Post: #51

Easiest vote I've ever made. Obesity. If I was President, I'd deport all obese people to an island and only allow them back to the mainland once their BMI is healthy.

Tattoos? Eh. I'm not a fan but at least they have a cultural history for many civilisations. Obesity has more or less always been universally gross 99% of the time. But colourful hair, weird piercings and tattoos? I'd have to think about that one.

Post: #52

I don't like either but IMO tattoos are by far the lesser of the two evils.

Looking at it from a societal point of view, not having any obese people would boost productivity and remove the enormous health costs caused by obesity and its related complications.

Looking at it from an individual point of view, I'd much rather plow a thin girl with tatts than some obese land whale without any.
Of course those gross chest and thigh tattoos are harder to screen for than a girl who struggles to wipe her own arse but I must admit I've never been ambushed by a girl with shit tatts.

Post: #53

I hate both REEEEE

Post: #54

Obesity ruins not just the body tone, but also every other aspect of attractiveness (face, scent, skin, sexual ability, joie de vivre...) and on top of that imposes enormous societal costs on everyone else, not just you.

Tattoos are nasty, but they only ruin the skin and character. A far lesser evil.

Post: #55

Voted for obesity.

Tattoos are a lesser evil in comparison. And:

(11-28-2017 04:08 PM)Blaster Wrote:  Less fat chicks means more mate competition for females meaning they'll be more likely to think about the consequences of getting a stupid tattoo.

Post: #56

I think we can all agree that it's better an ink and jizz stained whore than a fattie.