Post: #1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...e-you.html

There is or was (site inactive) an app called Anaface, which assesses the attractiveness of women via standardized factors and basically lets them feel good about their Hamster-state. Obviously the app completely ignores age.

How would You guys rate them?
also:
How would You rate them at their prime (likely estimate)?

Also see the absurdly high ratings even at their age - in my opinion most would not merit that high ratings even at their prime. Mind you also guys that the pics are the very best that can be possibly made - those women are somewhat famous and look worse in most of the other pictures.

[attachment=18451]
1. Samantha Brick, 43, score: 8.01 out of 10

[attachment=18452]
2. Petronella Wyatt, 42, score: 8 out of 10

[attachment=18459]
3. Liz Hoggard, 51, score: 8.61 out of 10

[attachment=18453]
4. Eve Ahmed, 54, score: 7.1 out of 10

[attachment=18454]
5. Sandra Howard, 73, score: 8.41 out of 10

[attachment=18455]
6. Kate Mulvey, 49, score: 5.75 out of 10


Of course those women may be wonderful mothers and truly be highly attractive to their husbands who grew old with them. It is just that the app as well as the article is another example of the hamster-rationalization that is supposed to convince WOMEN-KIND that it is fine to blow your 20s and even your 30s on carousel-riding, since special snowflake can still get a 8,6 attractiveness count at the age of 42!

Men can be very attractive at that age too, so why can't women right?!!!!

The HAMSTER is strong in this one!

____________________

Personal score:

1. Samantha Brick, 43, score: 8.01 out of 10
NOW: 3.3
Prime: 6 (maybe)

2. Petronella Wyatt, 42, score: 8 out of 10
NOW: 3.5
PRIME: 7 (with precaution)

3. Liz Hoggard, 51, score: 8.61 out of 10
NOW: 2
PRIME: 4.8

4. Eve Ahmed, 54, score: 7.1 out of 10
NOW: 3.3
PRIME: 6

5. Sandra Howard, 73, score: 8.41 out of 10
NOW: 3.7 (extra points for staying in best shape at age 73)
PRIME: 8.5 (was famous model)

6. Kate Mulvey, 49, score: 5.75 out of 10
NOW: 1.5
PRIME: 4

Post: #2

Quote:3. Liz Hoggard, 51, score: 8.61 out of 10

Post: #3

Samantha brick now-5/10
In her prime-6/10

Petronella wyatt now-6/10 (cougar factor)
In her prime-6 to 8. She looks like she easily could've been a fox

Liz hoggard now-3/10
Liz hoggard then-4/10

Eve Ahmed now-4/10
Eve Ahmed in her prime-7/10

Sandra Howard now-5/10
Sandra Howard in her prime-8/10 she looks like that at 70 so she had to have been hot

Kate mulvey now-3/10
Kate mulvey then-3/10

Post: #4

Was this rating done by having random animals walk over buttons that represent numbers?

Post: #5

That is just painful.

Post: #6

I could still bang the first 2. They fall into the 'yes' pile. The others are either "no" or "NO" or "HELL NO"

Post: #7

Now women do not even need beta orbiters to inflate their ego, just a stupid app.

The bitch shield will reach epic proportions. I am an 8! Says a 51 old who was not even attractive when she was 19!

Post: #8

WNB

Post: #9

Retards do these ratings, fatties on Hot Or Not have a 6+ most of the time.

Post: #10

(05-01-2014 03:10 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:3. Liz Hoggard, 51, score: 8.61 out of 10

That was where I stopped given how ridiculous that rating is - she's probably more like a 2...man what a mess of a ratings system..I'd bang the first two though..

Post: #11

On one hand, the hamster is strong in this one. On the other hand, she is encouraging girls to be thin. Hmm, this hamster is strong, but it is being utilized for the betterment of the world.

Enjoy laughing - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...tiful.html

Post: #12

(05-02-2014 04:50 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

On one hand, the hamster is strong in this one. On the other hand, she is encouraging girls to be thin. Hmm, this hamster is strong, but it is being utilized for the betterment of the world.

Enjoy laughing - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...tiful.html

Perma diet?

If these idiots got off of their fat asses and lifted weights they'd be able to eat whatever they want within reason and still look good without going on a perma diet.

Post: #13

(05-02-2014 05:45 PM)frenchie Wrote:  

(05-02-2014 04:50 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

On one hand, the hamster is strong in this one. On the other hand, she is encouraging girls to be thin. Hmm, this hamster is strong, but it is being utilized for the betterment of the world.

Enjoy laughing - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...tiful.html

Perma diet?

If these idiots got off of their fat asses and lifted weights they'd be able to eat whatever they want within reason and still look good without going on a perma diet.

Read the article - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...tiful.html
Too lazy to quote it, but enjoy laughing at the hamster.