Post: #1

Now here's a man both myself, Vicious* and Samseau can agree with. This dude is an atheist and prominent critic of Islam, and I've posted about him before. There have been disagreements regarding religion, Islam etc on various threads... However, this is a video I am sure we all can unite in support for.





* You may have some issues with his criticisms of Sweden.

Post: #2

yeah he gets it. It's nothing new, but western feminists care more about fat shaming and rape culture in america than they do about the poor living conditions of women in the muslim countries, or really any of the third world like africa or india, where the women can be treated like property and beaten and raped by the men in their family with no repercussions.

Post: #3

Precisely. A feminist asked in the comments section:

"What exactly can a western feminist do to defend women's rights in the middle east?
I'd like some specifics."

I responded:

"Stop whining about 'rape culture' and attack real misogyny, not 'creepy' (read: unattractive) men who ask you out."

Post: #4

Another great video from that guy. This is one of the biggest hypocrisies of modern feminism. They literally twist themselves in knots to accommodate their moral relativism and "intersectionality". Noticing more dope posts from Teedub since I've been on here. +1 rep point from me.

Post: #5

Thanks bro, appreciated. I really like Pat Condell, although he can be a little dogmatic in his videos. At least he has balls and conviction though, something lacking in today's Western males. In a way, me included, I wouldn't want death threats etc like he gets!

Post: #6

Actually I know Pat Condell too! Generally I do agree with him but he can be a little hard headed too!

Post: #7

Makes you wonder what would happen if a guy like him ran for office.

I'm sure he'd get vilified according to the various "isms" but he seems less extreme than the BNP (from my basic knowledge of UK politics).

I wouldn't be surprised if there were a lot of hidden voters for an immigration policy that was only restrictive towards Muslim dominated countries, that could be argued, don't share Western, secular values. They'd have to phrase it around "financially beneficial newcomer" type language most likely.

But it seems too far gone to have something like that happen, Japan is one of the few countries that keeps a very homogeneous immigration policy, even though I would consider them more Western from an economic stand point, rather than a cultural one.

Post: #8

(09-06-2013 07:32 PM)LeBeau Wrote:  Makes you wonder what would happen if a guy like him ran for office.

I'm sure he'd get vilified according to the various "isms" but he seems less extreme than the BNP (from my basic knowledge of UK politics).

I wouldn't be surprised if there were a lot of hidden voters for an immigration policy that was only restrictive towards Muslim dominated countries, that could be argued, don't share Western, secular values. They'd have to phrase it around "financially beneficial newcomer" type language most likely.

But it seems too far gone to have something like that happen, Japan is one of the few countries that keeps a very homogeneous immigration policy, even though I would consider them more Western from an economic stand point, rather than a cultural one.

In all honesty, I'm one of those people. I think a restrictive policy on Pakistan would be a very good thing for England. However, whilst I don't think they should join the EU, Turkish people are a very different proposition.

Post: #9

What else is there to say? It's pure hypocrisy. Just like liberals who preach about racism in Ameirca and yet live in lily-white neighborhoods.