Post: #1

http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2012/11/me...hales/all/

Quote:Lee says that spending money on games like Clash of Clans is actually saving him money in the long-run: Before he started gaming, he says he and a small group of friends would go out drinking, sometimes spending as much as $6,000 in a single night between them.

I don't know what so if I'd do with $6000 to spend in a night, but I wouldn't be it wasting it on fucking Ipad games.

Post: #2

Who cares?

If fewer guys go out, it is an overal plus for us, so really we should be encourging this behavior.

Post: #3

I can't get mad at them because I used to do the same shit they do now. Hell I remember back when I used to play WoW with my best friend. I paid $60 dollars just to get my priest geared up. And I remember paying a little bit more for some other online games. 60 bucks for a fucking ninetailed fox. I'd say I've spent around $200 on online shit.

And I can't get mad at him! If thats how he wants to spend his bread then so be it! It's the blue pill way of spending and living. But, his life is going to be boring as shit. He's not going to be able to tell his grandkids anything crazy he did in his life. Most of us on here has done something that was crazy as fuck. And that's good! Bitches love crazy things!

But after being around this forum for a while, 5k could be better spent on whatever will improve your chances of doing better things. If I had that type of bread right now, I'd have my style fully improved, game coaching, and just doing shit that would please me and not some fag whose killing me with his level 949 warriorshaman.

I just hope that they begin to understand that. If not, thats even better for us. But, with 5k in any of our hands, we'd do some serious fucking damage.

Post: #4

The most Omega of men would be Farruko, aka Dash Global.

Post: #5

(11-01-2012 06:11 AM)Pacesetter20 Wrote:  Who cares?

If fewer guys go out, it is an overal plus for us, so really we should be encourging this behavior.

Actually no, I believe that the better game guys get, the more women will lose weight.

Post: #6

You know, you say these are the most omega of men, but who is really the most omega:

-The man who pays $10,000/year on video gaming.

-The man who pays $30,000/year on alimony and child support for his ex-wife who cheated on him and has now moved in with the guy who she was cheating with.

Post: #7

(11-01-2012 05:22 PM)Celtic Wrote:  You know, you say these are the most omega of men, but who is really the most omega:

-The man who pays $10,000/year on video gaming.

-The man who pays $30,000/year on alimony and child support for his ex-wife who cheated on him and has now moved in with the guy who she was cheating with.

The Omega and the Beta!

Post: #8

(11-01-2012 06:11 AM)Pacesetter20 Wrote:  Who cares?

If fewer guys go out, it is an overal plus for us, so really we should be encouraging this behavior.

This is a double-edged sword, my friend. What is good for the individual player isn't necessarily good for the civilization. I still care about both, so I wouldn't exactly wish for it.

Post: #9

In these guys' defense, the article says one of these guys has an got annual income in the mid-low six figures. One says he makes over a million. So it's not the crippling financial blow that it would be to a normal guy.

Still pretty omega, though.

Post: #10

(11-01-2012 10:40 AM)Rosca Wrote:  60 bucks for a fucking ninetailed fox.

What's a Ninetailed Fox?

Post: #11

(11-01-2012 02:15 PM)soup Wrote:  

(11-01-2012 06:11 AM)Pacesetter20 Wrote:  Who cares?

If fewer guys go out, it is an overal plus for us, so really we should be encourging this behavior.

Actually no, I believe that the better game guys get, the more women will lose weight.

You're kidding right? That's like saying you want to go to sausage parties because it intensifies the competition.

What will make women lose weight is an absence of male attention. What will make women lose weight is when they're placed in a position to compete for a limited number of males.