Post: #1

Gentleman, I now think the theory Heartiste and others have put forward that the press conference Julian Assange gave on the 4th of October 2016 is a scam, and he is no longer in the embassy since the 22nd of August 2016 is very, very real.

Look at this interview of him done by RT (Russian news channel) in person and most importantly, inside the embassy posted online on the 6th of August.






Then compare it to the press conference of 4th of October 2016





Now that I look at it again....it does seem highly suspicious. The audio communication between him and the room where the press is waiting is practically non existent. Overall he is devoid of emotion, humor or humanity, his body language is very weird, he rambles on and on without a point, constantly says "um" and "uh", he blinks a lot when not speaking, he looks to his left side (and sometimes left and down) over and over again. He NEVER shifts his lower body in his "chair" like normal person would. The background doesn't actually seem behind him...but a superimposed image. The moderator always waits several seconds after he finishes speaking before she says anything.

Here some other details I noticed

1:24:52
They try to connect to him online but have weird technical difficulties where they can hear but not see him.

1:26:46
His image slowly appears on the screen like in a movie....they say "happy birthday" to him but rather than replying to that he talks about his t-shirt. Then claims he heard nothing of what was said in the press conference.

He then starts talking for 24 minutes in a cold soulless, monotone way, repeatedly making short pauses saying "uh" and "um". He gets really annoying to listen to him long term.

1:49:00
He mentions Gavin MacFadyen as being in a "very difficult way" He died a few weeks later on the 22nd of October.

1:50:17
He stops talking abruptly and there is a 7 second pause until the moderator starts speaking

1:50:32
A reporter asks a question on Hillary which Julian claims not to hear, then the moderator repeats it again into the microphone a 2nd time and he replies in a somewhat indirect way.

1:52:15
A question is asked about threats to the Ecuadorian people.

1:53:43
A question is asked about whether he will release documents on the US republicans. Firstly the moderator gives her own reply and then she asks if Julian want to add anything.


VERY SUSPICIOUS
1:54:42
He starts off by saying "There's a lot of fascinating angles than are unexpected." and then suddenly stops and says nothing and the moderator puts her hand over mouth in the dark and quickly says "I think he can't hear what we are saying"

1:55:20
Question about the future goals of wikileaks....he gives rambling answer.

1:58:05
Question about stats and verification of documents. He starts answering ok, then stops abruptly.

2:00:15
Question about malware on the wikileaks website.

2:03:37
Question about the change in structure of wikileaks

2:05:35
Question about his legal situation inside the embassy. VERY vague reply.

VERY SUSPICIOUS
2:07:35
Question if he feels affinity with Donald Trump. The moderator and the press in the room all laugh ....he first claims not to be able to hear again, then shows ZERO emotion or sense of humor with regard to this funny question.

2:09:00
Question about future election leaks

2:10:04
Question about Brexit

SUSPICIOUS
2:12:22
Question about why he cancelled his speech on the balcony of the embassy in London. Very short and very weirdly phrased answer from him.

SUSPICIOUS
2:13:18
Question about how is doing after 4 years in the embassy
Instead of talking about himself and saying something personal he starts talking about vitamin D, Astronauts and then abruptly stops.

SUSPICIOUS
2:14:42
Question about supporters of wikileaks being subject to counter propaganda. Instead of showing empathy with his supporters he talks about it's a great opportunity. Starts rambling really badly...his sentences have no full stops and never gets to the point.

2:19:24
Question about nationalism, rule of law and the culture clash.
More endless rambling without a point.





My theory:

This press conference back on the 4th of October 2016 does not look like it is with a real person (human being) speaking, but with a "live" speaking CGI (computer generated image) with some sort of advanced AI artificial intelligence (smartphone SIRI like) simulated program.



...

Post: #2

Here is what happened back on 22nd of August 2016, 2 weeks after the 1st video from RT inside the embassy I posted above.

Source:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/702542/...an-Assange

Quote:
Asassination attempt? Panic for Julian Assange as intruder scales Ecuadorian embassy wall
AN ATTEMPTED break-in at the Ecuadorian embassy where WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is living was foiled this morning.

