Post: #1

By moonbat Ashley Judd, the pussyhatter in chief and others. This means we're winning the culture war as the extreme left is starting to eat their own people if they don't fall in line with the narrative. Keep the pressure on Hollywood, and keep turning their shit programming off.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/201...ore-139507

This is an odd story because the New York Times wouldn’t be publishing a career ending report against one of their own, especially a power-player, if Mr. Weinstein didn’t end up on the wrong side of the ever-virtue-signaling cocktail party circuit for some reason.

Nice production company you’ve got here Mr. Weinstein; it’d be a shame if something happened to it….

A cursory motive for the far-left to punch one of their own would be if the target refused to participate in a larger agenda.

Perhaps refusing to fund a Madison Avenue agenda item; or if the target distanced themselves from the mission objective; or if the virtue resistance needed to send a message to other reluctant donors by tearing down one of the apex predator insiders.

Any combination therein is entirely possible.

Hillary’s current position within the late-night circuit of facilitating moral creeps would lend credence to the probability the loons need capital and “resistance” branding support; and Weinstein’s public embarrassment is merely a warning of required participation toward others. Harvey Weinstein’s response further validates that probability.

https://apnews.com/46ce359d79e7440aa0849..._medium=AP

Harvey Weinstein, the larger-than-life Hollywood executive and Oscar-winner, is taking a leave of absence from his own company after an explosive expose revealing decades of sexual harassment against women, from employees to actress Ashley Judd, was published in The New York Times Thursday.

The article includes first person accounts of Weinstein’s alleged conduct, including from Judd, who recounts an incident from two decades ago in which she said she was asked to meet Weinstein in his hotel room. Weinstein greeted her wearing a bathrobe and asked her if she would give him a massage or watch him shower, the paper reported.


“Women have been talking about Harvey amongst ourselves for a long time, and it’s simply beyond time to have the conversation publicly,” Judd told the Times.

Two unnamed company officials tell the Times that at least eight women have received settlements from Weinstein over the years, including actress Rose McGowan, who allegedly had an incident with him in 1997 when she was 23.

Other stories include similar accounts of Weinstein coercing young women into giving him massages, while naked, or watching him shower, and promising career advancement in return. These incidents were all said to have happened in hotel rooms.

Weinstein’s attorney Charles J. Harder said in a statement that the story is “saturated with false and defamatory statements about Harvey Weinstein.”

“We sent the Times the facts and evidence, but they ignored it and rushed to publish,” Harder said. He did not respond to questions about what specific allegations Weinstein was contesting.

“We are confident in the accuracy of our reporting,” said a New York Times spokesperson in a statement. “Mr. Weinstein was aware and able to respond to specific allegations in our story before publication. In fact, we published his response in full.”

Requests for comment from The Weinstein Co. and Judd were not immediately returned.(read more)

What democrat darling Harvey Weinstein is accused of is as common an occurrence in Hollywood as indulging in drugs, booze or any other typical ‘ism’ within the culture of moral degradation. There are dozens, if not hundreds, of depraved Hollywood predators just like Weinstein. So why did the New York Times single him out?

Mr. Weinstein’s reply shows the tell-tale evidence of him receiving the message:

I came of age in the 60’s and 70’s, when all the rules about behavior and workplaces were different. That was the culture then.

I have since learned it’s not an excuse, in the office – or out of it. To anyone.

I realized some time ago that I needed to be a better person and my interactions with the people I work with have changed. I appreciate the way I’ve behaved with colleagues in the past has caused a lot of pain, and I sincerely apologize for it.

Though I’m trying to do better, I know I have a long way to go. That is my commitment. My journey now will be to learn about myself and conquer my demons. Over the last year I’ve asked Lisa Bloom to tutor me and she’s put together a team of people. I’ve brought on therapists and I plan to take a leave of absence from my company and to deal with this issue head on. I so respect all women and regret what happened.

I hope that my actions will speak louder than words and that one day we will all be able to earn their trust and sit down together with Lisa to learn more. Jay Z wrote in 4:44 “I’m not the man I thought I was and I better be that man for my children.” The same is true for me.

