Post: #1

Black Lives Matter Wrote:We are committed to disrupting the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, and especially “our” children to the degree that mothers, parents and children are comfortable.

http://blacklivesmatter.com/guiding-principles/

Compare the poverty rates for single vs. married black women for a

Quote:only 8% of Black married couple families live in poverty which is considerably lower than the 37% of Black families headed by single women who live below the poverty line.

http://blackdemographics.com/households/poverty/

Post: #2

A Soros-backed 'movement' wants to disintegrate nuclear families...what a shocker.

Post: #3

The welfare state already beat them to that.

Also notice how they say mothers, parents, and children with no explicit mention of fathers. Quick google search reveals all the founder of BLM are all strong, independent Black women so naturally men have no role in this utopia except as sperm donors.

Post: #4

(08-29-2016 11:08 AM)Genghis Khan Wrote:  A Soros-backed 'movement' wants to disintegrate nuclear families...what a shocker.

I don't even consider groups like these to be "backed" any more. They're actually products. I swear evil mofos like Soros and crew sit around a table and build these things like a marketing department designs a new ad.

Post: #5

Actually the founders & leaders are strong independent lesbians, transgenders and biracials (half black half Jew). Fortunately they have everyone's best interest in mind, especially the black men who are merely foot soldiers and poster boys in the movement.

Post: #6

"Men, give us more money so we don't need to rely on men for support"

I wonder if they recognize the logical problem with that statement.

Post: #7

Thanks for sharing that link. If you hover your mouse over each one, it's very blunt and direct about what they are really doing. Next time I get into an argument with another black person over this, I will direct them to this site and ask them to tell me what they think about each square.

Just look at this feminism in broad daylight:

Quote:We are committed to making our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We are committed to dismantling the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” that require them to mother in private even as they participate in justice work.

Quote:We are committed to building a Black women affirming space free from sexism, misogyny, and male‐centeredness.

Quote:We are committed to embracing and making space for trans brothers and sisters to participate and lead. We are committed to being self-reflexive and doing the work required to dismantle cis-gender privilege and uplift Black trans folk, especially Black trans women who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans-antagonistic violence

Everytime I talk to someone else about this, they constantly bring up the slogan and that's all they think about. They don't care about the slogans being chanted or what is said on twitter from the ones that run the group. I even hear excuses like, "Multiple people represent the movement and it doesn't belong to nobody." Well if that was the case, start your own movements separate from violent degenerates then! It's ridiculous.

If we could just find a way to stop or drastically slow down feminism in general, alot of our problems as a society will stop.

Post: #8

I haven't seen these BLM posers help protect their brethren from divorce rape, false accusations and misandry.

Haven't seen one BLM raise awareness on their Hebrew Israelite brethren who could've gotten murdered by police because of a false rape accusation in broad daylight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjYABikad6A

Point is, BLM is SJW retardation. They don't care about the plight of their people. It's an elitist-run SJW group masquerading as some mission to give black people rights. The only thing BLM is doing is encouraging anarchy on the streets while the elitists who fund them are busy sipping their champagne in their gated communities.

I also heard how Planned Parenthood supports BLM....Kind of ironic that an organization which had a history of encouraging abortions based on a eugenics enthusiast founder is accepted by BLM

Post: #9

In the main, the black nuclear family has already been destroyed. These leftists are advocating for something they have already "achieved."

The majority of African-American kids are born out of wedlock.
The single motherhood rate for African-American households is appalling.
Many times more African-American kids have never met their father or meet him so rarely as for him to be permanently gone compared to Caucasian, Asian and Hispanic kids.

Kudos to every African-American, including some on this forum, calling out this crap from BLM and others. It's high time that this calling out of SJW insanity got the wide dissemination that it deserves.

Post: #10

If they want to live in family villages how about they fuck off to another country where people do that shit already?

Oh, that's right. Places like that usually barely have electricity. They want their crackpot tribal bullshit without having to actually sacrifice any of the comfort that productive Americans from whole nuclear families made ubiquitous in this nation.

These people are such ignorant, stupid fucks it just boggles the mind.

Post: #11

(08-29-2016 12:01 PM)Gimlet Wrote:  Actually the founders & leaders are strong independent lesbians, transgenders and biracials (half black half Jew).

That's what I used to think, now I'm pretty sure they just recruit the noisiest freak they can find who will take orders, and then install them into their new project. How many fuckups do you think there are, versus who gets a "movement" to sit atop?

Post: #12

"The nuclear family is a disruption created by capitalism's need for greater consumption"

I went to an old fashioned school for my mechanical engineering degree. I had to take a certain number of credits in humanities. Most were in traditional western civilization type courses. One though, I ended up in a philosophy course run by what you typically find in the liberal arts programs today. This turd of a prof wrote that on one of my papers (I argued with him a lot).

The value system of the SJW left is that of chaos and evil. It attracts losers who want everyone's lives to be as chaotic and useless a their own. Frankly, I don't think you negotiate or reason with them. These are people who need to be at a minimum derided. If they become too numerous and seek power, confronted with deadly force.

Post: #13

Mentality of SJW lunatics in four easy steps.

1) I was raised in a fucked up household, BUT;

2) I am the apex of all reason and justice, SO;

3) I must force everyone else to be raised in a fucked up household, THUS;

4) All humans will become the apex of reason and justice like me.

