Post: #1

Men and women, gay and straight, were sat down and shown a variety of stimuli. Straight sex, gay sex, lesbian sex, animal sex, good looking people walking around, naked exercise. They rated their sexual arrousal subjectively, and then there was a device attached to their genitals taking measurements.

"The genitals of the volunteers were connected to plethysmographs — for the men, an apparatus that fits over the penis and gauges its swelling; for the women, a little plastic probe that sits in the vagina and, by bouncing light off the vaginal walls, measures genital blood flow. An engorgement of blood spurs a lubricating process called vaginal transudation: the seeping of moisture through the walls. The participants were also given a keypad so that they could rate how aroused they felt."

Surprise surprise, men knew what aroused them. What the machine measured was what men said they were aroused by. Women, however...

"And with the women, especially the straight women, mind and genitals seemed scarcely to belong to the same person."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazi...=all&_r=1&

It seems like women were basically turned on by everything. Gay men, lesbians, straight couples, animals. Basically everything except for the sight of a good looking man walking down the street.

Post: #2

(11-17-2014 05:07 PM)Sonsowey Wrote:  Men and women, gay and straight, were sat down and shown a variety of stimuli. Straight sex, gay sex, lesbian sex, animal sex, good looking people walking around, naked exercise. They rated their sexual arrousal subjectively, and then there was a device attached to their genitals taking measurements.

"The genitals of the volunteers were connected to plethysmographs — for the men, an apparatus that fits over the penis and gauges its swelling; for the women, a little plastic probe that sits in the vagina and, by bouncing light off the vaginal walls, measures genital blood flow. An engorgement of blood spurs a lubricating process called vaginal transudation: the seeping of moisture through the walls. The participants were also given a keypad so that they could rate how aroused they felt."

Surprise surprise, men knew what aroused them. What the machine measured was what men said they were aroused by. Women, however...

"And with the women, especially the straight women, mind and genitals seemed scarcely to belong to the same person."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazi...=all&_r=1&

It seems like women were basically turned on by everything. Gay men, lesbians, straight couples, animals. Basically everything except for the sight of a good looking man walking down the street.

"A woman doesn't know what she wants. Her pussy does"- Dante Nero

Post: #3

It's a large article, but it's got a couple of very interesting quotes:

Quote:“One of the things I think about,” she said, “is the dyad formed by men and women. Certainly women are very sexual and have the capacity to be even more sexual than men, but one possibility is that instead of it being a go-out-there-and-get-it kind of sexuality, it’s more of a reactive process. If you have this dyad, and one part is pumped full of testosterone, is more interested in risk taking, is probably more aggressive, you’ve got a very strong motivational force. It wouldn’t make sense to have another similar force. You need something complementary. And I’ve often thought that there is something really powerful for women’s sexuality about being desired. That receptivity element. At some point I’d love to do a study that would look at that.”

Quote:The generally accepted therapeutic notion that, for women, incubating intimacy leads to better sex is, Meana told me, often misguided. “Really,” she said, “women’s desire is not relational, it’s narcissistic” — it is dominated by the yearnings of “self-love,” by the wish to be the object of erotic admiration and sexual need. Still on the subject of narcissism, she talked about research indicating that, in comparison with men, women’s erotic fantasies center less on giving pleasure and more on getting it. “When it comes to desire,” she added, “women may be far less relational than men.”

Quote:And within a committed relationship, the crucial stimulus of being desired decreases considerably, not only because the woman’s partner loses a degree of interest but also, more important, because the woman feels that her partner is trapped, that a choice — the choosing of her — is no longer being carried out.

Quote:Yet while Meana minimized the role of relationships in stoking desire, she didn’t dispense with the sexual relevance, for women, of being cared for and protected. “What women want is a real dilemma,” she said. Earlier, she showed me, as a joke, a photograph of two control panels, one representing the workings of male desire, the second, female, the first with only a simple on-off switch, the second with countless knobs. “Women want to be thrown up against a wall but not truly endangered. Women want a caveman and caring. If I had to pick an actor who embodies all the qualities, all the contradictions, it would be Denzel Washington. He communicates that kind of power and that he is a good man.”

These morons are validating Red Pill and don't even know it.

Post: #4

Yeah often NYT or other mainstream sources will throw out scientific studies about sexuality that are completely red pill, presumably without even noticing it. Or perhaps there are a few people in the times who know what is up and what could sneak through.

Post: #5

I ran into this study years ago.

I've been mentioning it in conversation ever since. There is nothing more conclusive on women's lack of sexual self awareness out there.

Post: #6

(11-18-2014 02:26 AM)Suits Wrote:  I ran into this study years ago.

I've been mentioning it in conversation ever since. There is nothing more conclusive on women's lack of sexual self awareness out there.

"There is nothing more conclusive on women's lack of sexual self awareness out there."

Cognitive dissonance my good man.