Post: #26

(06-15-2016 03:41 PM)redpillage Wrote:  For you young bucks: Look guys - it's not brain surgery. Actually it's rather simple - those women literally have had hundreds of opportunities to form healthy relationships during their 20 years of sexual prime. They failed miserable and of course won't let the truth or reality interfere with their post menopausal hamstering. Ask any woman who has been in a stable relationship for a decade or more - a real mother who deeply cares about her husband and her children. Those are usually red pill as fuck and confirm every word I said.

Have fun with the cats, girls!

Agreed, there are probably hundreds of guys who'd love to commit to this hoe, but she can't be bothered to do it because he's not in an emo band, or he drives the wrong color Volkswagen Jetta, or some other detail that indicates she might not be getting the best deal.

One of my plates is in her late 20s, another is in her early 30s, and they both have plenty of girlfriends and former roommates around the same age who are still riding the carousel, "hooking up" with a new guy from Tinder every two weeks and then bouncing him, because they have a big ass list of impossible-to-meet standards for "Mr. Right" and not "Mr. Right Now" and find everyone lacking in some way.

We laugh at them together, because the reason I've been able to tolerate these two girls as long as I have is that they seem to be somewhat self-aware enough to realize that it isn't anyone's fault but their own if they want to judge everyone according to some ridiculous list of standards, and they're more "independent" types who seem satisfied that so long as I treat them well, make them feel good, and don't give them drama when they're with me (and vice versa), they don't stress over the possibility that I might see another girl sometimes when they're not.

Post: #27

I know these women all too well. I am 36 now, so these women are my ex's, my friends, and above all else, they are the ones now chasing me.

Do I feel sorry for them? A bit. But I also felt a bit sick when they would go #yolo and fuck some dudes like us over a weekend.

I have been that guy, and somewhat still am. I have watched a girl splash water on her just fucked pussy, give it a quick wipe and accept the call of another man that she is trying to lock down. As I leave, I shake my head at just how the hell she is going to be able to do it all again in a couple hours. The flirting, the manipulation, the over the top laughing and caressing of this other man. All in the hopes that he will choose her.

I have been to university, and fucked a good lot of students myself. They are not trying to lock anyone down, barely even a boyfriend. Instead they joke about with their 'besties' and fish for attention from whoever seems to have the flavor of the week.

These girls are being lied to by everyone, themselves mostly. But also their divorced mothers, their barren profs, their jealous friends and their beta orbiters.

The truth that sucks for these girls is that they really had no chance. If they wanted to find a good man, they would have done that as almost any 16yo girl instinctively knows what a good man is.

Instead they choose social affirmation. Its not even the sex, as she so plainly put it. Its the validation of being chosen. The fact the sex is bad is the one last straw that they grasp to in hopes of being able to have some semblance of reason for their degenerate behavior.

Post: #28

A more unfiltered photo of the author. You can see what excessive boozing and the wall have done to her already.

Post: #29

Guys guys guys come on here:

WB and eat breakfast with after (if she cooks).

WNB again if she's a starfishin, no-dick-suckin', fishy-smellin' kinda gal I think she is.

Post: #30

This is I would encourage any man to take up college, University, hookup apps like Tinder and nightlife. You see for yourself the pure, unadulterated face of the fairer sex.

Hang around guys in frats and sport societies. Hang around guys who are exotic, foreign and can get laid regularly with different women.

All you see is a seemingly endless line of willing sluts wanting to be dicked. then you get articles like this, slut empowerment walks and rape hysteria.

All of this bullshit can be traced to the very fact the men who fucked these women either;

- Fucked her good then vanished
- Fucked her, her friends and then ignored her
- Fucked her and then told her to get the fuck out - I knew a guy at university who was brutal with the girls he pulled and fucked. Told them he doesn't want to see them by the time morning came round and to leave


He toned it down slightly after I discussed false rape stories with him but it was hilarious knowing there was a huge line of discarded scraps in the city I was in and many men would fight over them. His scraps were those guys trophies.

All these girls getting used is their own fault. Every time a girl feels she has been used and wonders why she should be directed to the Internet. Countless stories of women who came before her and did the exact same thing, getting the same result.

The definition of insanity is trying the same thing and expecting a different result.

The only difference now is the sheer size and scope of this hookup culture now. We're so connected that Ms X can get Mr Y across the goddam world at the press of some buttons and more men do it these days which leads to an ever increasing number of women getting tossed aside.

