Post: #1

Found a couple of nice videos to share with the gang as they cover what we have been talking about on these forums for a while. Loved how he puts that Russian Babushka in her place:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDyzR13pHlo

Dating Women is legalized prostitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cANgHUOjpm4

Notice how the 2 women on the video get outraged when they get called out for their whoring. Hamster logic at its finest!

Thoughts on these videos guys? I'll post mine later.

Post: #2

I just noticed there's a couple of Fox News segments with both this Marc Rudov guy and Lis Wiehl broad - can't help this is like a pro wrestling rivalry where they intentionally put them the two of them together in these segments for ratings and lols

Post: #3

Pure genius... I first saw the guy on valentines day and loved how he put fox news "anchorwoman" in her place when she stated women "should receive more than they give"....

Post: #4

Dude is dead on about broads saying they want equality but then demanding one sided relationships.

Post: #5

The clitoris is voice-activated not coin-activated. Classic

Post: #6

Hahaha I love this guy's style. His eye rolling early in the second clip is classic. I was hoping that he'd call out the Slavic chick for being fat. I imagined it something like this:

Her (thickly accented): "Man must protect woman." [She actually kept repeating this]
Him: "And what should she do for him? She should look pleasing to him, yes?"
Her: "um, yes..."
Him: "Then why would a man protect you, when you, by virtue of you being fat, do not look pleasing to him?"

He says that when a woman forces a man to pursue and pursue, that when he finally gets her (i.e. fucks her), he tosses her aside, implying that if she hadn't forced him to chase so hard, then she wouldn't get chucked immediately. This is a great point, one I haven't seen elsewhere. Part of the problem with these chicks who make you chase is that even after you fuck her - by that point, I've lost all initiative to keep up the charade, and I'll bounce sooner or later. Whereas if she had put in mutual effort, and felt that pursuit went both ways, then I would be happy to spend more time with her.

Have to disagree with his opposition to ladies nights - if private establishments want to throw those, and give me the option of getting a better sex ratio at the bar by blowing a few dollars, then let them. Framing women as equals to men, instead of their complements, is problematic. Men and women want different things, but calling them equals implies they should give each other the same things. A man doesn't want protection from a woman, and a woman doesn't want a docile, subservient man.

Gotta love how these feminists become die hard free market capitalists when ladies nights are at stake. "The government needs to make sure private employers pay women just as much as men... But bars should be able to charge men more than women."

Post: #7

Ladies night is the shit. You walk up to a woman, hand her a 5 and ask her to buy you a drink. Easiest opener ever.

Post: #8

I used to have an equalitarian attitude, and was troubled by the hypocrasy of feminism, and had the attitude that women should be treated the same. After all, that's what they asked for.

But as I've been living in a place where women don't ask for equality, it finally dawned on me that it's perfectly fine to treat youth and beauty as a commodity that has financial value. It is. And over here the women know it, and they don't pretend otherwise. There is no feminism, so we can be honest about it. Pussy is worth money. Either through marriage, or paying for dinner, or paying the rent, or gifts, or whatever. Over here it's openly acknowledged that being female is a profession. No shame, no argument.

So be it. If they aren't even going to fight it, why should I?

I think the most amazing thing about the videos is that the women come back at him with the simplest ad-hominems, as if they were genetically encoded come backs. I think they actually ARE genetically encoded come backs. "If you disagree with the female stance, watch out, because WE will not fuck you, and we can declare you as unfuckable". "If you disagree with women it means women aren't fucking you". Somehow that isn't just a meme - that thought is hard coded into DNA. I'm not joking. It's an instinct. And we all know how extremely complicated instincts can get, by watching the behavior of freshly hatched animals.

Post: #9

(01-01-2013 06:09 AM)xsplat Wrote:  I used to have an equalitarian attitude, and was troubled by the hypocrasy of feminism, and had the attitude that women should be treated the same. After all, that's what they asked for.

But as I've been living in a place where women don't ask for equality, it finally dawned on me that it's perfectly fine to treat youth and beauty as a commodity that has financial value. It is. And over here the women know it, and they don't pretend otherwise. There is no feminism, so we can be honest about it. Pussy is worth money. Either through marriage, or paying for dinner, or paying the rent, or gifts, or whatever. Over here it's openly acknowledged that being female is a profession. No shame, no argument.

So be it. If they aren't even going to fight it, why should I?

