Post: #1

http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/nj-teen...04488.html

I'd hit it. Chill she is 18.

Quote:A New Jersey teenager claiming that her mother and father tossed her out of their home and cut her off financially is suing them for immediate support, current private-school fees and future college tuition. The parents, meanwhile, say that daughter Rachel Canning, 18, moved out voluntarily after refusing to abide by their rules.

“We love our child and miss her. This is terrible. It’s killing me and my wife,” Rachel's father, Sean Canning, a town administrator and retired police officer, tells the Daily Record. “We have a child we want home. We’re not Draconian and now we’re getting hauled into court. She’s demanding that we pay her bills but she doesn’t want to live at home, and she’s saying, ‘I don’t want to live under your rules.’” The rules, he notes, include reconsidering her relationship with a boyfriend who may be a bad influence, being respectful, and abiding by her curfew. He and his wife, Elizabeth, who live in suburban Lincoln Park, about 25 miles outside of New York City, have kept their daughter’s car because they paid for it, says Canning, and he admits that they did stop paying Rachel's tuition at the private Morris Catholic High School. A hearing is scheduled to take place on Tuesday in the Morris County Superior Court.

For months, Rachel — an honor student, cheerleader, and lacrosse player — has been living with the family of her best friend and classmate, Jaime Inglesino, whose father, attorney John Inglesino, is bankrolling Rachel’s lawsuit. He’s also requesting in the lawsuit that the Cannings reimburse him for the legal fees, so far totaling $12,597, according to the paper.

Rachel’s attorney, Tanya Helfand, is not taking calls as she prepares for Tuesday's hearing, her office tells Yahoo Shine. Rachel did not return a call from Yahoo Shine, and the Morris County court was closed on Monday due to inclement weather. But the Daily Record reports that, in the suit, Rachel alleges that her parents decided to cut her off “from all support both financially and emotionally” as of her 18th birthday, which was November 1. Her suit also demands the following of the Cannings: that they take care of an outstanding $5,306 Morris Catholic tuition bill; pay their daughter’s current living and transportation expenses; and free up her existing college fund, as she’s already been accepted to several universities.

It’s not unheard of for youngsters to take legal action against their parents for various offenses — from a pregnant Texas teen who sued her parents for allegedly pressuring her to get an abortion, to a pair of Illinois siblings in their 20s who sued their mom (unsuccessfully) for bad mothering. Even so, the Canning case is an extremely unusual one, according to experts in family law. That’s because similar suits typically involve either a divorce situation, with parents disagreeing on a child’s financial support, or a fight for emancipation, in which a teen is declared financially independent from parents.

“This young woman is actually saying, ‘I want to compel the court to continue to support me financially. That’s what’s unique in this case,” Mary Coogan, assistant director of the nonprofit Advocates for Children of New Jersey, tells Yahoo Shine. “So this young lady is in a unique situation because it does become very fact-sensitive. There’s really no law directly on point.” What families in similar situations have done, in Coogan’s experience, is to file for what’s called a “family crisis petition,” in which the court will try to mediate an agreeable outcome between the parents and their child.

Talking the situation through would be a better route than a lawsuit, Kenneth Neumann, a New York divorce mediator and psychologist with the Center for Mediation & Training, tells Yahoo Shine. “We often use the legal system as a way to deal with disagreements when we should be using therapy or mediation,” he says, noting that Rachel’s case is “extremely rare,” and that he’s “not had a case like this in 30 years,” with the most unique angle being that the parents are not in disagreement. Unfortunately for Rachel, Neumann says, “I don’t think she has much of a case. This sounds like just another 18-year-old who got into a thing with her parents.”

Post: #2

Would bang.

Post: #3

Would bang.

Post: #4

The girl I lost my virginity to went to that high school. Spoiled little shits, the whole lot of them. I hope that the parents win the case and keep her out of the house permanently.

Post: #5

This stuff has gotten ridiculous. Reminds me of the Bren Lawsuit. He is a billionaire and he was sued for child support by the kids. At the time I was telling my friends, so basically if the kids were living in his house they would have to take what he gave but because they don't live with him, they can sue for a lot of money?

Now, even though the bitch in question has moved out, she can sue her own parents. And it isn't like an ex-wife situation. Fuck me...

For those curious about Bren. Luckily, he won.

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/bren-...court.html

Quote:The Bren children live with their mother in Los Angeles. They are seeking retroactive child support of $400,000 a month each between August 1988 and December 2002.

During that period, Bren paid the two a combined total of $3 million in child support, his lawyers say.

In all, Bren has paid more than $9 million to Christie and David Bren – the additional $6 million-plus resulting from a separate case Bren filed in 2003 to determine what, if any, back child support he should pay.

Post: #6

I'm confused, how in the hell can she even pull this off?

She left voluntarily, because she doesn't like the rules that her parents have given her? And she has the audacity to sue them to pay for her school and other crap? What the fuck is this shit....