Post: #31

The only breakfast I have the morning after is when I bite my arm off to crawl out of bed then head out the door.

Post: #32

(06-15-2016 07:12 PM)scotian Wrote:  The only breakfast I have the morning after is when I bite my arm off to crawl out of bed then head out the door.

Yeah no shit, I can't remember the last time I slept with a random woman til morning.

Post: #33

(06-15-2016 03:41 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

Quote:The truth is that, for many women, there’s nothing liberating about emotionless, non-committal sex. The young women I spoke with were taking part in hookup culture because they thought that was what guys wanted, or because they hoped a casual encounter would be a stepping stone to commitment. In doing this, we actually deny ourselves agency and bolster male dominance, all while convincing ourselves we’re acting like progressive feminists. But engaging in hookup culture while wholeheartedly craving love and stability was perhaps the least feminist action I, and hundreds of my peers, could take.

Complete b.s. - never believe what a woman says as it reflects how she 'feels' about reality and her surroundings - not how she actually affects it with her actions. Especially the new generation of young women between 15 and 25 love every bit of the attention they receive and on social media sites we're seeing a full fledged arms race for attention. I see those skanks out there snapping away constantly - any vacation destination they visit is being relegated as a backdrop for a photo shoot. Which they then milk for all it's worth on Tinder and other social apps. A large percentage of them hooks up with a different guy every other day. You do the numbers, the cock counter on these skanks easily runs into the hundreds after a few years.

Every time I read a bleeding heart story like that I just lean back and grin from one ear to another. I was one of those schmucks way way back when I was in my 20s trying to find one ounce of humanity in these women. I learned my lessons fast and turned the table on their game without any compunction. I'm an old dog now but can still pull women 20 plus years my junior. If I can be bothered that is. I am very well set up these days and my tolerance for bullshit is hovering near the zero mark.

For you young bucks: Look guys - it's not brain surgery. Actually it's rather simple - those women literally have had hundreds of opportunities to form healthy relationships during their 20 years of sexual prime. They failed miserable and of course won't let the truth or reality interfere with their post menopausal hamstering. Ask any woman who has been in a stable relationship for a decade or more - a real mother who deeply cares about her husband and her children. Those are usually red pill as fuck and confirm every word I said.

Have fun with the cats, girls!

All true, but her perspective was limited to college girls. Presumably there are a couple still below the ten cock count by their sophomore year such that these experiences and feelings they report are genuine. By the time they reach graduation and definitely by the time they are living in NYC doing the Sex and the City lifestyle, all bets are off - they've got the thousand cock stare and the personality of a motorcycle cop.

Post: #34

(06-15-2016 05:23 PM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  

A more unfiltered photo of the author. You can see what excessive boozing and the wall have done to her already.

WB tho.

Post: #35

The flip side of this is probably two or three guys that stayed around the next morning and took her to breakfast that actually liked her and were summarily dismissed as "clingy" or "not her type" or some other hamsterized garbage. This girl and every one like her can go fuck themselves.

Post: #36

Amazes me how women think of reducing themselves to the status of an unpaid prostitute equals "liberation". Even actual whores at least get paid for their efforts, these chicks just do it for free.

Reminds me of the MGTOW crowd who somehow think that being confined to their basement and financially dependent on their mom allowing them to live their well into their 30s is "liberation" from traditional male gender roles.

Seems that gender roles tend to provide more genuine liberation than our perversion of them.

Post: #37

(06-15-2016 07:49 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(06-15-2016 05:23 PM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  

A more unfiltered photo of the author. You can see what excessive boozing and the wall have done to her already.

WB tho.

Still a solid 6 would not kick her out of bed, and I'll join her for breakfast if she's cooking.

Post: #38

Quote:We were desperate to know what it felt like to be wanted; desperate for a chance at intimacy. Desperate for a hand held in daylight, for public affirmation of desire typically expressed only after too many drinks. Desperate to try commitment, then decide if it wasn’t working, rather than being prematurely cut off from it.
I wished that I could be like the guys, who seemed not to care at all. Ironically, once we stopped hooking up, we became friends, and he actually developed romantic feelings for me.
If this was sexual liberation, it was hard to understand how it was helping women. But I was pretty sure my friends and I weren’t closeted conservatives who wanted to go back to an era of sockhops and going steady.

Few points:

(1) As I've said, women still have not figured out the real meaning of equality feminism. Women think its implementation means everyone will be considered equally special. The reality of equality is that everyone is equally trivial and equally expendable. I keep being reminded of The Incredibles. As time goes on that movie reveals more and more red pill hiding inside it - the dominant and most important message of the film being that when everyone is special, no one is.