I think the most amazing thing about the videos is that the women come back at him with the simplest ad-hominems, as if they were genetically encoded come backs. I think they actually ARE genetically encoded come backs. "If you disagree with the female stance, watch out, because WE will not fuck you, and we can declare you as unfuckable". "If you disagree with women it means women aren't fucking you". Somehow that isn't just a meme - that thought is hard coded into DNA. I'm not joking. It's an instinct. And we all know how extremely complicated instincts can get, by watching the behavior of freshly hatched animals.

The last paragraph is a great insight, makes a lot of sense.

Post: #10

The quote that really stood out to me is "There is nothing more boring to a man than his last conquest." After you chase a girl around for a bit and you finally get that sweet lay she does seem to leave about 10% of her original allure behind. The games and shit tests women play coming back to bite them what a concept!

Post: #11

"There is nothing more boring to a man than his last conquest."

I wonder what percent of men feel this way? We know that not all do - for some of us it can take 6 months or a few years to get bored with a girl we are into.

I also wonder if it's a choice. Are the guys who get bored quickly with girls born and built that way? Or is that an attitude that they cultivate? Are those mental habits that they construct and reinforce, or a strong innate predisposition for novelty?

For myself I suspect my attitude is both from predisposition, habit, and strategy. I cultivate habits of maintaining a girls strong interest, and that interests me, and the whole process maintains a lively libido and passion for the girl.

Sometimes it seems as if the two approaches are like two countries speaking a different language, and there is a great communication barrier.

Do guys who get bored with a girl after one fuck prefer living that way? Would they change things if they could? Do they feel that that attitude can't be changed?

Post: #12

(01-04-2013 04:51 PM)LaPastillaRoja Wrote:  The quote that really stood out to me is "There is nothing more boring to a man than his last conquest." After you chase a girl around for a bit and you finally get that sweet lay she does seem to leave about 10% of her original allure behind. The games and shit tests women play coming back to bite them what a concept!

I think they know this and this is why they make so many shit tests.

The attraction is there, but they are trying to prolong the inevitable drop in value. They also know about the wall- they know they have a limited to exist an object of value in the sexual market place.

I'm so happy I'm not a woman.

Post: #13

(01-04-2013 08:30 PM)soup Wrote:  

(01-04-2013 04:51 PM)LaPastillaRoja Wrote:  The quote that really stood out to me is "There is nothing more boring to a man than his last conquest." After you chase a girl around for a bit and you finally get that sweet lay she does seem to leave about 10% of her original allure behind. The games and shit tests women play coming back to bite them what a concept!

I think they know this and this is why they make so many shit tests.

The attraction is there, but they are trying to prolong the inevitable drop in value. They also know about the wall- they know they have a limited to exist an object of value in the sexual market place.

I'm so happy I'm not a woman.

A woman's goal should be to get married and pregnant before she hits the wall. Having a man's children is supposed to ensure she's taken care of long term.

Post: #14

(01-04-2013 09:09 PM)Parlay44 Wrote:  

(01-04-2013 08:30 PM)soup Wrote:  

(01-04-2013 04:51 PM)LaPastillaRoja Wrote:  The quote that really stood out to me is "There is nothing more boring to a man than his last conquest." After you chase a girl around for a bit and you finally get that sweet lay she does seem to leave about 10% of her original allure behind. The games and shit tests women play coming back to bite them what a concept!

I think they know this and this is why they make so many shit tests.

The attraction is there, but they are trying to prolong the inevitable drop in value. They also know about the wall- they know they have a limited to exist an object of value in the sexual market place.

I'm so happy I'm not a woman.

A woman's goal should be to get married and pregnant before she hits the wall. Having a man's children is supposed to ensure she's taken care of long term.

@Soup seconded mate, the Y chromosome is like a golden ticket and we are all truly blessed to possess it (although I can think of a lot of beta and omega males that should have theirs revoked) hahaha.

@Parlay ahhhh the old trap, this is why I am very, very selective about who I fuck raw-dog, make sure either they can't find me, live in another country, etc.

Post: #15

Dude has the point. However I think his choice of self promotion is bad. I mean going to TV and doing interviews discussing with mainstream does not really serves his goal. The odds are too much against him to present his points right. It's like Roosh went to Oprah trying to prove his points about women from his books. He couldn't brake through the booing from the audience and silly phone calls. Discussion like that wouldn't go anywhere. Much better way is to do your thing, ignore bad press/TV shows, laugh at haters, stay in your niche and grow your tribe.