By Zoie O'Brien
PUBLISHED: 08:00, Mon, Aug 22, 2016 | UPDATED: 15:57, Mon, Aug 22, 2016

Security was scrambled at the London building sparking international concern Assange was the target of the intruder.
A statement was put out by WikiLeaks this morning.
It stated: “16 mins ago at 2:47am a "cat burgler" scaled the side wall+window of the Ecuadorian embassy in London; fled after being caught by security.”
Mr Assange has been living inside the embassy for more than four years and has been granted political asylum by Ecuador.
Fans of Assange took to Twitter to suggest he may now be in danger inside the embassy.
One wrote: “Here we go. I hope Mr. Assange knows what he's doing. Hope he leaves his information with others in case of an accident.”
Another said: “Somebody is definitely out for Assange. I really do hope Assange has some great intel for us once he's done redacting.”
Some suspected American involvement.
One Twitter user wrote: “@wikileaks Maybe one of Hillary's assassins? #saudimoney #neverhillary”
Another said: “@wikileaks attempted assassination you think?”
He is wanted for questioning over a sex allegation, which he denies, and believes that he will be taken to the United States to be quizzed over the activities of WikiLeaks if he goes to Sweden.
Prosecutors were set to interview him inside the embassy but Mr Assange claims the case have been dropped.

Post: #3

Pam Anderson visited him in October and brought him some food, maybe a couple times, why doesn't someone ask her?

Post: #4

The US intelligence counter- coup, financed by Trump sneaked Assange out of the Embassy in August disguised as a pizza delivery boy.

Post: #5

No, that's goofy.

Stay focused here. Don't let weird conspiracy theories distract you.

Post: #6

I call BS. Remember that interview he had when he winked when he was asked if Seth was his source? Wasn't that after August?

Post: #7

Post: #8

(11-02-2016 03:14 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  I call BS. Remember that interview he had when he winked when he was asked if Seth was his source? Wasn't that after August?

No.
That was on the 9th of August.
Way before the 22nd.
Link below.

(11-02-2016 03:03 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  Pam Anderson visited him in October and brought him some food, maybe a couple times, why doesn't someone ask her?

Pamela Anderson never released any photos of them together.


Im not saying he definitely got killed. Maybe he escaped...or is still in there.
But that press conference video in October is definitely not him.
You cant get a basic simple working audio connection for worldwide press conference in a city as big as London in 2016 ?!
Give me a break.

Post: #9

I don't believe it was CGI

1. This wasn't a direct stream, they had a camera setup filming the projection of him.

2. He is filmed against a green screen. The camera filming Assange is most likely of low quality.

3. The audio is being recorded from the speakers in the room. The audio of the hosts is also recorded off the speakers, it sounds like shit.

The answer is yes, they couldn't put together a decent production.

Post: #10

I don't think so and I don't care.

The guy is probably fine, just in hiding and waiting for Obama to leave the WH. Wikileaks is doing its job (told you they'd deliver) and he's biding his time during this very volatile period.

Post: #11

Tbh, Assange always looks like he is a computer simulation. Perhaps instead of seeing the world as we do he just sees steams of numbers in front of his eyes.

And yes, he has a type of weird tonality to his voice in interviews that makes it hard to make out what he is saying. Like he has a deep EQ midrange scoup on his vocal chords.

But that ten year anniversary broadcast was just weird with all the "um" and "ah".

Post: #12

Another thing, when Gavin MacFadyen (of the Julian Assange Defense Committee and who was helping to run the online presence of wikileaks) died on the 22nd of October 2016, was more or less the same time when the official twitter account of wikileaks starting changing both in it's tone of writing and style of content.