(2) Don't get too sad when you see her pining for a "hand held in daylight," mainly because all of its implied desire for human affection and connection is contradicted, killed, by the very next phrase: "...for public affirmation of desire." The driving desire is still look at me, I am desirable. She doesn't want affirmation from her partner, she wants other people to affirm that she has a boyfriend. This is fucking narcissism.

(3) The phrase "try commitment" is a contradiction in terms.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #39

(06-15-2016 07:12 PM)scotian Wrote:  The only breakfast I have the morning after is when I bite my arm off to crawl out of bed then head out the door.

Post: #40

She says the guys don't make eye contact, don't touch her unless it's during sex, etc. That's not normal behavior for a guy to show to his hookup or girlfriend.

If she's experiencing that cold treatment regularly, then guys like her a lot less than they like the average girl they get with. It's some combination of "she's just barely attractive enough to be considered worthy of a hookup" and "she goes out of her way to act aggressive and unfriendly."

Post: #41

(06-15-2016 05:53 PM)Jones Wrote:  Guys guys guys come on here:

WB and eat breakfast with after (if she cooks).

WNB again if she's a starfishin, no-dick-suckin', fishy-smellin' kinda gal I think she is.

You beat me to it! I was just scrolling down to write "something about her face/look makes me think she could have a stinky pussy" She's just got that "look"...like somewhere between 'slut face' and 'showers are optional'

Post: #42

(06-15-2016 09:04 PM)Walker Wrote:  She says the guys don't make eye contact, don't touch her unless it's during sex, etc. That's not normal behavior for a guy to show to his hookup or girlfriend.

If she's experiencing that cold treatment regularly, then guys like her a lot less than they like the average girl they get with. It's some combination of "she's just barely attractive enough to be considered worthy of a hookup" and "she goes out of her way to act aggressive and unfriendly."

Or they all know what the deal is with her, word gets around whose door hinges are well oiled.

Post: #43

Article confuses me because the overwhelming majority of women I've fucked with over the past couple years (we're talking around like 30 girls here) did not want a relationship with me. They didn't chase me, seem eager to be "wanted" or vy for any kind of commitment from me.

Some were one night stands that I would reach out to again and they didn't oblige. Some where flings where we casually fucked for a few weeks/months. Some were girls I sort of "dated" that never showed any real interest in putting a "girlfriend/boyfriend" label on it and were allergic to commitment.

My personal experience shows that most young women don't want commitment, and the cock carousel is their choice.

Maybe it's me. Maybe I'm not "boyfriend material" that these girls are just itching for me to validate them and accept them as a relationship option - but from where I'm sitting most girls are just down to hook up and nothing more.

Post: #44

(06-15-2016 09:49 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  Article confuses me because the overwhelming majority of women I've fucked with over the past couple years (we're talking around like 30 girls here) did not want a relationship with me. They didn't chase me, seem eager to be "wanted" or vy for any kind of commitment from me.

Some were one night stands that I would reach out to again and they didn't oblige. Some where flings where we casually fucked for a few weeks/months. Some were girls I sort of "dated" that never showed any real interest in putting a "girlfriend/boyfriend" label on it and were allergic to commitment.

My personal experience shows that most young women don't want commitment, and the cock carousel is their choice.

Maybe it's me. Maybe I'm not "boyfriend material" that these girls are just itching for me to validate them and accept them as a relationship option - but from where I'm sitting most girls are just down to hook up and nothing more.

Count your blessings since they've done you a favor.

Post: #45

^I can relate, General Stalin, but too often the juice isn't worth the squeeze.

On the topic and not looking her in the eye, I will complement ex's when I run into them and they do genuinely feminine things (like grow their hair back out). I mock them endlessly about the stupid tattoos some of them got, especially when I saw their 18/19 year old body nude without them. Doesn't matter if they put on weight or have a boyfriend, I try my best to be decent to them. I do feel bad for the ones that are rudderless and hop from dick to dick. Sometimes they go alpha widow after a single fuck.

That said, I think this girl must be giving off a "super crazy" or other kind of vibe that is putting these guys off. Her personality sounds fucked. Maybe she's exaggerating about men "running away from her" at parties, and they just make distance because she drones on and on about stupid feminist shit that nobody wants to hear. Who knows?