Post: #16

I have female friends who work who also want the guy to pay for dinner because:

"I work really hard, and I deserve to be taken out"

Well, so do we. I guess that in a girls mind, doing the normal of amount of work that a man does, say as a bartender, seems like extra work.

Post: #17

(01-05-2013 11:22 AM)soup Wrote:  I have female friends who work who also want the guy to pay for dinner because:

"I work really hard, and I deserve to be taken out"

Well, so do we. I guess that in a girls mind, doing the normal of amount of work that a man does, say as a bartender, seems like extra work.

Well bitching and bleeding all day is hard work

Post: #18

Here's Mark Rudov laying down some smack, watch how he nukes the bitches hamster right at the end hahaha.

Post: #19

(12-31-2012 04:13 PM)basilransom Wrote:  Hahaha I love this guy's style. His eye rolling early in the second clip is classic. I was hoping that he'd call out the Slavic chick for being fat. I imagined it something like this:

Her (thickly accented): "Man must protect woman." [She actually kept repeating this]
Him: "And what should she do for him? She should look pleasing to him, yes?"
Her: "um, yes..."
Him: "Then why would a man protect you, when you, by virtue of you being fat, do not look pleasing to him?"

He says that when a woman forces a man to pursue and pursue, that when he finally gets her (i.e. fucks her), he tosses her aside, implying that if she hadn't forced him to chase so hard, then she wouldn't get chucked immediately. This is a great point, one I haven't seen elsewhere. Part of the problem with these chicks who make you chase is that even after you fuck her - by that point, I've lost all initiative to keep up the charade, and I'll bounce sooner or later. Whereas if she had put in mutual effort, and felt that pursuit went both ways, then I would be happy to spend more time with her.

Have to disagree with his opposition to ladies nights - if private establishments want to throw those, and give me the option of getting a better sex ratio at the bar by blowing a few dollars, then let them. Framing women as equals to men, instead of their complements, is problematic. Men and women want different things, but calling them equals implies they should give each other the same things. A man doesn't want protection from a woman, and a woman doesn't want a docile, subservient man.

Gotta love how these feminists become die hard free market capitalists when ladies nights are at stake. "The government needs to make sure private employers pay women just as much as men... But bars should be able to charge men more than women."

I've always felt this, though like you, I've never really seen anyone focus on this aspect of male/female interaction. I've found that during the song and dance to get the pussy, a man may find that he doesn't like a woman very much, but in order to justify the time and effort he's already put in, he has to get the bang. Once he gets it, it's mission accomplished and time to move on. Also, he may simply develop resentment that she made him jump through hoops, only to find that it probably wasn't worth it anyway. The bang becomes inticlimatic, and he can't wait to get away from her.

Post: #20

(01-05-2013 08:49 AM)XXL Wrote:  Dude has the point. However I think his choice of self promotion is bad. I mean going to TV and doing interviews discussing with mainstream does not really serves his goal. The odds are too much against him to present his points right. It's like Roosh went to Oprah trying to prove his points about women from his books. He couldn't brake through the booing from the audience and silly phone calls. Discussion like that wouldn't go anywhere. Much better way is to do your thing, ignore bad press/TV shows, laugh at haters, stay in your niche and grow your tribe.

I don't think guys like this go on shows to change hearts and minds. They do it for entertainment. Their own entertainment. They get a charge out of blowing up some bubblehead on tv. It doesn't hurt you with the audience you already have, and it may very well get other men to google your name and get you more followers. Any male that isn't a major celebrity that goes on Oprah knows, or should know, that it's a setup. You're there to be the villain or punching bag for her stacked audience. Guys like Rudov already have the thick skin required, because he knows his views are going to be unpopular with women and whiteknighting-type guys.

Post: #21

If you're cool and man enough women will drop the good girl act in front of you. You wouldn't believe half the shit women have told me in private.

One girl I was fucking told me I was cool because I didn't care that she had a boyfriend. She still calls me crying and looking for a sympathy fuck once in a while.

Another girl said ...Lets go out to this bar because a guy I know will buy us drinks. It's unbelievable. I'm far from being shocked anymore. I've seen and done it all.

Post: #22

I love how he just sits there like this when the females are bitching

Post: #23

Are women really like this in America? It has to be a minority right? I hate feminism as much as the rest of you but this guy seems a little clueless also.

Post: #24

She's a "relationship coach?!" WTF does that mean? She sits on a couch and yells "Go for second base!" to guys?

Actually, that would be a good set-up for a porno.

Post: #25

I like this guy.