Post: #1

Why can’t the Muslims, Africans, and Indians be more civilized like people in the West? Why do they insist on endless breeding when their children have no chance of attending an Ivy League university? Isn’t there a way we can help them to see the light of civilization, rationale thinking, and clean hygiene? These are questions you may have asked at some point when looking down on the third-world barbarians, but from the perspective of nature, it’s not them who are the problem. We are the problem. We are the defects of nature that will be eradicated.
Nature does not care about education, “high quality” offspring, college degrees, equal rights, cleanliness, sustainability, philosophy, or the environment. It cares about fertility and might, and the species or race that is most fertile and most powerful will be rewarded with the bounty that the Earth provides. The people who are able to take over the planet in sheer numbers, regardless of its intelligence or manners, will come to rule the world, just like how homo sapiens came to overrun the more intelligent Neanderthals by breeding at a far superior rate. The most intelligent race on the planet can use their smarts to fortify themselves in caves as the more numerous barbarians take over the planet, even if they’re nothing more than mindless zombies.

Rational thinking from the enlightenment era, when taken to its logical end in proving that families, divinity, and traditional standards aren’t necessary, along with the notion that the individual is God, leads to the suicide of society. Rationale, in it’s beautifully cherished civilized form, leads to the end of any race who participates in it, while the stupid barbarians with IQs of 95 or lower, who follow a two-thousand year old book that implores them to conquer and chop off heads, continue to multiply and take over more lands.
We are the mistakes of nature. We are the grotesque. We have been condemned for replacement, forsaken by God for enabling over one billion abortions in just a few decades while we attempt to change the rules of nature, to declare man woman and woman man. Our goal is not one of spiritual enlightenment but of achieving the most vile feats of degeneracy.
Because of our cultural and biological sterility, I believe we have been fated for destruction. Even though this end stares us right in the face, the best we can muster is a few rants on internet web sites, while the barbarians are raping, conquering, and breeding. I promise you they will win. History shows that the barbarians always win. They are the solution to a broken people. They faithfully worship their gods while we worship our Facebook likes and celebrities. We are so hopelessly sterile, so anti-life, that nature will celebrate when we are replaced by those who can barely read. But they will treasure the life of their kind, and that’s enough.

Even if we solve all the political problems of the day, and neutralize the most  vulgar of our society, what are we left with? A shrinking population and citizens so atomized that they are even losing the ability to communicate with each other, who have to use computerized apps and alcohol to fornicate while the female is on sterility medication, which her parents awarded her upon turning 16 years old. Our punishment is coming. Lands of the West will be given away, and even if the barbarian horde can be beaten with technology, there will be a day where there’s man left to stand against them to push the kill button. The barbarians will inherit the new world until they become civilized themselves and the cycle renews once more, like it has many times in the past.
Nature doesn’t care about your egalitarian laws or your superior IQ. It cares about reproduction and power, and what the barbarians lack in intelligence, they make up for in life energy. We are the anomalies, we are the mistakes, and unless we re-discover the ways of family, tradition, and God, we must be ready to accept the inevitable end that it was us who become so weak as a people that we didn’t even bother having a gate, and that all the barbarians had to do was walk right in.
Read Next: 7 Reasons Why American Culture Is The Most Degenerate In The World




Posted on Mon, 15 May 2017 14:00:20 +0000 at http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/dcb/~3/cR...-existence
Comments: http://www.rooshv.com/the-barbarians-wil...ce#respond

Post: #2

So I wonder, what are the factors that influence how long it takes for the barbarians to take over? A few that come to mind:

(1) Geographical factors. The U.S. and the U.K. are separated by ocean from the Muslim world, so we're in a less exposed position than, say, Syria. The freezing temperatures of Russia could also protect them from invaders who aren't prepared for the cold.

(2) Economic health. According to some accounts, it was bad economic policy that brought down the Roman Empire. A strong economy is a force multiplier, since it can fund production of more and better weapons, along with food and everything else needed to run a military and mobilize vast armies. A country's warmaking potential comes down to not only the number of laborers, but the productivity of that labor, which depends on training and capital. A strong economy, with full employment, also tends to keep the country more politically stable.

(3) Ability to assimilate barbarians (including both immigrants and conquered peoples). This goes hand-in-hand with economic health. If the economy is strong, then the barbarians usually want to join the civilization rather than try to beat it. They usually don't fully culturally assimilate in the first generation, but their kids typically do. When people see success, they tend to want to imitate it if they can.

(4) Technological superiority. Even when the barbarians are numerically superior, guns, germs, and steel can do quite a number on them. The stronger the economy, the more it can afford to spend endless amounts of money on technology to fight the enemy from a distance, while suffering few casualties.

(5) The will to rule. The British Empire probably could have maintained control over India, except that it wasn't willing to resort to ruthless enough tactics. They could have just shot Gandhi and the others who disobeyed them, if they had really wanted to maintain their dominion. But their will to rule had weakened.