Post: #46

I don't know why this article has me so pissed off, but I thought I'd go back through it and have another look. Some random angry thoughts:

Quote:Hanna Rosin epitomizes this perspective in her article for The Atlantic, “Boys on the Side”:
“To put it crudely, feminist progress right now largely depends on the existence of a hookup culture. And to a surprising degree, it is women—not men—who are perpetuating the culture, especially in school, cannily manipulating it to make space for their success, always keeping their own ends in mind. For college girls these days, an overly serious suitor fills the same role as an accidental pregnancy did in the 19th century: a danger to be avoided at all costs, lest it get in the way of a promising future.”

She had it right there. Right there. And she entirely missed the point. Women driving hookup culture is not destructive because it separates their cunts from their emotions, it's destructive because female participation in hookup culture is driven by selfish motives.

What is a college girl's idea of a "promising future"? Why, a $80,000-a-year job right out of college with a liberal arts degree in how life is unfair for women; weekends with my similarly-minded, similarly bigoted female friends; and pumping up my fake life on Fakebook. That life is not compatible with a relationship where you might actually have to go along with someone else's desire for (or better economic prospects) living outside fucking New York.

That is, a life that requires no compromises, no sacrifices. But relationships involve compromise and sacrifice by definition. The most red pill man must understand this. Even the most traditional 1950s marriage did not include the husband having all the power, he conceded a great deal of the decisionmaking, parenting, and social choices of his family to his wife, just as she conceded him the breadwinner role.

However, I can give you a good statistical reason for why so many college women act like this. It's unresolved, unresolvable childhood fear -- masked as a drive to be independent. With a historical divorce rate at 50%, we know a massive slice of people in the US were brought up by single parents. That means a large percentage of women across the board were not raised in a stable, normal household (with some skew towards the lower socioeconomic orders because whole families are the best predictors of educative and financial success).

And we know how, unequivocally, single mothers suck as parents.

And we also know that they suck at teaching girls about compromise and feminine power, having failed to choose the right husband and then failed to keep him using feminine methods, and consequently having to harden the fuck up and get better at independence and loneliness than compromise.

When you combine this great cauldron of fear bubbling away in the female psyche -- any partner I choose will leave me like Mommy always says Daddy did to her, no man is going to do that to me, I'm getting a job and a house all on my own -- with Western society's narcissism, you get a generation of women primed to prefer hookup culture and illusory qualifications over taking the plunge with a man at an early age. A generation of women who think they need to sell their youth and fertility for about ten years of unsuccessful masturbation, ten years of goodjobgoodfriendgoodapartmentgoodcappucino.

Quote:Men’s experiences with hookup culture are equally complex. It’s worth noting that the vast majority of males I interviewed and surveyed also ideally preferred committed relationships. But they felt strong social pressure to have casual sex. Culturally, men have been socially primed to believe they ought to “drive” hookup culture, and that a crucial part of the college experience is sleeping with many women and then discussing these “escapades” with their male friends. So despite what men might truly want, pervasive hookup culture prompts them to predicate their public identity as heterosexual men on the number and physical attractiveness of the women they’ve slept with. Needless to say, the detrimental effects of this performance pressure are countless and severe.

I'll admit, this section made me the most angry.

What sort of man actually responds to a survey of the kind that this stupid bitch created - one asking what you think about hookup culture, a survey that's by definition self-selected? The short answer would be: men with an axe to grind, or men who were getting stupid and conflicting messages about their masculinity.

I don't understand the sort of "cultural social priming" that says you derive your sexuality from your notch count. Your identity as a man isn't based on how many vaginas you've lubricated, it's based on the fact your cock gets hard when a 7 with a short skirt and shoulder-length hair gives you a smile as she walks past.

But then again, this is the same body of people half of whom were raised by single mothers. What sort of man winds up as the father figure/masculine role model in a single mother household? The men she goes out with. Who does a single mother go out with? Not infrequently, the sort of IQ-90 ape who does base his entire identity around how much pussy he got that week. I mean, for fucking real, did any of you guys actually have pussy-count bull sessions back at university? I find the idea about as odd as the dick-measuring thread.

Quote:Since seeking out pleasure-centric education on women’s sexual anatomy, and taking the time to explore the nuances of my body both alone and with my partner, I’ve realized that sex is inextricably linked to emotions, trust, curiosity, and above all, self-awareness. To attempt to separate emotions from sex is not only illogical, given that emotion intensely augments pleasure, but also impossible for almost all women.

