Post: #326

Post: #327

(01-18-2019 09:36 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:  ...
Part of is grateful I'll be dead and won't have to live in that dystopia but the other part me wants to fight for the future as futile and stupid as that may be.

It's not stupid at all. In fact its the only smart option. Considering what the collectivist tyrants of the last century did to their political enemies it's safe to say that for everyone that's ever so much as made an account on this forum the clock is ticking. There is no point in trying to tuck tail. You fight or you get the bullet.

The good news is that that the elite are only ever one particularly rowdy week away from being totally routed, and the desperate stench of fear you can smell on them ever since the yellow vest rebellion is proof of that.

We sack up and start pushing back or we wait for that inevitable pounding on our door.

Post: #328

(01-14-2019 12:20 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 12:16 PM)Mortay Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 12:12 PM)questor70 Wrote:  Holy SHIT do I hate being preached to from a commercial. What kind of world do we live in? Leave this sort of sermonizing for church.

Ya it was hard to believe this was real when I first saw it. However, the public seems to not be accepting this crap as tons of comments say they will not be buying their razors anymore.

Won't matter. Gillette is owned by Proctor & Gamble and good luck boycotting every brand they own:

Brands owned by P&G

I boycott every cosmetic product in the market since they are full of anti-androgens that can lower your testosterone. I use only organic toothpaste and organic liquid soap. These 2 products are from brands that are not made by Proctor and Gamble and contain no testosterone lowering menthol, parabens, phtalates and BPA. I also do not use shampoo since most brands contain anti-androgens and instead shave my head every 2 weeks and I do not use razors and shaving cream because I allow my beard to grow.

Post: #329

If this wasn't posted yet.

Edgar Watches Company respond ad to Gillette.

I know where im buying my next watch.

EDIT: support them here https://www.egardwatches.com/collections/all-watches

Post: #330

(01-18-2019 10:57 AM)HD668B Wrote:  If this wasn't posted yet.

Edgar Watches Company respond ad to Gillette.

I know where im buying my next watch.

Now this is well executed. The narrator has the perfect voice for this commercial. I had complained in an earlier post that the manosphere's home-made video response to the original Gillette ad just sounded wrong. But this is how you do it. Great job.

Post: #331

(01-18-2019 11:08 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Now this is well executed.

It's nicely done. But I haven't heard of any of actual rival shaving companies coming out with a quick viral response like this. What are they afraid of?

Post: #332

Post: #333

(01-18-2019 11:08 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(01-18-2019 10:57 AM)HD668B Wrote:  If this wasn't posted yet.

Edgar Watches Company respond ad to Gillette.

I know where im buying my next watch.

Now this is well executed. The narrator has the perfect voice for this commercial. I had complained in an earlier post that the manosphere's home-made video response to the original Gillette ad just sounded wrong. But this is how you do it. Great job.

This was a desperately needed response. I'm glad one company had the balls to go against Gillette. They probably saw it as a well timed marketing opportunity, but I really don't care. Well done. The best part is they didn't even have to take shots at anybody (besides maybe Gillette) to get their point across. I'm not even a watch wearer and I may go buy one to support them now.

Post: #334

I just about teared up at that Egard Watches commercial.

I'd buy a watch but I don't wear them. Definitely gonna share that commercial though. Good stuff.

Post: #335

(01-14-2019 12:20 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 12:16 PM)Mortay Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 12:12 PM)questor70 Wrote:  Holy SHIT do I hate being preached to from a commercial. What kind of world do we live in? Leave this sort of sermonizing for church.

Ya it was hard to believe this was real when I first saw it. However, the public seems to not be accepting this crap as tons of comments say they will not be buying their razors anymore.

Won't matter. Gillette is owned by Proctor & Gamble and good luck boycotting every brand they own:

Brands owned by P&G

That's not the point. This isn't a really boycott. This is simply a reaction to advertising. Advertising is supposed to get the audience to buy the product and improve the brand image. This ad is having the opposite effect and is going to cost P&G revenue and damage their brand reputation, irregardless of the immediate loss of customers. Huge publicly-held conglomerates like P&G don't stay profitable by not giving a shit whether their billion-dollar brands make money. If men's razor blade sales tank because of this misguided new brand identity campaign, they'll replace it with something else.