Also, we must remember it was only 5 days before Gavin's death that it was claimed that Assange lost his internet access inside the embassy, and the 3 pre-commitment (dead man's switch) codes were released as well.

pre-commitment 1: John Kerry 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809
pre-commitment 2: Ecuador eae5c9b064ed649ba468f0800abf8b56ae5cfe355b93b1ce90a1b92a48a9ab72
pre-commitment 3: UK FCO f33a6de5c627e3270ed3e02f62cd0c857467a780cf6123d2172d80d02a072f74

References:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/787889195507417088

/thread-58853...pid1419961

Some believe it was MacFadyen who ran the twitter account, not Assange himself, and this would explain why it's gotten so different since then, including this very weird tweet and online poll on the 23rd of October (the day after Gavin's death) that has NEVER been followed up on:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/790406530738913285

I don't know how to embed tweets, but here is the text

Quote:
9:16 PM - 23 Oct 2016
Thousands keep demanding Assange proof of life.
Not unreasonable.
He's in a tough spot and is WikiLeaks best known validator.
Preference?

Picture
Video
Statement by his lawyers
Appearance at window

103,461 votes - Final results

Post: #13

The Based Leak merchant is apparently alive and kicking, doing an interview with RT soon. Russia is NOT to blame for the leaks...

Post: #14

(11-03-2016 08:29 AM)komatiite Wrote:  



The Based Leak merchant is apparently alive and kicking, doing an interview with RT soon. Russia is NOT to blame for the leaks...

Now THAT does look (and sound) like the real Assange.


It will be really interesting to see 2 things when that video is released by RT on Saturday 5th of November:

1. On which EXACT date was it filmed ?
2. Can you definitely make out it is filmed inside the embassy ?


Gotta hand it to RT....they are getting really good at what they do.

Post: #15

I always get a chuckle when people massively overestimate the capabilities of AI. Right now the state of the art in AI is playing Go and Atari games by sight. Natural Language processing hasn't been invented yet.

Post: #16

(11-03-2016 12:15 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  I always get a chuckle when people massively overestimate the capabilities of AI. Right now the state of the art in AI is playing Go and Atari games by sight. Natural Language processing hasn't been invented yet.

Post: #17

The full 24 minute interview with Assange has been released by Russian news channel RT today. Assange says some really important things about Hillary, Trump, the globalists, the migrant crisis, and how the world works today.






My observations

1.
It doesn't tell you on what date the interview actually took place, but there are a few hints to give it a timestamp. He mentions the internet being cut off at the embassy, Hillary fainting on 9/11, and most recently the FBI reopening the case against Hillary.

2.
You never see a wideshot of the interviewer with Assange in the same room. Im not saying they aren't, but you just do not see it. Compare it to the interview back in August that i included in my first post where they show that numerous times.

3.
The interview was done after sunset in very low lighting. You can't make out much of the background behind Assange to definitely say he's in the embassy. Again, in the August interview, i put in my first post it was filmed in bright lighting with wide shots of the embassy interior. Assange probably is still in the embassy, but this video is not useful to prove it without doubts.

4.
In this interview from today he speaks in a coherant, non rambling, interesting, human and emotional way especially when talking about being in there for 4 years and not seeing his kids. His dialogue and various subject matters are both fascinating and compelling. The guy in the October press confernce was devoid of normal human expression, rambled endlessly without a point, and everything he was saying was so monotone and boring you lost interest very quickly. In October when asked the same question about being in there for 4 years he rambled on about vitamin D, astronauts, and scientific stuff. Its like looking at 2 different people..or rather one real person and one fake CGI creation.



I stand by my original analysis that the October press conference is NOT Assange.

Post: #18

Come on Merc really...

Post: #19

Yeah this theory doesn't hold water. Assange would have come out and said the interview was fake, and this would have generated a huge amount of coverage. And if Assange is compromised and acquiescing with the PTB, why would they then need CGI when the real thing is under control?

It's good to be vigilant and to have a basic mistrust of the political system, but you have to have a lot of rigor buttressing that skepticism, otherwise you are just undermining the effort. Shape-shifting lizard people, flat earth, "no planes"/Judy Wood, "it's all CGI": those kind of fake narratives are used to discredit real skeptics.