Post: #1

Oh goody. Another nobody, undistinguished, inexperienced idiot woman running for President:

Quote:JUST IN: Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar launches 2020 presidential campaign

https://twitter.com/i/status/1094695782240915456


Here's the important thing to understand about women in general: they have almost zero real understanding of how large organizations tick. They can't build them, they can't run them. They parrot the words properly and sound convincing, but just look at their performance over a few years...abysmal.

The reason is that women have never really risen above their traditional roles of getting pregnant and gossiping with the neighbors. Men have spent the last 200 years building billion-person civilizations and women have pretty much been not paying attention, too busy milking the cows and changing diapers. Now suddenly, like a toddler who sees a shiny new toy, they think they are going to jump in and be POTUS -- because "it's OUR TURN".

Or because..."look at AOC getting all that attention...I want attention too...I'll run for President."

No ladies, this isn't kindergarden. You don't get positions of power because you cry, threaten, or pout.

Post: #2

I can't believe Pocahontas thinks she has a chance, a CNN poll said likely democrat voters prefer Trump over Pocahontas. I'm surprised CNN admitted this but it shows how unpopular she is.

Post: #3

@Sidney Crosby

I saw a recent interview with Pocahontas about her putting American Indian on her Taxas Bar application. Holy shit, the number of times she apologized for not being “more mindful.” It was pathetic and the interview was just a huge mea culpa. Definitely starting her campaign on the back foot which, to me, does not predict success.

Between the Native American farce, her first attempt at making a YouTube video, and her proposed wealth tax, she shot herself in the foot - with a bow and arrow.

Post: #4

Hell, why not let Elizabeth "Theranos" Holms run for POTUS at this point...?

Post: #5

Most of the women, and women of color in particular, who ran in 2018 were god-awful, even if they actually won their election.

The thing is, women don't vote for women. They are 51% of the electorate but they are only 20% of elected representatives. Women as a group are more likely to vote for a leftist candidate, and when they run for office they are more likely to run as a leftist. So the split is actually 30% of Democrats and 10% of Republicans, give or take.

But it's not as simple as that. White women still vote Republican as do married women. Plus high school educated women seem to as well.

So even though there are male-female/left-right differences, it is more of an ethnic thing.

Are leftists more likely to vote for female and minority candidates? We know from Obama that black support for a (white) Republican presidential candidate was cut by somewhere between half and by 4/5ths. AOCs district is 50% Hispanic so that probably contributed to her primary win (her win at election was a forgone conclusion).

Post: #6

The only reason AOC gets any attention is because she's like 30 years younger than most of the other chicks.

Post: #7

It's like the workplace 20 years ago. Women start infiltrating and immediately, the quality of work and the decision making efficiency start to plummet. They set themselves up with cozy little rent-seeking roles, drive down salaries for everybody

Post: #8

Women like these are a symptom, not a cause.

It's like complaining about the cockroaches when you never bother to take out the trash.

If I complained that my wife and kids were annoying shits that never lifted a hand to help me then I would rightfully be called a little bitch who needs to learn to exercise the pimp hand.

We men of the west in aggregate are little bitches who need to learn to exercise the societal pimp hand.

Post: #9

(02-11-2019 01:05 AM)Sidney Crosby Wrote:  The only reason AOC gets any attention is because she's like 30 years younger than most of the other chicks.

Yup, no different than any job really. If she was doing this post wall no one would know her name.

Post: #10

Do we need a ((())) for her? I'm not sure.

Post: #11

(02-11-2019 01:05 AM)Sidney Crosby Wrote:  The only reason AOC gets any attention is because she's like 30 years younger than most of the other chicks.

She has 34D puppies and rates a 9 compared with other female politicians (although a 6 compared to other women that guys here try to game).

More information in coming out about how she was "created". I mean "too dumb to live" and "so smart to annoint" are so far removed that somebody is pulling something to put her in place as a pawn.

Post: #12

Funny how all women crave being dominated in the bed; and yet can somehow simultaneously think they can rule countries and have political power outside the bed. Can't have it both ways little darlins.

Post: #13

(02-11-2019 03:49 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Women like these are a symptom, not a cause.

It's like complaining about the cockroaches when you never bother to take out the trash.

