isn't just dreamed up by some nerd in a basement. They are VOTED by Maxim readers. WTF???? There is something wrong here.

(04-11-2014 04:47 AM)Bix Wrote:  

(04-11-2014 03:50 AM)Espresso Wrote:  

(04-11-2014 02:31 AM)Enigma Wrote:  Dude, are you trolling? I really can't tell if you're serious about that girl being a "generous" 4.

Seconded. If that girl is a "generous 4" in your eyes, then there really isn't any point in having a discussion involving ratings, it would be completely meaningless.

If I may....here's a scale I propose:

10 - absolute smokeshow. extremely rare creature. level of hotness only sustainable for several years.
9 - stunner
8 - hot. cut off point for the 'high-end' in quality
7 - cute. universally bangable. a cut off point for being considered good looking
6 - bangable but absolutely nothing to brag about. most girls can achieve this level or above by being slim.
5 - barely bangable on rare occasions. would usually involve alcohol and repeated strike-outs. would send you into a downward spiral of questioning your choices and contemplating your life.
4 - ugly. worse than the before photos in neutrogena ads
3 - very ugly
2 - face transplant success story
1 - do not look directly at or risk boner malfunction for the next couple hours

The problem lies in that your descriptions are fairly accurate but only for a place like the US. In Japan, a 5 is much, much more bangable, so you have to rewrite the descriptions.

I think you are overthinking this whole rating thing, it's mostly just a bit of fun. Anyway, this is a philippines thread, lets not derail it too much

On a more serious note, do you guys think we can swindle an RVF 'company' discount at the gramercy?

(04-11-2014 05:27 AM)Espresso Wrote:  I think you are overthinking this whole rating thing, it's mostly just a bit of fun. Anyway, this is a philippines thread, lets not derail it too much

On a more serious note, do you guys think we can swindle an RVF 'company' discount at the gramercy?

The train's right on schedule, actually. It's not officially a Philippines thread until someone goes on and on about how unattractive the women are.

I think this is the first time that someone has done that while posting a tight-bodied 19 year old in a bathing suit and claiming that she was below the countrywide average, though.

Quote:That statement also ignores the fact that many of the guys here were gaming attractive women in the States and the truly upper echelon of women in these countries tend to be no less accessible to foreigners than those in the states.

Disagree completely. That's the one big reasons I travel. If you dress well, fit the part, and social network, its not that hard to get into the upper echelon. Just takes a bit of time and you have to be in the appropriate age group. Thankfully, I am still in my 20s and I look asian enough.

Granted I probably will never get into the upper echelons in Europe, but easy for me to say oh im half ___ (insert country here).

Am I the only person on this thread who thinks that girl I posted looks like a GUY? Am I that crazy to think she is a 5. LOOK AT THAT FACE. I know her body is pretty damn good, but look at that FACE. For a 19 year old filipina girl, yes she is a 5. Or you know lots of fat 19 year old filipinas.

And yes that 4 is in the bottom. Looking back ok maybe take away the word generous. A "solid 4". In between bottom 30-50% of the young Filipino population. It would make sense.

@Beyond Borders lol comment was directed as you. Another typo.

All in all yah its semantics. I stand by comment that Philippine Talent is poor compared to other Asian countries. Your Japan 5 will be much better then a Philippine 5. And Bix I will do that when I finish my datasheet.

Don't wanna open a new thread for this:

Does anyone know how much a 1 hour taxi ride costs on avarage?
Is it safe to go with taxi from one city to the next, or are there better alternatives?

Quality arguments really are pointless. I think this thread shows that pretty well. It's too subjective.

(04-11-2014 05:45 AM)BlondeChaser Wrote:  Your Japan 5 will be much better then a Philippine 5.

I agree that a Japanese 5 is better looking than a Philippine 5, but it's only due to better nutrition and grooming. And also you have to allow for skin tone, if you prefer light skin you will prefer a Japanese 5 to a Filipina 5, or golden tan skin, vice versa.