Post: #26

(03-02-2012 11:03 PM)P Dog Wrote:  

(03-02-2012 10:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(03-02-2012 11:24 AM)Roosh Wrote:  In the forum early days, all we had was information on South America. But I think critical mass has been reached where the forum has information on everywhere regardless of where I decide to visit.

I'm not so sure about that. I bet if you went to Asia you'd get a lot of members with good info on Asian countries most guys here don't know about.

There aren't a lot of Asians on this board.

YMG is the only regular poster that comes to mind.

There's Luckystar. Though I'm not sure if he's born in the US from asian parents, and he's not posting regularly any more. I guess he must be up to his nose in polish poontang.

Post: #27

(03-03-2012 03:06 AM)Vicious Wrote:  

(03-02-2012 11:03 PM)P Dog Wrote:  

(03-02-2012 10:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(03-02-2012 11:24 AM)Roosh Wrote:  In the forum early days, all we had was information on South America. But I think critical mass has been reached where the forum has information on everywhere regardless of where I decide to visit.

I'm not so sure about that. I bet if you went to Asia you'd get a lot of members with good info on Asian countries most guys here don't know about.

There aren't a lot of Asians on this board.

YMG is the only regular poster that comes to mind.

There's Luckystar. Though I'm not sure if he's born in the US from asian parents, and he's not posting regularly any more. I guess he must be up to his nose in polish poontang.

I thought Luckystar was Indian?

Post: #28

(03-03-2012 03:34 AM)P Dog Wrote:  I thought Luckystar was Indian?

Same difference-India is a part of Asia.

Post: #29

(03-03-2012 04:18 AM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(03-03-2012 03:34 AM)P Dog Wrote:  I thought Luckystar was Indian?

Same difference-India is a part of Asia.

Fair enough, but that definition includes Arabs, Persians, most Turks and Israeli's as "Asian" as well. And I don't know anybody from those backgrounds who considers themselves Asian.

Post: #30

I've noticed that as of now, if you aren't trying to do a search, there's no way to easily browse through the threads. It's usually just the ones that are new or that get bumped that are readily accessible.

I'd bet that there are certain topics that come up more than others. It might be useful to have levels of sub categories within the main ones. This way you you'd be able to get an overall sense of what's most important and you'd also be able to dig deeper into a particular subject.

Maybe there's a way to do it by using the kind of method employed for word clouds. Actually, a word cloud thing might be a cool forum navigation tool.

Of course, there would always bee the option of browsing new posts.

Post: #31

(03-03-2012 09:29 AM)soup Wrote:  Of course, there would always bee the option of browsing new posts.

There's a View Today's posts button on the grey bar if that helps.

Post: #32

(03-03-2012 04:18 AM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(03-03-2012 03:34 AM)P Dog Wrote:  I thought Luckystar was Indian?

Same difference-India is a part of Asia.

Right - I'm talking about the Orient. Not many orientals on this board.

Post: #33

(03-03-2012 08:02 AM)P Dog Wrote:  

(03-03-2012 04:18 AM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(03-03-2012 03:34 AM)P Dog Wrote:  I thought Luckystar was Indian?

Same difference-India is a part of Asia.

Fair enough, but that definition includes Arabs, Persians, most Turks and Israeli's as "Asian" as well. And I don't know anybody from those backgrounds who considers themselves Asian.

With the exception of Israelis, none of those groups would be considered "white" in the US, though they may choose Caucasian on forms (I think).

Arabs, Turks and Persians have an ambiguous category, but they are each different from each other.