Well she should follow in Belle Knox's footsteps, deep throat some cock and pay for school

Post: #7

A few things:

1. Just like in the Bren case, she's not going to win.

2. We need Parlay on this thread because these are hard core New Jersey shenanigans.

3. Totally unrelated but I saw this pic linked from the article which is a pic of the world's current confirmed oldest woman and it's one of the f'ing sweetest images I've seen in ages:

Post: #8

What a spoiled brat. Would hate-fuck.

Post: #9

Is that a duck face on the oldest women!?!?

Post: #10

(03-03-2014 06:54 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  Is that a duck face on the oldest women!?!?

This pic is not shopped, it's completely for real. The woman's name is Misao Okawa and she's about to turn 116 on Wednesday. Her face is f'ing legendary.

Sorry about derail but had to post it...

Post: #11

Just signed into the Forum to post this article, I see SamSamSam beat me to it.

This is the absolute pinnacle of the Entitlement Generation. A girl decides to move out because her parents don't approve of her slutting around with a badboy, and then sues because she wants to keep taking their money.

Also, wtf is up with her best friend's dad bankrolling her lawsuit? What a white knight. He probably stays up late jerking it to the thought of her every night, and thinks that being her "hero" might lead her to fuck him.



Everything about this story is sickening.

Post: #12

(03-03-2014 06:54 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  Is that a duck face on the oldest women!?!?

its for her instragram.

Post: #13

Quote:For months, Rachel — an honor student, cheerleader, and lacrosse player — has been living with the family of her best friend and classmate, Jaime Inglesino, whose father, attorney John Inglesino, is bankrolling Rachel’s lawsuit. He’s also requesting in the lawsuit that the Cannings reimburse him for the legal fees, so far totaling $12,597, according to the paper.

What a fucking lowlife.

Dollars to donuts he talked her into this just to get the parents to pay him.

Post: #14

Why does it seem that the Asians outlive everyone else? Minuscule amounts of radiation? Jk jk

Post: #15

Quote:For months, Rachel — an honor student, cheerleader, and lacrosse player — has been living with the family of her best friend and classmate, Jaime Inglesino, whose father, attorney John Inglesino, is bankrolling Rachel’s lawsuit. He’s also requesting in the lawsuit that the Cannings reimburse him for the legal fees, so far totaling $12,597, according to the paper.

Looks like we know who she's banging.

Post: #16

Would bang.

Post: #17

(03-03-2014 07:02 PM)Vroom Wrote:  

Quote:For months, Rachel — an honor student, cheerleader, and lacrosse player — has been living with the family of her best friend and classmate, Jaime Inglesino, whose father, attorney John Inglesino, is bankrolling Rachel’s lawsuit. He’s also requesting in the lawsuit that the Cannings reimburse him for the legal fees, so far totaling $12,597, according to the paper.

Looks like we know who she's banging.

lol. Probably multiple people. This lawyer dude sounds more like a white knight though. I doubt he tapped that.

Post: #18

If he isn't tagging it you know he's in the bathroom rubbing one out nightly wishing he was.

Post: #19

The girl is entitled, but what vindictive lawyer took her case on? There are some adults who should know better enabling her.

(03-03-2014 07:00 PM)Dagonet Wrote:  Also, wtf is up with her best friend's dad bankrolling her lawsuit? What a white knight. He probably stays up late jerking it to the thought of her every night, and thinks that being her "hero" might lead her to fuck him.



Everything about this story is sickening.

She's 18. Could this guy be fucking her?

Compensated dating, I think it's called?

Post: #20

Gotta give props to the boyfriend. She probably left home thinking she could stay with him. I bet her mindset is like my ex's. She thinks she "deserves" everything merely for existing.

The friend's dad is being a white knight because he thinks that her parents are "destroying her future". It's how they think. He's also gambling that he will get the money back in the lawsuit. I might look into this and take a personal day just to go Morristown to see the smug look wiped off his face when the judge rules against him. What he is doing is just feeding her ego more garbage. Some hardship would do her good. Too bad it won't happen until it's too late.

Post: #21

He probably banged her when she was underage and she is blackmailing him.

Post: #22

(03-03-2014 07:09 PM)teh_skeeze Wrote:  The friend's dad is being a white knight because he thinks that her parents are "destroying her future".

Just send him some of that Duke chick porn. Basically this girl is as fucked as that girl is.

Post: #23

How the fuck did this dude bill $12,000 worth of attorney time on this case? I would:

1) move to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
2) move for sanctions against her attorney for filing a frivolous law suit
3) report him to the NJ bar for violating the NJ rules of ethics for his over billing
4) counterclaim for their attorneys fees

Most courts really hate to get involved in these sorts of law suits.

Edit: 5) WB

Post: #24

Honor student? In what ...fashion? Liberal Arts? Give me a break. She wants a 4 year season pass to ride the Carousel Le Cock.

Any judge worth a shit will throw this out.

See what happens when you raise girls to be princesses.

And what a fucking scumbag bottom feeding lawyer.

Post: #25

Hasn't locked down any of her social media accounts - isn't this Lawsuit 101?

http://instagram.com/rachecanning
https://www.facebook.com/rachel.canning.33

This one posted two weeks ago (guess somebody needs to pay for this trip???)



This one back in December:




Regarding bangability:



But regarding the lawsuit: