Post: #1

I'm still impressed how he managed to go on so many dates a week with new attractive girls.

Didn't even touch night game or online game.


Sure, he was attractive, but how much more marginally attractive can he be vs the other street hustlers in NYC who are struggling with their approaches?

for those who don't know who this guy is:

Post: #2

Firstly, attractiveness is not everything- game is real. See Krauser. If you do 1000s of approaches you can get a subtle calibration that will boost your results by orders of magnitude. Ordinary looking guys can get a magnetic vibe after years of practice. These is what makes them elite.

Secondly, and to add to nuance to that, Janka IS a very attractive guy. Sometimes this is hard for us men to realise. What seems to be a slight difference in facial aesthetics can actually be a very wide looks gap.

Take this famous OK Cupid test - the image shows the number of unsolicited mails received by each man.

   

To me, I could almost say, eh, the guys that got 2 or 12 responses are almost as goodlooking as the guy that got 38. Maybe the top guy just has a better photo. But actually, to women, that guy's looks are top tier and he gets 10x the response. I think Janka is indeed in that top tier male model category.

Post: #3

Daygame in NYC is really easy. I mean, not like just any asshole can meet tons of gorgeous women, but there are infinite opportunities.

That isn't to diminish Janka, I don't really know about him much, but just, NYC is the perfect environment for quickly meeting a lot of new people.

Post: #4

He didnt really work so he just approached during weekdays which is simple in nyc. I find that i dont have nearly the energy or opportunity to approach like that since im chained to a desk all day. Also since he had no professional reputation he didnt have to worry about who or where he was approaching.

Post: #5

He's good looking (not the key issue or required) but combined with ample opportunity (NY), the time to do it,
and I think this part is the rossetta stone, he overcame or doesn't have "approach anxiety", so he approached like a mad man and achieved results.
Also, the more you do it, the better you get of course.

Post: #6

Logistics x Looks x game.

Post: #7

He's an example of a male 8.

Girls in the mid to high 7s he banged that many of us would proudly bang and be punching above our weight looks wise would be the same as a more normal looking guy like banging a low 6.

Looks matter alot especially in the West.

Post: #8

What's up with all these Paul Janka threads popping up? The guy fits the definition of "Tall, Dark, and Handsome" that women love. He doesn't even really need to use game to pull 7's and up. Point Blank.

Post: #9

Hurray! "looks vs game" again.

Post: #10

How are you so sure he "did" it?

Post: #11

Krauser is in third world country. Don't ever think for a sec that he can replicate Janka in NYC.

Post: #12

This is hand down a low-key hater comment. Janka is a 10 by any measure (Harvard Degree, cash, looks, central apartment at the time, fashion, probably pedigree). Whatever makes you feel better bro.

(12-22-2014 10:43 PM)Travesty444 Wrote:  He's an example of a male 8.

Girls in the mid to high 7s he banged that many of us would proudly bang and be punching above our weight looks wise would be the same as a more normal looking guy like banging a low 6.

Looks matter alot especially in the West.

Post: #13

By order of importance:

1. Elite - tier genetics
2. Ability to mass approach
3. Location

/thread

Post: #14

This is a dupe, player.

/thread-22542.html

Post: #15

Paul Janka's a class act. And his DVD is absolutely packed with gold nuggets.

I've spoken to him on a few occasions and got a very good vibe from him.

As to why he was successful in NYC:

1. Pond full of fish: NYC is packed to the gills with smoking hot chicks

2. Logistics: Paul's apartment was in Manhattan near central park

3. Volume: Paul approached a shit ton of girls every day, got their numbers, and sent mass texts.

4. Focus: Paul knew what he wanted and most importantly, the terms he wanted it on.

He refused to spend time and money on fundamentally rigged scenarios like bars and clubs.

Plus, before his information business exploded, he worked as a tutor and was broke as a joke, so dropping $50-$100 for a few rounds of drinks at some swanky NYC lounge to *maybe* get a girl in the sack was untenable.

He was laser focused on getting pussy and he manifested that attitude in his communications with women. Because he had such a large pool of girls in his phone, he could basically send out an offer to 100 girls on a dreary Tuesday night when girls are at home in their jammies eating Chinese food, and invite them on an adventure with a mysterious, handsome stranger. That's an easy sell.

5. Look & vibe: Paul's a good looking guy, dresses well, has great body language and knows how to think on his feet.

6. Practice: practice makes you really smooth. And in a city like New York you can shake the rust off quickly.

When I lived in San Francisco my game was super tight. Now I live in Thailand, run a business, and use online dating a lot, so I don't really need quite as much game, so I've become rusty and complacent.

But you put a guy with the balls, horniness and determination out on the streets of NYC and he'll sharpen up PDQ.

7. Market fit: I think Paul has a niche look that works particularly well in a city like NYC.

He's got the GQ, blasé, scruffy yet well dressed look. And he's out chasing tail in the middle of the day so clearly he doesn't have some 9-5 commitment, besides which he'd have to shave.

So it pushes certain intrigue buttons like "possibly rich", "well bred, good family", "self-employed", "player (obviously)".

This appeals to the narcissistic American girl brain. It waxes 50 shades of grey.

I tried emulating Paul's style for a while but eventually found my own rhythm more in tune with the musician, rebel, "do what the fuck I want" vibe. But I learned a lot from Paul and I'll always be grateful to him for that.

Post: #16

(12-23-2014 05:02 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  ...
He's got the GQ, blasé, scruffy yet well dressed look. And he's out chasing tail in the middle of the day so clearly he doesn't have some 9-5 commitment, besides which he'd have to shave.

So it pushes certain intrigue buttons like "possibly rich", "well bred, good family", "self-employed", "player (obviously)".

This appeals to the narcissistic American girl brain. It waxes 50 shades of grey.

I tried emulating Paul's style for a while but eventually found my own rhythm more in tune with the musician, rebel, "do what the fuck I want" vibe. But I learned a lot from Paul and I'll always be grateful to him for that.

Absolutely agree. Besides - despite his above average looks he still honed his game not using money but hardcore Daygame before it was even called like that. He actually went in r-selected lover-style also before it was called that way.

He never went boyfriend on them, it was all focused on getting her number fast, build a modicum of attraction and then text the huge number of girls.

He still got rejected thousands of times. Frankly with Tinder now he would have been more effective with less work.





And yes- he is close to a 9 in looks - plenty of professional models look worse.

All of that does not invalidate his Game knowledge though, because according to his statements his first hundreds or even 1000 approaches were dismal in comparison to now.

And I can guarantee you that there are other Players now with worse looks, who get an equal amount of quality pussy by finding their own niche.

Post: #17

Looks+Height +Harvard+ DiligentGamePractice--- How could he NOT get girls..

EVERYTHING except unusual wealth or fame was in place.

Smoking models who aren't world famous dream of bringing a guy like him home to mom and dad instead of the good-looking bartender who isn't too bright .

People who attend Harvard refer to telling dates they attend Harvard as "the H-Bomb" because it intimidates them so much.

I jealousy-hate the guy because he can snare out of my league.

However I have to admit he answered my game question once, I asked how could so many girls live in Manhattan when it's so expensive, he said their dads subsidize the rent.

Post: #18

He had a salesman mentality and approached like mad. He saw it as a numbers game. That and his looks.

Post: #19

I like how he would number close a girl and then later just invite her straight to his apartment. The ones who refused he just nexted with no fucks given

Post: #20

(12-23-2014 07:01 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  Looks+Height +Harvard+ DiligentGamePractice--- How could he NOT get girls..

EVERYTHING except unusual wealth or fame was in place.

Smoking models who aren't world famous dream of bringing a guy like him home to mom and dad instead of the good-looking bartender who isn't too bright .

People who attend Harvard refer to telling dates they attend Harvard as "the H-Bomb" because it intimidates them so much.

I jealousy-hate the guy because he can snare out of my league.

However I have to admit he answered my game question once, I asked how could so many girls live in Manhattan when it's so expensive, he said their dads subsidize the rent.

Dropping the H-bomb works on k-selected provider Game. Pussies don't get wet by degrees or physics PhDs would be swimming in it.

He usually did not even go on dates and his Game model was highly concentrated on: "I live close. I wanna fuck. You up for it tonight?" Just put more eloquently and with a high automatic rejection rate.

Most girls likely did not know where he studied and what he did for a living - and frankly pussy tingles do not care.

Post: #21

(12-23-2014 03:46 AM)germanico Wrote:  How are you so sure he "did" it?

Never sure, but if you read his pdf book, look at his stats, and pay attention to how much time he puts in, you can tell he's not bragging.

The numbers are realistic given two points. 1 Given the time, energy, and overall work he put in, the number of phone #s and dates are realistic. 2 At that point, it's a matter of closing the deal. Looks help him here a lot, plus game calibration and positive reinforcement.

He starts off with "Out of about 30 girls I could think of off the top of my head, I only had sex with 2 or so". That's not bragging. That's him saying "I put a shit load of work in to get laid"...nobody brags about that.

Post: #22

Heard about him for a while. Not surprise at all that with the work he puts in he would get that much success.

I used to think those kinds of stories are just hype, but after I got my new model wingman and getting mindblown over and over again, it becomes very clear. This is a shot of my wingman. He's jacked as shit too, and has very solid Mystery Method game. We game in Paris.

He doesn't even go out to do "active" game. All he does is game every girl he runs into when out and about or at social circle, and already he's got more pussies than he could handle.

The other night we were taking a salsa lesson. He was looking for a partner and the hottest blonde in the room that everybody was goggling tap him on the shoulder "Are you gonna dance with me or not?" He only talked to her 5 minutes before that at the start of the night. Later he shows me the texts and the girl was already calling him "baby".

The other day we were smoking outside of class, and some cute girls approach him "do you have some chewing gums for me?" And girls eyefuck him every 5 secs on the street.

I can only imagine the success if he goes laser-focused on hunting and orient his entire lifestyle on it.

I've come to think about look this way: it's a game multiplier. If you have solid game then it blows your success rate to pussy paradise. But if your game is zero then zero x 10000 is still zero. With good looks you put in less effort for the same quality, but you still have to put in effort.

Post: #23

Agreed with Zelcorpion, there are LOADS of rich dudes with great educations (doctors, lawyers, etc.) who are absolute shit with women in relatively safe social situations.

Put one of these guys on the street with nothing but their ballsacks and they're just another asshole.

You have to practice, fail, learn, and repeat daily for a long time to develop the kind of vibe and calibration to get laid consistently.

But you have start where the girls are.

If you're out in Bumblefuck, Idaho, you can be Dr. Paul Janka Krauser Mystery Sr. the third and you'll have better luck fucking a potato.

Paul put in the work and he reaped the benefits.

He very much embodies what he talks about and teaches. To wit:

Post: #24

Seriously, does anyone know a really good looking guy who has trouble getting laid? I dont.

Post: #25

None of you said "no homo"...