The difference between this and a boycott is that a real boycott has a clear objective. People boycott a company until the goal is achieved, then you end the boycott. What is the goal here? Pull the ad? Pull ALL ads that you don't like, even ads for products targeted at women? Have the responsible executive be fired? Fire ALL the SJWs at the company Have a Gillette rep issue a public apology? What's the goal? Clearly identifying the goal is important for a boycott because otherwise the boycott won't be a part of any meaningful strategy, it will just be a mob throwing a tantrum.

Though again, a boycott may not be necessary. As far as I'm concerned, there doesn't need to be a goal. I can simply stop buying Gillette razors forever. If they want me as a customer again, let them figure out what they need to do.

Post: #336

(01-18-2019 12:19 PM)heavy Wrote:  I just about teared up at that Egard Watches commercial.

I'd buy a watch but I don't wear them. Definitely gonna share that commercial though. Good stuff.

They have watches as low as $85

What's important is not that people buy their expensive watches. The metric that they will be watching is "total increase in sales due to the commercial".

We want them post a press release that says "Egard Watches Sees $350% Sales Bump from Anti-Gillette Ad". Of course the mainstream press will ignore it, but the marketers will see it. It will be a big fuck-you to Gillette and the SJW shitheads.

Post: #337

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2019/01/18...a-boycott/

Dalrock had an interesting take - the ad has a very very negative brand changing experience for men.

And the difference to NIKE is this - Colin Kaepernik may be a libtard bitch, but he is a masculine bitch who is still rich and good-looking. Sure - his athletic credentials are not top-notch, but he isn't a soyboy.

The issue with the Gillette commercial is not only that it's filled with libtard ideology - it has fat, effeminate, cock-blocking, old, ugly, soy-cuck-looking men in it. No one wants to be any of the men except for maybe 2/3 of the black dudes who pass through as positive examples that are not cock-blocking any other guy.

Thus - when this catches on, then it's worse than a boycott - it's a brand destruction.

I just hope that they double down on it and really tank the entire brand - after which the brand manager will get fired. He is not at CEO level and unless his Dad bought 1-2% of P&G stock, then he is done.

Post: #338

(01-18-2019 10:57 AM)HD668B Wrote:  If this wasn't posted yet.

Edgar Watches Company respond ad to Gillette.

I know where im buying my next watch.

EDIT: support them here https://www.egardwatches.com/collections/all-watches

-video snip

Fan fucking tastic video, bravo!

Post: #339

(01-18-2019 01:49 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2019/01/18...a-boycott/

Dalrock had an interesting take - the ad has a very very negative brand changing experience for men.

And the difference to NIKE is this - Colin Kaepernik may be a libtard bitch, but he is a masculine bitch who is still rich and good-looking. Sure - his athletic credentials are not top-notch, but he isn't a soyboy.

The issue with the Gillette commercial is not only that it's filled with libtard ideology - it has fat, effeminate, cock-blocking, old, ugly, soy-cuck-looking men in it. No one wants to be any of the men except for maybe 2/3 of the black dudes who pass through as positive examples that are not cock-blocking any other guy.

Thus - when this catches on, then it's worse than a boycott - it's a brand destruction.

I just hope that they double down on it and really tank the entire brand - after which the brand manager will get fired. He is not at CEO level and unless his Dad bought 1-2% of P&G stock, then he is done.

This fiasco is going to hammer Gillette's brand, currently estimated at up to $20 billion. This campaign is a $5+ billion mistake.

Quote:In 1999, Gillette, as a company, was worth US$43 billion, and it was estimated that the brand value of Gillette was worth US$16 billion. This equated to 37% of the company's value, which was the same as DaimlerChrysler, one of the world's largest car manufacturers at the time.[19]

Post: #340

(01-18-2019 01:49 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  The difference to NIKE is this - Colin Kaepernik may be a libtard bitch, but he is a masculine bitch who is still rich and good-looking. Sure - his athletic credentials are not top-notch, but he isn't a soyboy.