If I complained that my wife and kids were annoying shits that never lifted a hand to help me then I would rightfully be called a little bitch who needs to learn to exercise the pimp hand.

We men of the west in aggregate are little bitches who need to learn to exercise the societal pimp hand.

My current peeve in that regard:

What the FUCK is wrong with the Catholic church that Cuomo has not been excommunicated yet? The Bishop interviewed and flat out refused to.

Post: #14

(02-11-2019 11:36 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  

(02-11-2019 03:49 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Women like these are a symptom, not a cause.

It's like complaining about the cockroaches when you never bother to take out the trash.

If I complained that my wife and kids were annoying shits that never lifted a hand to help me then I would rightfully be called a little bitch who needs to learn to exercise the pimp hand.

We men of the west in aggregate are little bitches who need to learn to exercise the societal pimp hand.

My current peeve in that regard:

What the FUCK is wrong with the Catholic church that Cuomo has not been excommunicated yet? The Bishop interviewed and flat out refused to.

Oh come on. You expect the pussies in that church to do anything?

Post: #15

They've been co-opted for a long time now.

Whatever force remedies this insanity is going through them, not by them.

Post: #16

(02-11-2019 05:32 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  

(02-11-2019 11:36 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  

(02-11-2019 03:49 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Women like these are a symptom, not a cause.

It's like complaining about the cockroaches when you never bother to take out the trash.

If I complained that my wife and kids were annoying shits that never lifted a hand to help me then I would rightfully be called a little bitch who needs to learn to exercise the pimp hand.

We men of the west in aggregate are little bitches who need to learn to exercise the societal pimp hand.

My current peeve in that regard:

What the FUCK is wrong with the Catholic church that Cuomo has not been excommunicated yet? The Bishop interviewed and flat out refused to.

Oh come on. You expect the pussies in that church to do anything?

There's quite a few who would. That's why Ratzinger had to be forced out before he could stuff the ranks with enough voting conservative cardinals to control the church.

Post: #17

Klobuchar is bug fucking nuts. Was she born crazy or made crazy. No way sbould she be near an elected office.

Post: #18

Beta O'Rourke is such a loser, he speaks Mexican and they fly the Mexican flag at his rallies of a few hundred people. If he can't beat Ted Cruz how can he expect to beat Trump?

In 2015 he also said they should tear down the existing wall in El Paso.

Post: #19

Beto is a placeholder for AOC until she is old enough.

The female Latina Obama - and Media Darling.

Post: #20

(03-18-2019 01:50 PM)Deepdiver Wrote:  Beto is a placeholder for AOC until she is old enough.

The female Latina Obama - and Media Darling.

It will be interesting. She will have to reach the age of 35. At the age of 35, while a man is just beginning to reach his truest level of maturity (and qualified to be President) -- while a young women who has not gotten married and borne children will be reaching her point of absolute peak batshit. She will be nuttier than box o squirrels.

On the other hand she might between now and then, choose to get married and pop out a couple kids. She can breastfeed them in Congress to the oohs and aahs of all the women of the world. That would be a savvy move on her part and would seal her victory over Barren Tulsi.

Her future largely rides on whether she gets married and bakes a few muffins.

Post: #21

The women candidates on the democratic side don't really seem any less qualified than a lot of presidential candidates before them.

Post: #22

White sharia now.

Post: #23

I don't think it's about winning for these candidates.

The Democrat's strategy is far more about having a diverse set of candidates all preaching the same doctrine of socialist/SJW policies, any variances between their separate platforms are isolated to minor issues.

They think collectively and they shout their propaganda collectively using the diversity of their candidates to legitimize their positions. Because hey, if a white guy and a black chick are preaching the same set of values, how can it be wrong?

Ultimately, the media will instruct democratic voters to back the candidate that garnered the best feels

Post: #24

Women or not, the QUALITY of presidential candidates has drastically declined over the last 15-20 years. This was the country of Washington, Jefferson, Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower etc. Well-spoken, thoughtful men who cared deeply about the nation and culture and not just the GDP. To compare those guys with whatever we have now, on both sides of the aisle, is just sad.

Post: #25

Just like Rome's republic, America's system is dead. It needs a Pinochet, Mussolini, Augustus etc.