Post: #14

The lunacy expressed here finds parallels in Neo Nazi and White Supremacist circles.

BLM represents blacks as much as David Duke represents all whites or El Chapo represents Mexicans.

Stop the race tag and baiting. Judge people individually on the basis of their character, Period.

Post: #15

BLM is just communism in blackface. It sounds like what they want is similar to how Israeli kibbutzes were originally envisioned, with no parents and communal child-rearing.

Post: #16

(09-01-2016 02:00 PM)El Padrone Wrote:  The lunacy expressed here finds parallels in Neo Nazi and White Supremacist circles.

BLM represents blacks as much as David Duke represents all whites or El Chapo represents Mexicans.

Stop the race tag and baiting. Judge people individually on the basis of their character, Period.

The problem you have here is whether you judge other people individually or not, you're not going to stop other people playing identity politics games.

Let's remove the race angle and simply look at how women behave. Women, in my experience, are almost always going to side with other women if it's a woman vs a man in a conflict. The assumption is the man is wrong, and if the woman is clearly at fault it's still the man's fault somehow.

Why? Because that's what they've been taught. They've been taught their prime identity is Woman, and their allegiance is always to Team Woman first. They've been taught men are the root of their problems.

And there are strong parallels in many minority groups. That's what they're taught damn near from birth. It's Critical Theory, a root component of the Frankfurt School, and it's taught in probably 99% of the schools in the country.

So it's nice to say things like just judge people individually and ignore skin color, religion, etc. That seems logical and the moral thing to do. But you don't just get to opt out of the culture war because you don't like the way the war is being waged. If you try, the other side(s) are still at war with you.

Post: #17

(09-01-2016 05:01 AM)weambulance Wrote:  If they want to live in family villages how about they fuck off to another country where people do that shit already?

Oh, that's right. Places like that usually barely have electricity. They want their crackpot tribal bullshit without having to actually sacrifice any of the comfort that productive Americans from whole nuclear families made ubiquitous in this nation.

These people are such ignorant, stupid fucks it just boggles the mind.

Agree 100% about your feeling here bro, but I would like to point out an important fact here. The idea that there are remote backwards cultures with communal child-rearing is pure communist/luciferian propaganda, spread by people like Margaret Mead. In reality, there are virtually no cultures that aren't centered on the family, because if there was they wouldn't survive.

Mead started out the work carried here by BLM, the deliberate destruction of family, nearly a century ago (1924). She was a lesbian who dumped her husband and advocated women "fulfillment" through sexual liberation, using her doctored anthropological studies of Samoan tribes, claiming that they practiced hippie-like family-less free sex. Her study was mostly fake.

Unfortunately that kind of propaganda stuck. Mead was a powerful force in social marxism, here's one of her disciples, a SJW college professor, who is perpetrating the kind of damage that Mead started with her students today:

https://www.dukeupress.edu/margaret-mead-made-me-gay

This is a good opportunity to expose Mead's propaganda, here is a solid article about it:

"In full flight from Puritan America, Mead was prepared to employ her humble social-science skills to imagine a fantasy island of sexual fulfillment regardless of whether it existed in reality or not. The result was the semi-salacious “Coming of Age in Samoa,” easily the best selling anthropology text of all time and still a standard in high schools and colleges.

Sex was “a natural, pleasurable thing” for Samoans, Mead claims to have discovered, but for Americans it was just the opposite. Americans faced an “implacable” God and a “half dozen standards of morality,” all of them repressive. As a result, American girls found themselves crippled by neuroses, frigidity and Electra complexes as they watched in horror “the huge toll of barren, unmarried women who move in unsatisfied procession across the American and English stage.”

Although she would expand the scope of her wrath as her celebrity grew, Mead focused her youthful indignation on the bourgeois American household – this “tiny, ingrown, biological family.” According to Mead, these families instilled in their children a self-perpetuating set of “Puritan self-accusations” that crimped their libidos and left them burdened by “guilt” and “maladjustment.”

In fact, as was transparent to anyone who had spent time in the Samoa of the 1920s, the islands were anything but a sexual paradise, at least in the Bohemian New York sense of the word. As other anthropologists would later observe – Derek Freeman of New Zealand most notably – every attempt was made to safeguard the virginity of Samoan girls. There was much at stake. At marriage, the bride had to undergo a formal virginity test, and it was not multiple choice."

http://www.wnd.com/2005/06/31000/#Xz6m6K3KUsk7HO5Z.99


And a couple of pictures that summarize this thread:




Khmer Rouge nuclear family-free reeducation camp (scene recreated from actual testimony):

Post: #18

^

Interesting, I have never really looked into that aspect of things much. I just remember being taught about things like that in school. Of course since then I've discovered that whole chunks of the history/social studies type stuff I was taught were just so much bullshit.

Post: #19

The West destroyed the extended family 3-4 generations ago. This was the northern European equivalent of a small tribe. A number of factors contributed to the destruction. The popularity of the automobile. The disruption of WW2 and the following economic boom. And, what I consider the biggest cause, the drive towards consumerism. Nuclear families buy a lot more stuff.

Now we have destroyed the nuclear family. Not surprisingly, broken families buy a lot more stuff than intact families.