I'd argue the difference is that Kaepernik actually had a valid protest and Nike supported said valid protest while Gillette have created a protest against themselves by highlighting a non-existent issue and tarring all men with the same brush.

Post: #341

Nothing valid about Kaep's protest, it's just dumb self-defeating victimhood culture, the kind of thinking that keeps Blacks down. He's a tool and a useful idiot who bought globalist propaganda.

Post: #342

(01-18-2019 03:20 PM)Bikal Wrote:  

(01-18-2019 01:49 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  The difference to NIKE is this - Colin Kaepernik may be a libtard bitch, but he is a masculine bitch who is still rich and good-looking. Sure - his athletic credentials are not top-notch, but he isn't a soyboy.

I'd argue the difference is that Kaepernik actually had a valid protest and Nike supported said valid protest while Gillette have created a protest against themselves by highlighting a non-existent issue and tarring all men with the same brush.

Valid protest insofar as he's able to do it. In terms of substance or authenticity, valid is not the word I'd choose. More like vacuous

Post: #343

The video finally hit one million "dislikes" and broke into the Most Disliked Videos Top 40.

Commenters are still claiming their comments and dislike votes are being removed. I wonder if YouTube's people will take the weekend and MLK holiday off, and allow the negativity to really take hold? Or did they get people to work overtime to continue to put out this fire?

Post: #344

Post: #345

(01-18-2019 03:20 PM)Bikal Wrote:  

(01-18-2019 01:49 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  The difference to NIKE is this - Colin Kaepernik may be a libtard bitch, but he is a masculine bitch who is still rich and good-looking. Sure - his athletic credentials are not top-notch, but he isn't a soyboy.

I'd argue the difference is that Kaepernik actually had a valid protest and Nike supported said valid protest while Gillette have created a protest against themselves by highlighting a non-existent issue and tarring all men with the same brush.

This was never true.
Whatever credibility he may have had should have been completely destroyed a few days ago, when he and his wife (not even kidding) had the audacity to call out OutKast's Big Boi, who has more street cred among blacks than Kaep could ever hope to, for confirming that he would perform at this year's Super Bowl halftime show in his native Atlanta–basically going full "if you're not with us then you're against us"-mode. As if he needed CK's approval or some shit... fuck that guy for becoming a professional attention whore.

Post: #346

(01-17-2019 09:45 PM)Dusty Wrote:  Not a parody. The cucks over at National Review wrote an article making the “conservative” case for the Gillette commercial.

Written by (((Mona Charen))), one of the original Never Trumpers, the same woman who wrote in the National Review symposium against Donald Trump:

Quote:"Trump has made a career out of egotism, while conservatism implies a certain modesty about government. The two cannot mix."

Quote:I am disappointed in people on our side for being hypocrites about sexual harassers and abusers of women, who are in our party, who are sitting in the White House, who brag about their extramarital affairs, who brag about mistreating women—and because he happens to have an 'R' after his name we look the other way ... This is a party that endorsed Roy Moore for the Senate in the state of Alabama even though he was a credibly accused child molester.

Credible huh? Why have those women completely disappeared after the election?

Post: #347

(01-14-2019 05:07 PM)metalfan20 Wrote:  Personally I use a razor I'm going to make the switch to Harry's. They seem like a good alternative and more affordable too.

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2019/01/1...sculinity/

https://www.harrys.com/en/us/social-mission

Add Dollar Shave Club wants you to keep your vagina neatly trimmed too:

https://content.dollarshaveclub.com/en-u...minist-dad

https://content.dollarshaveclub.com/en-u...ndrogynous

Post: #348

What the fuck? Is there any company that doesn't do that nonsense? Perhaps generic supermarket label brands?

Post: #349

Johnnie Walker is joining the cuckwagon.



source: http://archive.is/HIFNQ

Post: #350

To be fair, they're a sorry excuse for scotch anyway.