Post: #226

(05-01-2017 10:08 PM)kbell Wrote:   2004

The Olson Twins now.

Although it has been discussed on this forum before, it still brings profound sadness and anger whenever I see their current pictures. I have never seen such a dead eyes look like they have. Whatever they saw and did over the years (and more probably was done to them), has killed their spirit a long time ago. They are truly the walking dead.

Post: #227

(05-01-2017 10:08 PM)kbell Wrote:  

The Olson Twins now.

Wow. Those pictures are just tragic. These girls were among the first crushes I had when I was a little boy. They must have seen some pretty bad stuff. That and they did not age well at all.

In contrast, their sister Elizabeth looks pretty fine.

Post: #228

Cheers to Elizabeth. Her sisters look like they've been on a week long meth bender. As for Nicki Minaj, she's a black hotness thread in and of herself.

Post: #229

(06-21-2017 07:13 AM)Filbert Wrote:  Amy Poehler:

Good for Will Arnett leaving her. Now's he's onto some 30 year-old designer. SNL aired a funny skit around this time with Tina, and Amy. Guess what it was about? 'Gross men dating younger women'.

Post: #230

(05-01-2017 10:08 PM)kbell Wrote:  

I would like to go on record to say that Rachel Bilson is still very welcome in my bed. She's not one of the twins obviously.

Post: #231

Lindsay Lohan (30 years old)









More at: http://archive.is/WfdZJ

Post: #232

^
Hmmm.
That might add to the reason why she's promoted a line of 'burkinis'...

Post: #233

Bruhhhhhh ^^^^^^^

Post: #234

An even worse thought.
How bad will Lohan look at age 40 or age 50...?

She's almost on par with her 54y/o mother.

Post: #235

I was in middle school when Mean Girls came out, and really wanted to fuck her. I would fap to that movie, and my friends did too. She looks like some trailer park hooker addicted to meth now. What a shame.

Lacey Chabert was my favorite though. She was some prime pussy for a while. Rachel McAdams and Amanda Seyfried could get it too.

Post: #236

The Olsen twins have looked scary for years though. Why?

Post: #237

Not many like 52 year old Elizabeth Hurley.
She puts many younger girls to shame...

Post: #238

A quick note about the wall, from personal experience:

I had a barbecue last weekend with my ex and our kids (we get along pretty well and occasionally have barbecues or do Christmases together for the sake of the kids) and her friends, all women in their 40s, some of their kids, and a few of my friends. It was a nice time and I really enjoy grilling, talking care of people, having a cold beer and hanging out.

These women were good looking and in decent shape. They are probably better looking than many of their peers, not fat, but you could still tell that they are in their 40s, pushing 50- you know, a little too much makeup, and an obvious effort to wear clothes that would be more appropriate for someone younger. Two of them were Brazilian, which probably explains it, but the best looking one of all was American, though she is very tall, which detracts from her appearance, at least in my opinion (she's about 6'2").

All of them were sitting around talking about their divorces and their recent sexual exploits. The entire conversation revolved around what bars or restaurants they went to (I'm in DC and there are literally hundreds of bars, restaurants and clubs around), the guys they meet online, the guys they dated and dumped, the places they have traveled, where are the best beaches etc. While at the barbecue, one of them asked me if it would be ok for her to invite a friend over. I said sure, the more the merrier, and the next thing I know a tall young black guy shows up, apparently her latest conquest.

Flash forward to today- I'm at the airport, and while waiting at security I see this enormous land whale ahead of me, folds of fat on her belly almost drooping down over her waist. A few more pounds and the button holding her shorts on would pop off with enough force to depressurize her plane, and what do I see wrapped around her knockwurst fingers? An engagement ring. Some guy got down on one knee and proposed to that thing.

My point is: there is no wall. These old women are getting more sex now then they probably ever did in marriage, and certainly more male attention, which they are lapping up. They have no financial consequences from divorce, considering all they were talking about was bars, restaurants, vacations and boyfriends, and one of them even had a good looking normal young guy hanging all over her. My ex has told me that the tall one has guys hitting on her all the time. Then today I see this enormous, disgusting wildebeest in front of me, sweating her way through security, with a boyfriend/fiancée/husband at home somewhere waiting for her to return.

I guarantee that there are guys who would fuck all of the hags shown here in this thread, from saggy worn out Lindsay Lohan to zombie Cher, all of them, without exception.

Men are responsible for all this. For allowing and pushing feminism, to dating and fucking these shriveled up dusty Egyptian mummies, it's our fault. From every article we click about how "50 is the new 30", to every childless female politician we vote for, it's all our fault.

Sorry if I sound a little bitter, but sometimes I fear that this stuff about "the wall" and how "people are waking up" and all that sounds a bit naive and unrealistic to me. Believe me, I wish it were otherwise.

Post: #239

(07-15-2017 04:17 PM)Stirfry Wrote:  I guarantee that there are guys who would fuck all of the hags shown here in this thread, from saggy worn out Lindsay Lohan to zombie Cher, all of them, without exception.

It's very unfair to compare Lindsay Lohan to Cher. Cher is FORTY years older. Cher was still doing quite well when she was in her 40's, while Lohan is only 31 now. Here is Cher in her video for "Love and Understanding." She would have been 44 or 45:





Cher is 71 now. It's a safe bet that Lohan won't even make it to 71.

Post: #240

That's true- I don't know if we should be including the elderly (like Cher or Bridgette Bardot) among the "wall victims" but I believe my point is still valid, not to mention the fact that sometimes these old women are also promoted as sex symbols, at the ages they are now, like Goldie Hawn or Raquel Welch.

Post: #241

(07-15-2017 05:48 PM)puckerman Wrote:  Cher is 71 now. It's a safe bet that Lohan won't even make it to 71.

I'm far from certain she'll even reach 45.

Post: #242

Michelle Trachtenberg - her face isn't beat, she could bounce back if she lost the weight...but they rarely do.

Post: #243

Jeebuz.
Ice cream is not supposed to be a comfort food honey...

Post: #244

(07-21-2017 12:37 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  Michelle Trachtenberg - her face isn't beat, she could bounce back if she lost the weight...but they rarely do.

Dammit there goes my childhood

Post: #245

(03-07-2017 06:01 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Lisa Kudrow, now 53:

God, she dresses like someone called Gerald who works in IT.

Post: #246

You just ruined my days with those photos of Michelle. She was so hot in Eurotrip. She was in this as well:

Post: #247

(03-07-2017 06:01 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Lisa Kudrow, now 53:

Post: #248

Scarlett Johansson (age 32) with a new 'modern day hairstyle':

Mid-2000s:


2017:

(03-20-2017 10:58 PM)Slam Wrote:  Was randomly on an article about her and look at what I found.

That's a hoverhand by her husband. Definitely a hoverhand.

0:46

Post: #249

(07-21-2017 12:37 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  Michelle Trachtenberg - her face isn't beat, she could bounce back if she lost the weight...but they rarely do.

Man, there is just no excuse for this. She is only 31 today. She must just eat like a hog and never work out.

Speaking for Scarlett Johansson for me she peaked about the time when this picture was taken. This Scarlett Johansson is long gone.

Post: #250

Scarlett Johansson has always been vastly overrated anyway.