I want a second chance in the community but I know I’ve got work to do to earn it. I have goals that are now priorities. Trust me, this isn’t an overnight process. I’ve been trying to do this for 10 years and this is a wake-up call. I cannot be more remorseful about the people I hurt and I plan to do right by all of them.

I am going to need a place to channel that anger so I’ve decided that I’m going to give the NRA my full attention. I hope Wayne LaPierre will enjoy his retirement party. I’m going to do it at the same place I had my Bar Mitzvah.

I’m making a movie about our President, perhaps we can make it a joint retirement party. One year ago, I began organizing a $5 million foundation to give scholarships to women directors at USC. While this might seem coincidental, it has been in the works for a year. It will be named after my mom and I won’t disappoint her. (link)

Seriously, think about what Weinstein is saying here. Think about it.

Sorry for all the sexual assaults over the years folks, in order to deliver appropriate reparations I shall seek penance via attacks on the NRA and President Trump.?

Hollywood is running out of money. Not as many people are buying tickets to their crap movies. Viewership of their self-indulgent award shows are way down. Overall, the entire entertainment enterprise they constructed, then politicized, is an ever imploding echo-chamber.

Subsequently, as the finances tighten the downstream beneficiaries, those who rely on that income stream – politicians and connected democrats, are weakened by less donations.

President Trump cancels his attendance at the insufferable and affiliated White House correspondent’s dinner, and middle-America cheered. Examples of reality hit hard and must be avoided at all costs if the ruse is to be maintained. Weinstein is simply the example.

In addition to the economics and renewed patriotism, President Trump is channeling, and championing, the average American in the larger culture war. And we’re winning.

Chase the motives for the larger left-wing political apparatus and inevitably it’s always about the money.

Post: #2

If I was a big time Hollywood producer I would definitely require pussy for roles in my films. Notice the gay pedophiles have yet to be hung out to dry, while the heterosexual adult fuckers are under constant assault....

Post: #3

Hollywood invented the "casting couch" long before internet porn became mainstream. This should come as no surprise that there's been a tollbooth of "sex-for-access" for a long time in the movie biz. Oh, did I mention the like underage kids too?

Post: #4

I'm sure it's pure coincidence the heat finally turns up on this dirtbag only after the Weinstein Company has lost its luster.

The worst sin in Hollywood is losing other people's money.

Post: #5

deleted

Post: #6

(10-05-2017 07:25 PM)Canopus Wrote:  The worst sin in Hollywood is losing other people's money.

I suspected something else was behind this when I first heard the rumblings a few days ago. Most likely Zionist Jews setting up an incredibly-powerful Reform Jew for destruction by using the Reformist's own weapons against them. (In this case, Batshit Feminists).

I think he knew this was coming: just on the 20th of September he publicly-vowed to combat Anti-Semitism and stated both his belief in and allegiance to the State of Israel.

Why?

After a little research:

Unsurprisingly, he's a Reform Jew, and was a very vocal supporter of Obama and a powerful fundraiser for him, then he supported Hillary's Presidental Run. Since he's tied to the Democrats, their increasingly anti-Israel bias has most likely sunk him.

Particularly as he released this film in 2010:



It's a film about "the coming of age of a Palestinian girl named Miral who grows up in the wake of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and finds herself drawn into the conflict."

Since it doesn't tow the Zionist Line, it caused a stink.

Weinstein personally-decided the best place to hold the film's premiere was at the (increasingly-Anti-Israel) United Nations, to, in classic leftist fashion, "Open a discussion". This would match the Reform Jew / Democrat belief that Israel has no special God-given 'right' to exist, and needs to be held accountable as an ethical actor on the world stage.

Quote:The American Jewish Committee had asked the president of the U.N. General Assembly not to screen the film, claiming it portrays Israel "in a highly negative light" and is "blatantly one-sided."

Weinstein, whose The Weinstein Co. is distributing the movie, told The Hollywood Reporter he disagreed with that characterization.

"The people who don't want you to see the movie for political reasons are crazy or wrong," Weinstein said. "I think the idea is, let there be peace."

It was then used by pro-Palestine Academia.