Some red pill here. Women can't separate emotions from sex -- not until they've acquired the thousand-cock stare or are getting paid for sex. And even then I've seen enough articles from former prostitutes who just repress the emotion and let it all come spewing out in a hateful diatribe against their johns after it's all over.

Quote:Looking back, I’m awestruck by the time and emotional energy that I, and so many of my peers, could have saved if we’d made the effort to explore our sexual selves, ask the questions we deemed “taboo,” and, critically, educate our partners in the bedroom. Given the current state of sex education in America, there’s a lot of learning that young people have to do on their own.

Translation: having ridden a thousand cocks, having worn G-strings and slutty lingerie on request, having imitated child porn by shouting "Fuck me, Daddy!" as I get pounded, having taken semen in every orifice from guys who never stayed past 8 a.m. the next morning -- I will never do any of these things for my man in a relationship because I'm "not that kind of girl" anymore. And if he dares to come before I do, he's a selfish pig. My orgasm matters more than his.

Quote:If we taught pleasure-centric sex ed, beginning in middle school and high school and all the way through college, I can only imagine the possibilities.

I can't imagine how, as a species, we ever managed to have relationships that lasted more than six months without classes for 12 year olds on the best angle to rub a dildo.

Quote:Young women who are only beginning to explore physical intimacy would go in armed with the knowledge that emotionless, casual sex is likely to be radically dissonant with their bodies’ desires. Men would know that it’s their responsibility to care about women’s sexual pleasure—which includes caring about their feelings.

There was a mythical, mystical time in human existence when we knew these truths. This time stretched from the dawn of human history right up to the point where second wave feminism was first shit out of Andrea Dworkin's cunt.

Quote:As feminists, progress demands we build a relationship with our own bodies before engaging with anyone else’s.

And there we have the final summation of the theme in all its weary predictability: feminism is about selfishness first.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #47

(06-15-2016 05:10 PM)Laner Wrote:  I know these women all too well. I am 36 now, so these women are my ex's, my friends, and above all else, they are the ones now chasing me.

Do I feel sorry for them? A bit. But I also felt a bit sick when they would go #yolo and fuck some dudes like us over a weekend.

I have been that guy, and somewhat still am. I have watched a girl splash water on her just fucked pussy, give it a quick wipe and accept the call of another man that she is trying to lock down. As I leave, I shake my head at just how the hell she is going to be able to do it all again in a couple hours. The flirting, the manipulation, the over the top laughing and caressing of this other man. All in the hopes that he will choose her.

I have been to university, and fucked a good lot of students myself. They are not trying to lock anyone down, barely even a boyfriend. Instead they joke about with their 'besties' and fish for attention from whoever seems to have the flavor of the week.

These girls are being lied to by everyone, themselves mostly. But also their divorced mothers, their barren profs, their jealous friends and their beta orbiters.

The truth that sucks for these girls is that they really had no chance. If they wanted to find a good man, they would have done that as almost any 16yo girl instinctively knows what a good man is.

Instead they choose social affirmation. Its not even the sex, as she so plainly put it. Its the validation of being chosen. The fact the sex is bad is the one last straw that they grasp to in hopes of being able to have some semblance of reason for their degenerate behavior.

Post: #48

Women found that feminism leads to misery, tried to explain it with feminism, then proceeded with doubling down on feminism. If it doesn't work, it has to be the fault of weak men screwing it up for them.

This is also very scientific, for the leading scientists among these women. "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result."

Post: #49

(06-15-2016 11:32 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  Women found that feminism leads to misery, tried to explain it with feminism, then proceeded with doubling down on feminism. If it doesn't work, it has to be the fault of weak men screwing it up for them.

This is also very scientific, for the leading scientists among these women. "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result."

Recursive loop — Möbius Hamster Wheel.

Spectrum Is Green.

Post: #50

It's simple; if a woman wants commitment, she has to go for a guy on her own level, but most women lack the introspective ability to realize what their "level" is, or even acknowledge that such a concept exists.

I can't pull an acceptably attractive slut to save my life, but I get my share of slim/cute relationship-oriented girls who show interest. This concept holds for the guys I know as well; the ones who go for relationships tend to be with cute and likable girls, while the ones who brag about all the booty calls they have and the "freaky" stuff they do with them always fail to impress me when I finally see how unattractive their chicks are.

The moral of the story is that for a girl, being used as a sex doll is a symptom of batting out of her league. A typical man is actually quite eager to commit to a girl that has as much to offer as he does. The girl in question here is somewhat cute, which makes me confident that the guys she refers to are either ripped semi-famous athletes or outrageously charismatic players.