Historically, it has been possible for relatively small European civilizations to control vast and populous empires. (In the British Empire, the ratio was 10:1.) So maybe the U.S. can hold on to its territory and sphere of influence for a long time even as its population shrinks.

There are some groups that haven't assimilated well into western culture, but how much of a threat do they really pose, aside from their participation in the political system? Most of the Muslims who try to bomb us fail, and the ones who succeed, do so only because we left gaping holes in our security, e.g. by not securing airline cockpits. That almost falls in the category of lacking the will to rule.

It's almost as though our politicians wanted 9/11 to happen, so that they could get the people to unite behind them and support going to war and taking away a lot of civil liberties. It's almost as though Osama bin Laden was a pawn in a game of 5D chess. Hmm.

Anyway, the U.S., E.U., and Russia could, even now, with their low fertility rates, still team up to totally clobber the whole Arab world, take everything they have, and utterly suppress Islam worldwide, if they wanted to. It would require only the will to rule. But, that sounds like a lot of work, and the west has become decadent and lazy.

Also, the western world has adopted a strong belief that every life and culture is precious and must be nurtured, rather than destroyed, so that it can reach its full potential, even if it doesn't seem all that promising (or maybe ESPECIALLY if it doesn't seem all that promising). This was something Ayn Rand wrote a lot about. The Stoddard Temple has to be converted into the Stoddard Home for Subnormal Children, because their need is greater.

So, there's Muslim terrorism? That just means that they're a problem child that needs extra resources. Therefore, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Palestine, etc. must be taken away from secular leaders and given to the Muslims to rule over. Then we can have peace in our time.

People speak of barbarians coming into the U.S. and corrupting and undermining us, but we could also do the same to them. A lot of non-western countries still have patriarchal cultures that encourage traditional marriage and childbearing, but our culture infiltrates theirs (via Facebook, feminist propaganda, etc.) and they end up becoming as bad as us in those ways.

Post: #3

Higher fertility/virility rates only means more otherwise useless people may die when the war goes hot. Success in warfare, and evolution, isn't dependent solely upon superior numbers, but a combination of variables.

Post: #4

I don't think that the Barbarians will win.

Let us look at the numbers:

Quote:There are approximately 1.3 billion “white” people around the world:

800 million in Europe
400 million in the Americas
100 million in the rest of the world
But the definition of white can vary a lot so you may or may not add the following groups:

200 million Castizos (mainly white but with a touch of other races)
300 million Mulattos, Meztizos and Eurasians (half whites)
100-200 million people from the Middle East and Northern India who aren't of European descent but have pale skin and Indoeuropean / Caucasian features
If you add all this up you have 1.9~2.0 billion whitish people around the world.

We miss the sheer number of more or less pure Caucasians, but they are not only in Europe, North America, FSU countries, Australia, New Zealand, but also in Argentina and big minorities like the one in South Africa or other Latin American countries where they make up the economic top.

One could say that 1.3 bio. are not Barbarians.

In addition you have 1.6 bio of North Asians - China, South Korea and Japan who are on many metrics at least as civilized at Westerners.

India while still very backwards will become an ever greater civilized force, but they won't be more destructive at least, but positive. So you have another 1.4 bio. of civilized people.

We are now at 4.3 bio. of tribes of civilized nature, plus close to a billion who are white-mixed.

The globalists control the money system of most countries in the world and the real military tech is decades ahead than what we see in ISIS territories.

There are also billions in Africa and South America and SEA who would never stage any barbaric revolt against the West, China and India - in fact they would have no chance.

So all we have now are partly unruly South Americans, backwards sub-saharan Africans who and of course a solid number of non-secular Muslims.

The globalists usher them into the West to destroy the current cultures, but they believe that they can control the diversity and terrorism. And I happen to agree with them. At worst they have to chip everyone and usher in an Orwellian police state.

The civilizing forces in the world are already bigger than the non-civilized ones. Yes - Africans and Muslims procreate at greater rates, but technology has long been the big equalizer. The Barbarians would be wiped out in weeks if the West, China and India decided to go to war with Islam or any other Barbarians.

The bigger question here is what the plans of the globalists are in detail. We will find out soon enough, but for sure it is not a going back to the Middle Ages under leadership of the Barbarians.

Post: #5

Funny how the thread next to this one, on the forum, is, /thread-62832.html , a thread about "civilized" first-world people spending their free time with fidget-spinners (small plastic hand toys). A dire symbol indeed: Civilized men are fidget-spinning in their "stressful" developed cities, while Barbarians are making IEDs and chopping heads.

Post: #6

Ah another thing about the Neanderthals - they were likely smarter, but that did not matter too much in the stone age, but they had other things:

+ matriarchy rulership - very bad
+ likely high child and female birth mortality due to their massive head designs
+ extremely recessive genes when paired with the homo sapiens sapiens

All mixed Neanderthal babies probably looked closer like us and that is why they lost coupled with the other factors. I do think that the homo sapiens was simply a better model for long-term survival - and don't get me started on the matriarchy crap.