Post: #26

They can only do so much to limit males.

Companies still know full well that women take 43% more sick days than men, and there's always a push for strict maternity leave laws.

No company wants to a hire a young woman knowing she could get pregnant and be absent for months on end.

Women will never dominate the real world. All they can do is put in totalitarian laws to make it look like they do.

Post: #27

(03-17-2015 04:27 AM)Lucario Wrote:  



this school told boys to not come to school ,and only for girls to be at school to develop their scientific ability *laughs*

Schools view boys as second class citizens.

Girls can't do well unless the competition is out of site.

And all to make girls pursue to a STEM field. I would rather have more men in STEM fields regardless, since men actually have the mental superiority to do STEM fields.

Also they did not build those robots...any child can follow instructions on a lego box and build a robot.

I agree 100%.

This type of girls-only class is a tacit concession to how much better boys are. This is no different than when the NBA changed the rules after Wilt Chamberlain scored 100 pts in one game.

The intention is good but is foolish. When theses girls apply to tech companies, they're gonna be working with *gasp* men! If they can't handle the presence of little boys how are they gonna deal with the 90%(most the video girls will quit) male workplaces and male supervisors??

Post: #28

Here in colombia it is still common to find many all boys schools just like in the Middle East. Maybe, that is an option to ensure your boy isn't gender discriminated against.

Post: #29

It's really never been that different. Boy scouts sound good in principle, but they teach you to be a "team player", meaning super white knight from an early age. You're taught not to think for yourself, except you're not being sold the liberal agenda from a young age. Also, you'll have to wear those lame outfits and look like a clown to the girls. I remember going to a meeting once in grade school but and instantly knowing those outfits were just too goofy.

I've never met a dude who was a high-ranking boy scout and turned out to be cool. They're usually textbook raised. We used to call them "webelos", they didn't like it.

Another thing, look at the millennials who grew up going to schools before all the progressive indoctrination and still turned out SWPL.

The most important thing is being able to think for yourself, and hopefully play a sport competitively. Even with the current culture of "everyone wins", sports are still competitive at the high school level.

I always wanted to emulate Jean-Claude Van Damme from a young age, most other boys were obsessing over nerd stuff like Star Wars.

Post: #30

I'm all for male-only and female-only schools.

I teach professionally. The assumption with teaching is that you are teaching students. The assumption is that a set of teaching techniques will you allow you to teach different learning styles and appeal to all students.

In truth, teaching boys is completely different than teaching girls.

I teach conversational language skills and the girls never participate in class discussion or use their newly developed skills to make jokes. The boys do this instantly.

They have no business being in the same classroom.

Post: #31

(03-17-2015 09:27 PM)la_mode Wrote:  I've never met a dude who was a high-ranking boy scout and turned out to be cool. They're usually textbook raised. We used to call them "webelos", they didn't like it.

Bear Grylls

Quote:After leaving school, Grylls briefly considered joining the Indian Army and hiked in the Himalayan mountains of Sikkim and West Bengal.[20] Eventually, Grylls joined the Territorial Army and, after passing selection, served as a reservist with the SAS in 21 SAS Regiment (Artists) (Reserve), for three years until 1997.

In 1996, he suffered a freefall parachuting accident in Zambia. His canopy ripped at 4,900 metres (16,000 ft), partially opening, causing him to fall and land on his parachute pack on his back, which partially crushed three vertebrae. Grylls later said: "I should have cut the main parachute and gone to the reserve but thought there was time to resolve the problem".[21] According to his surgeon, Grylls came "within a whisker" of being paralysed for life and at first it was questionable whether he would ever walk again. Grylls spent the next 12 months in and out of military rehabilitation at Headley Court[21] before being discharged from his medical treatment and directing his efforts into trying to get well enough to fulfil his childhood dream of climbing Mount Everest.

On 16 May 1998, Grylls achieved his childhood dream climbed to the summit of Mount Everest, 18 months after breaking three vertebrae in a parachuting accident.[25] At 23, he was at the time among the youngest people to have achieved this feat.

In July 2009, Grylls was appointed the youngest-ever Chief Scout at the age of 35.

Post: #32

I have something to add seeing as somebody mentioned scouts. Here in the UK we had Beavers, Cubs and then Scouts for the boys, brownies and girl guides for the girls. We were seperate and it worked that way.

Both camps came together in large gatherings throughout the year to practice the old school craft we had learned at our respective clubs. In no shape or form were girls and boys mixed in either of their respective clubs. But according to my mother (rolleyes emote here) that wasn't strictly true.

Which is complete and utter nonsense seeing as it is only recently girls were allowed into Beavers, Cubs and Scouts. Those clubs as a result plunged in quality and the old boys being boys mantra were soon coddled into some lame bullshit version.

Whilst girls could easily go into their male counterpart the boys would find it difficult or unfavourable to go into the girls camp.

Post: #33

(03-18-2015 01:20 AM)Feisbook Control Wrote:  

(03-17-2015 09:27 PM)la_mode Wrote:  I've never met a dude who was a high-ranking boy scout and turned out to be cool. They're usually textbook raised. We used to call them "webelos", they didn't like it.