Quote:An open public panel discussion about Miral took place on 30 March 2011 at the Center for Palestine Studies at Columbia University with film director Julian Schnabel and Palestinian journalist Rula Jebreal on whose autobiographical novel the film was based. Helga Tawil Souri, Professor of Media, Culture, & Communication at NYU, and Hamid Dabashi, Professor of Iranian Studies & Comparative Literature at Columbia University, led and moderated the panel discussion. During the discussion with the moderators, Schnabel and Jebreal discussed the events that led to the film's premiere at the UN General Assembly. Schnabel described the film as sending a political message in his discussions with UN General Assembly President, Mr. Joseph Deiss.

It's back to the BDS movement against Israel. As such, when criticism increased, Weinstein hid behind 'Free Speech', but since there's currently Bipartisan Support for 'the Palestinian Exception' to Free Speech, you can see how he fucked himself during the Obama years by his allegiance to an anti-Israel President, and, well, Jews have cultural customs about never forgiving this sort of thing.

Two Jews discussing Weinstein's recent speech, the first trying to be reasonable:

Quote:Perhaps Mr. Weinstein having come forward more as a public Jew will now counter the slanders against Israel so common on the left.

The second, slapping that idea down:

Quote:He’s trying to worm his way into the hearts of the Jewish community which he has previously done so much to destroy.

Apparently, it even pissed off Weinstein's own mother.

Here's a Pro-Israel Writer taking it even further:

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com.au/2011/...stein.html

Weinstein just seems like another casualty of the Jewish Civil War. Since the Zionists are backing Trump, Bannon* and the Alt-Lite, I find it amusing that a crazy Leftist like Ashley Judd is probably-congratulating herself on her 'bravery' for - unbeknownst to her - doing Trump's work for him.

We should send her a thank you note.

--------

* Bannon's Brietibart called Weinstein 'Anti-Israel' and an 'Obama Lackey'.

Post: #7

I hope this is causes a major investigation in casting couches and pedofile networks in Hollywood. That would really light a fire on the left fighting each other. I bet it ties into some pretty players even outside of Hollywood.

Post: #8

@MarkYoungTruth 3h

Quote:So Ashley Judd claims @potus election was like being raped but waited 20 years to accuse Harvey Weinstein?

Post: #9

(10-05-2017 08:47 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ...
Particularly as he released this film in 2010:



It's a film about "the coming of age of a Palestinian girl named Miral who grows up in the wake of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and finds herself drawn into the conflict. The story of an arab girl tortured by Israeli soldiers by having most of her eyebrow hairs meticulously plucked on by one."

In other news, featured actor Lupe Fuentes is still looking well. You can tell (((they))) weren't happy with the film. Two hours of real-time footage of a steaming turd would still get 50%+ on Rotten Tomatoes but this film is currently scored at a mere 17%. A near statistical impossibility for any film that didn't literally give you cancer.

Post: #10

Not sure I get the controversy in full.

Seems Weinstein simply grabbed the girls by the pussy.

Post: #11

Post: #12

This is all a bunch of crap. I have been in casting sessions where the women had to take off their clothes, one of them was married to a known MLB player. Its not uncommon for directors/producers to have final call backs back at their place. For every woman that might find all of this uncomfortable there are at least 10 willing to go way beyond whats described in this article. Everybody is fully aware of whats going and at certain times what might be embarrassing is not the act itself but the lack of reward. Going to a fat producers house to lick his balls is not embarrassing for most actresses, its the fact that they might get nothing out of it. As long as they get at a talking part that doesn't get cut they are more than happy to do it.

Harvey is clearly being targeted for a variety of reasons. He has certainly made many enemies, his company now isn't worth much, too many distributors figured out his oscar season business model. On top of this, with an increasingly divided country that business model can't last. He is no longer in charge of creative decisions in the company but perhaps they are trying to force him out altogether for an upcoming buy out.

Post: #13

Lemme get this straight:

Quote:Other stories include similar accounts of Weinstein coercing young women into giving him massages, while naked, or watching him shower, and promising career advancement in return. These incidents were all said to have happened in hotel rooms.

How is he coercing them? If they're slutty enough to do it, then that's on them.

Maybe Harvey's onto something. Massage and bath might just become the new Netflix and chill.

Post: #14

(10-06-2017 12:48 AM)8ball Wrote:  This is all a bunch of crap. I have been in casting sessions where the women had to take off their clothes, one of them was married to a known MLB player. Its not uncommon for directors/producers to have final call backs back at their place. For every woman that might find all of this uncomfortable there are at least 10 willing to go way beyond whats described in this article. Everybody is fully aware of whats going and at certain times what might be embarrassing is not the act itself but the lack of reward. Going to a fat producers house to lick his balls is not embarrassing for most actresses, its the fact that they might get nothing out of it. As long as they get at a talking part that doesn't get cut they are more than happy to do it.

Harvey is clearly being targeted for a variety of reasons. He has certainly made many enemies, his company now isn't worth much, too many distributors figured out his oscar season business model. On top of this, with an increasingly divided country that business model can't last. He is no longer in charge of creative decisions in the company but perhaps they are trying to force him out altogether for an upcoming buy out.

Animal packs will cut off or kill the aged & frail.
Now that Weinstein is aging, perhaps 'they' figure he knows too much or was in too deep & this is a first step to his 'removal'.

Or perhaps in that cutthroat world, where no one really likes anyone else.
They'll tolerate certain folk for awhile.
Yet once again, once a former bastard is too old & frail, the daggers are unsheathed.
It's not as if that type of crowd is known for it's honour or valour.

Post: #15

Just remember, the more we can associate Hollywood with pedos and sexual exploitation, the better off we all will be. Culture affects politics, so kill Hollywood and they no longer control our culture. Stories like this are extremely damaging for Hollywood's brand.

Post: #16

It's also possible that he got Jew'd by a competitor or done one who wants his stake in Miramar.

Also the NY times article makes it seem like he has to beg for "massages" to get the sex going. I imagined things in Hollywood were way more direct and transactional than that.

Post: #17

For example, instead of Hollywood, it's now Pedowood.

Post: #18

(10-06-2017 12:06 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Also the NY times article makes it seem like he has to beg for "massages" to get the sex going. I imagined things in Hollywood were way more direct and transactional than that.

I think plausible deniability was needed by the women before they would so willingly fuck him straight off the bat. Harvey Weinstein is handicapped in the looks department, even by producer standards, despite his status and wealth. A producer with a more neutral/average, non-morbidly obese appearance can probably pull off getting fucks directly all the time.

I'm betting these girls' anti-slut defenses tripped up. For all the talk of ambitious girls wanting to break into Hollywood being willing to fuck any producer, there comes a point where vague promises of "I'll make you a star!" need a little more icing when the producer looks like Jabba the Hutt.

This was Harvey even 20 years ago:



Someone like Michael Bay, much older than casting couch girls but still presentable, would give a woman the kind of plausible deniability they need:



Harvey may have gotten away with the propositioning for three decades, but it seems his ROI in % terms was pretty low.

Post: #19

Also as Harvey's power declined he had to settle for less and less action from the starlets. He had less roles to give, and women were less convinced he could give them anything. Whores aren't all stupid you know.

Post: #20

Quote:"Mr. Weinstein should publicly waive the NDAs in the women's agreements so they can tell their stories," a Times spokesperson told CNN in a statement. "As a supporter of women, he must support their right to speak openly about these issues of gender and power."

http://money.cnn.com/2017/10/06/media/ne...index.html

They really want to destroy him.

Post: #21

Post: #22

The real issue, as Nolte on Breitbart pointed out, everyone knew and no one cared.

Maybe as AB says it was a public takedown by (((enemies))), but they're not thinking ahead. One will lead to another as their SJW golem goes after "toxic white males" in Hollywood.

Post: #23

Could Harvey Weinstein's behaviour be responsible for the rise of Horrible Cunts in Hollywood?


Harvey Weinstein steadies Emma Watson as she leaves a BAFTA dinner at Automat, London. They then went to Mahiki nightclub with friends in his Rolls Royce.


Harvey Weinstein © and actor Jennifer Lawrence ® in the audience during the 20th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards in 2014.


Of course, they are turning this into a club...

Post: #24

Man, I always thought JLaw had a bad case of Dead Inside Eyes, but damn...

Post: #25

Whenever I hear about someone being a rabid pervert I gotta question it sometimes. I was just reading that Harvey corned this gal in a restaurant hallway and started jerking off.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...d-her.html

Now come on. How many people would actually do that? Not me.

Aloha!