Bear Grylls

Quote:After leaving school, Grylls briefly considered joining the Indian Army and hiked in the Himalayan mountains of Sikkim and West Bengal.[20] Eventually, Grylls joined the Territorial Army and, after passing selection, served as a reservist with the SAS in 21 SAS Regiment (Artists) (Reserve), for three years until 1997.

In 1996, he suffered a freefall parachuting accident in Zambia. His canopy ripped at 4,900 metres (16,000 ft), partially opening, causing him to fall and land on his parachute pack on his back, which partially crushed three vertebrae. Grylls later said: "I should have cut the main parachute and gone to the reserve but thought there was time to resolve the problem".[21] According to his surgeon, Grylls came "within a whisker" of being paralysed for life and at first it was questionable whether he would ever walk again. Grylls spent the next 12 months in and out of military rehabilitation at Headley Court[21] before being discharged from his medical treatment and directing his efforts into trying to get well enough to fulfil his childhood dream of climbing Mount Everest.

On 16 May 1998, Grylls achieved his childhood dream climbed to the summit of Mount Everest, 18 months after breaking three vertebrae in a parachuting accident.[25] At 23, he was at the time among the youngest people to have achieved this feat.

In July 2009, Grylls was appointed the youngest-ever Chief Scout at the age of 35.

Wow. I never watched his show. I knew that he had a film crew around him, so I wasn't that interested. There was that other guy, Survivorman, who brought in his own cameras without a crew and they would just come looking for him days or a week later.

Grylls is no doubt, a badass.

Post: #34

The only real answer if you have boys is this:

Make enough money to send them to the old school, traditionally run private schools that the elite send their kids to.

Post: #35

(03-21-2015 02:43 PM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  The only real answer if you have boys is this:

Make enough money to send them to the old school, traditionally run private schools that the elite send their kids to.

Why? So your kids can be as fucked as up and soulless as the elite?

I would never bother sending kids to school. Huge waste of time. Nothing is learned. I would just teach them myself 1-2 times per week for a couple hours about various subjects. For socialization and making friends, I would help them find hobbies and sports, or other clubs. All in all, easy to do.

When they turn 14 I would look for a mentor in a given vocation for him to work and learn in. Then by the time he's 22, when most graduates are just getting out with 50K+ in debt he'll be making 50-100K per year.

The idea that schooling is necessary for a child's well being is one of the strangest myth's of our time. For the vast majority of human history, no one went to school. Around half of history's geniuses did not go to school - Aristotle did not either. Most of them were raised as I described above.

School hurts children emotionally and teaches them asocial tendencies, such as stealing, lying, bullying, and cheating. It also turns men into beta males, taking orders all the time, trying to win the approval of the group (extremely faggotty) with words or clothes, as well as sucking the soul of someone's life by wasting their time on useless bullshit.

With the advent of the internet especially, schools have no more purpose or function. At least in the past, they could credibly offer useful services to busy parents who couldn't go to the library all the time to teach stuff to their kids. Nowadays, there is nothing a child cannot learn from his computer he could learn in school.

Post: #36

I love this sentiment. And in general, you can do this, but you have to find a homeschooling community in order to pull it off (either that, or be so loaded that you can do it all yourself). You also need a dedicated woman with solid behavior and beliefs.

I've run into many (more than expected is many, but I suppose not many as a large % of the population) Christian women who would be capable of being suitable participants. If you're Christian, it's almost total open season on those women because their own institutions pussify their men so much that they are extremely easy and fun to game without having to be degrading to them. If you have to be degrading or if they act cold, run, because they're banging or whoring themselves out to alphas on the side.

It's the river I haven't forded yet, as I find myself incapable of being a believer ( even though church as a social institution can be very positive), but it's possible and they are out there.

(03-21-2015 09:05 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(03-21-2015 02:43 PM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  The only real answer if you have boys is this:

Make enough money to send them to the old school, traditionally run private schools that the elite send their kids to.

Why? So your kids can be as fucked as up and soulless as the elite?

I would never bother sending kids to school. Huge waste of time. Nothing is learned. I would just teach them myself 1-2 times per week for a couple hours about various subjects. For socialization and making friends, I would help them find hobbies and sports, or other clubs. All in all, easy to do.

When they turn 14 I would look for a mentor in a given vocation for him to work and learn in. Then by the time he's 22, when most graduates are just getting out with 50K+ in debt he'll be making 50-100K per year.

The idea that schooling is necessary for a child's well being is one of the strangest myth's of our time. For the vast majority of human history, no one went to school. Around half of history's geniuses did not go to school - Aristotle did not either. Most of them were raised as I described above.

School hurts children emotionally and teaches them asocial tendencies, such as stealing, lying, bullying, and cheating. It also turns men into beta males, taking orders all the time, trying to win the approval of the group (extremely faggotty) with words or clothes, as well as sucking the soul of someone's life by wasting their time on useless bullshit.

With the advent of the internet especially, schools have no more purpose or function. At least in the past, they could credibly offer useful services to busy parents who couldn't go to the library all the time to teach stuff to their kids. Nowadays, there is nothing a child cannot learn from his computer he could learn in school.

Post: #37

There is another thread dedicated to homeschooling here: /thread-46128-...#pid984509